abc123aa

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-6 07:31 PM:

可能講波佬呃飯食吧。

係呀

abc123aa

Originally posted by brightlee at 2005-10-6 07:30 PM:
I remember when I was watching this...

你係唔係話果度既講波佬話明顯係越位???
咁球証同利物浦班職球員都幾好野下.....

bigfish

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-6 07:08 PM:

咁如果真係冇第二位球員既話點解唔吹越位同唔投訴呢???
既然你老豆咁醒目知道既,點解d講波佬唔知既
睇黎d講波佬要讀下d球例

先多謝你讚家嚴, 佢解釋呢條例俾我係因為當時正進行 90 世界盃, 有個類似咁o既情況, 我記得當時d 講波佬都有講過 (唔知係咪陳譚)
呢d 係普通球例, 我意思係話知道條例都冇咩大不了, 而且所有球證一定會知 (因為有會員話呢個情況 - 龍門前過兩個後衛 - 比較少見, 連球證都未必知)
反而講波佬我覺得未必會知, 因為佢地真係冇讀過d 球例, 而且出錯o既機會都幾多, 千祈唔好當佢地係權威就得 la

wer

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-6 19:31:

可能講波佬呃飯食吧。

帶到氣氛就得

abc123aa

Originally posted by bigfish at 2005-10-6 07:59 PM:
先多謝你讚家嚴, 佢解釋呢條例俾我係因為當時正進行 90 世界盃, 有個類似咁o既情況, 我記得當時d 講波佬都有講過 (唔知係咪陳譚)
呢d 係普通球例, 我意思係話知道條例都冇咩大不了, 而且所有球證一定會知 (因為有會員話呢個情況 - 龍門前過兩個後衛 - 比較少見, 連球證都未必知)
反而講波佬我覺得未必會知, 因為佢地真係冇讀過d 球例, 而且出錯o既機會都幾多, 千祈唔好當佢地係權威就得 la

唔洗客氣
我同意你講唔好當d講波佬係權威呢個論點
依家既情況係如果真係冇第二個球員係前過祖高爾既話,啫係越位啦,
因為希比亞既角色變左係龍門,同普通單刀越位既道理一樣,
我見有時呢d通常球証都唔吹越位,所以我唔知球証知唔知呢條例,但應該會知囉
可能真係比較少見同埋可能冇咩案例參考,其實呢球同謝列美入果球一樣,只不過係謝列美後上咁解

唔知紅字果度講得啱唔啱呢,唔啱既話指教下

abc123aa

Originally posted by wer at 2005-10-6 08:01 PM:

帶到氣氛就得

基本上講解到場波就ok
如果場波係馬啟仁講既話佢可能知,因為之前亨利快開罰球佢都講到出黎係咩事

bigfish

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-10-6 08:03 PM:

唔洗客氣
我同意你講唔好當d講波...

其實我覺得呢球波真係冇越到位, 因為真係有兩個球員 (希比亞加埋另一個後衛)o係祖高爾前面 when 杜奧巴射門一刻
我都好肯定球證係百分之一百清楚呢條例o既運作, 睇唔睇到就靠對眼, 同對球例認知無關

艾力克

係咪即係攻方射門時,如果前過對方兩個守衛時,就等於offside呀?

ciger

Originally posted by shaqkobe at 2005-10-6 19:31:

可能講波佬呃飯食吧。

我要為班講波佬申冤,當晚有一個講波佬係有講過這個問題,我親耳聽到,至於球證唔吹有可能係佢認為當時另一個防守球員(唔係希比亞)同祖高爾平排,事實上真係好近,我地都要慢鏡先睇到,球證可能睇錯

bigfish

Originally posted by 艾力克 at 2005-10-6 10:16 PM:
係咪即係攻方射門時,如果前過對方兩個守衛時,就等於offside呀?

非也, 係某球員傳球時, 接應o既隊友前面 or 平排o既守方球員少於兩名就構成越位