Rika

由最好排到最壞
: H, f1 Z# `# \F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong) i) i+ g; P5 ?4 y
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
" z2 \- x( W' ]' {S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
3 V6 [# S7 X7 `3 S, a: n3 W* }M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure6 X( {9 l& |3 i( a6 B% p1 F. s
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:: H# A; j/ {. K# g
# i) F1 Q. o( ^# W: k
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
$ w8 `5 j0 j" V8 h8 v
" b& Y9 \' x/ t7 u7 ?+ z( V- |) fS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
  t0 n9 L! ^2 x     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!( Y: ~2 \2 v* e+ [4 c
: [3 R" V& B. r& [
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
8 g* D* ^9 q+ n' H
. m: u- p! ?+ _; E; n$ i  BL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
$ N- o. F, Q6 r1 o% a9 u; c& h- g5 N, j
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
' u4 V7 m; G7 m4 J9 k3 f; J5 ]     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
1 J5 X% W* c" [; l# b
: a# B* f# c' h[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案/ ], v- X8 b9 Z# ~
而家答多次- ^: N! N# d" g; G3 o- h& i' N. L( j
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽; J0 w3 `# J9 w* }* J8 b7 Q- P
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架  m8 R- C7 w4 C- W( G/ q5 h) c. j
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
$ a9 S& @+ }- U8 ms: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
$ \5 j! D5 P" l2 Z9 I8 H' ]: um: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
+ y5 u; J( p. L. Z# j
& T& a1 T9 I* N! g3 gL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大' W& G. s4 c6 D
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度. r+ u5 j: d2 W# Y% d8 ?; c
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒8 V2 M9 j* H3 |$ x: S( k
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
9 m' d) {6 B6 G5 x6 Z1 ?B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞8 q. J4 R  o- _6 V5 J8 S7 a
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"& O0 a2 b% F, _0 d* Y; b
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
& f! N- r0 d- _9 ]4 N% [M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
& N) \: B# @* I( b9 F) H1 @L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
' F; H6 j1 y, S+ m: X, LB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
7 V, D9 e/ o& _( P
" ^/ |" l9 N. W8 a世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:; N$ \9 U& u; Y, B- G; l, h3 j
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己% d4 T2 }: s4 C# |' u
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘. [. K! H& M7 A% M6 `; k8 }3 i
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
% ]' u. g: P; ~5 |2 nF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
; W% r' {  ], B5 K6 ]" [M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* h9 F  U1 ^8 A1 l

1 \$ e( D  S) B/ e same choices with u , but want to add some comments * n# f, \8 ?. V7 N

* v1 b9 i( x' b5 ?' k: YB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  ) @+ H3 t% [! L6 e/ d9 D
  N: U  X1 P, S
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )0 @2 p+ ^- I2 @( E

5 B- _$ z1 x* u2 [2 x7 yF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome : G& `" W. b! T& R, J1 G5 }* |+ q- M

3 U' m; M% q4 }# Q& ?: ZM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......2 B5 D6 R. I0 [- `: k: o
- j) K! v3 ?: n# @7 M$ g
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
8 ]# m- m0 j1 `4 E+ \& rM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
3 Q" W* M/ w7 cL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點8 j" l0 g3 W: `2 [& Z2 T8 m7 n
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
( b+ c( }0 G8 X- O/ l- Y5 ]& h% o1 w8 k
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
* D1 q& q. p4 n$ }有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
! z" B) f. S) V+ w4 ~3 |: f由最好開始排起既話，
7 ^8 V  M3 Z  ~3 rL B M F S 啦，7 r5 P7 c. Z# N1 t2 S, r3 J
9 o/ z1 L- S- U% }  T9 j
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，4 K; d0 H1 I" b( ?& Q6 H
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
, \# ^& t! A9 C2 ?+ a- S  J1 M如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？; u/ I0 k7 [+ Z4 U
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
$ Z  k# D+ d2 @+ x. l0 T9 X" r7 ~$ w, E2 ?
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，' g# V9 Z' d! S1 N
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，" J$ W" O7 D: N
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。' F% \$ Y+ u, V+ o; i9 k# I0 B9 {4 M

9 v. u4 H: K2 U( _/ x6 h. a而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
! H6 C/ c/ T: L( R+ g4 i7 v M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，6 Q/ n6 }- _. U* }
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
1 d' E' Q5 z  Q2 j知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
; E8 T0 \) i7 D1 @# B3 C5 e M 都可算壞了。! r. c2 w! j" c0 `* S2 @9 K' s$ b

3 |( [# c' n  p0 Q) ^  J; x* U F 呢個人仲掂，7 y: O& h/ {1 o( Q) R
知道既唔等於要講，8 o* j. K# c' `
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
) ^% t/ |9 y* `& x' b- L我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
" i! A" k! h3 q: K  }  T+ o+ u" ?; w" P. m
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
7 o! y/ D& t6 H4 M6 f始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
) b5 ]$ Y' ?! Z, T& b% ^( a& p4 A: N) v4 i, y) h3 Y4 B: i

6 ~/ F/ G6 ?8 o$ U& H1 [4 z$ e) {# `7 J1 G3 z: p
題外話：( `# C$ f8 S/ Y4 H' c9 S- u
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
: B1 |; F8 a; S) L1 [睇到 S 呢條友，  m/ B& |) A" h/ G
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L7 E. U+ W5 x9 Z' [* f- B0 i
1 e" i# g9 m3 w2 ^" m
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
# N& d$ P. ?/ C; }* v( v5 |F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
" v9 F  [! `2 b% IM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她- h( G( L- ?9 ?) d8 U- G
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
5 V  K! J0 _% g. O& }" c8 N6 H0 hL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...