呢d野邊有話拗唔拗得贏丫,不過再爭拗落去都冇意思喇..........。
只是一個少女,把青春倩影留下。有何問題。再下去。香港會悶死。
[quote]Originally posted by [i]12d3[/i] at 2006-6-23 01:34 AM:e
`.cp[
9nv2[X'_+q8H
講得好!!! [/quote]
t9l8zf Zb
O*oO;N~3H4E6q
X2? o&sd0r!bSI&f?
第三應該係傳媒?... [/quote])o5oEq Jg
傳媒唔係虛偽, 而係不知所謂
香港差佬最得閒, 而且最易被所謂民意左右, d人才痾屎唔出都搵警察;
並且乜都受理, 不過「雷聲大、雨點小」, 拉韓國農民一事已知, 最後一個都告唔入, 浪費公帑!!! 我夠膽批死呢單野最後不了了之, 無人入罪; 唔信? 邊個夠膽輸賭?:naughty:
aAHAHAHAH , WHAt the hell?
/c(~4Dc)f8Ph"v9e
Seriously, WHat a Big Deal?{j
V?E8u i
Just some normal Photos? Nothing special man??? hahahaha, i think you hongkong people must be Fxxk Up in the head...
Just some normal photo that contains a wet look, could make you people gone mad for nothing???gBG5g:S
0H Z3C;^"h3DGyO
Oh my god! that's how Hongkong could never improve that standard....e5bT:V W1D1L
M\
Feel sorry for you, Old mind Dumb ass...
[quote]Originally posted by [i]neitly[/i] at 2006-6-22 20:31:
%B7YQ#lJ;R+l
真冇教養,又冇家教 [/quote]v1Qd)D
[ ?9h
同意至極!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]lkilkilkill[/i] at 2006-6-23 06:15:
睇左咁多人既意見,又好似好有道理。... [/quote]sZ]%vy'{F
仲有,那些人話自願。衰十一都係自願。咁係咪唔告得?
d人無法律常識!十四歲無權同意架!
[quote]Originally posted by [i]機密[/i] at 2006-6-24 02:34:
w6_%N(Pz/L
DAuv3b
仲有,那些人話自願。衰十一都係自願。咁係咪唔告得?'U2N
TX,b l[
d人無法律常識!十四歲無權同意架! [/quote]
衰十一與影濕水照怎可同日而語?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]機密[/i] at 2006-6-24 02:30:
同意至極! [/quote]
就算人家沒家教又干卿何事呢?
[quote]Originally posted by [i]打狗棒[/i] at 2006-6-24 12:15 AM:UJ2F2\9kI
香港差佬最得閒, 而且最易被所謂民意... [/quote]
It's highly possible!:D
幾張相就話佢發姣???0P @
ElCo$w1}9G"I
邊個知實情呀?!
[size=3]美國的Brooke Shields(波姬小絲)12歲就赤身露體去拍"青春珊瑚島", 為什麼沒有人抗議呢? 人家老外的就是藝術, 咱家中國人就是"意淫"? 怪不得陶傑說中國人社會就是民智未開的小農社會, 一點也沒錯!!![/size]:giveup:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]打狗棒[/i] at 2006-6-24 04:05 PM:@I~*[.v~C;F(C6{!{
[size=3]美國的Brooke Shields(波姬小... [/quote]
外國既中學會派安全套比d學生, 如果係香港咁做法會點 ? 間學校聽封啦. 所以好難用外國標準黎睇香港..ied#F T7N
Tj