娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

Rated-R 發表於 2007-9-9 08:15 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2007-9-9 02:45:
我覺得史奈達要證明自己有能力著皇馬 ... [/quote]
咁就死la,球壇未來十年又多個廢人

Rated-R 發表於 2007-9-9 08:17 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fake2005[/i] at 2007-9-9 17:27:


一針見血!
最好再執執個樣!
不過咸哥咁完美,史奈達點都無可能100%繼承架啦~~~
足球之神只有一個--David Beckham!!
前無古人,後無來者!! [/quote]
你訓醒先上來留言la

amigofans 發表於 2007-9-9 08:24 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2007-9-9 08:17 PM:

你訓醒先上來留言la [/quote]

[b]你唔好話人啦, 你自己講d野都差唔多[/b], :D:D:D

算啦, 呢d吹水題目, 無謂認真...

即係問你碧咸有咩唔好, 你講來講去都係一個字...

廢丫ma...你都係咁啦...:haha:

咁洗咩咁認真?:giveup::giveup::giveup:

[[i] Last edited by amigofans on 2007-9-9 at 08:25 PM [/i]]

Rated-R 發表於 2007-9-9 08:31 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]filter-052fans[/i] at 2007-9-9 20:24:


[b]你唔好話人啦, 你自己講d野都... [/quote]
我真系Feel到佢廢,但用字面形容唔到出黎,咁又可以點呢?
咁咪算low

amigofans 發表於 2007-9-10 12:03 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2007-9-9 08:31 PM:

我真系Feel到佢廢,但用字面形容唔到出黎,咁又可以點呢?
咁咪算low [/quote]

[b]係啦, 我最鐘意你咁樣, 你一咁吹法, 我又可以唔洗咁理性..[/b]:good::good::good:

講真, 我都係feel到費高"廢", 而且樣非常之衰,:nogood::nogood::nogood:

魯爾正宗係門口狗一條, 卡羅斯成日好似縱慾過度咁...:nogood::nogood::nogood:

仲有大哨, 我以前好like佢, 但唔知係咪佢咩都攞過晒,
愈來愈無鬥心, 不如佢收山把啦, 去溝下d女網球員同model好過踢啦...:giveup::giveup::giveup:

[size=5]我好你少少, 我feel到之餘都仲up到d野既[/size]....:D:D:D

Rated-R 發表於 2007-9-10 10:25 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]filter-052fans[/i] at 2007-9-10 00:03:


[b]講真, 我都係feel到費高"廢", 而且樣非常之衰,

魯爾正宗係門口狗一條, 卡羅斯成日好似縱慾過度咁...

仲有大哨, 我以前好like佢, 但唔知係咪佢咩都攞過晒[/quote]
費高點廢都唔夠碧咸廢la,至少過你幾件落底比波碧咸已經冇可能有,而且碧咸D長傳費高都有,系跑唔起又點?能全程用個人技術去補常,好過D人好擺明咁表現我係碧咸剩系識斬,射Free,突破,左腳就咪搞我,要我有貨交唔該同我造埋空位先,咁多條款用你把鬼
費高除左防守差D外,我真系諗不到佢系進攻創作上有何缺點,有腳法,左右開弓,傳到波,有死球,又能自己幫自己開路,你搵個比我ㄚ,呢D球員先系十年難得一見ar

Rated-R 發表於 2007-9-10 10:38 AM

碧咸有乜唔好?
腳法差,冇頭鎚,冇速度,冇入楔,攻時太公式化,守時冇用腦兼茅到冇朋友

amigofans 發表於 2007-9-10 11:15 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2007-9-10 10:25 AM:

費高點廢都唔夠碧咸廢la,至少過你幾... [/quote]

叫左你主觀d, 唔好分析咁多啦, 根本唔o岩你個style, 因為言之無物,
[b]同埋我地開始離題啦, 呢個post係講史奈達既..[/b]

要插becks同拜figo過番去"插碧咸廢果個post" ok? :):):)

fabric 發表於 2007-9-10 12:44 PM

現在看來史奈達的作用比 碧咸的作用大, 最少其他球員不用因遷就佢去走位, 現在的皇馬打整體, 效率好好多. 另一方面, 史奈達不論傳波, 射門, speed和罰球都不在碧咸之下, 所以皇馬的收購是正確的:cheers:

Rated-R 發表於 2007-9-10 12:48 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fabric[/i] at 2007-9-10 12:44:
現在看來史奈達的作用比 碧咸的作用大... [/quote]
史奈達根本系卡卡,路斯基果種球手

fake2005 發表於 2007-9-10 06:11 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Rated-R[/i] at 2007-9-9 08:17 PM:

你訓醒先上來留言la [/quote]

噗!
呢位朋友真係好唔妥咸哥,
個假到出面既reply都插:giveup:

勇勇 發表於 2007-9-10 06:22 PM

我睇完佢幫荷蘭入o個個死球,對佢完全改觀!

sbbnuftne. 發表於 2007-9-10 06:59 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]勇勇[/i] at 2007-9-10 06:22 PM:
我睇完佢幫荷蘭入o個個死球,對佢完全改觀! [/quote]
係甘入free kick:D

bigfish 發表於 2007-9-11 01:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]sbbnuftne.[/i] at 2007-9-10 06:59 PM:

係甘入free kick:D [/quote]
其實佢加盟左皇馬之後不斷模仿碧咸射 free kick, 所以技術有所提升

zxcvbnasd 發表於 2007-9-11 01:30 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2007-9-11 01:21 AM:

其實佢加盟左皇馬之後不斷模仿碧咸射 free kick, 所以技術有所提升 [/quote]
你發完春夢未???

扭耳仔 發表於 2007-9-11 05:59 PM

史奈達踢阿積士果時已經踢得好好,扭波、射球都難佢唔到,而且佢左右腳都可以射波,一早就有好多大球會傳過話搵佢過檔,碧咸除左斬波落點好過史奈達之外,我諗無咩可以同佢比。罰球如果以現有狀態,我覺得佢地兩個都只係不相佰仲。

發表於 2007-9-11 09:10 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]zxcvbnasd[/i] at 2007-9-11 01:30 AM:

你發完春夢未??? [/quote]
我覺得大魚其實係度曲線反碧咸
唔知係咪我多心:redface:

hingwai 發表於 2007-9-12 03:54 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]bigfish[/i] at 2007-9-11 01:21 AM:

其實佢加盟左皇馬之後不斷模仿碧咸射 free kick, 所以技術有所提升 [/quote]

係呀! 個個球員都係模仿碧咸用 " 腳 " 射罰球 :D:D

fabric 發表於 2007-9-17 01:11 PM

昨晚史奈達又入罰球, 3場入4球, 碧咸第一季才入4球:D

amigofans 發表於 2007-9-17 03:45 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fabric[/i] at 2007-9-17 01:11 PM:
昨晚史奈達又入罰球, 3場入4球, 碧咸第一季才入4球:D [/quote]

所以我一早就講, 史奈達係神級, 佢愈來愈...
[b]唔係, 根本已經超越左告魯夫....[/b]

[b]莫講係碧咸, 就連施丹或者告魯夫, 都已經同史奈達愈來愈遠...[/b] :nogood:

[size=6]史奈達仲後生, 佢係唔會停落黎架, 下一站就係超越埋比利同肥馬 !![/size] :good::good::good:

頁: 1 2 [3] 4

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.