night

賣走owen拿.


haha講笑

ciger

Originally posted by SEEK at 2005-9-14 14:04:
皇馬攪攪下仲衰過上年,咁快已經輸左兩場,再係咁我都驚皇馬會一年衰過一年!

隨住施丹,朗拿度年齡越大,皇馬就越衰

wer

皇馬後備不夠
是死因

abc123aa

Originally posted by ciger at 2005-9-14 02:05 PM:

隨住施丹,朗拿度年齡越大,皇馬就越衰

不過佢地依家對皇馬既影響力真係幾大= ="

abc123aa

Originally posted by wer at 2005-9-14 04:19 PM:
皇馬後備不夠
是死因

對,平時施丹同大哨出到起碼魯爾或者羅賓奴會有後備,但係依家呢..........= ="

清揚

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-14 17:51:

對,平時施丹同大哨出到起碼魯爾或者羅賓奴會有後備,但係依家呢..........= ="

其實所有野都系皇馬自己攞黎衰,乜鬼一年一星丫,星出個禍來,由天上的繁星變成海底的海星.

abc123aa

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-9-14 05:54 PM:

其實所有野都系皇馬自己攞黎衰,乜鬼一年一星丫,星出個禍來,由天上的繁星變成海底的海星.

係佢唔識買啫,買d年紀有返咁上下既球星........

清揚

Originally posted by abc123aa at 2005-9-14 17:55:

係佢唔識買啫,買d年紀有返咁上下既球星........

買碧咸、施丹實屬不智

abc123aa

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-9-14 05:56 PM:

買碧咸、施丹實屬不智

其實佢地買既時候都係各球星既黃金年齡,不過佢估唔到既係大哨退化得咁快啫,再加上隊中一班後備殺手相繼唔掂及被賣走,例如:古迪,摩連迪斯同埋樸迪路,如果搵到人代替施丹個位同做到施丹做到既野既話,皇馬根本上唔會咁差~

ciger

Originally posted by 清揚 at 2005-9-14 17:56:

買碧咸、施丹實屬不智

買碧咸、施丹唔係不智,施丹作用好大,佢初加盟時就幫皇馬羸歐聯,而碧咸商業價值高買佢唔係不智,不過用佢做主力就係不智,碧咸加盟兩季皇馬都四大皆空,如果為佢同隊友未夾就多餘嘅,兩季都未有默契,根本就係風格唔同,好難有火花,而且當初為左出佢施丹同費高所以唔要馬基利尼係另一錯處,搵佢打防中導致防守力不足,打返右邊時已經賣左馬基利尼,搞到兩頭唔到岸,依兩季都一路為防守煩惱