Rika

由最好排到最壞
9 R- n0 E, E/ j( ZF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
$ v' Q! Y/ E7 q8 L* }' tB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount0 W& q# z# Q: v
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her& ?+ I/ U6 U1 @5 a
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure0 k% L; `' Y! e' f9 c
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
$ A& w" ~4 r& d
+ Y% S" m) w& e2 ^. [& h1 E# KM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
- B* Z  v" d- T1 l  I. U) K, ^# f. H5 P5 S$ M8 d/ G" U
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)2 t/ S! i1 e8 }( Y# u! X8 x
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
& M: ?( n( y0 Q2 O2 ]7 E" {; y& v# X, E5 D7 v( p2 U7 ?0 {
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
7 B+ P$ y' a; t1 j$ J) M$ ?  F0 v4 w9 V, g
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志* v4 y7 q: j9 \4 z

! c" B- Y& G! L# p: Y& Q8 E6 N7 i7 EF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
4 c$ ]4 k, j; g0 u     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
; n8 p8 ~" L7 Z4 t# ]0 I
* Z" M, s8 W) j6 s  Q[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案- d$ u" M5 B  s( o0 [- K
而家答多次
3 d2 D" X  d5 e" O' o6 E; Uf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
  Y: z" E  E& q6 z0 `l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架" X+ I$ i$ O2 ~
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢" k2 D2 K  `5 f+ t7 r+ V% {
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
" z7 d3 N. n$ o5 O' d: _! Em: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S! L, v, B0 M7 u7 p  {2 N! }
3 @3 T+ g3 m5 T+ c! \& f% K( ~
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
- ?* `% ]6 N/ p& ]. DF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
% N( S% J( H  h' _M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒1 f" c, k2 Z+ U9 q# O  h
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢/ W  g+ E: {  r0 f  O# c
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞" ?% I% O3 F" T! L% m
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
: b: ~; b! F( j, c" yS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
# d9 L0 ~5 _6 d4 m# @M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
* z" M$ @9 o0 lL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
5 F; k, v: m& L' m+ h) \" gB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情2 G8 F  ?: f: m2 u- |' Z

$ C  S$ T/ W2 N2 B+ t, W7 {5 j世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:% g. b0 J/ X" X/ ^  l7 N) |( H% e
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己' C6 ^! [: o3 B. Z0 z1 J
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
8 G  C2 Y* A( i2 B5 VS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
/ {- q$ t* A" D" M1 |, r5 z' _F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
3 b- S0 U9 q( _; g+ t9 G& GM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

  K' v8 d- r: s% Y1 Z7 P' w' C. h& s7 E8 N% H; B% Q
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 0 g. x$ H( o9 T6 t+ y

. }; n1 c5 I" d( V& M( R: N4 PB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
& G: @# n) K1 [2 {/ O' a  C% J: k+ f) p+ m/ A0 }9 J* `  h
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )" D) `# g4 _$ g; Z: d1 d1 @: @
, _6 |) f1 B% W
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 5 e/ s/ ^) O% y6 }; i2 Z

' J' g6 \+ `4 E/ y1 f! j2 k9 EM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so....../ |. L7 Y# C  k& c+ k0 P! P

- g8 p8 _# K' }, t/ t9 Y9 L[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge; h, Z7 O" a1 f, x% a; h  ^2 H
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
5 G' J. J( _4 P+ I  P. _& F6 N2 mL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
6 O2 K2 o7 R4 g( {' sF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma& Q! Y' O/ }; K5 C  {" r$ T1 J

/ l, n/ `& x  z" X5 H3 t最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- [5 A3 p9 r$ h- x
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，# r% s6 @/ n4 r
由最好開始排起既話，
. p1 `4 z  ?; L1 R) o6 B# d' pL B M F S 啦，" @4 U' Z5 N, i! l; M0 E6 }7 f! b. [( C
8 I& M5 B) {* G8 H8 c: g
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，4 h* v; n6 d$ v0 X! v$ ~8 {
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
  K$ I. p: e: F7 |( Z. T如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？3 |' F9 D2 o. m) P/ t7 E
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。5 @- a" }7 B  h1 T

* H' m8 _0 A" R而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，8 n  I: t) [4 Z. c
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，+ C" n2 R$ a( b6 \
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
( M" X# L) C  Q8 d" n+ G# m: Q4 [( ]" U" G0 E5 I5 P- l
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
4 f( s* M1 ~$ q M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，5 I4 i# B0 R7 \* D# Z$ X  L
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
) d! U$ W' G" v9 `知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，1 z- B. f( ?3 _6 F" z! u
M 都可算壞了。% p; W) F! \8 x( N, m

2 v& _# c+ P( @1 V, y$ e, [+ `. O F 呢個人仲掂，
7 N3 t, F% u; Q知道既唔等於要講，
  X" U2 y& o1 _& m如果呢件事發生係自己身上，2 M' d- H& t, u  H  W" Q4 h
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
6 a9 o* X. _) T8 m5 b( C; s: o+ X& p0 E$ A. v( l3 J
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，: K6 N; s  J2 C9 R
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
7 e* N& t* l2 d  `1 Y$ }" X# h7 r& M, f
& `' `, s/ k- F7 i" E7 i1 C1 H1 U
8 w0 O/ ^) `  a6 L9 y% e
題外話：3 i6 a$ |. _- N$ z+ j; S
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，  I& p) t* D3 {% j; S# d' i
睇到 S 呢條友，
" F5 z9 K8 A' {* Z我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L5 V- M- [, P  i; l( ~1 k/ g0 H1 U+ ~1 a
0 d4 e. n$ |3 o
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
$ \/ t9 C9 K2 bF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
( b' ?8 m- I/ ~" S1 W3 P* c7 OM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她& a3 p6 ?( ^3 i0 J$ a; e
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害8 c( T; d7 H; a. I3 s
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...