[quote]Originally posted by [i]kakeidevil[/i] at 2007-5-21 19:45:
:noway::noway::noway::noway::nowa... [/quote]
sorry ya, 大家心水唔同我都無計架, 真係唔係有心同你對賭架
買200分者,睇到我信心有幾大啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2007-5-21 20:12:
未聽過 :help:
不過係咪即係逐場加倍呀? :haha:
係o既話過左5,000我會玩 :D [/quote]
[size=4]冇錯.....[/size]:agree::agree::agree:...
[size=6]疊賭---Martingale[/size]........不過詳細講係:
[size=4][u]Martingale[/u] [/size]
Martingale is probably the best known system for money management. Originally designed for use in casinos, this system has nothing to do with picking objects. Martingale is a system which helps you control your stakes. With Martingale, you can be a lousy bettor, but still win money. Please not that Martingale is a system with very high risk of going broke.
The principle of the Martingale system is as follows:
[color=Red]If you lose, you double your stakes, and if you win, you start all over on your starting stake. This means that you eventually will be ensured a profit. Follow this example: You've found a game with odds 2.0 for home victory. You bet 100$, but you lose, as the game ends in a draw. Next time you bet 200$ on a game with odds 2.0. If you lose again, you must bet 400$ on a game with odds=2.0. If you win this time, you've placed a total stake of 100+200+400 =700$, and you've won 100$ for your efforts. The 100$ payoff is equal to what you would've won on your first bet.[/color]
Fantastic system, or what ?
Certainly, if you had unlimited funds available. Or if the bookie would drop his maximum bet limit. Or if you have the sufficient cool when you hit a long losing run. Remember, with odds=2.0, you will have to wager 32 times your original stake if you lose 5 times in a row. And losing 5 times in a row is not too difficult with odds 2.0..... And even if you have lost 5 times in a row, you have no greater chance of winning the sixth time. Too many people think they'll have to win soon when they've lost many in a row. The fact is that the chances for a win is just as big (or small if you like) as when you started the betting sequence. Martingale is in other words a very dangerous system, and should be used by punters with large funds and no nerves. In my opinion, Martingale is not a suitable money management system for the average punter due to it's heavy level of progression
大家可能唔耐煩睇咁多雞腸.....不過唔緊要......其實艾兄你已經講左要點...不過其實仲有好多細節.......
假設我買大細....第一鋪用$50買大.....輸左既話.....第二鋪再用$100買大.....不斷將注碼加大.......假設去到你用$400果鋪先開大...咁你就會勝$50......($400-$200$100-$50)....呢個理論既論點係永遠唔會長開細同長開大既.....咁你就最後永遠都係勝出.....(果$50).....
聽落係咪好吸引呢.......:dev::dev::dev:....
[quote]Originally posted by [i]feuosma[/i] at 2007-5-21 20:25:
[size=4]冇錯.....[/size]:agree:... [/quote]
所以casino咪有限紅囉!!:)
咁本錢要足夠喎, 萬一未開中你個飯, 你就無晒錢落注................你知賭錢呢飯,有時好邪架, 連開十幾口大,........都經常有
[size=6]大家說得好!!!!!!!!!!!大家請睇第三段:[/size]:kicking::kicking::kicking:
Certainly,[color=Red] if you had unlimited funds available[/color]. Or if the bookie would drop his maximum bet limit. Or if you have the sufficient cool when you hit a long losing run. Remember, with odds=2.0, you will have to wager 32 times your original stake if you lose 5 times in a row. And losing 5 times in a row is not too difficult with odds 2.0..... And even if you have lost 5 times in a row, you have no greater chance of winning the sixth time.[color=Red] Too many people think they'll have to win soon when they've lost many in a row. The fact is that the chances for a win is just as big (or small if you like) as when you started the betting sequence. Martingale is in other words a very dangerous system, and should be used by punters with large funds and no nerves. In my opinion, Martingale is not a suitable money management system for the average punter due to it's heavy level of progression [/color]
本人親身經歷:本人19歲時拿住$500過大海賭大細....用呢個方法嬴左$700(合共$1,200).....
第2次再拿呢$1,200去......變$4,000
第3次再拿呢$4,000去......變$20,000
比大家估劇情發展........
第4次我再拿呢$20,000去......變左幾多番黎??????;););););););););)
如果你真係咁買都幾waste money喎 :giveup:
可能我對數學敏感, 好細個就諗倒依個方法
咁玩就要有好多資金, 輸左又要繼續追; 但如果真係有咁多資金就唔會咁玩啦
所以依個玩法遊戲上實行就冇乜所謂, 實際上風險好大
main point就係加倍嬴左一至兩局之後, 就一定要由小開始再玩過, 否則...:secret:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]feuosma[/i] at 2007-5-21 20:40:
[size=6]大家說得好!!!!!!!!!!!大家請... [/quote]
變咗一張返HK嘅船飛:P:P:P
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2007-5-21 21:17:
如果你真係咁買都幾waste money喎 :gi... [/quote]
:good::good::good:....證明你聰明過我......:D:D:D
但....在賭既世界裹....單純靠智慧是不足夠的.....
愚蠢甚至並實並不緊要.....因為即使因為愚蠢錯了一次....以後總不會笨得再錯啦....即是說我覺得愚蠢是可以用經驗去救.....但在賭博裹(其實股票市場都一樣.....)有一個比愚蠢更可怕千萬倍既敵人會晌你面前出現.....
[size=6][color=Red]就是人性!!!!!!!!!!!!就是你自己!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/color][/size]
你呢段野1000%正確.....[color=Red]但當晌你見到你桌子面前既$50...變成$100....$400....$1,000.....$10,000...$100,000.....你估你腦入面仲會唔會記起你呢段野......起身離開走人??????;););).....([/color]現在晌度話會係冇用既.......一定要設想自己晌賭局前.....請反覆思考紅字)
賭.....即係貪......只要你貪....果個比愚蠢更可怕千萬倍既敵人就一定會把你擊倒......
劇情大結局: 果次我拿著$20,000......晌入門口前心血來潮攞番$200用黎買回程船票........
冇錯......最後就係得番呢 $200........(唔知有冇人估中呢???:D:D:D)
好似突然離左題咁.....不過其實我好想同大家晌度交流下好耐.....不過呢期一直冇時間.....(有都要黎晌度出文...:P:P:P).....呢樣野其實我真係好想同大家傾...睇睇大家既新睇法....
大家都晌度一排.....其實要估得中絕對唔難.......因為估唔估得中只係建基於智慧同經驗.......最重要係.......[size=6]你可唔可以贏$$$$$$$$$$$$??????...因為呢樣先至係你面對剛才我所講既比愚蠢更可怕千萬倍既敵人既對抗既結果!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/size]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ronja[/i] at 2007-5-21 21:38:
變咗一張返HK嘅船飛:P:P:P [/quote]
[size=6]ronja兄....我比十個勁你!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:[/size]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]feuosma[/i] at 2007-5-21 21:46:
[size=6]ronja兄....我比十個勁你!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:[/size] [/quote]
經驗之談:D:D:D:D
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2007-5-21 21:17:
如果你真係咁買都幾waste money喎 :gi... [/quote]
點解大家都話十賭9輸????(其實90%算保守估計...照我睇應該係99.9999%就差唔多...)正正係證明左幾乎全部人都唔係敗在估錯下....而係敗係呢個可怕既敵人---[size=6]人性[/size]---之下.....呢個敵人點可怕法???
(1)佢1年365日24小時咁晌你左近......
(2)即使你贏左佢10,000次.......佢只要贏你[size=6]1次咁大把[/size].....你就會輸得徹底....灰非煙滅.......
(3)你要贏佢........即是話你要[size=6]滅絕人性......[/size]
[color=Red]main point就係加倍嬴左一至兩局之後, 就一定要由小開始再玩過, 否則.......[/color]
艾兄你呢句真係金石良言......:good::good::good:...[size=6]問題係係完全違反人性既!!!!!!!!!![/size]...當你由$50變$500,000後.....[size=6]係冇可能再用$50下注既!!!!!!!!!!!!!![/size]....如果可以...呢個世界就唔會有十賭9輸呢句說話......正正就係....做唔到呢樣野既人.....係佔99.9999%.......
講咁多.....其實係因為呢樣係每一個賭徒都應該知既......因為呢個係每一個賭徒宿命!!!!!!!!!!
[[i] Last edited by feuosma on 2007-5-21 at 10:13 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]feuosma[/i] at 2007-5-21 22:11:
點解大家都話十賭9輸????(其實90%... [/quote]
等我都分享一下賭嘅心得.......
我覺得賭錢要贏除咗技術之外,另外最重要嘅一個因素係--------運氣!!
响冇運氣嘅時候,技術會幫助你將損失減到最低,而响有運氣嘅時候,技術就會將運氣發揮到淋漓盡致,贏盡最多唧$$$$!:dev:但係一個賭得叻嘅人除咗能夠做到我頭先所講嘅嘢之外,最主要佢係要feel到D運氣幾時嚟同埋幾時走!!!賭神都冇可能次次賭錢贏,但賭神賭錢十次入便就算只有四次贏六次輸但佢都可以贏住$$走,此話何解?假設賭神每次有$10000做賭本,因為佢輸嗰六次嘅時候feel到嗰日嘅運氣不在他的一方,所以賭神唔會輸哂$10000先至走,賭神响嗰六次應該平均輸到最多$5000就走人,而响佢贏嗰4次錢入便,賭神就會將佢嘅技術加上運氣盡贏,而我相信賭神一定會win多過$30000!!!
所以除咗feuosma兄所講嘅人性嘅問題,就係一個人能否响輸錢嘅時侯keep住好冷靜去分析當時嘅形勢,因為運氣唔係你一坐落去賭就即刻响你旁邊幫你贏錢,又或者成晚都唔嚟,所以我其中一個經驗就係贏谷輸縮,輸嘅時侯用細注(又唔洗鋪鋪買)睇吓自己嘅運氣返來未,未返就起身,下次再賭過,如果等到D運返嚟.......呢D咪正宗叫「等運到」囉!!!:D:D:D
.
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ronja[/i] at 2007-5-21 11:07 PM:
等我都分享一下賭嘅心得.......... [/quote]
就好似我之前明知黑仔都要1,000 1,000咁bet, 差d破產 :D
瑞典波唔識買:noway::noway::noway:
但照買:lol::lol:
AIK蘇納主勝(1.70) @300
[quote]Originally posted by [i]feuosma[/i] at 2007-5-21 09:45 PM:
:good::good::good:....證明你聰... [/quote]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2007-5-21 09:17 PM:
如果你真係咁買都幾waste money喎 :gi... [/quote]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ronja[/i] at 2007-5-21 11:07 PM:
等我都分享一下賭嘅心得.......... [/quote]
好堅呀你三條友:win::win::good::good:
買波時間又到:
(i)主客和二串一
星期一(1)
AIK蘇納 主勝 1.75
星期一(3)
佐加頓斯 客勝 2.15
2串1 1.75 x 2.15 x 320分:dev:
(ii)入球大細
星期一(2)
加爾斯 vs 卡爾馬 入球大
2.1 x 200分:dev:
(iii)波胆2串3
星期一(1)
2 : 1 7.5倍
星期一(3)
0 : 2 8.5倍
每注 20分:dev:
是日三項投注共560分:dev:
[color=Red]我追[/color]:noway:
[[i] Last edited by ronja on 2007-5-22 at 12:56 AM [/i]]
ronja:
AIK 1.7咋, 所以嬴左o既話我會計而家o既1.7
1,3場吹緊有鬼, 咁岩你買晒 :giveup:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]eqhigh[/i] at 2007-5-22 12:31 AM:
好堅呀你三條友:win::win::good::good: [/quote]
再堅d都仲得呀 :dev:
當一個讓平半盤乎合兩個條件, 最少中9成
- 對賽成績麻麻/普通
- 上盤低水
最近期o既試驗: 巴塞 :naughty::naughty:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2007-5-22 00:55:
ronja:
AIK 1.7咋, 所以嬴左o既話我會計而家o既1.7
1,3場吹緊有鬼, 咁岩你買晒 :giveup: [/quote]
我睇生果報咋:)
乜落咗飛?:clap::clap:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2007-5-22 01:11:
再堅d都仲得呀 :dev:
當一個讓平半盤乎合兩個條件, 最少中9成
- 對賽成績麻麻/普通
- 上盤低水
最近期o既試驗: 巴塞 :naughty::naughty: [/quote]
有冇分主/客隊?
:cheers: