Rika

由最好排到最壞% b& G2 `+ m8 V# w4 d, D
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
6 V1 S, V  |1 iB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
8 O4 F" `. g$ b' |- O1 Z: n% H# @- DS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her2 j. F/ {: g  B: v9 Q% s% ~! R& i
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
! k; ^) ?- d2 hL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:# R& v) ]7 p: Z! Z: o3 a/ P
; t  Z$ J4 A, A, U' v5 u
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
6 Y8 i% ~# r% W! F8 o/ r, T+ b; J1 p2 W# D1 K# s1 x
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)1 w: c& q& v: {% m+ G& B
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
$ t, f* E* o7 C' T, V
/ \; |  Q" P% xB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
! ?8 \4 B6 P& f5 U6 E) w- o: P. F9 u7 O
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
" [; M# s: ]6 i, M! f1 K+ Z- [7 M: c: L1 h0 `
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,3 s3 P) F7 m5 u% C  t
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
" x: j2 `; E$ v# w: E; m! d6 h- X
6 F$ A6 G) A2 l; c3 r. y5 {0 S+ f[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
$ l% J7 x" K6 j/ L5 M& _: V而家答多次, e# [/ g; s) |. f! L
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽5 A% a, r/ D& r
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
3 o1 a$ j, F# j& ]7 jb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢* E* m, }; c% P/ w7 C8 O
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.( b) y/ c: |( [8 c$ D; r
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S7 z1 U6 T* t8 K) l( m  W3 V% e! q

/ Q) e% _2 A" a, iL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
5 Z) A/ B3 E) j7 tF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度4 D) @$ @" [! I: Q
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒+ ^" L# e0 h1 p* _
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢3 p9 O8 L4 P- b% i6 ?; E9 ~6 T5 s* {3 b. t
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
  ~7 \: A! v% j9 ?1 m0 EF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"4 g2 F( a; T! o. h$ t
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取1 D8 |7 o3 V2 A5 }0 h& |+ t+ u
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
9 a: U' E7 a" J; ML: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
0 K' Z5 N: s+ M9 m) U5 |B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
% f1 x0 f9 A* [1 r  v8 F6 S# ~* l" f7 l$ _6 Y
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:5 S) H! J2 g& V
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己% D3 G& w. X; I% ?* D( D
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘- a3 h* Q5 z2 t5 P2 X
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
7 p, \# V! F6 P% |# C7 OF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
  b8 d% `  U' L% F: E1 L4 vM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

% g- X5 y' X% l$ q" f2 x
. l5 w$ |/ t. @. v6 D
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
1 m+ k. X7 l3 N3 d6 O- J
1 N- q8 {8 |9 D2 v" T: u4 y" dB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
$ Q; M% d& b- `. R" l  T' ]+ s( c* w0 ~# x: V
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )/ g1 N7 H2 [: _

* P; a+ @3 Y, [9 T$ {0 E2 a/ BF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome . k; `" A& M& X  ]8 v
! |6 T& X1 b( ?
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
% Y' u- x# Z- N
/ [2 B; l- E" h* C5 v[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
0 H- O% z+ ^4 u/ ]2 n8 o; R- }M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢8 P9 W" r; U, g8 o* D3 M
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點; X9 x2 d2 ^0 \4 v* z. T$ X
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
: I2 @9 {4 j4 y2 Z$ C
( ^9 i0 Z. E1 O最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
5 G1 e0 Z. |8 q3 H有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
, l- U3 |( F8 E# d9 P由最好開始排起既話，
3 z- I! F# ?9 m) B+ z0 DL B M F S 啦，
3 ~+ j4 ?9 f- s
4 m6 t# U" ~5 L& W7 r0 \  ^* I+ ?0 Q其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，  [" s' }! u( ~% G* D
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
, a! Y  q. _$ f0 g5 o9 M- c如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
7 R3 D8 ^. i8 Y6 r+ |% `: M又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。2 W4 K/ ]+ {/ s# L  ~0 a8 ^
/ Z" `# _5 ^, }2 |6 t
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，/ R  I: z6 m( C. N
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，3 f- h& c8 u( x( d* v
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。. [* W/ b' u3 A9 v2 ]

# ?0 x/ y& {- o+ x. h- t( W而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，2 W) t) Z: Z8 r3 f; `9 ]
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
+ X5 x9 g2 X  L. N' s9 ~, d亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，6 f2 C2 x# R! L9 \
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，. V6 X' I5 K! G1 i8 D
M 都可算壞了。
0 N/ g: x6 J  n& K& ?1 h1 O" R7 T8 u! W* T1 k3 C
F 呢個人仲掂，
% p& M* P& Y1 K- n6 a知道既唔等於要講，3 B. U, C; v% S6 U
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，# H% D) K% p+ K  I& Y: v- M9 v
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。3 d  _# z9 s. G" I3 a
# G+ |# L' Y6 Z2 x7 j
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，2 ~/ u. C7 r+ @/ Q& ]. e
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。# T" Y2 p0 W! ^4 Y  _
7 Z/ @( ?7 ?% K* L
- X# L5 k2 ~# E1 z5 Y3 s5 o- I3 b1 W

7 [& `+ ^% k6 u2 i, f4 a題外話：$ f1 f: p* K3 y5 @* R
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
3 A4 Q8 L; ]* x9 j, M睇到 S 呢條友，
- [& G, j+ A4 E6 }我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L; Q- B" {# j0 l3 l% f0 E5 g

# j4 ?/ h6 M' j' @* s' _S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!# [1 F" ~) x) t
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係: ?  `# d7 t, F0 Y* t# E7 t: v
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
6 `2 H( {& r8 z0 a( Z! FB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
, O' x( \2 p, K* }2 n! z2 bL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...