|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
y; N4 v3 K9 M g+ F
% U. R6 [0 F6 b) M; caccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
% |6 V8 k) m* c* m+ Y# l$ V
8 t/ c% T3 ^1 a6 {! O) E. bIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
) Q0 b$ ?7 R- r( H( s% J% Cand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.: H/ m' c0 X8 |+ k' e
( E5 p8 E$ N$ n5 Y% d4 cso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險# T# R) D( {: S3 ^3 \# P; \. L
- b& \6 Z6 ~. }7 }- R8 p' g
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
7 M+ l" c* i; e: M0 p+ nat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|