**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:42:9G)R%t
^N
\(ma#pg
but 鄧艾and陸遜have 10 pts,姜維only9 [/quote]$lF+v'O%B7R
ws,@'xsLG^n
But I don't think鄧艾and陸遜 is really better than 姜維. Even they are clever, 姜維 was taught by 諸葛亮. He learnt ~90% from 諸葛亮.s`,pA#k
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:45 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:45:\M)T+W*RM
}:G Xfw
why?
其實他們實力差不多，很難比較:o [/quote] {y#s e T | i
UD
see #22 Thus
:w9V-ci-Z(p
智慧: 諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜--->姜維--->鄧艾--->.s[r?j%FK
t?uA3D w2~*|
軍事才能：諸葛亮-->司馬懿--->陸遜~鄧艾~姜維7d3Ow4poy(E7d
mA1O"z9UQ
政治才能：<--- actually I forgot the details. u
ll
Q an
$~q3CLO(}Pq B9^
打：姜維--->鄧艾--->司馬懿--->陸遜--->諸葛亮
In addition, a merit for 姜維 you haven't consider for him. 姜維's fascination is better than the others because he was the only student of 諸葛亮.
yZO[+WE
on
[[i] Last edited by 機密 on 2006-1-30 at 09:56 PM [/i]]
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:51: V2Q(xrwZS'Y
fl A1^Hu([ M
他比孔明更偉大 [/quote]? \6E*])U(jG
Lr
q+m U?
Qg
Agree. Both of them were extremely loyalty. However, he was more great because he was in more poor situation. He could maintain a same loyality to his boss.
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 21:58:
他支撐了蜀國三十年，雖然孔明也有２７年（２０７－２３４），但那時的人材比姜維時期的好很多，五虎已屈機 [/quote]!X2i[jR'mga
yes, that's the point.:)
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006-1-30 22:20:
H ]\i/E6K-j#j
陸遜也偉大，但不得善終...... [/quote]*A A8maQ;A
Many '3 countries' peoples 不得善終 too:D
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]Originally posted by [i]151515[/i] at 2006/1/30 21:32:
DB']6\sjr
but i think智慧: 諸葛亮-->司... [/quote]R ?3x!@%{-m)e H2m A
why you think司馬懿 and 陸遜 are good at fight than 諸葛亮 ?????????????
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
"{"[}z] CJc
係咪如此?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........7C1IWk G!HU3R
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
uM!G-Ff4ww k N A i
係咪如此? [/quote]6W#f5]d9[n,b |
;l%[ y-I4M,z
V)?%pr c:OC
u;P
:cUUG/H
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真
[quote]Originally posted by [i]benny0105[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:46 AM:)s]w5{ Yi
Mbz!z*r0W8e c J
3ckH-@E!B$^)^h jQ
其實又有幾多人真係睇過三國志丫...
好多人只不過睇完神化既「三國演義」就信以為真 [/quote]
我嗰次係三聯見到本三國志,入面係逐個人物講,!_/H \ n!G
v'l`mU
唔係好似三國演義好似故事咁講出黎........)}9x5Y.g G+O E | T
:S7Xm[2a
qjK
三國志真係咁ga? 咁咪無咁好睇........
呢個網係講有關三國正史~
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~b[&y+@e~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 01:07 AM:D+EB,Z%u!r U&p {n6Nm
聽聞真正的history上,諸葛亮的軍事能力未如三國演義般吹得咁勁.........
佢勁係勁在治國能力............
x)G(F]
[(N a a
係咪如此? [/quote]
歷史中諸葛亮的軍事能力的確沒演義中那麼屈機,但也算不俗,始終對司馬懿也
沒有佔下風:)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]nashisthebestpg[/i] at 2006-1-31 02:01 AM:k`a@]
呢個網係講有關三國正史~6c5Wd"Wi7H;X
不過我諗好多人都有睇過~
[url]http://k-fung.net/han/real.htm[/url] [/quote]r$y[D'@G
正史中張松只有110cm?:o
侏儒?
你睇演義定火鳳? 你又點知佢地打得?vaR H-c2uB
阿壽寫打鬥一向草草了事, 姜維鄧艾無一次唔係不相佰仲, 點分邊個勁?
諸葛亮係上述當中絕對唔係最好嘅軍事家, 用人亦只用文人如楊儀, 馬謖等紙上談兵之輩, 可來成功?
相反司馬懿係對負孟達充份表現出打仗最重要的機動性, 諸葛亮即使有再多人力物力也不能做到, 以他謹慎的做人態度,[%]VZ fKr$|)@B,o x
X:[7c/v?9B _ a E
有人話諸葛亮最勁, 因為佢死在, 蜀就完全唔掂
聽完更加覺得諸葛亮唔掂, 死前唔陪養多D有用嘅人用(有一大堆文人嘅), 有魏延如此勇猛的人又唔重用......可憐自己個仔一野就比鄧艾打爆......~"u|s(f [6{
司馬懿兩個仔都至高無上, 個孫司馬炎仲統一埋......,pB Vi*w8S T#WL
陸遜個仔都係大都督,同羊祜更惺惺相惜......Ub%T"h3`X
諸葛亮!!!你做的事顯出你特別, 更加, 無敵偉大啊!!!
講番姜維鄧艾, 他倆各方面都不分上下(兩人亦往往是同僚針對的人), 但在政革方面, 鄧艾全勝, 他的團田制帶來足夠糧草以應付任何對戰, 相反姜維在政治方面差不多是沒有的)C5H&UE IQ6N
;Z"c-^PC,f pfO X3n
我講完依堆野之後, 想講嘅係諸葛亮死後最厲害既人物係 ------- [b]李世民[/b]:P