vivienna

Originally posted by 28083003 at 2005-6-18 01:07 AM:
# R* C3 [* y# \6 N% F1 Z& x+ Y反轉黎諗; D' C) O0 V% l0 \7 a
ps2之所以o係香港咁流行就因為有翻版3 d$ \5 |+ o6 ]4 \' n. a
你睇下DC,X-box5 {& T% W1 w6 p9 f) H( K
同ps2 o既機o既銷售量真係無得比2 O2 a0 ]5 T" O( |# _2 g( M% h
你估ps2無老翻會唔會有咁多人買呢??

; t  }% O  y7 F! x2 R
講中曬!!!, l3 I4 I9 n8 X# A
2 ]- Y3 ]/ `9 E! T( q( u# U; i5 D- T
仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。
; L, {- F) x4 q; U4 G- H. ?9 M3 x
& t+ n* u5 m% x, d6 ?% T6 ^講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

bodycharge

物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行改車先算犯法.  同樣道理, 改機, 無錯, intension係要玩老番(但係仲未玩喎), 但係就算依家連買老番都算犯法的話, 政府大不了只可捉用改機來玩老番(如果真的立了法). 改機呢個行為, 又點可以算犯法呢?  明唔明呢??

vivienna

Originally posted by bodycharge at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:( Y. ?  |4 c$ ?% V. ~% V- ^$ \* c4 O
物就係囉. 改車唔犯法, 只有係條路行...

- E. R- t+ z9 ^2 G
o甘政府當初立法嚴禁運毒咪立錯左囉﹖話曬都未販賣﹖又未用﹖$ c. l( N2 @7 \% ?$ {( c+ R

1 c8 }; ~1 i: x  {( l2 f4 I. s要斷米路﹐政府就係要甘絕﹐條條路都要封斷曬。

bodycharge

哩個例子, 即係: 毒品=老番.  針筒=PS機.  政府唔可以禁針筒喎.  如果係咁, 全區碼DVD機都唔可以賣啦.

細驚

針筒應該係等同改左機既ps2
! [& G$ g% U2 w% V4 y5 Y) V  }' m' Q
其實政府今次立法原意係岩
0 z8 P, N. a3 E3 c但正如bodycharge兄咁講, 改左機, 但未玩翻版, 唔算有損版權) s6 p9 B. G& Z# R
唔可以用販毒唻比喻 而且部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管1 U  ]9 Q* ?3 H% T
& f) R  `4 O' F, G# N3 J' b
另外, 政府咁搞係好心做壞事+ M/ U; p" P2 ~3 C; Q/ A3 x9 x* K
一個唔該令sony賺少左硬件既錢
/ ^) c* w& t* F6 J1 `! Z眾所周知% K0 ?$ L' K' Y. ^, p% s
ps2咁好賣, 同之前ps, gb, gba一樣原因 有翻版
& `( I- J1 f2 P佢假如真係立法成功 相信唔會再有咩人買ps20 Y, u* e+ p: V5 Y% L  c7 l, V7 g" @
到時希望真係正版軟件可以支持到佢地香港分公司既運作

abc123aa

Originally posted by vivienna at 2005-6-18 01:12 AM:
$ l. b6 d, u" v9 O: b+ I" `
) e4 h* \+ I: o3 u7 b& J2 t* m3 W講中曬!!!& Q( G, G+ A4 s, k0 ^

( K6 t) l8 z; o仲有GAME貴跟本唔係籍口﹐寫GAME果班人都要食飯。6 |2 F3 R+ v4 @7 ~: @3 Z

# Z2 R. H7 ?' V5 U; q" h) {! T7 z3 m講來講去﹐又係講知識產權尼樣野。

9 q* ~9 j! r7 \7 U* I2 r; l對~我得好少 game,因為冇咩錢,但係我唔會買翻版,因為都唔知玩唔玩整既,加上正版game畫面都靚d啦~
+ @% Y. F' l% d
0 Z! M5 h, }) t- Hps2要睇vcd果d野買多一條唔知咩線就得

waterfire

唔係翻版, 點會有咁多人買...
$ Z& I- }2 f: b4 N4 J其實最簡單一樣野
5 z* G8 S. r; k/ _正版好似翻版咁平7 u% s. d1 x1 S/ d4 _6 T
或者, 香港人個個好有錢, 買正版game 好似食餐飯咁
5 \; R8 g0 R( a7 d1 A咁就可以解決問題la

sheraton

I think PS2 piracy should not be an immediate concern to HK Gov't, who cares when we're only stealing, pirating, copying Japanese/American developed products?  Japanese "adapted" many Chinese culture and called it their own, who's going to pay us back for that?4 Z9 ^5 d9 G3 Z( n/ j
5 h4 W- b4 r- e: E$ a
But I agree, Copyrights should be supported if it's on HK developed products like Movies and Music.  Coz HK, we should care, I could care less about Japan

bigg

我覺得唔可以apply毒品呢個例子  W0 Q  v+ K% g  n8 x
因為你本身藏有大量毒品已經犯法, 咁你運毒就一定犯法啦,
% V3 A# s8 s3 D6 `& o但ps2本身係合法既, 咁我買左番黎點改係我既事, 唔通我將部ps2放落屎坑都話我犯法' J4 l( P9 B, i- _
我覺得政府應該係立例加重賣老翻既刑罰, 等佢地覺得冇錢賺就唔會賣
5 c0 ^6 c2 r7 n7 x再講而家d人都用bt download game落ps2玩, 立呢條例都冇咩用

Miz

我就覺得係關..
- m( ?! {; E; g& q改機既用途7 K! a5 g) q  C. I! C
如果改機既用途一定係用黎玩老番 so先要改既咁就可能會犯法囉. _8 e0 t+ T# g/ v
政府咁做都係想阻止d人玩老番啫(其實邊阻到架)...冇做錯架~
' t1 m* Z4 n* D- i2 ]) c4 c我亦同意樓上話..『部機係我既 我想點搞佢邊到人管』