娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 男人打女人 - 好賤的男人

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:ZYdp`(R
},B
k,[G+i@L Csm
,RKG{o;X2[g]R

UHu7G)lVPtO 講得合理亦有道理~:agree:bEFD(r)r
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]
0q+ZZ_0CTbN5O
eJ#F5ENA|1@v BOYDWAN版主，Jen01，我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:
7c2w` L!hMo N I'm nobody. K*O\Wh.@f_

z d3toji.iy.Ea tJ2AL#t q
不過段片又真係好誇張，w\4iH:VO'H
尤其最尾一腳，
*[mq!j)Wh8bc 踢到個女o既坐低（內傷都似:noway:），;L
U ?:nz8Iep U
若我唔回應幾句，qK7xNJ!k~9iT
個心真係有D唔安樂...
qnYYRgzu Wa"f9~ mJ
[[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01，呢個唔止係道理，仲係香港法例：0i,R(n|0@p:Z

q W`9V.]M6y;g(Sv 香港法例第２１２章  侵害人身罪條例
6M]X2bu*n-W
LqD9`m2iB*O7Sf 第１７條：意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人（可處終身監禁）vD;Z
Lzo!vwk4U
第１９條：傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害（可處判監禁３年）;[7H.D r;QZ+P&@
第３９條：襲擊致造成身體傷害（可處判監禁３年） Cg6ea [G
第４０條：普通襲擊（可處判監禁１年）/r.a3xzS(x{E

FB!U0W-C E
3PS9iAZBF2A$I4B 身為文明人，是非對錯，自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
h"K:LW e/Vc h
] JF]XqeH f W:K p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,tq?WZ(T
       但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
r W3bl6~/f Q,T /p9\(d0r$V8rGN&S
唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:
X-s;kg9\$z 咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:2^h2gxnYtH

BJ:Hg"V#T Q8y[2yc2W ?'e$|-\M0P8ZM
既然唔知頭唔知露,(GC4HX7pW
l,k%dj,Z
一開口就話個... [/quote]
'\ |7l/voDa@j
wyTYL,f^Y 'CR1H v"pXe)E
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
tt0bD4glw 1K_"E-J*Oc"Z
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....
daCY8A;FF#v7hG
dv$R
xpCg%Y (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)Qi(R;qv:c%IvV

!J d ]Ah)ED ~9~o however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....
,z'O!e%I e-Mb
1dE TG)jd "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,7U)sJ9{%cs
|/p
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??
?x%_ L`A,W:v eA 當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??
~2Sfc[{8w 至於你問有咩正當理由,yx!O&K!^H
你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
9w%|E)PI
A"eZ(pTq/W what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....\:B)M:}9kP

'@ G:l]axZ2G~ ______________________________
[Yfy4~.B:S
/ytT9_D&C well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
@1`np?4J 因為男人生下來比較強壯?&l2Uu'QCRR a
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:/q!Vhu'NZ
打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
4eR{lq2A 打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:nxx&mx%O4j&A
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
5rdCJ]6L 有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,
1ih4d h&[9cH 當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖
i(pI'to wc;l:d'v 我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
6gRSj6{ 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:(y6xIjTj xb:Y4k
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:
-N'n)y|e-M B6Y
Dn
!c(zJ B:@ XW
uwhijn!j#a 我想講嘅,
#f/|}/DF#f
@!c}.k$P H 只係我地根本唔知咩事,
d)T*^$lo(UPj9c;vq 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
%Lk1e:R2A2IH 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??:tH@
Y@+y[!p

7I+tmuVE` p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]+@*F@7vR^5Uzo7@

6[2Y$A z&G+r\ that means you still don't understand what other people are saying`*o+J|Y6A%G

*nH*[g HE no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....5^f1sLd4x
4m:k$VScfQ4l
the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
'nb8@S a 都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]
5G|@'L'eW/x*{ FU%kY.? }+M

S'h5vOZe'y then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
U&n|*@'lU,K$X q,dDWnZ
do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????
8cH.F@c4w
4\$p`$u@f8Yu if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
L7B,zO8qn5{,n[V
,`8gk]Z1z$}
cg7W/_6T0d$@"t oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!
STs_N+hA0]*X!E5B:lV h(\|{
\p*TMs
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,'u6j6LdY
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵. q/n_@\ f

~ sP!i7XP"HX0c7P 首先: BELIBALA
v QQ7f6l6vU,JP+Nh #9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.Y3GY.Nnri1d3n
#17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
arlA*aW #18, OK:)
A0Q*x8?)G l #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:4~-e#K9LB,WNN)_
ps. 有進步 good!:good:
j@)N}EH"o
M1A
j~d infjlam
9B"ntgJV;T;G K#l eG #30 good point, :good:
xTy+F[?;p #34 GOOD POINT:good:t+d F6pU ?(A"r'kl
#63, 講得好!
2~2\/`F3^M
(JA+j Z'G`M6X Jen01,6u"xr'|u4e'v
k,|~@5Sl*?&B
#33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.
"Rr6e%KW? 如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!
*LG*?N@!D0} 你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"
2w_z$LZ 我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?_Q `-}v2]{8CqY
g2h p+y-o-MOJT
SLWONG3,Rqp mV@eV c.L)Y5[
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
5~._1cy*lrY2x-Y 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
y_TX-g"A #doh:Z/W)f
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......Z,e8a)P!~_*Z
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你. T-wp*[
Dgc+Q)DV
而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"j;S8i!g6M/y

WE.Es!k/J [color=Red]我淨係段片見到,Y]*A1Ux l3@
個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,@2rC,tH-ehY(w_0}
仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,
!Jy0o3m xuA7Ib 咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]6|iz4[$m2L"BCBt4F8Z
我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀L/\8s1g7C3E
Jf
&d7`#L5Rz7qU5j(^
[color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,nKDK1Y]:Hy5U
       但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]'tzJk!g
?2K
呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:8IPNXm
G7\ k/k{L
SY,vSw)?!TZ k,B
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****/B/GuDp~
2dG?j:|T?/[1P
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^p^,fGrsrwc5V

-Mi*j!R/] 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時
!e,F)a.P9eS%DY ;? ?rV/m$yR
常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??
,_@]}u
z)Ne &S}F ?
jDSZa~
你意思話我知, 'T.N!l1| I`7Ye1Dp

!cy,B'^6O S 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯+GiD$O4F'gn

7xT8l,cUad 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例
;c5c#M
u+J4l
Og2nC?&QV6`Xz 包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   x/o+o4OX'K D

0{T/n1Vz*H o2b&] 係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護
;XkY V*a_Cg z,~QIXS#`
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:~@3n u6@ ?*D:][

;~p HVQ|
OlN(X G"Zx\sL5Bv 既然唔知頭唔知露,E2X+j0l|_%od![
一開口就話個... [/quote]3F+lhFI
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰 U{ _\4e?V} t}

K F%vKj6X8w'~1c;} 我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,
0zdjH ?v#w&c'h+p%L
+M5Hz/rL
fK-sC 你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯;V7g2YR/Z0c0\`
9U3I6J,GVn s
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
"k~@zLZaP0}E
Zn|x z2B'N,o!v
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
n"^O%w-n1N
IanN._u)o 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能_.nD.I-hD8q'w'E

:Z!rK1x:~J 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力#f0b:x G4oXKsQ

o zYm.P5T 我問你,  
yZQ[d z /qKfaP U E
世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
py$tW8KpK
|sy0R7i7g1PO_P 除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
mtYpS'] N9O
kPu [qQuWn 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話1t7k6k5]X
9f3sb:bY E
不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢 U!jCH0j7| c

[1bk.F3?
t`
d1xX 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
})g L1FR&q2F a
z0@0H7P@2O9o
ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰crX`x;EY[hn
2v|J0K5[%Gf
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
G _ }I"x1L
p%T*Y.b(OO2|WS h [[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可&A[`2~;q4~:w.p!v

/tBYvl2H(Hj 我比多個例子你啦N&t*yz4]E
d.?.VYa3i H n u
係香港  GW*k^.B)X3F7i
,p^#D YN;puf
曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
$_vt%|Rz]+v:C

rNg:t7x`Lz8cPc 結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
5_"|j*IL;I;R]9GeP
-I1F S2E4s6_ 雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪;R)z@~!w8a_)i

D%Yf&D3t"S5`"fk 你點理解??/z
j[ Fi7`
6I+KL0g/`!i9`_
呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....bqWSK

m Ps*yd*bJtH    四川官員就毆打義工道歉6SD4d0iB6Uw
[28/05 星期三 00:30]
Smn:of)R ;^Gg8[(D

+l.N_+T%X\7UWoz6u 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新，就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉，並停職接受調查。3_wPTgvm+f$aS_{
{$k2zK;J.N
事發在上星期三，張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時，被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部，於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後，引起網民強烈批評。KL'J \{aX#zeK:g

Nx:d7KF:R
iZ;}8? [url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

查看完整版本: 男人打女人 - 好賤的男人