奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:0 G; L+ |+ L! \# T8 f7 z# i1 M& H
7 d& ?2 G) K, I, x& x, H, {& u, o; G8 {
agree,+ Y: ]0 D; Z/ \2 u
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,
; z7 T5 g9 }* Q- N) W9 p% K但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,
4 ~! ^' C! x( P6 h& a, R期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

& C' o, d, I" t1 L: Q. h. P. ?
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
/ l6 f8 P  m# [; p4 o! x- a9 u已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地! U0 y5 }& K& O- B2 `' h+ R
搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.+ t3 R( O9 ?' s# L8 p* {
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:6 |  [" P6 W/ j% |5 i
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！ 1 t* z5 }  C1 a( p
: q4 l7 B; L  ?5 E* R) j2 ~- P: |
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???0 n& H' }1 B5 N

7 Z7 K0 u8 k: {1 E' V為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

' L8 z+ Y7 n3 R+ F; ?+ U" Y
; [. n0 ]' d% m; @* a絕對支持啦
' N, i; {' F1 H  W# _9 x" n/ i$ z9 \6 T; `) J- Z
有錯就認,打就企定
2 y: s* m4 Q4 O: @
5 r% t  e. f7 W無錯當然要撐到底
2 _( Z- ]; \; b! L
% Z9 d3 U& F$ E5 p! X1 \+ `( A但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩
/ W  p# D9 ?' O; q8 p) l! V8 v* h. Q* y/ {
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
. b; T0 v9 Q( x
- o' T/ Y0 |1 {  T- k5 l, J1 O+ ?一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
( u! S8 [' r  n; Q# B- z
/ _8 s# k+ \- K+ V# a4 I! i4 |我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生" b( e5 U5 B8 s  [9 Q

% }3 v6 i& o8 M唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
+ i# L( m/ Y% b; ~  I1 ~! Y$ ~; N+ k1 o4 M  O: Z
我唔認為lor
! _% X( s* W4 A6 h# b
' r  l/ |, ?" x* W唔係話要整死佢地: m0 y" o  q9 b3 ~
' {/ Z& @" N0 n3 @
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用2 _! T& l5 b8 y$ E  _. a

% D  m- J& i) E  ^+ Y我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大+ R4 \% h5 r% V+ b# K0 K# y

; Q! }. s: J: k; U9 `# T3 @' `有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的5 B! s0 Q# j, X$ V
2 R! J0 l7 V% |6 v
唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由; E& L9 c3 M! x8 F% c, a: Z5 `# }

* ~, ]3 n5 o& Y1 [3 n% `: e  N大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句& h& B+ _# M9 j/ F* Y
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
' i" h; @. T4 O
5 M/ d, `8 K) V; M5 i! _我們的大學生+ X( P! Z( Q$ B. Q! p

6 X* ?# ~7 v6 m1 |" d
( n4 M7 Y" N- W) ?# Z# |5 @2 \3 ?! I1 x  \" j

/ x( V' h' U7 b4 W

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
& E, z; t5 w2 K7 @* e. V4 N/ J
1 ]$ E+ y3 p6 Z$ Y8 B% t4 I! K0 V% p$ n$ C; f. K
有見地 !!!* v+ P: `7 `, O$ S: I( g0 P% g
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
3 ^- C; A8 V$ }* t# N- O- ?  s; A6 T5 }$ Y: Z
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. $ |5 t  L5 M$ c
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind. ; G, Y$ ]! g1 ^# a4 g7 e' x
I pretty sad that about the University official.
& h) S6 Z% L8 x8 Z* _It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
4 @- l. v) D& I; U# G8 `1 x  D+ Z/ T+ n+ P& a5 @# S5 |3 p
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
/ a: m" K6 N) J3 g0 r- ?( F1 ]$ w我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
$ D8 y% Q, y$ h( x
1 m7 p7 P6 ]7 `! X+ v  ?. G& q[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

. ~# f# o# n9 q% ^0 K3 ]) E5 j6 I  W" T( N' c! t' S' e3 M1 T
兩者有何分別?
) \2 I) X  A( _+ l9 G2 G, ]中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?