Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
' X% X9 F: P1 J2 I4 S) _* S' Y4 K  U  J! e* s, F- M7 H

( Y& i( j6 U' G( }" |我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

. L" J5 a8 K' X" ~6 e
. L5 }7 f$ Z/ D/ b' I8 [& h$ x1 E4 Z
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
% l8 t; Y& `/ i( A$ @4 I5 E$ ~; K/ v

9 v' G$ U% m: r1 x5 i% {: GIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

$ X  k# G1 q: B% W) B. i; K
' u) @* f+ n1 m3 W6 U
oh really...$ t1 H* ]" E1 b6 ^- k( x
hahhaa, thx a lot^^") R+ e. X! _- Q5 e& g( j% O2 T9 Z1 E
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
  ~' L. R4 \" b/ R8 C8 T' L1 N+ i: u0 L& u. b; E
當然這是個假設性問題
0 ]* W# i4 t' X但將人數倍大5 A6 w' m2 g: V+ M9 `0 |1 {6 d
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個2 b6 a% r9 H4 U% P# c! r) t2 n
(情況可以換作其他)% G5 f  H7 k  a  ], h. @/ N  `
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
- X4 i  u& L, y9 d. D如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...0 @: a) ~1 s. ?6 ~6 Q9 m
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:( ]9 S+ B* Q: _2 Q% |
絕情谷既問題...
6 n; M+ N# [/ {如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...3 v  l- a* @$ k9 H% t% D- ^
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

/ S; ]  f0 m! ]殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好# [# k* s- r, _1 L  T
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生: ?( a* h/ }+ Q% w9 g+ y
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩7 s  Z& n# W) W  x2 O$ k& i# O
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
5 ]6 O9 i) }% O% ^+ X: |其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢" `2 p/ I, `0 }

8 T. c/ s, c, `/ I/ V* y! R" p我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
5 ]  A: u( @/ [/ |6 E不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:  w9 R) b: [. @9 e$ I9 G
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

+ C! _- @  X7 r0 f
) D  s. O" A2 qhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣8 ]7 M/ Z5 Y. {# J$ T5 V
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
8 _0 k9 [5 |- @
/ m! @. N, |9 J( I) Bp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child" S3 N8 G% I$ O& S6 H
yes, my reason is helping more
) D" _1 k+ z! o0 |for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!) P: w: |0 ~2 f$ v/ t
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child) [9 |. ^$ j6 L& h4 I% h
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?0 g3 a& ]" U2 A  M% l
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!1 N) I* G$ ^+ v& c4 C) g
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
, E- _9 W5 T8 b  k8 M$ e1 c% Qunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~, }' Y! \8 `( ?
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
0 C( u0 J; A9 I3 d5 p: n8 |2 t我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~7 b" Z" M3 z) U! `
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
! u: X8 K! L4 F) h& R6 T即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~5 M" F7 W, f7 e) M
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~; L/ h6 x: Y+ B% ]5 E2 f  {. t
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~# o' M% j( }+ Z! }' F& P
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）