娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:uy1J2^{ k&|

P~Ze?9[A.@9Q
G+j!c a U4X~ AM9m 7rCI'f8h ?'R"i,R
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:
OI3[Q&[a$Lg 只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote];@G"b cI}hS
w{(wa~1a JX
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:Ql_@T
I'm nobody.
R6YHZ-S.P4I
/`:N9sV}ton 9\JU8r-Ok5sAD
不過段片又真係好誇張,:v7Oa_"o:D(xp
尤其最尾一腳,'Qe6X/R~(C
踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),
g j u:O/h:g 若我唔回應幾句,
`%W7M ?1N 個心真係有D唔安樂...'X$H]*{Ypf

J;T?z!iL(qX,_ [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:
4L%y~kl-L2vd r2j3{8rP0YU2M3v@
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
b Gs7S ^&L'Rg
c#k4SbE R M&Q 第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)
e,~C {/k#v 第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)
*H/@$X$HW)hb |4U 第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)
3Du G+WU!? GU-_h m 第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)!hsJ/St\
V_0c?"LdWyW&c
T/` ga\2m8s3R0n;O
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM: W#wy eoBEa

5y P~s Ny^N b@ p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,(HUyk;j
       但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]!~9Q yd1H

Wf ]6cheGD 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:Wa ww \fa5p.C%U8?R
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
P-o;ZqO ?F k6^ 5X6R9\,zD9K-D1W!` LG

f]A`G$k4| 既然唔知頭唔知露,2T~&sg2j Q6Qc |;F0gt
一開口就話個... [/quote];XA l4F,SZ

@,Ox kF jd 7@^&bc0{ Ws%P
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
FEC/v-d"y^V)y cZ w5xF9wv1W$d)^I
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....@rVI eN7?
4w#aSH)H
(yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl) g6H2moD
}Y`!xpB7_X
however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....
?oR#}V#JF
@"`-@(@IG4u] "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,XG2oj H)r~ B!c
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??R;j:oP0X#plc.b;B-R9h
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ?? ?3}GW+c4E"m4V
至於你問有咩正當理由,^2g6mL*G R
你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
x'C L tA qu lN 9f8xSd*s(q0?
what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....
3xFp.[%V4V'jt 5P,Q j \,p%{"[ zP"`+k
______________________________
X8K8N@0u9S(W [#{ FPkl#Y
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩{-HK\7c
因為男人生下來比較強壯?Qr^:u9Ls BhS#o)u
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
1hts7[0]tX(m 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
!j I[v)T0r p.K#i 打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:^rI| ^!T,@
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
R,\e9rk 有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,R ]a"\8F*@
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖
mM2h~Y/{A,Q,P 我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
8B e-] ei+QX%E;~T 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:
^a6je:xD 就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:
yS-W&Uo D+FT8{R

0\6X+uGQ4J0g0~%D 我想講嘅,
N3R5Y%hv t#S2R-| 只係我地根本唔知咩事,
X/E:wLj 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
!bdzj4Ro*}"D2`!zm 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??M#AC+djGZ!tT/S

d {c\8C3y p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]
;x&yy0rC!_k2{%db
W1T)@'czNv^q2wd that means you still don't understand what other people are saying-f+f](I~"@b-E
)rd1Ts{\"E
no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....
%sV3M aPK b/~*Z B$D1L.Wh%Z9e8P
the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
.?,SVD4v 都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]
_z t c1yo (G c9WJ{

N&jDJ2YI then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
A7y/N8] G*tNo
];wW!c.AP do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself???? U.K]n!X2W
Kwa;y NzE1i e
if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
&\8bt7R-~3Z(t&nk q x Js^ D.x
w.? x"`iA
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!2r+H;yn'u U)H)h(O
],Tb C2_
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,
'xOP CM#N*l-vVn8Kg 可能比較直接, 請多多包涵. qT'm@0r
)d&V&pe4r6Z$Eay.Y
首先: BELIBALA
6l\{1y:I3wr5O#S%l #9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.8`n:R[%|4_a$JPh
#17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
7hmq\6]7LMT4Y #18, OK:)
,f+v bV(ta Z #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:3e;I/WH_4o'_2a
ps. 有進步 good!:good:
JD)o&M4G0K'`$~#s)E
)?B f5y2dv*T'InQV infjlam w P7WvB].n8f4R k
#30 good point, :good:
.i l}4Ts7a #34 GOOD POINT:good:
\Yb!P&m,J-Te #63, 講得好! L8J VDct;~L0k

W0p7H/v!w V,g3|Q8XL v Jen01,
;?*J$D5~.G I/P%Qu^i N2i A^VU
#33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.
CK D:T8izc,w8q 如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!!Pt2j6Jn+di XI4H.?
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!""j4j4O!B@X'G9zg)v$f
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?5P8FO$Y2hB,a
-M_Uz+T2GD`
SLWONG3,'Bhk kR@u#_
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
/W}:X xXT 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:e;c C4`(S3K$w6o\6J1}

A*n3G-_+G:g+q jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......T_%M9r!M+x
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
+Y2[X.Ug{ w 而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"/wb7b'N,xU6|

;cS#xW{dt.?pQ [color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
/|L3h3p0c ^:UwX1o 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,9j-wk0eyKOA
仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,7d9Di8B LjGr%b
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
1\{`)?9Z3F:u r O 我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀
%]r'cm4X#b
ua+VCg[3n [color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
,gY~b D3v$d        但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
1O7f*U v^5\bG p| 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:5Fx7gROHj
-pr \5c+cO.w$g
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****
Z7Xh4{8C0F I*Q(wl
"h+P ^u k+^-o"\ [[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^
Ef[[#d)oG9^4a
\g6kX C ?8K 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時8x!PkYvqz eY6a

[Jc mJS6T 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??
[|Qk`o)s@ Q
:O iW4d `L 你意思話我知,
.g8^+jmD
4B9} I x iTEis 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯RMU q%iY

+mF*^#Vv I2G2V 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例@ ?8v"fv
/o h.nE@g6i
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   K[q L}
iuY%QoT@*D
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護
,w8MIK7CC0kQ 3f.t m0B6t+^l9z Y@
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
|7h}$R7^ L
"|c/da a h h$Y},ym[k7C
既然唔知頭唔知露,zQ[2_2t*w%|x
一開口就話個... [/quote]
c!E _wI ~ 見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
ik?"pJ9rmJ rr6wv*tn/YS b
我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,
o0Y\3{F[
\)WQ.L8Q6|h 你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯 a1G;b?5A

o4r9hh5D]5Zpk;J 但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
dP@yv+Ne O8Xt_%dba
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
3X!b2f0S weK
$V v-d*i&A+J2i:W*C0RV'? 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能x/G3`$lN)j:q
6l d]2S#]
個男人根本冇控制自己既能力 co9vB5R:g$w
3W] Lg;o@$]
我問你,  "y0ac*rOD%C

h'L4} VIj_Kh 世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
LG];A6VB|x)B |$@T2t(L2V htJ
除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
q0F3NI_ph5vd-w
m7G5@]+i!m 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話1Z9C]*T)r`7IK

c b0A:KP 不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢
F3u)Yq)z
}.bjy8~z_ 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)t@"TZ(e Cq

7A4sw/I{g p ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰
]3q.MO+w5] LY eHh&i%|
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
qU*W a+R#[z9Z !|F%{)n:v;w Xpo
[[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可
V o dfMR1pi2q#p X-zP+u Y u,b+g
我比多個例子你啦
lg@%N7SV
m+["e~7i5X} @ 係香港  
4}JI O'@M
@(Z.|-[&[~IL;t 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
:p1J9N'qw@%[Om
~+G)ZU3A)I 結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
u CuL6lOj-@ *CY8\i$z$k5M
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪-VV3nk7AAn
kB6U+Zf |
你點理解??
:Y9cl1efm )],G8i'\ L(K7Nn
呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....D%~ FiR:xja
4u([3t5B7]+r5Xj
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
f1h"K3L1q9OR.Q @@Z [28/05 星期三 00:30]
.})?&x@#]Y,W+Yji u&?"cru

Kpz{+G)[7@$by 四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。
2q1y;| D i5kPt
+AQ,q+jcD(\ 事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。5} OAl4d8{,IiI ]
^-U/~^pG&s
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.