奪命老妖

Originally posted by seafireson2 at 2007-5-15 02:29 PM:+ u  t" ~) y* ^, ?* Z' [. y: z

* h$ `0 n+ p1 R- r( Z. S/ Sagree,( m% f5 J* ~5 X5 V
我都未睇過,根本唔知係點,可能真係討論成份為主,1 P  ~+ W- t* g# Y% x7 j3 {' P. C
但我估同方向生果比,係小兒科," O" p' Q4 u) M0 d$ R
期盼方向生果比人被定性二級不雅!

3 l0 [! Z) C% L) qhttp://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html
& S  k: y" H2 h$ ^已經睇左幾期,性質傾向於性教育,同某報既果d嫖妓指南,差天共地
, B! U# ?! O% u7 e4 ^$ j搞成咁,都係兩個原因,第一係香港人係性方面真係好保守,探討下都唔得,第二係欺善怕惡,見係學生就恰你

chicken

Read the student post and find that it's not as evil as described by the media.
. j7 b) B$ W% N6 w; iJust some extreme-conservative people too nervous about it.

sakura310

Originally posted by d228216 at 2007-5-15 01:58 PM:) @, `% [0 k) D0 E: R& l9 t  Z. m1 k
有罪就要罸, 冇罪就要平反, 法庭應申張正義！
! _0 D7 H" K2 t/ _! L3 l* \6 K- f9 P4 ]9 j9 U  @. L
係咪大學生根本冇關係....大學生巴閉d?? 有免死金牌???, m2 L; a, z& |0 i# [0 y0 P
( {% Z7 W( f" l! P0 |6 l1 I
為自己既行為負責, 係今日既年青人最需要學習既野!

& J! R" [7 F# O/ j+ j

0 n5 W! f/ Z" M0 O: l8 E8 n$ F絕對支持啦
4 a7 V; Z& e# p
$ [7 W9 o# y1 e' g有錯就認,打就企定1 w) L' e( L) n7 Q2 q# V

5 V: B, P7 h" R8 v  ?7 j無錯當然要撐到底
% C7 I' V9 d- X! W0 u
6 m* Y& h# G( [1 G/ \* U3 t2 X但今次我覺得係班大學生唔0岩* \! ~  |7 n: m- m7 t2 m5 a+ ~
8 c. p& m  P" t7 g$ E
在發佈一份公眾讀物時,內容應該注意下,唔同私人交談,你講咩都得
7 M0 i7 L0 I# E
% Z! w# Q  y1 l$ O* b" \一份公眾讀物係好有影響力
- M9 x# C- C' |9 r9 D- [  ?  N) i+ S
我唔認為學校方今次要幫班學生9 g9 R/ ]/ c7 n! u# f
; t9 z1 M: N# s2 E
唔通第時出到去做野做錯事就有亞head幫你頂?
0 l- A" }! ~- v! S# p7 v: m1 M6 x, k9 t: o& Z6 g' M& B
我唔認為lor
7 H, W8 u6 M, K7 K* j( J7 Q) y. l
9 T& a4 @( K) H唔係話要整死佢地
1 I: g$ X1 [& }1 D6 g- ]9 {" u
2 A7 y" h3 j$ s* Y9 A% K5 b- s- P而係今次件事,如果判得成的話,自然起到警惕作用
- C! K, e1 i/ p2 k) O1 W3 H/ Z/ W1 i- ^" \1 _' n3 f$ Z
我覺得係d人將言論自由ge範圍放得太大* @& i/ |9 B/ w* |8 @
- r5 o3 C5 C7 L; ^9 d5 K3 V
有d野係應該講,有d野係唔應該係公眾場合講的
$ \( s/ _9 b: H
4 s5 @5 ]( {0 o# W) r唔係話唔應該講就係防礙言論自由  Y. W9 w8 u* Q3 l8 u

  E" G; P  V1 Y4 V- A大家都知偷錢搶錢係唔唔法,唔通咁又話政府防礙你搵錢?

浪子

睇完, 真係冇野好講, 咁所有中小學性教育書籍都可以列做不雅

hackenli

一日一金句; }0 I5 g, R3 H- x$ \/ J
"佢地有比一般市民較高o既學歷,就更應該能夠明辨是非"  E/ u+ \5 L" y( J, l/ A9 R5 A" a4 O
- K5 S0 `( C# }+ n8 Y* Q
我們的大學生
, m# W- \. h/ {8 m! C% J
( f! v- F+ ?1 P  X! N: K/ q
$ q; H8 p; `. R
" Y* g6 E1 F( o) Q$ h/ v7 h* Y7 f4 ^7 J9 _+ R

Originally posted by easy_man at 2007-5-15 02:13 PM:
  K5 t8 Y7 w+ u2 C, P5 [
$ `8 @; w8 @4 b- `! z5 Y! l( l
- ^1 Y* J9 H) Y+ S( l0 s有見地 !!!
  G/ j* k* ~' M. t7 b- K現今大學生部份以為...

vv1668vv

反映大學生對法律認知不足。自以為是

支持者

http://www.xanga.com/cusp_07/590 ... 76362152636620.html2 r# o0 }9 E" u/ c1 o
8 X1 e, @2 J  r; ^: n  F
I think the content is rather premature, i.e. not a porn stuff compare with some HK newspapers. * b: c9 c/ w* }4 `$ b* N: }% |
I never think of any porn or sexual stuff after the reading, but just have some moment to retreat the social life in mind.
; |8 z- H. k# SI pretty sad that about the University official.
. K* i2 y& f1 X" NIt's them making the stuff worse.

bigfish

我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
0 D# Q+ A& l" n. S* C, B0 m" D! X# a: I1 X/ n; j- q
[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

mailcool7

有錯就認,打就企定

155220

Originally posted by bigfish at 2007-5-15 17:24:
1 Q% q5 V8 ]2 ^1 V我覺得份報刊以市井中文刊出就顯得不雅, 如果轉用華麗英文刊登就乜事都冇 la
$ Y4 \  C$ \5 ^! a. }
' F/ V: P( `% L( P3 s6 u: ?1 b" E[ Last edited by bigfish on 2007-5-15 at 05:26 PM ]

( W1 r) P# Y5 ]$ y( E4 S0 ?" N& V( k; m
兩者有何分別?7 O6 V4 ]' v2 V2 K$ F+ [: K- P6 r
中文就市井,英文就華麗,有咩根據?