nashisthebestpg

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2006-4-10 06:15 PM:

係ar，而且我唔想佢多人幾個就退休～

我諗kidd都係打多2,3季就退休~
now都好似33歲lu, 老多一,兩歲唔知仲可唔可以咁全能呢?

甘國武

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-4-10 06:17 PM:

我諗kidd都係打多2,3季就退休~
now都好似33歲lu, 老多一,兩歲唔知仲可唔可以咁全能呢?

地板型控衛壽命都好長架，如助攻榜一、二位的史托頓、馬積遜～

nashisthebestpg

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2006-4-10 06:21 PM:

地板型控衛壽命都好長架，如助攻榜一、二位的史托頓、馬積遜～

but kidd ge投射能力唔多好,
老左ge得分能力就弱左好多la~
張丕德估計過nash 的籃球壽命應該長過kidd,因為nash射波好準~

甘國武

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-4-10 06:24 PM:

but kidd ge投射能力唔多好,
老左ge得分能力就弱左好多la~
張丕德估計過nash 的籃球壽命應該長過kidd,因為nash射波好準~

kidd得分能力，係走位同靠團隊互相拉空既！
仲有，我都唔信nash的籃球壽命長過kidd！！！

nashisthebestpg

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2006-4-10 06:27 PM:

kidd得分能力，係走位同靠團隊互相拉空既！
仲有，我都唔信nash的籃球壽命長過kidd！！！

點解呢?

甘國武

Originally posted by nashisthebestpg at 2006-4-10 06:28 PM:

點解呢?

因碰撞比kidd多～

kgkgkg212121

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2006-4-10 06:21 PM:

地板型控衛壽命都好長架，如助攻榜一、二位的史托頓、馬積遜～

係ar~因為唔會打d太過體能化ge波, 相對地唔會用太多體力去打

Kian76

Originally posted by kgkgkg212121 at 2006-4-10 08:19 PM:

係ar~因為唔會打d太過體能化ge波, 相對地唔會用太多體力去打

單單係唔使不斷跑、入楔、突破就己經至少節省近一半既體力啦！！

Kian76

Originally posted by 甘國武 at 2006-4-10 06:27 PM:

kidd得分能力，係走位同靠團隊互相拉空既！
仲有，我都唔信nash的籃球壽命長過kidd！！！

拿殊點會長過傑特呀？？佢經常要作個人突破，而且佢靠既好多係快攻，身體又唔係話大隻，唔似傑特，再加埋而家既佢失誤己經多，控球己經唔算好穩，老左之後仲會更蝦碌。

nashisthebestpg

Originally posted by Kian76 at 2006-4-10 08:33 PM:


拿殊點會長過傑特呀？？佢經常要...

講得都啱wo,將攻擊力與壽命撈埋黎講tim....
咁如果話nash ge攻擊力唔會因年紀上升而大幅下降,
因佢主要得分來源係射波,咁有無問題?