娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

rayyipas 發表於 2006-5-8 11:53 AM

[加分題]各位同意做了壞事的人會有報應的嗎?

純粹好奇沒有任何宗教問題的
6g9S#ZYv7I+r-\
2Q9jwKD$j)FQ![#ap [[i] Last edited by 月月鳥 on 2006-5-10 at 09:11 PM [/i]]

chansuper123 發表於 2006-5-8 12:36 PM

No, Absolute No

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 12:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]rayyipas[/i] at 2006-5-8 11:53:9}p,A%^:X!`J
純粹好奇沒有任何宗教問題的 [/quote]~V)f6w bc+?0\
海潚兩公婆已經話了你知!遲來早來問題而已!:D

chanhoyingap 發表於 2006-5-8 02:16 PM

無得咁講
B$mN*mZ$a#SV 無論你做左好事定壞事H5D3amwo @%k DT
都有好同唔好事發生

155220 發表於 2006-5-8 02:20 PM

坦白講,小弟覺得唔會,不過如果人人都覺得會的話,就不會有人再去做壞事,世界也會變得美麗

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 03:07 PM

好簡單,
/|+r3~ h6y1M(qN gI b
C_,gz&KRl,E5G#W 你幫助人,人地就自然內心會感激你,覺得你份人好。呢種已經是最起碼的好報。
z Xah"AA2F,RB 掉轉,你害人,你心裡自然有種犯罪感,久而久之,你起碼都唔會敢話自己是好人。 被人害過的人又會恨你。呢種已經是起碼的報應。
So"U6?W0o5^/`2v ](j
:d:J?SEH 咁仲有疑問?

FishyR 發表於 2006-5-8 04:28 PM

其實, 同唔同意, 和報應出唔現, 好容易攪亂.
q(?v|un U.a Oe h3c1jXfe
現實中, 報應未必出現, 又或者同所犯罪唔多相稱; 更再者是犯錯重有好報, 受害者得唔到公道重要喺追究過程中衰多d.E+`0UMq

4aZCedCFA 我係同意做了壞事的人應該得到報應. 現實中, 只要極惡極小心, 報應絕對唔會出現.

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 06:02 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]FishyR[/i] at 2006-5-8 16:28:(y L-lR$}X;G
其實, 同唔同意, 和報應出唔現, 好容... [/quote]WN`'L4Tm*d
不過如果用佛教道理去睇就好公平。 因為佛法是通過去現在未來三世。 所以就可以解釋了點解有人好運有人唔好!
+bO6[#xZ.F2vg9r.C\,?@ 就拿海潚夫婦來講,他們一定是過去救過人,所以海潚都死不去。 這是善果。Q?9oPP%d
但騙財就一定有惡果,所以被人告!6o~ H]4M&P
因果非常公平!

everybody 發表於 2006-5-8 06:21 PM

我淨係知做好事會早死...
Y"[6I5S SN2F 你睇下三國誌就知嫁la...

FishyR 發表於 2006-5-8 11:59 PM

機密兄, 我絕對尊重彿學導化人心靈的意志. 但我只是凡人一個. 沒有宗教信養. 不信前生後世. 只在乎活在今下. 睇來我短短幾十年都睇唔住, 莫講睇住下世前生果幾十年. 更或根本就沒前生後世? #ll,Y^i8G9|0k1T
拿海潚夫婦來講, 我覺得佢唔夠小心同冷靜, 自己身有屎,死唔去,重咁揚. 唉! 我睇怕重有d同呢兩公婆一樣的人捉唔到, 真係等下世啦! 報唔報等d有下世的人去證實啦.O(C.Fe1C"g%EF
既然我唔信前生後世, 呢d人只要小心d, 對我來講就無一定無報應. 對機密兄就或者係解釋成報應未到啦.'zL9e/f ^W0l7je~
歷史話比我知, 報應係唔會發生喺d有權勢, 夠惡又小心的人. 呢個係現實. 但為求個心好過d, 信有下世都無妨.

機密 發表於 2006-5-9 12:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]FishyR[/i] at 2006-5-8 23:59:
0X~&f,ay$R.J 機密兄, 我絕對尊重彿學導化人心靈的... [/quote]
m6C Gr4r}R+J9aM 當你唔信有前世今生。
8s`:SHv
P4WG4\ ~(mC 就拿做完壞事要好小心來說:!M#?[t1vQXn7H
Qt1f2sW,of
1. 無做壞事就心靈自在,海潚過後喜歡點都得,上電視點講都得,大事宣揚兼慶祝都得; U7Xnn.A/e1s @H4W

%v]8xA"|i.v2I#r L 2. 做完壞事就成日怕穿煲,做小船頭怕鬼船尾怕賊,做事畏首畏尾。每件事都要諗過會不會穿煲被人捉。 死唔去又上唔得電視。#ljrB7o/o(Qd3G#D
/k;]1|d+l3UDZ
咁,你話呢種不是報應之一嘛!:D 起碼相對無做壞事的人來說,他們就肯定無咁自在囉!係咪?:kiss:

ThomasKoon 發表於 2006-5-9 12:42 AM

我係覺得會有﹐不過唔係必然...

打狗棒 發表於 2006-5-9 12:59 AM

我覺得不會, 因為全世界99%的有錢人都是或多或少的曾做過壞事........:haha:

slwong3 發表於 2006-5-9 06:35 AM

I think it doesn't matter at all.%G({VxRc
a2I;n_3h;[ez
If a person has done a bad thing on you, even he is going to get his 報應 in the future.  It still won't affect you.
b-o;N$y4qwq0JG Ex. A person cut your finger before and eventually got into jail.  Maybe going into jail is his 報應, but it still wouldn't help you grow back your finger.
ji [mH 8m~8Se9h%~D0kR Q5p
The only thing is that when you see that person got into jail, you might feel better inside of you.

機密 發表於 2006-5-9 02:41 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]slwong3[/i] at 2006-5-9 06:35: P/Z?(]Q.K
I think it doesn't matter at all. gNk}%dp
... [/quote]3N%`h&w ef
According to the rule of 'Cause' & 'result', you had cut the guy's finger before.  Thus you will be cut by him in this time.  However, he cut your finger is a sin, he is jailed.

anttiniemi2000 發表於 2006-5-10 05:00 PM

yes there will be, but you don't know it had happened actually.|y w3m my
for example, you stole $100 from somebody, u maynot have to give it back to that person.  however one day, you will lose something worthes $100.

hold_find 發表於 2006-5-10 09:35 PM

一定會有
j2R9Z;N ut9@~ 總有一日,做壞事的人會因自己做的壞是有報應
2~4T+J8g `] 最簡單,你害了一個人,總有一日,他/他的家人會「報仇」c(zF6Zk;T
就算佢地原諒你,你都會一生唔安樂,不停問自己「點解我要害佢(原本的人)?」,這也是纏擾你一生的報應(如果你冇改過,你就唔會咁諗,但他/他的家人亦唔會原諒你,就會回到第一個情況)

76 發表於 2006-5-10 10:04 PM

做壞事不會有報應除非犯左法....s d DOl-v1C3`"lG

mf,_K9^lc 做壞事有報應lei個諗法..好多時都係小學教育...religion 用lei 教育之用....lei 句說話只係一個手段

Jk 發表於 2006-5-11 04:36 AM

雖然我絕對同意做了壞事的人係應該會有報應,不過應該還應該,實際上做了壞事的人未必一定會得到報應,我認為兩者並無關連!jUJ0YL`5D
I1f5CR3Wa!v
壞事---
Ms5O"g]\|2`-w 淨係hk班"有錢佬"都唔方做得少啦~~.pK$z|k

F*MFFa"v;e [[i] Last edited by Jk on 2006-5-11 at 04:42 AM [/i]]

pangpang2066 發表於 2006-5-11 04:55 PM

我覺得最多係自己唔開心(通常人都唔會) 同 得罪人:y3lD;vt n3YSMO
如果得罪人之後,俾人報復 都可以叫報應既......

頁: [1] 2 3 4

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.