**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:!\.B;x2X5A_c
8h0C n-h3l9A p mC
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]l6EAa&N
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.{ \Wv3H;CWP+D-r
%I@)NP ma;z:s%W#\8@
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:6T0e.I vH#H
o@;s,fd-UjO4z
uRd8e'Y:M sv2W
why?
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote]V,\2BF R
D0Ma Bl fz"y k
see #22 Thus h1m;yT#dck bzE O,r
v~ u.Q/@0])q"r
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
%wR bJ'{ F{UC
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維3W8U
o%B L[
H)s*@9W4JJA
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details. ^5b ph9N cP%r
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:i*M*R
RC6b%eb
U'q C @#|'ay7I H
#WG9tv*b4B3v
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]"@'{,a4eMV2w5k[#X]
u z;f SN
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:b+Yz+W%q \
e
;l2j I2Q
R*Y+~X8CE
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote] | \0fm P [2aNM
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:^H0@)wBr gp
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........|.y$d$xz{6T
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM: VY
b"~M `#KCD}
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............~/l%k&MW
rd3Y q)@W
係咪如此? [/quote]
R-Ah:a0{ ? [&k8l,L
#W c^ N5b#|
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:
Z;jGT9\.H!^6LZ
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...:^VcmO R%u
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]T K^2[ ?w8J^4?.\
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........
W+^ \Na5_.P
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~F%J-^W5jqq
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~#e'i(v W b$GQm
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:Z9sS s x8u4M
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........'kq
z.o d&ICg)va%j
佢勁係勁在治國能力............a6N!r9m)[ _t
r
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~)m{/isvh ^U
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
正史中張松只有110cm?:o
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?6_9M/[[ On*s?
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
@q&?'X)Z
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
L#fn V;I1xg6[7CJ
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
$pe.e ]f
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
`v q/~
D"g]v
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P