<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)& M& O( D3 ~9 X
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
% n7 k( ^, K/ U大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
6 z8 a6 W! q" A0 ?
I agree you points that it could be illegal
; Y, v  T0 M: v' Y/ {" ^  \but that is still a "gray area"7 R+ d" u' M& A/ s* f
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair* l; h! K( y2 p1 p- V
& Q6 @& w, H: z- d# f/ Q9 |
anyway, I want to say that is3 B) l. {, A) y3 A5 ]9 ]
who is supposed to be protected by laws: l% Y! y5 n* T+ ^- X+ h, W
creators?
. l8 b& n6 Q8 h8 ^2 ^but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
6 ~$ S2 Y8 g3 r. E6 P, Jlet's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
& ~5 F* T1 X6 h0 g# H  Q0 w: N( Gwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those$ N; e9 o$ b' _% ]
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:9 @7 }) x) m+ X3 P+ o5 ?& P5 ^2 A  ]
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
  I( J" ~7 J9 u. [- G* p我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:6 [9 [3 y! d) N3 }* r/ W* H* j

/ g) h5 T& E" h2 H8 {5 G我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
; T( _9 \8 P$ h/ C' o1 a, o/ |唔係喎!# y# F* q$ }' q( a. P$ a9 E
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
) h1 G# s0 w4 i我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
" s+ f2 h# k6 v5 l4 e佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
( |' z  c: C6 O6 A5 o! }7 `就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事3 |. H: o! \- q* g
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!% _* `- X  g# g# s/ w" t4 [- c
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
2 v& C6 k; D$ m! b6 ~5 T! D+ M9 sif so bad, dun download la, right?2 u% @+ [  `! N  Y; J
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
0 i# _. B- O% t/ Z  }/ J; d: s: j" Lbut for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct) V; T, ~1 e, @4 k2 Y8 o6 c% I( _0 ?
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la" F2 ?2 I' s4 W  y8 o; o/ u
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society8 N+ S# E* B7 t* H
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
5 Z5 e1 s& a9 ?% z1 h% Ewhy not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
3 Q7 r% x2 D; \so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
4 H0 m* k1 e$ l佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
3 L8 G5 c6 \, P+ ~# }政府想比下馬威0的人~~' V# G( C" c8 _( ?! e3 T8 ~
錢就一定罰
; b8 T* S; C) P4 f未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,. Y( j2 D; C; [; K9 Q% o
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
- H! S1 X7 a' v: _: L0 v佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?+ l- o/ P! F& ^# u6 K% c/ u
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。