Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:9 z% O, m1 m3 q' c$ m' }- v5 Z* j& q
& f9 h1 a8 E  H# s: y3 n

; Y8 ?1 h4 f5 Z5 m/ U" J我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

2 p7 {1 _% ], V8 M+ y2 R! j
7 ^2 b" |8 N2 m" r# k- m4 m
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:1 e8 ^+ K2 a* B& ~; k% t. ^3 R

0 p  c% N$ R% g; q0 }; K9 q- O$ i" T4 Z! {. X8 d, b% p" ~" f$ ^. y
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

$ X6 P; q; s+ \: A$ J
) e' [9 V) Y; A: Q  }5 Soh really...- R  F9 y5 l; }- N' z
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"' u4 M9 }# B$ R0 m2 J( U
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
* S+ f5 \' W% M) w% ^& O: W6 W5 ?6 N
當然這是個假設性問題
9 @: I4 t4 E" H- B' u但將人數倍大
# S% n9 [, r: [* O" }例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個3 c2 z# w0 z" u! ~; r4 j
(情況可以換作其他)1 O; w0 C; p0 d7 D) @8 Q  Z2 x
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...2 }& z# Q$ `& I+ P
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...* p3 L  [5 R$ r9 p
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:1 q  q; Z, {  W* M. k9 @# K
絕情谷既問題...- Z" _. }$ ~, z. H; p
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
3 n0 J# w  H+ p5 t4 _如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

: q" |9 K2 Q0 E# G' t" X3 s8 G" W殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
% ~: D. c. _2 Z/ M. l於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
4 }* Q* G1 t7 Z但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
  \* y2 `% ^, ]! l( ]7 ~好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
( \9 }7 [9 |; g# b其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
2 W+ m3 l$ E. K' U, m2 `2 M4 h. ^" h% S  C: M8 D" l! ]0 @- W8 V
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
$ S9 a5 h" O7 N; Z& Q8 m不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:" Y. z& r# c1 O0 t+ R
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

- x* J9 g9 z7 A5 R8 M8 \( Q( X* Q$ H  }3 Z7 H9 X
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
, K' w; p" U4 n+ P9 A4 n! h' Q" v你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....- b/ f' U3 E9 n

, ?+ X# Q; U( Z. N' r( M. Lp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child$ J1 U& f) G) @# K( t* s
yes, my reason is helping more! }6 |4 `7 Q% P# h
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!2 U' Z( A, [. _0 ?6 f' L' e
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child8 v; p& e0 X" Y4 ?: v
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
& e9 Q( a, e9 `* K2 Balso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
$ h5 v+ s  o* l/ Jmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!* i! N* m$ f  F2 }1 u( c+ H
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
! m, T* R: _5 D  l& q! l; ?當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
! u: h2 E/ ]9 K2 Q我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
: ^, `5 I$ ~9 u3 K正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~1 n$ b: S$ k9 P3 V  i$ o* O
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~9 Z9 U" t4 ]2 D4 X9 v
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
; c5 p) |" E0 }5 e但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
2 p$ q8 z( T  |- |我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）