殺人犯係咪特別蠢架呢?
(不知在這裡發貼,是否發對了地方?若發錯的話,麻煩版主幫我移位,唔該:P)2c4]Ib o,K vIXP1RZ+nS'w.p I x&f^ih
入正題...z)i+w#O4h nbu C0l5N
發覺好多殺人犯都係同出一個錯誤,點解每次殺完人後,都一定要用死者張八達通?
係咪一個指定動作黎架?每次都係衰係張八達通手上(雖然呢條鳳姐殺人犯係唔值得同情)@7M$^#}j7d9w{ Q0M
定還是叫"天網灰灰"呢;) 逃之夭夭o個d又冇人知o者 [quote]Originally posted by [i]費事高[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:12 AM:
(不知在這裡發貼,是否發對了地方?若發... [/quote]
M _i^r
到你殺人既時候就唔好咁蠢啦:naughty::naughty: [quote]Originally posted by [i]wcchan886[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:21 AM:
z-_x!@ fJ's*o
到你殺人既時候就唔好咁蠢啦:naughty::naughty: [/quote]
你都係呀:PT3No3Ub
[quote]Originally posted by [i]阿感[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:16 AM:1j znIf9AsV
逃之夭夭o個d又冇人知o者 [/quote]
S:~*sVeQZM&s;M Yz[
nA,P!N8xa p2X
二個鳳姐殺手都捉晒啦:cheers: [quote]Originally posted by [i]費事高[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:23 AM: O)z pw5Z`#}
@XFX[Y6Q)B
你都係呀:P
i\5T uY|$A
N%H g,Ri:^K]S
g(\I#WD
二個鳳姐殺手都捉晒啦:cheers: [/quote]
捉左兩個,仲有第3個...費X高:dev::dev: 如果動機係錢, 咁八達通最起碼都值$50, 如果窮到去殺人, D:C,C h O}6LQ ]OeL+O
更係用埋張八達通去喇~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]wcchan886[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:37 AM:8K8?k*xy\9P8`
9vv` x.\}z
1wd+\FB] H/g
捉左兩個,仲有第3個...費X高:dev::dev: [/quote]
| a6d@-YGYi?+_
你咁都知道;)睇怕...我要殺人滅口先得喇:D [quote]Originally posted by [i]kuru[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:54 AM:
如果動機係錢, 咁八達通最起碼都值$50, 如果窮到去殺人,
更係用埋張八達通去喇~ [/quote]
咁咪就係抵x死囉:P而家咪幾好,以後唔使為錢煩,一日四餐(連宵夜)都唔使錢:cheers: [quote]Originally posted by [i]費事高[/i] at 2008-3-25 12:58 AM:
你咁都知道;)睇怕...我要殺人滅口先得喇:D [/quote]
;w0n.DlZ;Y
唔好啊:cry::cry:C Ya LPy fyL
最多唔爆你出黎:giveup::giveup: 佢係唔夠常識
e-L3rx)v3Bm3c [
我過兩日開下個post 大家討論
}4W,IXT+a%L|H%K
點樣殺咗人令警方好難查同有機會查到既方法 , 原因 [quote]Originally posted by [i]wcchan886[/i] at 2008-3-25 01:04 AM:
唔好啊:cry::cry:
最多唔爆你出黎:giveup::giveup: [/quote]
u-s;u,S*` oH;E
咁就暫時放過你先啦:D [quote]Originally posted by [i]大優勢[/i] at 2008-3-25 01:05 AM:
佢係唔夠常識
.[ TG4XJ%M V
我過兩日開下個post 大家討論(I@7MTM y5H(b
T(XM-~!Y
點樣殺咗人令警方好難查同有機會查到既方法 , 原因 [/quote]ate5BC7dQ9o
mmK}2x&J5F:C0z
其實我就唔係咁信,殺人後可以走得甩,我覺得梗會天網灰灰,雖然...現實中真係有好多人暫時未比差佬捉到,但我亦相信走得甩都要留意收尾個幾年,因為我相信因果循環:agree: [quote]Originally posted by [i]費事高[/i] at 2008-3-25 01:13 AM:8~:aF ?0b7U]5^ P
f.d5U;B-IQ*f:U;N
咁就暫時放過你先啦:D [/quote]
你快D將你張八達通增值啦,咁我就可以......:naughty::naughty: 梗係特別蠢啦,殺死咗人咁大條屍都唔知收埋去邊,唔收埋就實畀人發現!
但被殺者都一樣咁蠢,好多時死咗都唔知咩事~~ [quote]Originally posted by [i]大優勢[/i] at 2008-3-25 01:05 AM:dB?8ytwG
佢係唔夠常識
我過兩日開下個post 大家討論,v_p:h5]C-O
j^_ U3JD
點樣殺咗人令警方好難查同有機會查到既方法 , 原因 [/quote]
|/Fz'BNl X kR
DON'T DO THIS THING~~~!!BROTHER!!(q5Gy/}7Ba q;LG#U}
do you remember long time age the post talk about raping a girl, and finally it become a real big shit?9rX)JeO%m@
Although I am interested in your idea, but please don't post it.
[[i] Last edited by qazplm on 2008-3-25 at 06:20 AM [/i]] !
?j zb7\9\R,Z*^
########### #############
^ wn/g*N N)V4I["])G7~
Why I use the word "d i s cuss", it can't be show??
and the word will be show like this ----"filter-004"$g+{h,PRa F{
The word "d i s cuss" is used to be filter?????
filter-004,filter-004...
0^g+@ft#l7N
SC k6\N:n)Tu_
############H"v:PT%GZ)I2P1{
[[i] Last edited by qazplm on 2008-3-25 at 06:25 AM [/i]] [color=blue][b],~J#}A0e_
版規的功用, 其實並非只針對維護論壇運作, 亦係保障論壇及會員兩者的基石。
一直以來, 縱使係互聯網, 亦受法律約束及監管。
過往的"強姦快閃黨"同"網上自稱黑社會", 發表人都遭到起訴已經係一個例子。
"奇拿事件"更是互聯網如現實一般受法律約束及監管的一個鐵證。
言論固然應該享有自由,但同時每人亦應要對自己的言行負責。
有時無聊無任何動機的發表, 在別人眼中可能成為了一種鼓勵而將之實行的"源動力", 結果就產生了悲劇.......-?;syn(t
一時逞口舌之快而導致不快結果, 甚至招惹官非, 不論會員同EF 都絕對唔想見到。 k `5ymBDr
為保障會員免於無心之失下招致官非, [吹水版]版規已更新, 請各管理人員繼續留意, 各會員能多多自律。
多謝大家:)
[/color][/b] [quote]Originally posted by [i]qazplm[/i] at 2008-3-25 06:22:@^7\2Be0b lw
Why I use the word "d i s cuss", it can't be show??
and the word will be show like this ----"filter-004"
The word "d i s cuss" is used to be filter?????
filter-004,filter-004...[/quote]
ld_$j"l2H-\9D
1?lX~;Kn L4f3J
cos "d i s cuss" is also a brand name which under using by all forum and this word is one of the restricted words in here.:kiss:PR:]phK
not only this, even foul language & another forums name are restricted to show up.:) 好明顯個兇手有精神病..... 死者係咪用學生八達通?(有相有資料)
如果唔係點樣查?普通成人八達通都認到主人?
頁:
[1]
2