Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
) W8 s1 Y/ `' J& \
  H( m/ N( A7 j+ ~0 q7 @
2 a1 F: R8 K/ b+ p我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

; I; M- m$ Z4 R8 K8 ~5 m3 Z# y: C2 {8 u; r: t" w( c) Y; f! v+ E
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
! X, w( n3 V  a" H* ^( ^; I7 U$ x
# f* U& @' ?: q9 }7 {$ y( T
2 _7 \" m" A0 U8 A# W8 xIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

% {* Y6 ~% M7 z

- q+ l2 E+ b. l7 {oh really..." ~$ N# u4 Z0 l; p* G1 F& D
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"4 J; E- M: c3 s  A6 t1 W$ {* i8 `$ o
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
  H! L! l( a1 G( b$ w4 h, F, o- e( X6 M' y0 G# v( {
當然這是個假設性問題
* d. i% b. z6 N4 |5 a8 @但將人數倍大0 h( z) {8 L5 J. y
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
4 @$ q7 c/ N& z1 B7 i; }) k(情況可以換作其他)$ y1 M& u4 ]1 Q, w+ w7 C
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題..., A7 H+ x& U; v' X& B
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
+ S$ @3 ]* f3 Z2 R7 r如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
5 @* j$ J; w, P, K1 A  S' f絕情谷既問題...& D2 ?/ r" s4 R1 D" l) G* w4 N$ Q, B
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...1 D6 S8 Q) W, P9 {* D8 R
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

. V9 l7 G5 o: P2 N, z
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好1 e" H7 e/ K2 u- f! g
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
1 b2 [* F3 w2 C8 @9 Q" M' s但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
- A/ S3 ]! ?4 X% u. ~! [3 o好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢9 U$ k* _; Q0 j0 `$ m
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
( _; c& C- R+ Q& r" P3 v% P- _% }5 x* U" i0 k) b& R! g; ~$ f
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
# K( C0 \$ D# }1 D8 W- z* D$ {6 y% T5 P不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:, ~  Z2 s; j) P, _6 j
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

1 {2 \3 h1 E% x0 c
0 X# x4 u: W) a( Zhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
& S8 o8 ]4 E# `/ r$ R你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
( Y$ R  i5 U0 e* V9 ~) E
* w4 L) m8 Q, Z; X! A( Cp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
$ ]+ {" [# ]/ W' _$ }yes, my reason is helping more1 Q6 v1 W% X! L- o6 L! J
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!+ Q& |! Q: a1 K3 j
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
* e& C1 s. |9 t3 F  f0 B1 D% Bbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?+ |" g1 I2 T# H' V" ^
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!( b3 ?; b. k7 W3 ^' m* e
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
+ v& }0 ?* P6 d* I3 Qunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~- _0 j& c7 U5 Y$ |' p- A5 n% p0 S
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
# e# B! Z. {  x我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~  z1 C% b$ J+ x, @) ~( n
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~/ ^$ ~9 @' S* a5 I7 K+ P) Y
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
# k* O% b" Z, m- d# z* \2 |2 f( ?4 @- v我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
& c2 p7 e" }, g0 x$ Z' ~/ y' [+ c( r但如果o係當時o既情況中~~' U3 ~  v' P6 `- Q; e9 ^( ^3 y7 o* ^
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）