Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
% }9 X, ?2 x  q+ i4 c6 X9 ~- v
4 {8 Q6 u9 g! O7 r( g# v1 p6 f; i
2 G$ Y! I9 m  k' s  T" G, u) n8 }我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

( [3 W( K7 [4 A# `9 L3 M3 K9 c, T

. c: `1 n- w4 C% ~: N. @In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
+ h* i/ C$ M' l7 k! {  A4 {0 W* ?5 w9 ~2 o6 N

! b+ \. f/ N9 H' [: P: VIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

# ?+ U! c0 [/ t2 K+ U8 d
# s, n3 [* @# B# d6 W
oh really...7 `) F& ?9 I9 g  C% O$ |' r7 Y. u9 d
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
- f0 A  W# E( d+ V& Oi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題9 x. [3 [- q- D

  y3 u: a0 a3 J! ^當然這是個假設性問題
1 W$ `5 H% G' z* W/ m. N- i6 D但將人數倍大
# v8 X1 V- q0 I! d例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
. H* H- U$ J% k4 J" }(情況可以換作其他)3 \* X2 O8 `2 L6 q+ b2 p
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
+ M8 Q! t& S: @) L6 s% |6 }" M如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
+ Y& K! R7 s' x5 P& d" Q* f+ M如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
8 {6 p$ S9 h  b& G& i* m* E# K  q, A4 C絕情谷既問題...
. i. u& u2 w, |' b9 X如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
$ X; ~0 E0 K) Y- u( q+ j如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

( C& i" t3 u6 B
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
  p9 i& o8 N8 `0 M於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
9 z2 y6 b% y" u. G8 y& y8 q但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩" s6 n" ]3 y) X7 `  v$ o; G- F8 y
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
8 g0 t2 h) p6 V! J; ?- u0 Q2 L$ P其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢- M) A) b. y* ~( C( @
2 u& z( q8 t5 R* \
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
; a# b2 |0 z/ V1 P不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
8 w4 u5 U* t" C% N! c8 f- G3 z其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

; E  W4 ^3 s6 S
2 w( @: ^; Z1 n; o# t) h" X) j
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣* i4 b. v+ B2 }, ?/ V
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
# \5 i$ U7 s$ d/ U  y7 I$ c( `5 C+ ~. b3 c* L  g6 N3 d" c
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child& P, g% z8 I% {$ t9 u. Z
yes, my reason is helping more
, N6 q* U9 m$ xfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!& X: N* Q: N5 n9 B+ v* K! m
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child. W; G: U0 _9 Z, T; w
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?- U2 X" M/ R# l, v& @
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!& s7 M# H9 [- |5 C/ Z, f
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!7 Z1 {  Q! R: L& ^( k5 m
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~4 L7 E$ l5 D9 i1 y0 i. U) x3 p" |7 ?
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~9 V5 d3 c1 i- I, L! T  ?7 u* Z
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
+ t% K# W0 X4 X+ R7 O正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
9 t' M. f# b6 t5 B即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
. g3 U8 L* C) `- T1 ~$ V我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~8 \  m- I1 Q5 @9 A& V3 q. u5 I6 y- {
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
6 H7 w( [4 N: ?8 L& F我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）