奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:+ K7 e- p( r2 I8 R+ O+ ]# S# J
8 C' Y6 U6 h! A
agree,
# s8 {. J) w9 y) l. c6 r我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,0 k/ O  A1 @3 [, l: U" l) \
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,# m) j9 u% r3 ]  W& e: S5 P
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

& X' Z( T3 N( x, F# i3 z* k
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
4 s$ b* s* X) t1 y# }: ]. X6 ?已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地) J' C* X2 @$ `% Q
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.$ ~8 o4 R1 V  U
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
; x& X6 A" I3 C) }有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 5 Y) x/ {. S( o( q( X4 p) |

) s( M9 d; Z2 [係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???
4 b7 F. [8 C4 u0 m* a* L+ y0 a% N7 s" ?+ W6 x
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

; F4 f* `7 O4 r3 T3 y, M9 \& D5 M1 D: U% q! o
絕對支持啦
1 v0 `" N! Z! n2 q; J# V2 I) I
5 v0 V% m! B9 \5 _$ A" @有錯就認,打就企定
7 z6 |9 V  N0 ?; T5 s
8 Q0 s4 M( T; J8 O  Y無錯當然要撐到底
8 f+ r3 v% J: p& q3 `6 x2 h2 H7 Y. E* P% S
但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
" K  ?! M9 ]* K
" K2 O9 O% A6 ?, g0 H0 c4 \在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
* h8 }5 \3 s: M8 X! U
" Q$ z& u$ G) E一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
2 ^# Q) p- L, k3 v" D# S; h2 n  V; m- o
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生% S1 F4 }4 V2 F- f6 e. u

& M- F2 `" X) _' h9 h唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
8 b; ?5 h7 Z5 R
, `. @9 u" C8 M" h2 Z8 ^我唔認為lor
6 z6 ~7 Q% d9 i  W" W4 o5 k6 m! w
唔係話要整死佢地
. K4 J8 a! d/ I$ n! p
$ c7 x0 {* s7 g+ q: A而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用- l2 I2 x& i4 c; J9 m( n1 W$ n
% t1 Y5 s/ r& L6 V
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大. a7 P7 Q" t) M0 A& Z3 p
) M5 u, ?( I: I; K3 X9 Y4 k- G& F
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的4 x* d5 Z3 b" m# O9 [3 u1 t  a3 m2 Y! U
" X" |, l! r$ a) B
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由4 L9 i- g# \+ Z6 ~

" M& U; z$ S5 x* v) A' }5 O! F; }大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
( _7 U: T& p1 l5 H8 x3 o* X"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
, c- z7 j+ t) F: m$ e+ b" n6 |5 y% u9 z6 C0 l
我們的大學生4 a% |9 B# J$ u6 v' o. D9 v3 U

* t7 `* m+ F& W9 D& C2 j+ M. S. A
3 {- `2 `) H, v5 [# j7 R
3 o. p) P& M6 C) Q: n7 `7 B5 d- j6 `* z' l. ?

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:! g3 _9 b) \9 s% w: k

2 [$ a& `9 P9 K. H! u" Y
6 _$ b, f6 b# u" U有見地 !!!
3 b* A3 `5 r' c0 E: x現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html3 i' q3 c% z+ U$ ?4 l/ i
/ u9 P2 C& B" |% o9 d5 P
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers.
' ~) |  n8 B( k# h$ SI never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
* p5 R% v% {2 D8 w2 AI pretty sad that about the University official.* L+ m8 E7 z* t: ^8 Z
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
/ d8 W9 @% V# s/ l  k# t# x1 d0 b8 e7 n7 n8 }
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:! [' O; j+ k% w* R; h; w- a  L
我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
+ g8 E  S2 c2 |0 ?' U) `  L& t8 d0 N
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

1 B7 p3 `$ Q! a1 V( V% x, X
' s  \0 `+ Q1 Y0 {; b, ^
兩者有何分別?0 w: N2 G: T$ O- Q( F  x
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?