Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:% z% Q9 e  B( Q' H" Y% Q
" W. U3 X( B4 ]& ^: s8 U( a
9 V& y5 j& s) d+ P# z% ?
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

( r2 y. Z7 _' c0 s; d  H6 h0 J1 x
+ G  J- ]' P# Z$ X7 u- ^
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:# G  o8 L! Q) g! L  H* O9 M
0 l0 V0 ?4 z0 X" f" C- t& Q0 c
5 C0 e) f) _; b; @
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

8 O) x- q9 Y. F) m! N; D6 m$ g. K' n' M$ ~4 e
oh really...' b  r3 G' D2 ^' i
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"2 Y% [: r% A3 c# k+ r4 z( I8 ]4 C) G
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題* O* c7 n: L7 z! Z* e# G

1 q+ M6 C3 a! K% d- R5 r; N當然這是個假設性問題* Q+ y% Y, K# a: W/ R
但將人數倍大
. ?- A% g) F, [例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
- z& q$ \+ A! i% L" w% e  e9 F(情況可以換作其他)0 U  W! L2 s8 V
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
% _: `7 v) A* c% H0 t& [' S如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
! G! W* ~5 @2 p4 ?7 R如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
- G: A# P1 e  _' X6 r, U絕情谷既問題...) {8 E$ o- A( d9 ?+ ^- x8 [* A- e
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...% {, \; r  [' o) t& f& l7 L% ^: Q
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

3 e* F+ `1 F- x
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
+ p; V  a! F! ?9 k2 s於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生4 s1 s0 L; ]; S
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
! e, l, j0 M2 M: u好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
' }: h9 K" `7 \  G! S" V2 ]- q, E其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
5 @. a: s0 C  k8 H1 `0 g1 y- O2 v0 i
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命( S3 F: A* B& ]& A/ d
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
& w: Y# ~* a3 f0 {0 d% U其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

0 j' r9 ?1 o" |. a+ X. x9 u1 ?" y9 `  L% y8 }1 B! \% S
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
9 g5 a; u1 Z+ U  R4 Y2 V你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....+ S  j  n# a+ \3 e7 i
1 W" e% H- l+ H3 u
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
2 E3 i' ]1 d. }' e. |. Nyes, my reason is helping more# f9 h6 m; q) D3 ?) \
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!/ t; L6 v& b6 v# i
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child! t! ]4 y  k6 b0 Y
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?3 x: g6 d3 Y& o% ^/ M5 b
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
. O, }  q; F) zmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!# f$ w3 w$ Z- w" W5 n- P
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
& V3 R1 m; W7 X: I" m1 T1 [0 B# \1 }$ h當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~5 t6 [1 G4 L) w- m- ^7 l0 `4 c
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~" x+ w; |' H. {$ c. |5 H, U9 t  t( w
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~) }5 n; L( ^' S% X6 T- V; ^
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
) s0 p1 f$ V5 K- g. x我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~7 ]* n# I* d1 X: O
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~$ ]3 h4 S* c0 v2 N
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）