娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:3`|$]z4nK#@bn3mv
iq\ }Y,dJU:r*t4|
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
5v"J#?K\J8Y3C 't!G]U7g2? v
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.i)D$jvg F hl
5X"d'Gx!Q]j.m
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:
W}d Of bT
T` v:k tH5e9h x%Yu,ECe
why?x?d\Y{
}'zN6l7o&a
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]
5VU f&APGW F/D{bKI@ ^(w
see #22 Thus;kz:{ alz
M_U4VL1[
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
tD;E7BF7\4lN+_ `:|gR.t2`I
軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
w9k4d/c SJ L/Y'd#t zzzLsS
政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.
\+i4{ b4kX NV
Z:HM)Q Nn 打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.
e`H;| a;Q1tRF 2r[y`tLNM
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51: dM;Ex i-R niV
!}X%^?DGkqY

z#k#B:kW8Bq9~ 他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]
)k5a4bfF
#}8Yy7mq m Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
{/W \3km$s %x8x A7G#Kx^Y

2a/Km2Lht 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]
(U%t(M N.l7Hj yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:U0w4Xcb
T\0hr;j2IOTG5t
kTgn'x}
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]
AB&STyb,| Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
+yp m{S6m)Vq!z vbZ w0Jpj

T@V o'Bn9I6l$J/B but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]
8H/P;Ky$c8w} why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........c&a M7~h` Qv6L
佢勁係勁在治國能力............yk#l6{_,j

p ]+O T!c] 係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
!^oQu!Z%Ks 聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........y*d,^lP,QB5a
佢勁係勁在治國能力............f(Wk_vu k|
$a7h jN(j'v eA;[
係咪如此? [/quote]
A I:bw2s8d\(fo 4{s&{fy?5R

$K_-Id2oN$D s7jb4pB
3nSP$j1_A'Qtz 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...G-`w%VDo$r
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:F&u UGo6|d

:]9K3eA7iK#TWj-} Mpo%W ~ L2|#Q
4U8{[,Y|U*uoP2g

7y!S'Si3fa 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...!TN n FA6n*J
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]"S uu:\1|4O2_hu
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,L#Lz e/G4s/G n
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........
0s5t r$k0f&p GBn
KZ:swB!I-p 三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~vJhwg4ApX
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~'iR;m2vy8ga
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM: e K`P2?$@5P^rc
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
A4S p| E qv 佢勁係勁在治國能力............0`Y~JXi-o

.Kr9m)@t1d"]$g/R`z 係咪如此? [/quote]
%d+l-l5At9d9I 歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
@ZJ3r3]4a;e%g$F 沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:
2`P,kt)w2h 呢個網係講有關三國正史~
,tL9iH2B i:c 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~ knX1` AG&}G
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]YeI$Bx/B \-p`
正史中張松只有110cm?:o
sA-b ]sg$_W 侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?*x.gx O+E"rnW
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?lF$M:D"qu,jW I

#y6YJFkR n 諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
h6b$G.`GxRS!ME9H"kY
xT9tc1p0Q4E:Y 相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度6gG#Ud4`
X$JO&Tn/^
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
eC9{(~]@5p!K 聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......!Zu*wJYVa
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......
,_qd.R*Y Wa!z,T 陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......5I h/R1l ]
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
d*m&\*k%n
q%B _ Vc g*Lhv 講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
n.Nz;fic #c c'~/wrZ].U
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.