Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:- K) Q  ^& R) e) O! l3 U& r  u" F5 P

6 r, Z  T" j# c6 m  ]  M* v# s' o  J: B  O, P% ^
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

% u5 J6 q. {  J- a/ u8 J

1 _& Q+ `6 j4 H+ M. nIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
$ A, E" q! I, c: X
$ K2 f: t, @: C7 u3 C: G/ ~" r3 d
# {5 J' o1 R9 k$ K4 i3 W3 S  zIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

( G( V2 K4 j. d9 J  d
6 ^  ]  m# D4 ^2 H& J' uoh really...
1 e! M- X6 k- w! E7 q" k2 B4 R! zhahhaa, thx a lot^^"8 T6 @& W$ h& k. C& D8 d- w- D
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
% l5 t9 X- A; K6 w  w; F/ l; ~/ I' F$ x' ]9 U& _
當然這是個假設性問題
: P, z7 Q  G, e4 w  F但將人數倍大
, k! c, ^2 H1 I0 ~8 p, n例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
* I5 t% x; ]1 `(情況可以換作其他)
! |& a1 q9 z8 z7 f  x1 D8 o始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...6 H* l" @" x4 X; h6 T
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢.../ w( Y, _: T: X1 c
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
8 K  n- W* W7 N4 G& e2 `1 [絕情谷既問題...2 T+ F; h8 a3 X# j% Y7 x
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...2 B) R5 m: i/ D$ l, v% a
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

* Y, R, s4 f% h5 X- u7 r7 G1 y
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好8 Z# ?& v  W3 O/ `/ V
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生  N/ ?7 C0 H. C7 T% A, T
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩* p, X4 ~$ o. Z" Z2 F; b; q0 S
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
+ H  o9 D! ^) t; N- _其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢: D/ q2 x3 ^1 A) Y
1 }5 M- o% W1 |* `: h$ a
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
( [( B8 e1 O* |$ y0 `2 C8 A* `不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:+ q9 a1 D0 \+ J
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

9 |) q% f: G1 V  E: j8 O0 K3 c

. g, ^% j$ N& a! l$ s1 I  Nhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣+ T5 u# g3 R0 [2 s" v$ g# G
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....2 {. u1 F  B- ?, V
5 k% O  {5 I" [1 X5 e2 f. h
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
) z( \# ]0 \! x  i) Eyes, my reason is helping more5 W. w8 ?0 d: F2 I! R
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
7 N* M6 N1 |8 l& v* ^  q' F0 {* Fif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
& ]/ I/ e! n9 f. ?( jbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?9 D* o' N) B* a' i4 y3 n
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!* s  d8 [7 Y8 D/ g5 o( i
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
) K, n) U5 L& y* X4 {under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~9 ~. K: _$ D4 L) v6 P5 y4 R
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~5 |+ [5 X* Y- i
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
/ N# e2 y$ }: b( f( Z正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~/ [! k+ e' B  A' r/ ~2 E; R
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~6 t6 e  P& x; S4 N
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~3 A0 v- {3 u/ n8 r3 L# N, k4 I% @
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~3 ]* _5 H& I' n9 D
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）