<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]
返回列表 回復 發帖
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)1 p7 x: \  D! ~/ w* @
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
能忍不計心胸闊,悅盡人情眼界寬
Originally posted by 短毛 at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:9 S  }) `9 l$ k' M
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ...
9 o, a, p# P: B' ^* q8 T  q  Y2 I
I agree you points that it could be illegal
; p3 L) I( b- d6 Hbut that is still a "gray area"
' `2 a" ^, d4 `5 I9 _: x/ awhoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair" @7 L: l0 [( T' M$ m+ [, w( P
- Y. E6 M* r2 t8 }# m9 G' J' B
anyway, I want to say that is; N: s7 `9 [" i5 `& J
who is supposed to be protected by laws5 Z( E8 k0 E+ Z8 N
creators?
. L3 b: V9 T+ H+ Cbut I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market/ ^: h& ?* }% S, {9 r
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
* Z5 G3 O5 Y8 bwhen we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those( \3 A3 E' U7 [- B
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
Originally posted by dogson009 at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
* m7 J$ o" Q" @) _其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.=
9 X0 s+ }1 n  r& @我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
Originally posted by junob04 at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:" }- m, x. F' J, w) s+ z) m

+ P" U: ^' h. i我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
! M/ q# B& Q+ a" Y+ m& C" q" S唔係喎!; ?8 t8 V' _# a/ G0 O0 Z' j
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!3 J1 K+ v+ _' z# x$ y$ }1 P8 r( Y( A5 U
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
2 F# H# [3 J) r: F; X7 F7 q佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
6 o' A* e3 \8 ~$ J$ C就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
希望佢無事' T" P5 R, \) Q* p
一有先例以後就死嚕
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
* Q0 c  P  _3 ?+ B0 v0 T: j! ldun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face......." j2 ^& x- n! r/ V! I% Q
if so bad, dun download la, right?! J3 K1 W. c, R" Y) h: I0 {
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^# c! ?3 P7 z2 S& J
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
! f0 [+ z$ r3 x4 H5 h% Kno need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la9 a) H9 r8 B+ y4 Z/ U
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society% Z5 a! w8 F0 ~' z; P
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........4 f# w- [5 I# a' s& _
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!$ C/ W0 `! Y: P- Z4 h7 R
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
jason
罰款,冇留案底!
1 F' G8 v" b9 {5 E3 m2 ?; E佢又唔係殺人放火~~~* {/ K3 b* \' O9 U! z" S5 Z! A
政府想比下馬威0的人~~- v8 ]& N0 J4 a2 j! ~, }! p9 j
錢就一定罰
+ H( W8 u! D- w未必要坐牢~~
如果真係判佢有罪,
7 i& j; V2 Q6 f9 `唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?# }* ]) [& z7 a, U6 X
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?: O: U6 m8 E! L
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
冇事!!!!!:cool:
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5]

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。