<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學
返回列表 回復 發帖
Originally posted by nightmare at 2005-4-7 14:04:
+ R( g% I( }( ]% N, S1 ^好鬼正呀....哈哈哈"""
: ]& B. `+ y2 A, M; M支持!!!
. b5 ^( t& n- f4 G
, ~  i' X& v6 L4 j
so do I!!!
9 R( K+ Y) Q  p/ B0 LI agree what you write...+ g% y: `. O8 k$ O5 B
time, experience, will tell ....
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!

衪對事物的定義和我們的截然不同... not necessary

「如果衪對事物的定義和我們的截然不同,衪也可能對其他的事物有著和我們不同的看法。衪可能對永賞、永生等都有自己的一套看法。你在天堂的永生可能只有一年,也可能是一千年的折磨。上帝可以說,衪有自己一套包括痛苦折磨的定義。」 ...2 g+ U/ U( @" L( \
1 v' Z  D6 w. t4 w. X
If people are created in God's image (his DNA ??) , our view of good ,evil and suffering can't be that far apart from God's view. He is not THAT unpredictible.
( C1 A0 S8 N5 P5 s5 ]* w9 P. V* [; S( E: h
[ Last edited by sk on 2005-4-7 at 12:39 PM ]
掂wo~~~~~~~~~~~!!!
TO sk﹕2 P; Z+ d* I- n( m: y
NO OFFENCE : d6 n$ E/ H+ |" b" p
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣8 K0 j7 h' Z3 r. o7 ]8 e, X+ b
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢
4 F& C" r0 m# L, C) z9 o+ c5 {IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢( K# V" D8 E& Z# g% ]3 ?; Q3 d. y
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢; A/ y# l+ g$ d$ {
我唔知
: O9 ]5 w, n- ^0 i但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐6 f  o' Q, \7 c8 G2 T1 u- y
會唔會覺得未夠班呢
: \4 i" O! n2 ?: G0 M, l人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
6 Y7 ~0 a6 \1 ?- y- u- b( \但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇0 ]  V# u) S2 u4 o5 t, V/ @
又點解釋* i) {6 P& b8 E$ h

3 B8 n9 c& a6 b0 B# b, R4 ?' ^仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。
it's been a foolish game .
thanks for ur info an questions.....
# S. q( v$ m) T4 ^+ d2 o& D% V5 d& U/ K
em..I didn't goto that website either......
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
我就敗興而回
$ f* y, T- K# o以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到" G" _, O) G! W3 t
家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\
it's been a foolish game .
hahhahahhaahahhaha =p
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
Originally posted by jsqaure99 at 2005-4-7 02:24 PM:( C) _5 D* v" V; E
我就敗興而回* _! S; [" [1 A0 Z4 C
以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
/ h5 g8 D( M7 O  D/ j" y家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\
' N0 D) g. C  N- y0 O" Q  Q+ n8 [2 J

* X4 d1 V' e! T0 z; f個網站係一個唔錯嘅反面教材.  莫講話唔信嘅人, 就算基督徒都有時會犯錯, 將自己嘅意思”讀入”經文裏面.  在聖經裏面左搵右搵, 見到片言隻語能夠乎合自己心目中嘅意思就抽佢出嚟, 斷章取義, 迫聖經食死貓.
, t) H! z# s" U順帶一題, 現今科技發達, 出現電子聖經.  但係用嘅時侯要小心.  特別係search key word, 好容易將search results胡亂貫串, 小心小心.
反面教材
3 ^- y" A9 {# R6 d9 g- {講得好
$ q, [+ h: ^$ w  s6 ~: @仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添
it's been a foolish game .
yes you are right!!!!!% k* `( c! T7 I' C% U! d
% ?* h0 A! _& Q* A
so if you want to read bible.. need to study in right way.. look at clearly for all the related bible versus... ..
1 e5 {2 g+ i3 dChristians (or non-Christians) could make these mistakes due to misunderstanding for bible versus.. look widely.. it could help.....
We are blessed that we can watch sports, to do many things...
so be happy!
返回列表 回復 發帖
<<新主題 | 舊主題>>
娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學

重要聲明:26fun.com為一個討論區服務網站。本網站是以即時上載留言的方式運作,26fun.com對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本網站之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見(如涉及醫療、法律或投資等問題)。 由於本討論區受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。26fun.com有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。