Triangel

原帖由 Lee3 於 2008-10-12 11:19 AM 發表:


not enough people in the government know how the economy  works, neither does Paulson and  Bernanke, evidently by their actions. So we've just burned 700billion, well filter-038, how many 700 billio ...

不要問,只要信~
Sound Stupid....
但每個 investor 都懷著呢六個字去做, 不出半年,問題便可解決!

Lee3

i cant believe 聯合銀行 is still holding up. My accounts are there, dont know if you've heard of it.

Triangel

原帖由 ktwu2005 於 2008-10-12 11:21 AM 發表:

不如使幾百蚊去叫雞

幾百蚊d雞就吾好叫啦,  哂精子

Triangel

原帖由 Lee3 於 2008-10-12 11:27 AM 發表:
i cant believe 聯合銀行 is still holding up. My accounts are there, dont know if you've heard of it.

Boydwan 可能知!

Triangel

原帖由 Lee3 於 2008-10-12 11:25 AM 發表:


first of all, those we caused this mess are pretty much bankrupt. Second of all, Congress is their  friend. Congress is the people who are helping them. I would've done with the UK is doing, use the ...

Quoted....
"The $700 billion package will help the Treasury Department to use a variety of measures to help bank (sic) rebuild capital - including buying or insuring troubled assets and purchasing equity of financial institutions. The Department will implement measures that have maximum impact as quickly as possible. Seven hundred billion dollars is a significant amount of money. And as we act, we will do it in a way that is effective.
The plan we are executing is aggressive. It is the right plan. It will take time to have its full impact. It is flexible enough to adapt as the situation changes. And it is big enough to work."

Lee3

原帖由 Triangel 於 2008-10-12 11:25 AM 發表:


不要問,只要信~
Sound Stupid....
但每個 investor 都懷著呢六個字去做, 不出半年,問題便可解決!

To KNOW and to believe, you can be forgiven.
To NOT KNOW and to believe, you are blind.

Lee3

原帖由 Triangel 於 2008-10-12 11:38 AM 發表:



Quoted....
"The $700 billion package will help the Treasury Department to use a variety of measures to help bank (sic) rebuild capital - including buying or insuring troubled assets and purchasin ...

How do they justify it. There is no justification to it. All they say is "this is a whole hell lot of money, just believe us" This is why there is market panic. They are not coming out saying "this is what we are going to do, this is how it's done" They're just saying "We believe it is right, and therefore it MUST be right and it will be right" They are using very very vague terms to cover up their incompetency.

Lee3

原帖由 Triangel 於 2008-10-12 11:31 AM 發表:


Boydwan 可能知!

yea but he's not here

Triangel

原帖由 Lee3 於 2008-10-12 11:42 AM 發表:


To KNOW and to believe, you can be forgiven.
To NOT KNOW and to believe, you are blind.

To KNOW or To NOT KNOW  are the lower level of 不要問,只要信~

Lee3

原帖由 Triangel 於 2008-10-12 12:04 PM 發表:


To KNOW or To NOT KNOW  are the lower level of 不要問,只要信~

Well that's one way of thinking, unless you know about philosophical skepticism. In order to know things, we must first observe them. Observations can be done personally or by proxy, through books or tv or hearsay. The problem with that is, it relies on physical senses, and it is too easily tricked. How do we know that our brains are not in a little tiny vat that's constantly stimulating us?

Of course, KNOWING also means that we have a belief in something and it is justified. It does not mean we are RIGHT. There is a difference between right and knowing. In order to know something, we must believe in it, that's it. In order to be right, it must be proven right, and the tricky part is, can something be always right? That's a hard question, something may be right let's say 100 years ago, and then heck, technology advances, and whatever "it" is, it is no longer right.

Somethings are more readily acceptable to be right, such as 1+1=2, that's right. However, if you go around telling people about the string theory, people might go "wtf?"