奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:
: D, R$ E1 O! M
3 J- g* S/ w( ^0 \$ z2 S) pagree,
! O% n# k- A) l, L6 ^8 ]$ ?; w我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,/ b# T- P7 M' G" r4 ?; V+ _2 h
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,$ \1 G9 ]! @" f! A
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

- \" r$ d/ K/ Z1 L9 Lhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html+ P1 a  S" q( b/ B% F# c
已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地9 z  A/ ^& `. ~. i2 N" U* Y
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.& m7 Q! B; Y$ ]7 w' e
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:0 W, Z$ t  e9 D# ?  z" z# Z$ r
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 3 k& }: a1 ]3 g3 C- m. p# j- Y# W
1 L0 `# v. q, J
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???* j% m" n; }  B( o( {5 C

$ M! @, A: a# J" c為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

& n  K2 P4 U) y* V
4 K* F  i' g, I3 ~: n絕對支持啦
# ?, i8 R1 A, C9 N% o% u+ o$ E2 [/ u1 |* Y
有錯就認,打就企定
$ p' }* e* \+ ^1 _. m* B$ V
6 X5 T2 r& H5 f  J+ I: q無錯當然要撐到底- D5 g- {3 i' T% Q* _5 Z
% [: V( X* x& d. |* ]
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩8 W! C' {! H& ]% P

. j+ j# \1 \6 G3 n" ~: Z# C$ M在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得! v9 j+ t9 P6 W& O

8 y* r2 F0 s# m7 A一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
8 `) a+ k; z" R% k( r# p4 U' B# ^5 M7 }  K9 K$ I7 ~9 i( e
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生- f1 r# O8 U* S
  g" L, v; |# o) P) A1 m' Y
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?5 C1 o, G1 n- a! D0 j2 V& T( ?

. |& O9 V% O' j2 `8 r1 p, q- Q9 b我唔認為lor+ i4 ^/ K1 P1 @' \  \: d& ?

) G/ ]5 L. {/ V6 ]唔係話要整死佢地$ e: ?5 c: @/ ]% G8 p

+ H& _- F; Q+ X而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用* ~1 b) {" N6 r+ a

) R; u' p: k: Z我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大* S, S  G. J" E1 d. C3 b. \

" W& u5 i$ C  M5 x# ?有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
* N3 @* j8 f  H8 }! a% P
7 Y) E4 v/ {7 t+ C6 e8 O唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
9 B/ d5 `- C7 ^9 e- I
& p, q! v3 l5 W: d1 i9 Y% J3 e$ A大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
( H: ^, S  \( J& H"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"9 O7 k2 j; B9 ?9 U2 {2 ?
: n8 y6 C+ @3 R. S2 b  U4 [" k
我們的大學生: j% O2 }" \( Q! j7 O

6 b& E. w/ K: I3 s$ x
- t5 _) V: ~: S. y! p) ?- d% K; Y. w5 t
' ^& c- C8 G- e4 l+ u3 c4 \

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
5 h7 p! m2 u1 s; c* L  H" F5 T$ J: s9 [% E7 H
8 T8 f- |0 X0 R# x! Z
有見地 !!!; d% b/ c/ R% n: _  m0 W. ^
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
! \( U$ c7 K2 t' d/ l  `% n/ J/ u( Q" O7 X
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
/ o6 u. d: Z) j+ W$ LI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
6 m9 i9 q& c- M  sI pretty sad that about the University official.
+ ?/ Y9 a+ ]! u! r$ G  dIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
* f' m  N& D; u' w: z& s0 V& r( _' j5 ?9 a
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:* j4 a  Q% g- u2 q# h  u
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la* E" e& x- l2 ^# d6 c  W
! T# e7 _% C9 [
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

- }  v, o9 o6 m" Y: j: H5 a2 O
4 X/ M( |5 _( d- E2 @" W6 \
兩者有何分別?
' @1 Y  s* s" p0 W7 S% E5 j中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?