 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.' K+ q; l/ H" L: [# ~# _" Y3 {
* c. |. y+ s3 W: v g) Haccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
$ @" E/ G! i4 V- R# p
* K5 c+ p$ O( Z/ [1 I bIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
: C6 {- H" R7 o _7 z, Mand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
+ o. @* G9 T: R1 K" o$ T
6 R7 j9 J u! D: N/ @% ?# lso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
9 M1 S2 x- M( l! }9 m: Q4 H$ s% A: E6 t" s! S
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
4 i7 k/ N! C* Q* c$ A! ]. aat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|