|
  
- 帖子
- 706
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 316
- 魅力
- 150
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
12#
發表於 2008-10-8 07:03 PM
| 只看該作者
i thought it is the reason of rate of return.
4 h2 ]4 [0 n5 F0 e+ [' Z1 T% ]2 z7 qCDs could have different ratings, AAA -> F,
6 f' B; z$ J9 j' H5 qmore risky ones would have higher premium (interest rate) as a compensation for an investment.
, ]5 s% C, B" V, fmain reason why ppl buy those risky CDs is because the rate of return exceeds their internal rate of return,
) ~9 \( m5 \0 ` u4 U! u# y- i- Oin other words, the interest rate of that investment > their required interest rate, therefore they invest in those securities.- w, I% p- W' I% @
Also, fund managers would include risky assets in their portfolio for different purposes, eg efficiency.
. k2 I7 {, Z" x0 e& z/ Ksimilar to bonds, CDs trading in the secondary market have different value at different times,6 R4 C: \1 R2 o% r Y* j4 O3 n
normally the value is calculated by adding it's principle and interest. $ r" K- h+ Q# j3 Y
eg. the value of the mortgage+the interests to be recieved in the future. ' @( h/ O6 p5 Z* E5 ~8 f( g
banks who sell the CDs, could enjoy a few benefits like, the present value of cash and passing the risk of holding a debt to another party.
; ~: Q" o4 N" w; u; U8 E8 ~+ R8 M. G {' T; N
im not quite sure if the multiplier effect does really matter in this case.
$ [7 z! j! ]5 ?1 B8 xin stock market, it's the demand and supply pushing the price up/downwards.
2 y+ m9 p! M, B+ C" [; D( v* ?/ tFor eg, A bought 10000 shares @10$ ; B sells 20000 shares to C @ $12,7 B+ J8 b- n4 M9 x" V3 f( I. _# f. _
A's shares would suddenly increase to $120000 from $100000 which does not invlove any $ transaction.
. o a# E7 k6 Q' ` O0 r. QThe capital loss that ppl suffer nowadays, i believe, most of them does not really suffer a real $ lost yet as long as they dont sell their securities.
; I& t' B6 F# S! \) q. s! [but the value of their assets did really drop significantly.
) U! D6 T, i* C# t+ y0 m( i/ r$ ?4 U; P; E! u( f
[ 本帖最後由 Kev 於 2008-10-8 07:26 PM 編輯 ] |
|