Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:. \) |- J4 t$ \7 u$ H. S
# m# b* t& z8 `: S& W
* ~( i7 H/ U5 U" S6 m/ ~! i- ?) ?
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

% I& T, u# \, a+ S
* ^9 I# a- H6 ^; }% Z+ N0 vIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
1 a. }$ g4 r- ~- }" k
" N$ k0 |% h3 s/ u9 E
7 M1 h; [6 {1 V3 B9 h# Z( AIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

; A5 d/ t8 e+ J+ M; U$ L! m& ~
% F& j$ C. q" e. Y/ A( D) ?oh really...
( ]3 B8 L1 ]# Bhahhaa, thx a lot^^"6 G: C5 z9 V. X) \5 s  A
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題' z! {/ W  K/ f; s4 m! L, u4 x
. f, A1 o; V8 E; |
當然這是個假設性問題  S0 D. x# m: v8 q
但將人數倍大
0 \' Z. s) `: L4 [1 e' U例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個( y2 u+ Q7 w" m$ P
(情況可以換作其他)
% u$ |$ P& W5 W. e- ]. B& N始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...! b& d# }/ O) R
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." `$ |0 X" l9 q8 ~% [
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
, ]+ b+ Y7 l* ?: X2 B絕情谷既問題...
6 b4 i4 e3 h/ G9 g2 M如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...7 |& M# s9 q. p9 T& C
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

8 @6 u6 H  \! C- G: H3 P# j
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好/ K3 N& O8 h0 t7 J1 X- u3 D8 v3 I
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
0 [2 X6 \/ G# `5 O" E( R& N但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩+ L! p; ~8 h4 P: W8 M6 v, C
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
; L# X' f; f9 a+ }! ^9 T. S  S! m其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢5 g0 o) P4 o" x  C6 F& b" Y

) F8 d2 V1 j2 y我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
+ `+ G1 X. w% k不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:7 d1 x! \) K) e) B' X+ k. E) v
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

9 f! F9 j, O4 }8 j8 E2 v7 l- ^
. n* U8 M6 H' l% \9 \4 i+ a1 {
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
  S! E% p0 D  b+ j% r+ V4 u你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
7 t: r& X( W: h
/ Y9 s; C" ^' q! @0 G1 Kp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
4 t2 l2 ]  z1 U; {6 Cyes, my reason is helping more
1 O9 C* |$ x2 D. [) |for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!" x: _) U* Y; Y
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
/ _5 ]* e2 _/ K! w3 Q7 y$ sbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
1 z  ^( O, O: \  Q; T+ Walso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!  `: y3 r' C( z) {* g4 I
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
# i: K4 t! v' h/ zunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~9 V5 \! j* l: T; \8 [" H" z4 C8 @
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
; y8 |! v; @* B* Y5 i我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~. g6 J' Y, ^% R  |
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
, b- q+ R5 F  {+ e/ ~" y/ w- F& b即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
. s8 i# z  E# |我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
9 g" z6 G" u5 g但如果o係當時o既情況中~~9 j$ y& G4 D2 y! }
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）