Rika

由最好排到最壞( |3 Y8 `; W- ~3 Y2 |$ T
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
: ~" j& A7 I* Z2 QB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
( F. h6 x2 }  pS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
3 K  z$ m$ o. y6 w) |( N( CM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
1 s0 A6 o& R2 x! I4 y8 r" l# cL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
' D& J: ?* e9 Q* U) d* B6 e' o% S, h: w) e* b, N2 L9 M  Z! {' g4 i
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
! _9 d- U- K% r7 e* Z1 M
% U; ~2 M! ], X1 ~4 }8 f+ x1 AS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
! J) q' O% I; K; C! R. t     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!- Z# x  T% i3 D9 G7 A: y

% ^3 B+ f6 z2 ]. GB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
2 H" b/ L" g& _$ \' K. f- F' ?2 b4 j3 t% U* H& I' s" m5 s* G
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志! L2 o+ ?, g1 `4 c/ F  G

! f& T- T/ G4 R. ]* V) X/ ?: IF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
; u6 O! ]; M6 K0 `     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好+ f6 ?! I% [: R$ i

+ A# n2 B' }# u  M+ b& d! U6 R  x2 w[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
9 _% [6 M$ S9 u" }- J$ N而家答多次6 g4 c" }/ c( }" A" F
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽& P9 j6 g6 c% A. I/ |7 {4 A4 R
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架# N% y' W; ^9 M: h4 Z6 i7 C
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢/ T$ B: e* h) ?. m) f+ i
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.  a0 j  X& P* V# p
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
% J. o2 Q0 Q; _' ~7 E/ ^+ w$ R; g! Z: z) b2 [6 @! I! U
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大. s8 B# ]5 R1 e9 C4 \
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
/ n( [1 `' p4 m3 v( B# RM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
# ?2 B# T) @# G9 ~" T1 ~, h6 sS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
+ D1 w. F+ D1 W' ^' q: mB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞1 u2 V7 _! t% p5 @
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"- r- a/ j" r; @
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
7 {8 O0 s1 S! z1 u8 O% s1 nM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法, k8 R5 B& m- z. z
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果2 N* x1 a4 Z* ^
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情! o7 _7 K$ T, C: g3 S. j1 m
" r( j4 C' }8 ~. t( g
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:+ R% \* l7 d8 L6 m1 K: V0 O% ~
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
" {- y, B7 g! jB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘" d, |4 N% u" R/ T1 A" ~$ f$ O' a
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件' o; N2 P! r! E" E
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
% O, b. p5 @7 `9 u4 q) `: _M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

& ~/ G* s$ z" Z9 c+ @+ d5 Q; o: N  D( o. N" u
same choices with u , but want to add some comments * a  i( }9 c! T2 Q

6 P+ C* B1 l8 f0 Q2 |# ?B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  . W/ f1 j* e, `$ M/ T; H2 {
8 H5 v) P1 j: l  _
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
; n3 D" _1 a" a! s2 i: C  T, _- x. r1 \+ d, p( v+ h
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ' A: c. }; C. ^; A1 p7 Q
; G4 @' `1 f# m! E" I7 ^; i% Z
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......" d9 B4 W; @7 y) i) ?$ K

' f/ n; j: h0 w[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge6 k, L( k3 q# \! z( a; m
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢! A* w2 f( H! n$ x
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點. W. Q: ?0 Y' s7 r: x/ j. V% F" m
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
0 |6 L+ N5 m8 C4 o6 ?8 S* p: F
2 [" z/ z$ U; A0 l) L4 ~# N; F" f最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....9 M" P  a7 \$ _9 n
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
1 m* ^2 L5 ~4 |* ~由最好開始排起既話，5 a/ c, M# g: v
L B M F S 啦，& ^+ o" l' M$ X- j" l- Y

- M% Z& N* S2 j9 f/ _其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，% B4 J% }) O/ [7 i. _
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？/ ?3 \" L& l6 F8 m6 ?
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
. S' V, X3 q0 d8 f0 a3 g$ u) n又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。, `- F5 U" q7 t
& i; r6 @1 G& M
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
- [) `( F3 h1 Y2 k所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，9 b" }! ]/ E. s+ Y- m# L
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
% a5 m! L% N  [0 v  t/ f/ C9 q5 v" s  b
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
4 p$ o& T! G' f M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
1 ]! @/ e8 T. y+ V亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，% w2 F: ~% m1 }' J' f
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，0 f% O  b  c: e3 {7 B
M 都可算壞了。
2 n6 V/ v6 n& ?8 l% W3 H- o; Q
# B" b& q  L5 k F 呢個人仲掂，
* ~2 A; n, I* W知道既唔等於要講，
- g. ]7 _! T5 g& }% I如果呢件事發生係自己身上，& A1 p6 O- j( g. j4 a. g
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。* F, J5 ?+ G( D: p

* V" z! h- f" o最衰個個緊係 S 啦，0 v( h3 m' S+ z: i5 ~; S
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。2 o) z8 B1 q5 \! T  x% s
* y8 o: A8 r: F7 O

, S  n1 g# f! ^0 k3 ?4 d
% C" g  `$ O7 d' Q% c0 h1 U/ `題外話：( K& \+ ~0 e8 T9 l
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，# J0 R: w7 l! l* s0 f, C
睇到 S 呢條友，% u  {6 \% F, D8 D7 K; D# d
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L; P  V' g1 `/ Y' C

- F5 z0 N# X7 Q" }S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
  }' h* w: a4 Q4 T' T8 xF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
) o% l1 C  B) p5 @5 M. xM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她( v7 J5 v7 Q0 b& O5 q8 \% R& P
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
; j. L2 i/ I" f+ W9 FL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...