奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:0 r  x, x: n) R7 y
$ A1 B3 h% P4 K3 s5 q" o/ m
agree,
  A9 h) l# @( \$ `我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,# d& N" v1 E$ U3 U7 I2 m/ E
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
. M" r$ U/ j- L, r期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

% x! @6 `, y+ A+ L  J% Yhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html* m2 @; r' |) D8 i
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
5 \4 x. K! B3 I' c# m; @搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
6 p$ R' r" V% P" _6 GJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
  L0 r8 ^( m2 ^( ~2 b% o! C& Y有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
1 h' F% O" G2 A" @% p. _8 T& y0 P" A
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
4 P9 {" k1 X% [2 E1 p# \$ t$ D& F3 [: s6 S6 v
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

2 S/ e3 k; B  [7 N7 G8 j" X4 F. z$ F: c; Y
絕對支持啦$ B7 B$ t. P5 e- r
* a, L. n* {6 }. f* @, d1 T
有錯就認,打就企定
* A2 m5 X) t# |# \! e3 l. G3 T5 L8 i4 v+ P
無錯當然要撐到底( ~% C6 C0 W- \! h2 X

- T' f: Y3 K5 c$ I7 k- C" [但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩1 A  g% N1 X% I& {# |

" G) v* H8 \( l9 q7 Q2 @& P0 B( c1 \在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得8 H5 Y9 c$ p5 L6 k! w1 P
3 ~, w/ {" ?& ]+ b  Q
一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
; z/ I- a* J. d2 l; f1 k  e
) n/ I8 W" {$ p4 @% v我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生8 t8 z8 `/ ^1 A4 Y, B9 S

0 f9 t8 w- r% I# g唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?% [, l$ V, d% o' r8 @- P0 j

' h; V5 h6 u1 V/ [' S我唔認為lor
) ^* N9 x  ~$ A3 N! ]. E6 t0 g. U* h  `, r' s
唔係話要整死佢地1 v* A/ ]0 G! O8 l& D" l' u: B3 L
0 d: R8 Q$ Z" k7 i: T
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
+ R. X9 N  h) ~3 \" z2 t1 s" c
" S) ~! f( D4 G$ [! o1 o0 r我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大; h% P$ U$ _3 ]2 F' _

- w% P+ T9 S; Q  p& I+ a有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
3 A4 J8 k% x5 N) E) w
" f  J+ s1 i1 u5 V( j" P3 ^$ b唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
* p4 ~! O( ^& f
4 w$ j: m1 M" Y+ q4 X大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
! \2 O- S" k* n, a" i1 n"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
7 U) G/ T( {' [0 H: {7 w
# R& v3 s* M! k' X我們的大學生
; @5 [- D# i( J7 k/ i6 U2 f" s
  `- U; q  x+ D, }9 Z% |9 t. [# p
* W8 Q9 o. m  b7 |& y: Q& B3 z# K; P9 L
/ B3 r7 x) w5 G4 R4 Q( [

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:( V" D& C' Y! W4 r. Q5 }- k+ c2 d

9 I1 n* @: s7 t1 @) Y& E& `  h' j/ S+ B, }0 f0 M
有見地 !!!* K* H& a( }; f: m+ e
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
" `+ V+ b- J" c+ Q* X( R
- d& {: G3 B" e% f2 Z; I6 B3 Q6 {I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. 3 v9 b8 h. v! e0 h
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
6 o1 S: p% S( dI pretty sad that about the University official.  {& G  ^& M  {
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la7 G6 t9 x3 q# `, U6 O5 T
: a. w* O. y8 y- c$ Q
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:  D: j; c9 o8 I$ B' S) ^+ U, M
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la( Y* `) @/ K0 T, m2 Y* s

. L, V4 I/ P# H( k& ]: G1 g$ b[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

( o% {' a4 `# o5 W3 w5 a; c( x, _. m5 C
兩者有何分別?/ ]( F( z, b1 C4 P' D( N! w
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?