娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

rayyipas 發表於 2006-5-8 11:53 AM

[加分題]各位同意做了壞事的人會有報應的嗎?

純粹好奇沒有任何宗教問題的
u'tkM wK ^|K!N 0wXD&zw"t$g
[[i] Last edited by 月月鳥 on 2006-5-10 at 09:11 PM [/i]]

chansuper123 發表於 2006-5-8 12:36 PM

No, Absolute No

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 12:46 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]rayyipas[/i] at 2006-5-8 11:53:9T+r E,O+lF0O
純粹好奇沒有任何宗教問題的 [/quote]4trxP.f lU z~
海潚兩公婆已經話了你知!遲來早來問題而已!:D

chanhoyingap 發表於 2006-5-8 02:16 PM

無得咁講
*y*SR)~5w,[8~ r"F 無論你做左好事定壞事
U9?q$G)|Z 都有好同唔好事發生

155220 發表於 2006-5-8 02:20 PM

坦白講,小弟覺得唔會,不過如果人人都覺得會的話,就不會有人再去做壞事,世界也會變得美麗

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 03:07 PM

好簡單,b)nOy+[6By d"dO:y

C"[,Y&Pa @'NB@J 你幫助人,人地就自然內心會感激你,覺得你份人好。呢種已經是最起碼的好報。
)? {2?7l&G Bs]7ZF 掉轉,你害人,你心裡自然有種犯罪感,久而久之,你起碼都唔會敢話自己是好人。 被人害過的人又會恨你。呢種已經是起碼的報應。
qS&B&a9@t3s*w
H l'sE^ 咁仲有疑問?

FishyR 發表於 2006-5-8 04:28 PM

其實, 同唔同意, 和報應出唔現, 好容易攪亂. &\RieD\o/R.~$A6u

M@#@Z te[k 現實中, 報應未必出現, 又或者同所犯罪唔多相稱; 更再者是犯錯重有好報, 受害者得唔到公道重要喺追究過程中衰多d.!xKb2Y7}K2y

KpI4GI 我係同意做了壞事的人應該得到報應. 現實中, 只要極惡極小心, 報應絕對唔會出現.

機密 發表於 2006-5-8 06:02 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]FishyR[/i] at 2006-5-8 16:28:-EF-O8m#_k X-[6Q
其實, 同唔同意, 和報應出唔現, 好容... [/quote] {$nB)@4|!O
不過如果用佛教道理去睇就好公平。 因為佛法是通過去現在未來三世。 所以就可以解釋了點解有人好運有人唔好!f7HrA2yM9wl
就拿海潚夫婦來講,他們一定是過去救過人,所以海潚都死不去。 這是善果。YKmew"g8a\
但騙財就一定有惡果,所以被人告!
*Nw){FL!|T:S 因果非常公平!

everybody 發表於 2006-5-8 06:21 PM

我淨係知做好事會早死...
LW:`;~ DTJ-ZZ9\ 你睇下三國誌就知嫁la...

FishyR 發表於 2006-5-8 11:59 PM

機密兄, 我絕對尊重彿學導化人心靈的意志. 但我只是凡人一個. 沒有宗教信養. 不信前生後世. 只在乎活在今下. 睇來我短短幾十年都睇唔住, 莫講睇住下世前生果幾十年. 更或根本就沒前生後世? /Q&FqGV-oX&F
拿海潚夫婦來講, 我覺得佢唔夠小心同冷靜, 自己身有屎,死唔去,重咁揚. 唉! 我睇怕重有d同呢兩公婆一樣的人捉唔到, 真係等下世啦! 報唔報等d有下世的人去證實啦.B @)H*jnX\k
既然我唔信前生後世, 呢d人只要小心d, 對我來講就無一定無報應. 對機密兄就或者係解釋成報應未到啦.
9VK9dl hxx 歷史話比我知, 報應係唔會發生喺d有權勢, 夠惡又小心的人. 呢個係現實. 但為求個心好過d, 信有下世都無妨.

機密 發表於 2006-5-9 12:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]FishyR[/i] at 2006-5-8 23:59: z!`Abyj
機密兄, 我絕對尊重彿學導化人心靈的... [/quote]
.rv4n ^ O+k$S 當你唔信有前世今生。Dy]YMz
&_hkrvdK[
就拿做完壞事要好小心來說:
:wv%w ]!Nl^j
|V*AsM"Q:\&KN dE5S 1. 無做壞事就心靈自在,海潚過後喜歡點都得,上電視點講都得,大事宣揚兼慶祝都得;
"D]UC|-pi8[9m
8r3M4@w R J+I?m 2. 做完壞事就成日怕穿煲,做小船頭怕鬼船尾怕賊,做事畏首畏尾。每件事都要諗過會不會穿煲被人捉。 死唔去又上唔得電視。W/Rq\O0nc

7Q j'J-c7uy4Z 咁,你話呢種不是報應之一嘛!:D 起碼相對無做壞事的人來說,他們就肯定無咁自在囉!係咪?:kiss:

ThomasKoon 發表於 2006-5-9 12:42 AM

我係覺得會有﹐不過唔係必然...

打狗棒 發表於 2006-5-9 12:59 AM

我覺得不會, 因為全世界99%的有錢人都是或多或少的曾做過壞事........:haha:

slwong3 發表於 2006-5-9 06:35 AM

I think it doesn't matter at all.
`*q;wZ:y+LO
.M%W6h*gKL"m If a person has done a bad thing on you, even he is going to get his 報應 in the future.  It still won't affect you.,Jr8cya ry?Z x
Ex. A person cut your finger before and eventually got into jail.  Maybe going into jail is his 報應, but it still wouldn't help you grow back your finger.
{$NJgJ "?9wnf%J1tne
The only thing is that when you see that person got into jail, you might feel better inside of you.

機密 發表於 2006-5-9 02:41 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]slwong3[/i] at 2006-5-9 06:35:
H;e F h)O,^6l^ I think it doesn't matter at all.V"r mFt UeBc
... [/quote]
1fvs^8BT#z;? According to the rule of 'Cause' & 'result', you had cut the guy's finger before.  Thus you will be cut by him in this time.  However, he cut your finger is a sin, he is jailed.

anttiniemi2000 發表於 2006-5-10 05:00 PM

yes there will be, but you don't know it had happened actually.
p Z ~ Ir~3j for example, you stole $100 from somebody, u maynot have to give it back to that person.  however one day, you will lose something worthes $100.

hold_find 發表於 2006-5-10 09:35 PM

一定會有9WX%]k4c H!B
總有一日,做壞事的人會因自己做的壞是有報應7u"a5ww [m
最簡單,你害了一個人,總有一日,他/他的家人會「報仇」[| d#m[IkY
就算佢地原諒你,你都會一生唔安樂,不停問自己「點解我要害佢(原本的人)?」,這也是纏擾你一生的報應(如果你冇改過,你就唔會咁諗,但他/他的家人亦唔會原諒你,就會回到第一個情況)

76 發表於 2006-5-10 10:04 PM

做壞事不會有報應除非犯左法....5A:xLjH

/x+|*PWF 做壞事有報應lei個諗法..好多時都係小學教育...religion 用lei 教育之用....lei 句說話只係一個手段

Jk 發表於 2006-5-11 04:36 AM

雖然我絕對同意做了壞事的人係應該會有報應,不過應該還應該,實際上做了壞事的人未必一定會得到報應,我認為兩者並無關連! s t~g'[
)T;CjY;E:v\,y(O&i
壞事---)y%jvW;m4|QH|!P i8[
淨係hk班"有錢佬"都唔方做得少啦~~
:I_D l6v
0httSk [[i] Last edited by Jk on 2006-5-11 at 04:42 AM [/i]]

pangpang2066 發表於 2006-5-11 04:55 PM

我覺得最多係自己唔開心(通常人都唔會) 同 得罪人&?1wI,A ~:i
如果得罪人之後,俾人報復 都可以叫報應既......

頁: [1] 2 3 4

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.