**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42: w.c@
]T%^ O
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
S.}Ew*O B{b4j:V
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.R3i_-bWN/n _ F8I }nH
u3E Ahse \}
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
e.`?2a oiX~g
:s
g A.{%wU*i*U
why? A~[B!sy*HT;tB1g
LA6X~I w$W1a
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]
see #22 Thus6p?@0}W0d ?0q'W nf
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
Qb Z[A)F
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
,V7k5z)R*Ra
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.+F#G[.Q
SY!f k)u L
.Gy3?
q#y6wO
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
kPUM nb q
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
\*L |\-Ch
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
#k0CE3~u:kb0u
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote]TQ] j F"?k
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:q#Im l2eT
+g"n&OZ1Q aD6Oi#c
SO#] |j6L ~7c,y
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............ WA]+s)s*h
]h'|%_']/D
m
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............ e~"\z!E)t
~ P(b:p8U
係咪如此? [/quote]
6KEO"I Rh
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
0oh Z*Z;C \ D(@
A
M |%r%S ^@ [~
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,~bc"G!\-G2^nt
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~J+L:|&V3h3hM0o:Z$D
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
W_(C m P!z
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............ Z2bF
\4A
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~"K x@7b G9xB
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]ytwQA4G
正史中張松只有110cm?:o5ot$v,a {
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
;FH F+q4kU/qd$z
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?V:NDgF#i
Y
?,A0z"c
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度/uQ0\E3A
%L?!j k S Z"G
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......J5W0F(q,p
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......+LL"f(o*vi'a1c~#m)`
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!5^_2H*n#K"UF
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的+u
D4F(^/l+z ix0q
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P