大家覺唔得史高斯好慢, 係時間讓比安達臣

alanfcw

尋晚睇對熱刺場波, 心想應該會出安達臣, 點知出史高斯.

史高斯在週中已經踢了, 我想佢已經開始無復當年, 很多時都係後場分波, 很少走入禁區射門, 和遠射.

對實力不太強的球隊, 或者在主場比賽, 我想出史高斯也是可以.

反而面對較有實力的球隊, 明顯作用不太, 只係後中後場分波, 間中才有幾下長遠, 但活力明顯未夠.

相反對熱刺在落後下, 出安達臣, 中場立即有生氣, 走動也變得靈活......

安達臣在之前史高斯未復出時, 踢得幾好, 場場都交足貨. 奈何史高斯一復出便要即時讓位.

有時真係唔知費sir諗乜.

史高斯係時候退落黎, 比d新仔踢多D.

大家覺得點睇?

Kaz00086

其實呢個論點有D 唔同意.....因為史高斯復出冇幾耐.....你都要俾時間ga~~

PS:你呢個post 同朗尼個post ...都應該係【奧脫福茶餐廳】度發表.....唔該~~

shehboy

的確係慢, 但佢從來都唔係快.
問題係活力已大減, 尤其進攻方面, 佢既作用已配合唔到佢踢個位的角色.
而家基本上係靠兩翼同前鋒搵食.

alanfcw

佢以前d遠射好多,e+唔多見

sat

The starting line up is relatively definsive with Hargreaves in the middle...he is not settle in game so far in this season.  In first half, there are lack of discipline at front with Ronald as striker and give away the ball too easy to let Spur counter attack. Give credit to their press up.  In second half, bring in Carrick to add more creative into midfield but Giggs and Scholes look run out gas. In last 15mins, put Ronaldo back to the frank and Ronney up front. it is too late.

amigofans

Originally posted by alanfcw at 2008-2-3 03:59 PM:
尋晚睇對熱刺場波, 心想應該會出安達...

史高斯趺watt, 你講得無錯, 佢主力變左係後場分波, 好少攻門, 你都無錯!!

但其實上季史高斯已經係中場最後一人, 即以前堅尼既位置,
進攻中場, 係卡域克, not史高斯, 佢永遠係"逗"住卡域克黎踢,
只要你有場場睇曼聯就會知道....

至於安達臣可以替代史高斯, 咪正正係買佢同nani, 夏格維斯番黎既原因lor,
我認為費sir十分公道, 安達臣同拿尼, 以一個19 20既小子黎講, 已經有好不錯既上陣機會..

我唔同意呢一刻史高斯已經要收檔, anderson無史高斯既經驗, 同唔識掌握球賽既節奏...

強如c7要用3年先可以完全代替beckham, 我認為長遠計一定係年青人上,
但史高斯呢一兩年仍然好有作用....

只有打機先可以一野就replace d老將, 因為遊戲只講求數值...

[ Last edited by amigofans on 2008-2-4 at 12:09 PM ]

bunce2806

Originally posted by Kaz00086 at 2008-2-3 04:51 PM:
其實呢個論點有D 唔同意.....因為史高斯復出冇幾耐.....你都要俾時間ga~~

PS:你呢個post 同朗尼個post ...都應該係【奧脫福茶餐廳】度發表.....唔該~~

Agreed.  Scholes is a good player, certainly underrated because public attention has mostly gone to "glamour boys" like Beckham.  Ferguson has been a great expert in making use of everyone's best years and then moving them out of the club well before they go downhill.  The fact he's still there shows that he hasn't gone downhill yet.

germ

Originally posted by bunce2806 at 2008-2-5 12:43 PM:


Agreed.  Scholes is a good player, certainly underrated because public attention has mostly gone to "glamour boys" like Beckham.  Ferguson has been a great expert in making use of everyone's best years and then moving them out of the club well before they go downhill.  The fact he's still there shows that he hasn't gone downhill yet.

Scholes , like Giggs, sometimes become the weakest links of Man United when the rhythm of the opponent is fast or purposely physical.  

"Scholes is a good player"?....it depends

anakinchan

Originally posted by filter-052fans at 2008-2-4 12:06 PM:


史高斯趺watt, 你講得無錯, 佢主...

史高斯實在應該退下來，因為曼聯踢的主要是中場反擊，快速突入

史高斯在中場追截不足，，在中場時成日追追下唔追

敵隊相對容易突破中場，組織攻勢，所以曼聯有史高斯在陣時，失球會較多

史高斯退下來，其實中場有足夠人去做，卡域克、夏格維斯，安達臣、費查等

其實如果有睇曼聯，冇史高斯在陣的時候，曼聯係相對容易贏的

因為佢地後場壓力較少，中場截斷較好，所以可以壓住人踢

所以史高斯係時候退下來

~ZOLA~

佢的確係跑得慢、唔夠快而且無速度