Rika

由最好排到最壞9 f2 H' l* G9 \; t
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
8 C$ q" x1 D& [0 |- EB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
/ U, \7 ?; c. I1 B+ R( nS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her; T' l" Z: [# `5 W1 ^! ]
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
$ S. ~. P& x7 T+ @) j- g6 CL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
) b* _7 o# ^3 }
0 A( i6 h) f4 F9 dM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人4 F4 ?' I8 O9 f+ y

. C5 P3 x! \2 ^3 a/ hS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)1 I% k. P4 P2 s
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
, I% M& {8 I6 p; @; i8 B- h4 R4 Z; B- x6 a
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做2 }7 N1 V* ^" Q# s; I

* x: \- Y/ V& {L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
5 p% n! F& \; r( E
0 B# f4 S$ e8 |" U! ]4 f% }F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
) o$ v. q. V) y+ A5 G% g& t* x     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好# L# k' d; X0 Z* R
0 `( C7 P0 o' a* \$ u
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案6 M0 k( l5 q, R# H1 Q6 S- D
而家答多次
3 f8 ~, H7 L! T3 f0 b/ c7 lf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽! L* K8 D9 p0 T* M* m2 L' Z
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
0 [' {4 M5 c8 F4 N6 ~& Zb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢. [: ]2 M6 H! [8 K  s$ k* [% N! S
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
+ C" B# l8 l' A5 wm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
4 O' R1 @1 j: [0 L: b
, `* ]: p% X' D0 p& wL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大" p7 x* d2 i$ b
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
; ]3 e& J% T0 D; V* }) sM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒. e* A% D% x2 [. Q2 s: t
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
0 f7 o5 A- m' A% F1 F0 YB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
% _- i/ j0 C, T( K+ Y% S( x! cF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
- V5 z& `8 I/ r8 v9 w! u: tS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取" O4 x9 g/ u' M# x* L
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法/ M; U/ B) p! S9 b. r; s
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果0 H6 {, `! w: t- F( @9 B+ b
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情, k8 s! q/ b- y" T9 [, q! `8 Z

& J- ?$ p% {/ F6 I7 V4 b# S1 u世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
9 B2 R5 w2 j* x5 D7 K/ C. e' `  ]% j; VL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
0 Z9 d. a+ r0 b9 ^) KB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘% `" L& M  @2 H5 e9 l+ t
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
. m, v& N- \  O$ ?1 r7 t2 ?8 w  EF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方% N; ]9 o+ }& P, S
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

0 Z1 u1 c2 [, X+ v4 I* H3 n" L3 g4 t) N: {# k
same choices with u , but want to add some comments / E5 j8 [0 o+ M( D% I! X
# v* c3 A2 p" I8 @3 @" S% P
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
7 K* o9 `9 a) Y* f2 B; t+ I: v. Y' v# N
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
5 U9 `& o+ z4 Q3 R& G4 `; E# D# o# c1 {+ i0 w+ @
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
* d1 d! E- Y; |1 T( |, D6 |' y+ X  f5 `( t* ]" _* D
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
4 P( B/ g( {% J$ p" }4 g# v1 _) w% H$ w, O4 n/ }0 E! A) z
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
2 e! r8 ]) R/ W9 p" A# X- ]M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢0 b$ I5 u; i  p$ q+ n# [9 ~
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
! n0 x+ Q- r4 b% x; Y) H0 ]" yF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma( u2 R! B9 I/ v& {( E1 Q# g

4 G5 A, ?" M& k: |& o最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- T/ d# R, d1 v- r$ j: }9 y4 a: N
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，$ j, B* C; y2 G. B
由最好開始排起既話，" w7 b" n0 X- }& c! F) ~' Z( }) |
L B M F S 啦，
* e1 |# D6 L" ]9 B* n
8 P% _7 E& d  a3 R! T' m( k! M0 y其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
0 i! s0 ]$ [! |8 G2 s) s但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？( K4 ~6 _: s& m. o
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？8 q' v6 D: o* ~2 ?4 ?0 _+ N- }: l
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
4 V+ F0 v$ m% {% B  [: O
; ^* K' q1 S7 N( l( l而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
0 ^. F. S$ _' h! f) h& \( @8 D所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
4 a* o' v- V4 ^! }6 J明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。# g- J0 {" s  F6 @: j9 o$ V

. \- B6 `  \* Y& \2 ^. p$ m而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，2 q4 J7 o. h/ j2 F  E9 l# A! g
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，- ], j% K# ~* Q
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
5 x) }/ L- N( S' J# J知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，% }6 }. S4 Y* F: M3 t1 ?1 k, T# E
M 都可算壞了。" @( A4 R3 P/ P5 z/ {% R( \( f8 m
( E0 d! d. {5 x0 P. Y4 l
F 呢個人仲掂，
' y) b" z- m% V- j知道既唔等於要講，3 l1 k. g# V- U: _9 U* o, L7 |& ~$ w1 P
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，" E; }! K! e7 I' h' |9 L* z. b
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
* @& a9 r7 w$ p
; k# v* [% ?% E* b最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
# G" A" l; G0 e始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。: ~# U5 c" \" B2 ^+ E6 n. e

" C* x6 F8 v2 J. v
; V4 b) z- O: z% X7 a% F& v/ B$ W& s0 |$ c  z. @
題外話：  p' _. z& R# D
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
+ I  B+ R: \- z( W" G; O! S/ g睇到 S 呢條友，" l; L: r$ A; j; f3 Q9 S
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
, m* C  @+ {- V; ~( p, [4 c- t/ u/ c. A/ |0 Z
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!" G$ H6 {4 d' @
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係5 T) }  c- B4 s4 E" Q3 }
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她8 R( U8 J$ u; d0 t, l& @
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
+ L! ]& P3 X" E4 _L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...