Rika

由最好排到最壞/ o$ e9 b% z" h+ k
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong+ G8 |* ?. N* E0 i) r
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount2 h$ h5 k$ M/ q9 W! o: ~+ ^& X
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her$ ?1 R4 M2 F; \7 f- k4 ]  r3 d
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure% \1 P" J( U+ J0 c2 g
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
% l5 z% F' j# `5 g5 J  b; [
1 n# K3 [1 O' K4 T$ \M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人( `5 K( v+ i2 H) u( @! T
4 t% t) C2 |: [  a
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
' y. _: f& m; q. p: Q/ |* z+ \     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!; ^3 H  s! |. X4 n# c( [. A# D

( j% f. c5 l5 kB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
$ r  K2 i; e$ J2 q6 }3 I( v) F" J: W! {2 z. I! M
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
) n+ {; D' a4 V8 ?& d0 {, ?, Y3 M$ j& t: z2 k4 j/ f; p5 \, a, ~
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
! P" ^3 s& ~% z, J+ R  m' ~: a( S     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
" ?; [, }! g9 K! u; S% A% l" O, f/ ~. T; ?* _
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
( w; P8 ]5 e+ J7 T9 L而家答多次+ s6 j/ o5 w& ^+ E
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽$ B- O' u2 R3 X+ X1 n
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
( N8 H. s) w+ A7 H" \b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
7 _) n, x+ K9 A1 R1 {% G# H+ bs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
* U7 q" f$ K! B& t9 n, P6 d* pm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S! z8 L2 ?+ x- L7 Q0 L1 l. p/ f
# I: P; g, p- [2 [
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大6 A! Y9 h0 J& V  E- n* r0 `/ b
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
! w% I/ o- H( [( ]/ EM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒8 R3 B! Y7 W8 ^( M1 k. g
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
$ @. T* r' x. h  pB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
! ^5 c" Y/ w& {$ P4 r4 V; e$ S4 b3 xF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
. U0 y! f* \' c; H* J& vS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
% A" f9 f( V, ?- I, P0 C- N7 x# BM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法3 D4 K# [1 q* ^- p3 O
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果, j0 a( }+ S/ C
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情; x9 R. `  M2 j8 f

# h5 L; f* X0 m: p3 i- G/ L( e世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:1 G. B0 ?5 `; V  _( D
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
; H  n) |& [) h0 Q! DB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘8 u; r7 H& v9 r, ]1 X% h
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
/ t- g3 o8 A4 G3 jF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
$ d0 m) I! m) R7 p$ s% hM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

% p3 a0 L3 s& ]# }: L' Q3 R6 o  a  n6 H# n& l3 ]
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 8 m" |' K2 [5 h9 g+ @9 x
5 H& Y. I4 p0 f# ]8 H
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  9 K  g" y" n/ z% I
! N5 i$ f& a3 O9 y& x. R' @9 Y
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
# P$ o0 f' D5 d! I7 y/ v8 u+ V, m2 W. C8 N& e! v; [
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome * }6 g( W5 b# K1 c

3 g& O$ f* H0 g( U) YM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
/ [! z6 D5 R+ n/ W3 c, L/ h
$ U  t& D  W, I! Y/ k6 b( o9 o[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
2 u7 |% p1 n+ d9 k  fM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢6 i1 V/ n; O( i8 R. @, P
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點3 M4 ]" }; C' M. q
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
1 X1 N+ S, l3 e4 |1 e
. t8 X! J0 {8 x最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- \' l9 m" l. t$ Y! h; r
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
  o- l6 E2 G2 e) P由最好開始排起既話，7 A$ M% m. T; f1 Z+ {; Y) Z: K
L B M F S 啦，% [/ E+ s9 A: n' `
' F! C8 ?) c1 a. M6 P. H
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，- t6 E3 `; i0 R' }3 ]
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？. w) ~9 T2 ]3 ]* q: M# [. i+ o3 u, e
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？0 w) `! i* N7 I% x0 r; }3 l
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。: P3 v1 g+ m7 I3 z
; [% X% l0 @/ B9 C7 b; X7 q7 U1 }
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，* W- M4 Z' N# D! g2 Q/ _' ?
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
) L8 H( K8 W2 Z: j! t8 x明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
7 ~* P' g* q+ W  ^. X# p: O0 A7 I2 {$ a/ M1 Z- h1 Y; d. U
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，' |/ d% b. j" F" J4 R' }
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，% b: o, J+ {- k* p# u
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
  x# R6 E0 ^# G, v知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
- T# V) G! _3 u" X6 `- Q0 D" T% {+ Q M 都可算壞了。1 r( W" m3 p* T$ i! ~" K: J1 u

# J8 k* V1 D" f$ n5 Y2 O F 呢個人仲掂，
% M$ q- m$ i% J: @0 ?7 A+ u知道既唔等於要講，" m% O! f9 ?$ ~. O# t
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，' a' p( ]1 f, C+ ?9 i
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
6 Z# N- j' P. J* y+ Q6 A% ?. g0 s5 ?1 y' O' ?6 k
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
! M2 @3 S7 G' r! I始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。) p( z6 s  I$ }3 z% w. U
5 j5 Z5 p$ _/ M" Y: t! O
8 ?, f( t$ W1 b+ v& D. z
/ N$ b, d. t0 i8 V5 y$ ?* D& x2 `
題外話：6 P# l2 B! i2 [
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
* j; Z6 d) x. \" P2 w# o9 R+ c睇到 S 呢條友，
7 f0 r. O5 P: d$ Z1 V8 O" [  T( c我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
% W2 t/ \% r4 ?' T
  y& ?% \: d  l3 d! }S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!( \. S% X$ @8 ~) t" b0 u$ I
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係3 B$ F. I( l- r
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她; K5 ?! l; o7 X; ^' S& p, _: Z0 s
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害. P% r, Z& Y5 l# r
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...