殺人犯係咪特別蠢架呢?
(不知在這裡發貼,是否發對了地方?若發錯的話,麻煩版主幫我移位,唔該:P)入正題...
發覺好多殺人犯都係同出一個錯誤,點解每次殺完人後,都一定要用死者張八達通?
係咪一個指定動作黎架?每次都係衰係張八達通手上(雖然呢條鳳姐殺人犯係唔值得同情)
&rg5m P)TU+J,^h
定還是叫"天網灰灰"呢;) 逃之夭夭o個d又冇人知o者 [quote]Originally posted by [i]費事高[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:12 AM:
(不知在這裡發貼,是否發對了地方?若發... [/quote] {Mb'OC S_
到你殺人既時候就唔好咁蠢啦:naughty::naughty: [quote]Originally posted by [i]wcchan886[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:21 AM:"q+f3]3L:xN
到你殺人既時候就唔好咁蠢啦:naughty::naughty: [/quote]
你都係呀:P6AN ~m H1~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]阿感[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:16 AM:
逃之夭夭o個d又冇人知o者 [/quote]fR4w/b7[{s~6{.r2J
?1{4Mt\0p C~%M i3_
t4l;x d dht5G
二個鳳姐殺手都捉晒啦:cheers: [quote]Originally posted by [i]費事高[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:23 AM: C$d-_C JA e
你都係呀:P
n3B'P;t*y ?1z*T
二個鳳姐殺手都捉晒啦:cheers: [/quote]
U5J'f:W0Qtx(J
捉左兩個,仲有第3個...費X高:dev::dev: 如果動機係錢, 咁八達通最起碼都值$50, 如果窮到去殺人,
更係用埋張八達通去喇~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]wcchan886[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:37 AM:K%C;e,_cjQ/m)Kr
捉左兩個,仲有第3個...費X高:dev::dev: [/quote]
你咁都知道;)睇怕...我要殺人滅口先得喇:D [quote]Originally posted by [i]kuru[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:54 AM:
如果動機係錢, 咁八達通最起碼都值$50, 如果窮到去殺人,
更係用埋張八達通去喇~ [/quote])F NZ3[ Oz s0]
J/N7oN+T q%X a
V"xE^|
咁咪就係抵x死囉:P而家咪幾好,以後唔使為錢煩,一日四餐(連宵夜)都唔使錢:cheers: [quote]Originally posted by [i]費事高[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:58 AM:
你咁都知道;)睇怕...我要殺人滅口先得喇:D [/quote]
Mw"V-R ms!is-zh `
唔好啊:cry::cry:
最多唔爆你出黎:giveup::giveup: 佢係唔夠常識
我過兩日開下個post 大家討論Z&NE3{3@l7JM_"jnX
點樣殺咗人令警方好難查同有機會查到既方法 , 原因 [quote]Originally posted by [i]wcchan886[/i] at 2008-3-25 01:04 AM:0M(i5s0| p
L)h%P_`-\x;o.R b
唔好啊:cry::cry:#?vz4KY \.Q7p
最多唔爆你出黎:giveup::giveup: [/quote]6Sj:oW]
E7s Dv ?a
0sZ(L4|$L
咁就暫時放過你先啦:D [quote]Originally posted by [i]大優勢[/i] at 2008-3-25 01:05 AM:
佢係唔夠常識
?,x3e3q l"s3[K Q
我過兩日開下個post 大家討論
.m&@` z,D&C*_
點樣殺咗人令警方好難查同有機會查到既方法 , 原因 [/quote]
1DOZ yj&C
其實我就唔係咁信,殺人後可以走得甩,我覺得梗會天網灰灰,雖然...現實中真係有好多人暫時未比差佬捉到,但我亦相信走得甩都要留意收尾個幾年,因為我相信因果循環:agree: [quote]Originally posted by [i]費事高[/i] at 2008-3-25 01:13 AM:
[:K.n LD9oP { o4k
咁就暫時放過你先啦:D [/quote]
你快D將你張八達通增值啦,咁我就可以......:naughty::naughty: 梗係特別蠢啦,殺死咗人咁大條屍都唔知收埋去邊,唔收埋就實畀人發現! K5c{D]U
但被殺者都一樣咁蠢,好多時死咗都唔知咩事~~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]大優勢[/i] at 2008-3-25 01:05 AM:d1PN$`"O]
佢係唔夠常識
"s7Lp!PMU/}%{
我過兩日開下個post 大家討論t*B$EM'h/rc8T
點樣殺咗人令警方好難查同有機會查到既方法 , 原因 [/quote]
DON'T DO THIS THING~~~!!BROTHER!!g:~!EJJi0R
do you remember long time age the post talk about raping a girl, and finally it become a real big shit?
Although I am interested in your idea, but please don't post it. Ks!E4@)VY2E2B
[[i] Last edited by qazplm on 2008-3-25 at 06:20 AM [/i]] !
?
########### #############
'? knA ZP z_
Why I use the word "d i s cuss", it can't be show??
and the word will be show like this ----"filter-004"
The word "d i s cuss" is used to be filter?????P Y`,T{7~7s(d,b
filter-004,filter-004...v fIvj5@
I I'h F9y y
############~S `*J q)s
W5zb5V$V4v/QF
[[i] Last edited by qazplm on 2008-3-25 at 06:25 AM [/i]] [color=blue][b]+c'uUS W(tL H,z,@
版規的功用, 其實並非只針對維護論壇運作, 亦係保障論壇及會員兩者的基石。y3m R&cL5^7Q z
一直以來, 縱使係互聯網, 亦受法律約束及監管。
過往的"強姦快閃黨"同"網上自稱黑社會", 發表人都遭到起訴已經係一個例子。 oN[/H G1y`
"奇拿事件"更是互聯網如現實一般受法律約束及監管的一個鐵證。
言論固然應該享有自由,但同時每人亦應要對自己的言行負責。
有時無聊無任何動機的發表, 在別人眼中可能成為了一種鼓勵而將之實行的"源動力", 結果就產生了悲劇.......
一時逞口舌之快而導致不快結果, 甚至招惹官非, 不論會員同EF 都絕對唔想見到。9G^`Vbi
為保障會員免於無心之失下招致官非, [吹水版]版規已更新, 請各管理人員繼續留意, 各會員能多多自律。%M/] k0mB z.D v.M
多謝大家:) B2ec'c O9Qoy,g(B0E z
[/color][/b] [quote]Originally posted by [i]qazplm[/i] at 2008-3-25 06:22:
Why I use the word "d i s cuss", it can't be show??
and the word will be show like this ----"filter-004"
The word "d i s cuss" is used to be filter????? \!a,aNd m
filter-004,filter-004...[/quote]Qq4H GU Q!j:hX
;W$w+Y$H0A5w
A b-p+Z*Hp V
cos "d i s cuss" is also a brand name which under using by all forum and this word is one of the restricted words in here.:kiss:
not only this, even foul language & another forums name are restricted to show up.:) 好明顯個兇手有精神病..... 死者係咪用學生八達通？(有相有資料)
如果唔係點樣查？普通成人八達通都認到主人？
頁:
[1]
2