奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:9 T* |$ q8 `" J# K  ?7 i0 d8 r( s

  v7 M' @1 p( e8 R3 Y1 r0 T, l+ H% Aagree,
% r" J9 U! a% }4 ]我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,9 {' X4 i) n5 |. Q7 {) W+ }" K
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科,1 T8 r5 E6 U/ A' I3 a
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

6 s( G+ C# M- h7 Z! f
http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
  r  Z5 f7 p( z8 e- o$ w  ]( f已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
! J" ?( s7 H' Y1 R/ a搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.- l+ G6 g$ f. C& V
Just some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:
2 c9 _5 y# K, F有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
% S" n' v) c  C- P: i
- e- F( N% G. S6 X% f8 F係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???! I* y- z  i" Q/ I

* ^! Q& s3 j4 G1 x5 ~/ D* P為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

9 M" q- Z( W) V5 r3 T6 B% k
- `1 t: L9 }/ z, J$ F0 |0 N6 g
絕對支持啦1 {, S( ?" [9 u5 q6 Q' v3 \

0 _$ K! V+ |, {& r有錯就認,打就企定% S9 p! o5 k, Y& n

$ P* J& v( D  h( s1 r$ O無錯當然要撐到底
  }8 M# x! O# C/ R" K
+ O! e& T  `) l8 H但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩) u# M0 Q3 L* f( U0 n

) D$ ~4 C( t8 ^0 r2 t在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得. n/ }+ z; `/ ^% t$ ?

; f2 G' s) j2 K9 ~一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
1 q/ Y$ g" N7 ^3 f( h- n7 a5 D4 c, J& `) X. ~4 X
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生
2 `, x8 U. q, R7 h+ }- `6 \, f/ N; j7 \' e/ a2 b
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?8 f5 [( E/ m9 D7 I  b# t
' x  a; o7 t9 P1 t+ i' F/ L" N; T
我唔認為lor  J' o$ v3 p6 R: i0 \

, Z+ L& _* ]2 E" j; P9 U唔係話要整死佢地' w! `- J( p- D6 _9 A$ I, i4 z
$ U9 ?; V, C7 e  U! t, F. T
而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用& @: l" L# i1 S; \. L2 L( `7 F

' p/ I0 d, r" I; L; t- w4 c; Y4 }我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大
' P( \0 ^/ S* [+ o
; d2 s) r6 Q* c9 Y7 a6 A% U有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
: i# @/ D8 Y1 [; Z3 k5 q# x" d, @
8 @& R, m( A) B4 n0 o& v$ `- q唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由
8 ~3 ]4 p, a/ n9 N; G9 c2 t+ |( h* ~0 `1 w. r7 q( Y7 R' {% Q. a
大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句
6 e) b' l6 r/ z5 G; D7 v"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"
7 {' f' \6 m( K, z9 {3 t  e* J9 [8 l
我們的大學生
" M# H) u1 L9 q: [5 w# \3 p, r' |2 }; b6 X* j, r
& z1 F7 H# K  q5 T3 _7 K1 P+ e

. u7 G2 J: M7 n6 F( q- w( S8 k* m, X

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:- N$ V" }- p( L( e

" }# e$ c* n  E6 K' r% g8 V
: }1 {/ S& I/ m: h有見地 !!!# N3 s4 f# A/ n/ H6 \1 v
現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
" F5 ]: y0 I/ [, z" m. g* F: n; p2 [6 G
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. % E1 O2 m2 |; P5 x
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.   q1 ~9 K: C7 B' z
I pretty sad that about the University official.* j. `+ J- @- @4 N
It's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
9 _* t& C" x. a6 ?. ^% |7 ?1 M
/ R% \2 L5 k( t9 G* E[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
: j( p+ \7 m1 Y  d% C  F我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
3 O7 I! M" [' J" B% n+ |$ x7 l) @
) G1 \0 y. K) x* w% o  v[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

; L/ e* T) H+ Y  C& g

1 D1 n# t, B7 L2 p- [/ d) s: I兩者有何分別?$ }( A, l& {; V) I
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?