Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:$ t) ?* q3 K+ X# {
. r# ~$ E2 e' ^+ H! g0 f" Z

, x( ?% A1 `# ^  J, n2 R我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

" c0 x) I8 [* c4 b! a
! t/ c" ]6 D: h4 z8 r6 U
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
+ h5 i* t' ?0 c7 |' }" G* m- R5 l. C  b( _, v- S9 Y

' m: h& L1 r4 O6 AIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

+ m: N' I3 Y+ a# L1 S, U" p

6 L7 n( O  b& {; y' r  hoh really...- @  g8 w, @8 ~+ ?
hahhaa, thx a lot^^", u6 x9 W& {* p& n: q4 ]  l' h8 N& z
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題5 t$ \% E: }# J) s, W
2 k1 I* U) ]# \
當然這是個假設性問題
( o* I( S' N$ d但將人數倍大' L# M  V. m. u$ [4 p4 Q( K, v
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個- e3 K0 f: I: }2 D5 I. b* F# y
(情況可以換作其他): d# |0 X! K; `; D
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...! r' L3 |  w; D9 s; i# K
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.../ `4 b# m! {( Q6 d) Z: [: h
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:1 r5 \1 c0 ]( R& y
絕情谷既問題..., n0 n, T5 F% C/ h
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
  J- F; ?. J7 ~' ?# R. c0 q' E如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

0 M  i4 h; `/ g* Q6 l3 s6 f7 q/ ]殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
, c1 N2 H$ W8 x2 P4 ~, @/ _於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
. d8 Q) t" G. Q) B8 C. |9 g但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩. N: h# n& b. Y7 i# o* k
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢1 l- `8 u4 V2 f; Y1 A
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
: `4 K2 w5 n* n8 f0 t! e
- h8 _& W' M) W9 X我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命  g% T( R" p) |, d& u
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
6 X8 S% P& J; v) l! E3 @其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

  b. T  y1 n8 O+ A* ]4 Z
6 z( f5 [6 U4 ~  _. D
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣' @. I* [: p9 b, u$ }/ `' T
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
( X) Z9 r9 h5 Y6 L1 G' Y& L. [+ F6 ?/ x+ Y9 s- M( x- K- W
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child) [0 F+ O' o7 G5 U) V5 J& @3 F
yes, my reason is helping more
0 ?' f0 ^4 \( Q* c% J, U, T5 sfor this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
" _5 Z' T$ ^. w1 Wif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child5 E- b5 v& t  w& M" B
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?' U! T& ?1 L  r0 Q# p
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
9 j; u! h, e5 omay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!6 d  o4 Q) K. F; `
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
4 Z2 [, S/ ]( o0 c. l0 i% Y2 S當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
  n1 h# W0 V  y1 _' A  k$ a我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
4 f1 \- t  T  F+ B# q% d; G正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~5 P! x% D% o% ~8 ], _( S8 g
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
7 C4 I  J3 d9 Y+ U' n' ?. M我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
) k( c  b( Y$ M  k1 I# Z7 D但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
' L0 ?" H0 K! l( I我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）