艾力克

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2005-12-3 10:49 AM:


parker just giv u two catergoreys....pts , assists ... these players hav less value compare to ppl like Ginobili / cassell who can do more than just pts/ assists

俾我揀我會揀 parker
用佢黎 trade 人都可以換倒個勁d o既返黎

eg. r. wallace --> anthony --> b. miller
s. jackson --> hughes
randolph --> webber

所以雖然清揚講o既野係岩,但名氣都係好重要 (esp trade人時)
換人就要換一個比之前好
如果你keep住用當然冇問題
但如果你第時會trade走o既, 相信parker會多d人想要

Xtravagant

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2005-12-3 11:03 AM:

俾我揀我會揀 parker
用佢黎 trade...

有道理bor

自從S.Jackson 換 Hughes 之後。 我add人都謹慎好多。

可以話無令我失望. D. Williams, Frye, Dalembert, Szerbiak...等等

[ Last edited by Xtravagant on 2005-12-3 at 11:11 AM ]

艾力克

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2005-12-3 11:07 AM:


有道理bor

自從S.Jackson ...

放走左 Dalembert 兩次...
今次有d睇漏眼~
d防守力真係幾好

我想trade o既話可以點?
我正需要佢o既 reb 同 blk

fantesticming05

Originally posted by Xtravagant at 2005-12-3 10:47 AM:


ok la
2 for 2 la

Illgauskas + JJ for
Randolph + Wells ?

yup ~

fantesticming05

好, 交易左啦 ~

不過本人都仲係放緊 T.Parker ~
有興趣既請講 ~

艾力克

Originally posted by fantesticming05 at 2005-12-3 12:33 PM:
好, 交易左啦 ~

不過本人都仲係放緊 T.Parker ~
有興趣既請講 ~

it seems u are the better side of this trade

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2005-12-3 12:38 PM:

it seems u are the better side of this trade

都係咁上下, 你睇下今場JJ幾強先得嫁 ~

艾力克

Originally posted by fantesticming05 at 2005-12-3 12:43 PM:


都係咁上下, 你睇下今場JJ幾強先得嫁 ~

一場唔代表一季
Randolph + Wells 夠穩定,有水準; 前者得分+reb; 後者全面

fantesticming05

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2005-12-3 12:46 PM:

一場唔代表一季
Randolph + Wells 夠穩定,有水準; 前者得分+reb; 後者全面

睇你點諗 law ~
JJ 係主力黎呢 ~

T.Parker 有冇興趣換 ?

艾力克

Originally posted by fantesticming05 at 2005-12-3 12:50 PM:


睇你點諗 law ~
JJ 係主力黎呢 ~

T.Parker 有冇興趣換 ?

冇
已夠 pg 用

wells 就有興趣

Randolph + Wells 夠係主力