**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:`5JT%` x
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]/My9yL:iX \S)H
\~qG'J-?Uz
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
$CM7q:ejr:y/D l
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:9K2u*U7iFYR
Z3VwVX
why?
f Y5ED.j&f
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]7T
K#{&S(q![
(r0k:{^J Gx
see #22 Thus Unc*['y,H
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->#af*p+jfyy
5Ia5J%T%\ l
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
| o9^TU8[
U2{p9R_
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details.
x#z.l7P4o+_ v3ds
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.+[ ~yAG1F
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
G!\%h9])Kg4D
%{#c9|;b$^5iOj6t5i
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
ol[R(x:WC
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
5`)k5^v!{n2`1V4m
A
@K8?kZ6O-Z
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote] _@
G
[%es.c8e
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:7l
b|
j L(k%b7D6r
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:Y8J[_
J*_
3EgVG x4cvS
G"U
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]3a$G2DxR/F ? v
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............0{4[/z"}"Z5v-rD
._K5c-[%H9gp0D
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM: W5d j l%P5c$K
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
$ZyZ*j,B.s D@O#b3?
係咪如此? [/quote]j3a)Q-wL ?
KBxe[
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
8w ?5Ki0U#E%L
8W/UT+V3}#Q#Y-l
}
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎......../R m
~0a"A E\
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:J|;E+S;D&W
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
i4v2OT cY Q
佢勁係勁在治國能力............ vBSnkW
)\]d apD S
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也3n TjD Yl WL
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~ ]jV,j
Qc8Yz
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~9l].pl b(n
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]?~v Hr8b v/^
正史中張松只有110cm?:o2q@h0J
h
M2a+P
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?'i/F!Mq ?/P5@+c
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
.at:v f0G;Sp wv
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?\S.Q!qQ(a
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度1Kp'GP5t _'aP
:R
d"v l*\ w|,B
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......8b MkD:T*s)u.~
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!S-q:lY]r%H U9f
*e
_ X ]c!`
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的J2i?(I)Rc
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P