Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
5 d2 Q" j% `. A* q" a& B
1 y+ s/ v$ m2 R7 r' ?3 w; [/ J0 ~3 F8 p
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

. a* v. t+ L; c: C1 Y8 a' t" x  V) `( {( j* L
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:) @; A& V2 ^  j4 ^, I5 ~
8 @6 k/ U. H8 C, z

* e1 v9 O0 c; K2 PIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

% J$ Q& w! W) v( V9 R1 B+ O5 J) H" }) L( ]$ v" z0 [
oh really...
: J- V' u' Z" a+ yhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
1 l& R- v6 f" U# u' H8 Fi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題- ^. m! \( ^. @- j, {( D8 C0 M+ l

* k- g4 r9 S* a; E" z6 R" c當然這是個假設性問題
1 y, L4 x# O0 y  O0 r但將人數倍大
, {& h/ m0 l: p. k, f% T例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
- X7 F3 w4 X4 j$ ?% F(情況可以換作其他)% m. p* \2 g: N1 @2 S: Z7 ?4 X
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題.../ o) d" v# L! d4 j
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
" e$ c  }$ \. T! j! N& B& @如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:  P+ {& }5 x" K! r# a: T; g
絕情谷既問題...
' H& W* {3 C. U# }2 ^如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 n4 ^" I4 M! A9 C如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

3 Z7 b* ?* c+ g, D$ h9 |0 n- r殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好# ]  s9 H, u) M# C* J4 e
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生' f- h3 e! l/ W
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩) {: i6 P/ z  E+ }
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
8 b% ]" s& ^$ m& A& B4 t* N其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢8 S" ~0 O8 N1 X* ^# V7 A& a$ S
! k; j6 ?" X- n/ N
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
3 |3 O# d4 d( ^不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
$ w4 b; K( I' L7 A其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

8 \. O/ @: ~# E9 ~% ?9 z! [- T- h, J: Y: Y$ T8 o
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣5 G4 V  M2 g7 Y/ `$ o' c
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
% B- l) |) |9 X" _& C- d% n7 V7 W/ i' k0 R- W
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child$ _4 n- K% l& f  {& w
yes, my reason is helping more& b5 \9 E; l  k8 L; l
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
( z) X5 A1 [) p! fif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child% g" h1 v% A. Y7 R1 U5 _- U/ s
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?5 Y  S& p) R- }# S4 w% L- T" L
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!* z* W! N5 y/ A( u
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!) |* X7 R0 n1 T  ?0 }
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~9 f5 @: l% I( p0 c3 o
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~) x% a" [& M" @* Y/ [
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
/ ?; \. g6 B4 l4 P4 @8 P9 ?0 j正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~7 H0 ~* L( o$ I6 V) I9 o
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
9 o; a: O& E0 h! o# s! ]+ V+ ?我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
8 d! V. O: h3 o+ k- L1 H. Z& A但如果o係當時o既情況中~~/ Y. v' V8 W6 n1 a5 @( \
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）