娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42::q:X9I`YE&Nol

&mvu huyR}"h but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]
U;]6Z eMw:UIE-o %H0xC4GYzeSI
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.
P~&T;m{*M/p
Y9v:Wn$k9R C E:p [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:;A!z-l't2bz N
gX1E*n9mr#Xh
d7A AV0j']
why?
H:O h%IQ-W#WfM&S;w 1m)BX/|2n/]s5z
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]U}C"A Q/k*l
7p1b'J@)hN} _
see #22 Thustap/M5R1auwWR

;H\8EMm{ ^ 智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->~FKJ1Gs

a D5e2?9Wv2f/xS 軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維2`l gSS

&{6y(c"_Y{ o 政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.2HQ;Z+{tJT?

C \gW"h 打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.4kJc`~ B

&U"s8WT'c/?7Lr [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
_&xQw(wU6R $T!G3NZ+?dY%Ux%_

{q8t+L!{|5U4Z9r} 他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]Z8B'D3A.H+f
n%JBr.c$t6H5V$_
Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:0f,j/h9hv(h#R k3n:lL
\*S+S4F*CQwA#C.jN2U)G

y1M |p2v5h&D-C c e 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]8n\QMs;@[%B!Bs
yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
OC p.X;Q(E
+W$oI7}0p~]W [~ g\JYW
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]x1IwAg4A ^!h*q~
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:e+sj1_,Cw

rR0x+F:g,{ c-H&x}o$Y*gl'F
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]
~w#Z]$z _ why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........+f~KP Ck
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
#^N:S%N [
Tr9k-R,G3O%KYk 係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
C/]2[[ dJ~D"`b 聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
"S&n:\mv k Q!r/p 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
8tn?)gP
?,}"tw,Ds2T*C^H 係咪如此? [/quote]
r0K7\D&XQm^c D].W2U} W3ib _m

q0~k/a2MC
^_ l'W#P 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
YW&M^i e`Q-s 好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:z+t;} J Z4lfM8}\
%}P u*{l7V0o
Hb:[3up

5uz6CT"p7d:m]
U?:bE/f 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
3R1Q;S6P)} bS 好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]R*d7H)zj1m2q!~
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,%e7?2jT.@/[-d
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........Xu;`[ d-q
I0@^,y2Q2p#l
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~
1y&PK"^!vMn6a 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
'qg+FLq [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM: PN Y u${${'P
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........S_V.X.H!O\3p
佢勁係勁在治國能力............,N+a2r'X'n
"u{7Dw2p ir)H%C
係咪如此? [/quote]
'D }*wo$l 歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也 o(?!Et/Z-rnI
沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:#m/iH'W4?;XZ!B
呢個網係講有關三國正史~$S?S"~:OG.d&h.E
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
9TD.E7y^H [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]
YV"^!df%K 正史中張松只有110cm?:oW#sK6`o"z#Kz5N
侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
;MH_4y_bL&t,? 阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?E6N7bO:[dlhyfn

L"ZX,lzP1b"XL&[X 諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?VE1Q'j.A

M9|r-A8u%{W3X&x 相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
No&z{Ui~)lRBT 9b4fvC5x9}9|6xz
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
(z YNwTH7tb!_ 聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......
V]K,Z4gnV 司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋....../R*vt)BVM\
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......
4wn7[$`hv+M"O*y 諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
TP#~[2x ?#bN
+{Ktx X#o PXi'm)D 講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的
@-Ze&_DG k b ~M{vI
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.