娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:+J!d*r.V4E#CIS
Q.LlFk-jO
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
sWK3EC#{b
v P3m\^~hJ4] VT But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
FC7c5FL2ZQ@ D Ur%p:WS)L
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
"|5f X VVI
.MZW!{ ? z U
2a,ppj3@5WW;\\ Z why?
`B^LU^V
6Fk!D(z[+y6n&o6L 其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote] ` Ps;YsT| vy
].f*d}i CB)I+{%PO
see #22 Thus
z4K o]RY)Qg
3_ H{^LX.q 智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->k,[+w'K-B.a
a*B&@}(ydG
軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維!C'|u(\k]
L'e4G8V*w(?u&A
政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.)dzp{2g%^.e
`.l-dYb
打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.
k|QsH S'{
B]F'e(u%M [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51: Y ` CG5VW/@ W5z

:u1gJW[U1{\ 3UKYY2y-P}R@O
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
:xq'L Y P F1Z.[1Z
U]r(L8M#P?6_'ix Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:8]T9D xy+k2Q{:v"Q
7Y,V&[K-ZXO[

2hS5U)uy+C9Q 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]
?@ Ar? `,M s yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:?&RSB n O3Qk
nO z ~/?G"Oe-^"s;f8a
p-x(f `Fw2x_7F
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]7~~IpU#I}|s
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:(Huez&R

4`2@#fh[_;pI:n
9DTp+NY `-S but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote],CHhX(t Wm`
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
]x+M9]%ur(X0qJ[H 佢勁係勁在治國能力............sbq#j$UU#e8V
LzFPH/nOGx*Qi
係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:qOb~bO GK_ Z
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........#M_RQF#Z
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
'wC@c7Nk \ P6qY ia-~*i)Q"l
係咪如此? [/quote]
$@$h+a]9{d(s }`A\/qx#v H2LZ pi

8cuwDPK F,Zk1S'y
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...Gn%QZ&u%B&pr
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:#W2}(U~,ec/Y+s

~U4tfco&H{#T Yysa U:?

(| U K;?+Q%X?:H
5TI#Y.\wYo8E 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...bBSG"A%Z9n j\@1^d4Eu
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
g'ee Q-b!K 我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,
N"s0k/tvMz;`J(q 唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........zRjJ(y

}9_m$__5ST&t g \/XA 三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~!LVTq;j(c!{q
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
;Tc.kE1HtY [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:V0k:O2L\!X;l'L sU
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
(A IP0{dCofH 佢勁係勁在治國能力............*DTF:t8m)@w2W$qX5c

5xo,F$id no 係咪如此? [/quote]'GO NSNn:yk%i{h R
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也)O\x%L;n Wh3G
沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
"ZJLv0MZ4i!p 呢個網係講有關三國正史~`2C(o.C3l[)V6P
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~ C5__X7U/kh
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]%Z+OO2{g*^9\2{/D
正史中張松只有110cm?:o-gH1X#S!oi5C
侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
t? W9\#h;k 阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
X1z)xfu(Zy4PV a*s] M8n6M)zI
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?+E-Oj\m[)dZ
ZO.wU.l!R
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度~;tG/P$|3TL0U
S.b6LFK2u
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
1Kw zLS m L C 聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
&mP \&E3P"bba 司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......MB:e[ X8`
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
w#L|.imE"iTlV 諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
;SB%H-[u,i~(U h&J 9v+A$@ZY4p5av;e
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的 H O/S6|m/w/SbL$F

+_1A N(])T~ 我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.