娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:42 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:!r"kUvS
YkY)IF i3{
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]AC{K/?*J,j"}lSQ?
XQ'K&r kIIv.|M
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by  諸葛亮.  He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.'h$g,z"o#p.Hq `[)f

5l:v)tt4a|i~ a [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:45 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45: u`*H@0p2o__$@8j
-o.@MdE,Kw [#tI
0P^6_z4T&? A;^#|hp~
why?.^`${fb^_7mh2y6z
ZG@}qu(F
其實他們實力差不多,很難比較:o [/quote]j2qeQz}|8t
Y;b,SxvV
see #22 Thush0}*juu&I%z Gm
Y#|U~R\Lh%v
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->
QV:y;~H $AHc;APL_,{
軍事才能:諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維
7}+\)z$kq^D 7c:_{'M1uVl.h Gh
政治才能:<--- actually I forgot the details.$f`7l#Lx

/I&g:r a/XAlE6} 打:姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:50 PM

In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him.  姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of  諸葛亮.
0S^N^O$yBQ-Y6u
)_&t.c#|V [[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:51 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 09:55 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51:
+xj9x(H,E*qQ)U?v j6]$r$h)L1a*H
'Z!] XW)Xx{4Y#a
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]~ `?A HhH2R

D5cg!` z Agree.  Both of them were extremely loyalty.  However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation.  He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 09:58 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:03 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:1X$^_v'snU:p'n ^
8yvtT4_

4iO7[[iR+X 他支撐了蜀國三十年,雖然孔明也有27年(207-234),但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多,五虎已屈機 [/quote]
X C/E;a%D8^F9d p t yes, that's the point.:)

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:20 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

機密 發表於 2006-1-30 10:29 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
3Uh+X O1xg $Q:v}@J4{9a \
Dz.pm.|!pO ?1e1_
陸遜也偉大,但不得善終...... [/quote]
Y0`0i3g&Bw0h Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D

151515 發表於 2006-1-30 10:32 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

CHECSS 發表於 2006-1-31 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
b l V#h ?
raP6CyV6rilz6H
(Rt-j)QF(myD but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]]m L.YwQ@
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:07 AM

聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
ltDLh)PT 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
_9h4M*f ~+yn
.P,r-J7?R2v[m 係咪如此?

benny0105 發表於 2006-1-31 01:46 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM: LJ;tR Rl0W
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
vz1r d(^[w)Z 佢勁係勁在治國能力............
/]oaR]:w &k~|2ne
係咪如此? [/quote]P9F3X;K _(JFzm
3U#O*SD7`[

*|"N1gf|7F vnl
7B.gw/J8H\#pA 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...Orr^/C
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 01:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:4ArQ*@!r

s lK1M S$N_T
)g,T(FL;w@+q3n9C U(W(O;s#k U

|s0g&^q {#U 其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...*bya_6N4M
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
j?5_8dV 我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,@6C%\!b_bs3h7|
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........
Jey;j1H.Qq ~E(`.QDY*L
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........

nashisthebestpg 發表於 2006-1-31 02:01 AM

呢個網係講有關三國正史~
9W7PZ/u+Xr({"z 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
w X_2|cI [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]

發表於 2006-1-31 02:05 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:*pDT8cw G,x
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
4hm.h+p9Q4a3v;] 佢勁係勁在治國能力............T\4Z\~P}Fg u

9@i^/Y-`lts2q+nB 係咪如此? [/quote]
a2e-H)oa)[*P ] 歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
0y1n$H2W-GP 沒有佔下風:)

發表於 2006-1-31 02:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:2PGz$Q4R l!S1s/[
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
,[[)q[UE jg 不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
Gt{h;] P T [url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]9^Ms6a9O$A3g
正史中張松只有110cm?:o`Q-Xb?'W
侏儒?

step025 發表於 2006-1-31 07:13 AM

你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?
k,x Nco1b9~ 阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?c K1] FS_%g@J
0aG v@ A Jn
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
$MQ%g3[ ] )c unfXMz;L
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度
6X3j6Dg3ip}
G-FK g;hO3m 有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
~`3o3Ta$cn&w9L 聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......8s UXC+H
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......*z9M:uv8@4vb H&m/b
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......l.d,EyU4DI
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
t!l H/llwf1H:X &O2r0w'm ^ wdC
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的7tc3z ] [

C-N$]9A6Z"tz4D'_ 我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P

頁: 1 [2] 3

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.