略說反「何文匯正音」本末
......轉貼.......略說反「何文匯正音」本末y2b[ M2{^&K
Ch\:`Wsr+K[p"n
傳媒新聞部的人,怕讀錯字音,這本來是負責任的態度。可是,他們卻給何文匯鑽了空子,誤將他提倡的讀音作為標準,根本不知道他違反學術原則,漠視廣府話的種種語源。/qr3ch,s7i5{
6v i kHeI(i'Dgv
當年何文匯的老師劉殿爵提倡「時奸」,王亭之立即抨擊,令其「正音」失敗。他在中文大學出錄音帶,給中小學教師「正音」,王亭之指出錄音帶有過百錯誤,中文大學說要告王亭之誹謗,過了兩年,則改為來信給王亭之要求更正,因為經過覆核,只有七八十處錯誤而已。經此事後,「正音」又無疾而終。
王亭之八六年往夷島定居,到九三年回港,才知道何文匯將「正音」搞到如此成功。因為夷島資訊隔涉,所以何文匯便無敵手。
後來王亭之來圖麟都定居,當邪音初出現時,曾跟蘇凌峰先生、何潔貞女士提出讀音問題,但反應冷淡,他們根本沒興趣跟王亭之討論。蘇凌峰甚至以「語音七十年一變」為理由,反對王亭之的說法,這是昧著良心的理由。因為他分明是跟何文匯的讀音,而何文匯則白紙黑字承認他是根據一千年前的《廣韻》。不承認「語音七十年一變」的正是何文匯,而不是王亭之。]s-~ D I#~
如今王亭之將事情本末略為提出,很希望兩家電視台思考,因為此事可大可小。:good:
[[i] Last edited by magic on 2007-1-2 at 01:05 PM [/i]] 何文匯
比佢吹脹
都唔知佢d讀音點黎! [quote]Originally posted by [i]kiuken[/i] at 2007-1-2 05:42 PM:+wGh3miU*_ V
何文匯
比佢吹脹
都唔知佢d讀音點黎! [/quote]8Rv4g:{)x5WCz
何文匯是根據一千年前的《廣韻》,不承認「語音七十年一變」....畀佢吹能...脹:mad: 個"時奸"亂咁 "提唱",唯恐天下不亂 I don't like this so call Prof Ho...so news said his PhD is not on the related field. So wht's is his phD belongs to [quote]Originally posted by [i]magic[/i] at 2007-1-2 06:46 PM:(L@Bw@m"u1suN
2BN3Zq9A1[ tUo
何文匯是根據一千年前的《廣韻》,不承認「語音七十年一變」....畀佢吹能...脹:mad: [/quote]H[5_$f`1vyv
1千年前已經有廣東話....,L)jJ4g \
真係勁|y-~0y5G;jd BpxM
[url]http://www.bookstrg.com/shtml/Reading/YHCH/101.htm[/url]
-xY]3f,e2D1f&r5U
[[i] Last edited by darkhunter on 2007-1-3 at 09:47 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]darkhunter[/i] at 2007-1-3 09:44 AM:
nm,u] n;]WJD
1千年前已經有廣東話....
真係勁/s7h(}0L"C-l5y#h.al
[url]http://www.bookstrg.com/shtml/Reading/YHCH/101.htm[/url]u$HbaF
G)Z7o$dy
[[i] Last edited by darkhunter on 2007-1-3 at 09:47 AM [/i]] [/quote]+P+\'[,~ }R oK7|jd
thx....:kiss::clap::good: [quote]Originally posted by [i]darkhunter[/i] at 2007-1-3 09:44 AM:
1千年前已經有廣東話....2K\Z\ v^P
真係勁$] y6J#@w
[url]http://www.bookstrg.com/shtml/Reading/YHCH/101.htm[/url]5rgT"X;a7a
0@%a6M _tA
[[i] Last edited by darkhunter on 2007-1-3 at 09:47 AM [/i]] [/quote]
現在無記之所謂[[[正字]]]...要小心...有D係[[何卜st]] 的錯野..小心!!!:mad: [quote]Originally posted by [i]ryankwok13[/i] at 2007-1-3 12:39 AM:
I don't like this so call Prof Ho...so news said his PhD is not on the related field. So wht's is his phD belongs to [/quote]