Rika

由最好排到最壞( U( Z- \+ W% B+ a$ I5 m0 l# v  _! }
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
1 l% n$ b% k. M9 QB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
) r% j% G$ t! h( E  MS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her& S' l8 E2 n( g. M/ B# U
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
+ l" {. Q% m/ ^, _L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:* a5 \% w4 d3 ?$ A% h- m/ o# d
% P( b4 M% Y* K. W" q, u: x
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
* z6 Z( s0 q7 x3 K. Q, j3 a8 a6 ^( I# z6 f2 |* j' t. X* O
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
3 C4 S2 I. I* w( w% e5 d2 s     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
" {$ G5 @7 `7 C( R8 R
7 X5 E( ?( g* yB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
$ y- s: z5 C/ Z
7 X7 x1 H8 ~/ _3 o6 EL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志5 y7 M: K5 p- Y: q4 W( ~+ V) u' N. p
0 l7 K, ?% Q7 w) y
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
. c) x9 v& p% v3 o     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好- i: m. O* h; [6 f0 q+ g: ^

" e& Z  e  m( C[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案! V" m7 l8 ?+ [0 e
而家答多次# w# I  n9 j9 C
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
+ ]* ]) Y" u8 f! ql: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架6 q) u. B( h, m; G! ]5 S' b  {
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢: W6 d# [7 j- Z5 H
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 C. n  }) W8 e4 ~% g; c* ]( d/ zm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
! _, i( \( h3 r/ D7 A, l6 |1 T6 _1 q/ g0 |6 a
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
/ p5 ]/ I7 z& z5 W8 nF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度0 S5 g) `9 q3 I# Z2 T9 u
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒2 Q1 a8 q3 `9 b+ k6 F3 ^
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
+ V2 T; i# |% e" {) e% Y$ jB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
" d- H% l5 e! Z( `F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"0 M; M/ O( E5 }# _& V
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
) Y8 o9 @3 A7 E; C6 P' k! r# tM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法, f; Z3 C5 ~6 x( @+ g/ ^0 @
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果; V2 l* h# L# S7 p1 W
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
/ {- F' e& {( l$ T; o$ A8 n% D! `4 y! H- K! D+ j5 b/ s
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
. V# ]) D! B; \' }) ~L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己) N( V8 y# h5 W: C$ f6 ^
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
( }- H, F) ]; x; LS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件7 y; w4 \6 \! ~2 v
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
( P2 i" X0 P+ C3 t$ c8 jM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

7 [; l# G5 R3 T' h+ p4 l
3 L( j. Q2 t( [
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
9 C, T5 n. [& P$ L: o" ~9 B9 c/ e* \& g4 |, y- }
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
9 n. X' m9 I6 K+ Q/ M
# M( m" U8 u2 ZS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
) E) H* z& l3 z0 O+ L) E1 P, U* C3 }, ?( G
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
, B. |: e9 a  e" B1 x8 N8 V1 d7 b
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so....../ J- ~/ S+ Y, q5 c: C( t

, W. ]: z( L& `[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
3 A) P0 x+ G& N; oM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
/ v* B4 E* a8 _& eL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點0 y' W- U/ B& l% }4 t, f$ @
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
/ V7 {$ \, G- N+ r, R6 m1 H9 z! N5 z# \$ [5 U: e- F  g& a+ L
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....( L( ]( s+ |) ]
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，) _0 f5 _, a1 Q; c3 h) [5 _
由最好開始排起既話，
% Y" F8 W: p  k: fL B M F S 啦，
# M$ n# j, ]; {. v: W
& V! n6 _3 O0 d3 c" h+ \1 N! ]其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
4 Y6 B$ x7 k) p/ r5 w7 g1 d但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
& A6 X+ F) ~6 p3 _' g如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？% I: J9 e" ]0 C7 e
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
4 z' P: y: c: I" o1 S& ?/ B+ S+ X  U- T" t/ U6 M' G! L, ?6 v. H( }
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，! ~" @1 f. g! C  G* V) A% j% ]
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，% p6 ?5 o# e/ a  a9 E
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。" K" x/ C0 v! k2 V! ^( D4 r

! i" R- F7 m7 U+ f  p而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，( l+ Z6 _. D8 {+ X
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
9 |% Z" B& O7 j0 J. C亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* F* u+ a4 A; q9 q& g
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
# G! e% r5 f- V* y M 都可算壞了。) I/ y$ y2 d5 a5 l1 A+ O% S

! y0 `$ o' K2 _7 y6 h0 s F 呢個人仲掂，
0 s/ A9 O1 O& G知道既唔等於要講，8 `& n" w- X% @& g, z* {7 _* ~
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
; G* I8 Z3 h* o. l我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。: ~9 q( X: r( N6 V
3 U3 X+ c: G" }
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，% n: W" M, P$ ]5 ]* M
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。3 m! {# c$ z5 j- L& e  s) Z" k
$ B: H( H- {- \9 }+ Q, d- C6 Y/ O- U

4 z4 {% J1 I! @: e9 j/ K, I3 s. r' I, {1 [8 V
題外話：; L* U. \+ v. p# a$ f! [0 t
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
! u5 f( X4 q% p3 y% j睇到 S 呢條友，
/ o! O  g  x0 k6 f0 z我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L' Y8 {# Z! M: u7 X4 z
0 k  t7 h# G* F$ Z
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
; u; d# h6 l' J& kF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
6 ?6 m% r' y8 }8 {: CM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她3 X/ {4 q9 U* D
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
4 }3 L. @: v' OL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...