Rika

由最好排到最壞
  L2 C' S. d5 M. O* E7 r0 JF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
7 E0 O. Y" N! L  h& \B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount" X# B2 K4 W) {- f) U
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
6 }5 `0 k* V- v/ }. rM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure( U+ d% L, ]( [# n0 D% ~
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:% U) {* M+ M) y  p% p

" |1 h6 V- F8 ]9 ]! u& f6 x+ XM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人$ ?" W) x9 B8 |  ^

( c5 P5 k0 J6 s5 _0 vS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
$ E% c2 H) N0 {6 f     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!1 A& e3 Y0 h9 ^; {# A
- @5 `) [% K# _5 [/ N+ y1 P
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
  D) @4 `4 \# i# `+ ]' W' g
; N1 Z9 o6 t6 N# k" }+ f" AL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志9 W4 p2 g8 D. G% `5 X
7 ~5 r0 y: d# `! j' ]
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,0 |% K. q6 ]# o# {! v& ^
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好; C* S/ T4 V  q- X& `. }" h
4 g; G( V4 |" M  S: S5 i' ~
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案% ]/ N7 \1 k3 n7 K# `; q+ b
而家答多次  P4 j$ {1 ~  [
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
1 j" P) X! X* r2 D' n) [8 ~) Xl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
8 ^+ B6 H* K0 x: t2 i# t6 T& rb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢7 V7 ?* A$ k' e, T4 F4 u/ k
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
. }2 N/ ~$ y, G) \) x) pm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S9 K) T8 _4 ~  e& M6 G; U

) Q; ], g3 H# k4 C1 }- R0 l  j* KL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大6 p9 ~& R5 |  G: X5 U0 O
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
6 p  ^/ i  _' h: ~/ OM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
& @3 |" l; E. \7 r, A( US乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
/ s9 o3 K8 k* K! ?8 l$ }B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞( v9 A* L5 F4 Q: V
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"6 H5 {9 W; F2 r
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取8 Q! @/ R" G1 [  Q) i+ E( {2 R
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法( E6 w& v+ i* z6 X9 u' I1 o$ r
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
! ~2 P- R( W+ A4 ?# k+ Y5 r. h% NB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
' ~7 A% s5 Z/ Z* `6 U4 {' B. J/ ?/ J1 d4 X1 Y
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
- ^7 i4 d/ P0 T6 ?/ O! Y, c/ YL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
1 w( ]7 ^/ ~; z+ cB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
: T1 |, `6 @% A$ US = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
: l2 p; a( V. D/ n$ mF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
' r# B1 ?9 X4 m  eM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, ]' R% z& `* i
3 T/ k5 k! ~$ j! x4 e same choices with u , but want to add some comments
% }+ U9 |3 f2 o% L, y/ p) D
$ _: d; M2 Q; o$ S* xB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
- n% W/ j$ `5 @5 z" T) \5 y/ G: _" O: f1 {" I/ B% m
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
8 K: B  U" B% w6 r
1 C, Q* t9 \2 D/ |- o! NF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome - {5 r" N' a: C0 I( A

6 u: b  L# }6 n4 DM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......1 R7 ^8 E5 o: e$ P: p2 `

/ x$ |, t4 |+ \2 H. |[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
& g2 Q- |: D- h& {5 A. P4 WM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢$ }+ ~3 _4 M  u) V  Y3 H. Y- Y
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
0 l1 h" `# c8 s( dF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma$ z3 w) l7 Y( ?1 P! F
4 l+ x2 X$ a: U' V0 q4 S
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽...." W# {- X- D, p
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，+ G7 f% Y3 `1 j; Z" h( P& ^
由最好開始排起既話，
3 h8 A2 |' L/ i1 KL B M F S 啦，
% h! j* ~' q" d7 d& p9 {( B* ~, o. e! y0 I1 I
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
9 G# ]1 g2 X7 K- ]1 g9 o8 Q8 u但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
! S+ F$ \! \& G) s如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
: L( Y) ]0 M5 s. s又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。& [7 c% u# ?+ ~8 K+ X4 Q  B: l

! e# i2 r6 D( b; F2 {而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
9 t7 w2 f5 N1 ~0 d# Q0 P所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
! J) w. Z! O- M' \9 u明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
2 n% ~" G& R+ E8 z1 \" z- L. q4 P" t9 R7 `
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，8 l; X. Y( T8 h0 M# }; ~
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，1 V4 \7 D4 Z  C
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
' ]8 f) u: G- M+ ]知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，- W# G2 O% ^; Y$ K' i, _+ v& Z
M 都可算壞了。6 Q7 V$ L$ _/ [8 x0 p5 u$ D
4 O- W& z. R2 e! i( J  a
F 呢個人仲掂，* n# e0 T* B5 X! |
知道既唔等於要講，
2 O0 X; R3 |+ U+ g( w  I! b- `2 t如果呢件事發生係自己身上，! u8 {1 u* p) s, L8 ~. _( h
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。9 D9 u! g5 w* ?# T2 a
: `! b/ j# d3 O4 w. q! P
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
- f$ p% n* U, U# p; h/ x始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。4 n/ D% H9 D* h: V  q" x/ Q
; d, D: O9 E+ l  \+ ^( U* d! f' t. g

" _! l/ W& O3 j7 E
/ e3 n* A4 O2 h2 j題外話：
  e6 r9 _& j) Y' _& M, h' Y唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
# f& R! `% o5 i2 J; X. d# |睇到 S 呢條友，5 `( @# t5 S0 v8 F& Z
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
. \* g3 j) @. _7 ~- {, @8 a; D. n; H! n% _9 ]0 d
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
( @5 j# [7 j4 [# GF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
- A  G' a7 ~, i1 v3 O! l% ?# rM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她( n2 R" \. M0 p9 ]' i& n( o2 I9 u
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
) u4 O1 U  M* P1 M, GL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...