娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:
3A1Y%p/@(LC Y!OV\nK0h
(K2bO Om+tS7~

R!sEo$| 講得合理亦有道理~:agree:
V4Li#^9{TE 只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]
y|+[h~ IsQc'K
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:(d;cR)Z \ o }y6a_
I'm nobody.v2xH HLX'@e6Y F

2p$E+H KLma
+C@f!?[2Q8G 不過段片又真係好誇張,8cS/@jdX
尤其最尾一腳,pwA7o+ert
踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),2}fZM@$@3Gw1tR3xA
若我唔回應幾句,
e&VL4CL9m 個心真係有D唔安樂...
$V:\,|uF&Vak#Dc
-]6u2F]U#m2r@ [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:?khF{ KhDO;W#B
3` y h2hl.BU
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
~ Ag ea&F zBT7fF fF
第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)
!_$gK,P w-c*v 第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)
$r4~;^)S"tz2L/H oy 第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)wd\%\*A
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)S[ }i1Z8R@`q
'ELW5f'v OO"\

w/_'Q/u2`1z4v7C]8GW 身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
tf*i,}8\!K &_?B$r,^j(e
p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,hXpk(s&Y7U]0{
       但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
&~}U0`P2Q(A@U 1A?KZ-y
唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:
1}0Qw @E{+F 咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
$v'hY*Jr+Hf2| ~.d \l(IL4a_
O/FY7U,au4b"h"k
既然唔知頭唔知露,7Gy Ka9WnM"yJ?&zb!da
一開口就話個... [/quote]
Zz PB4u
`,L#_;_K9QAu
x,ak*k6pe0{u Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
ABS ph&M4i Ur(CL
)Zs{_n(O'x you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....&z)?5|sqN4k q*N
c Ss9|O
(yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)X:j*g7x?3ha

3NvnI"u j&I however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....
$j%r&ht[g1\"Kr !pkp(A&r|JN
"個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,;somA&]*f9s
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??(SA;[|0aW:S4x
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??[lP izbQy*@]
至於你問有咩正當理由,c%avx2{
你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"HG@:R-M"| O%g
MUZT1S
what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....$c0K-t uMA.T7Ul2V
6jCXg"d9Pn9U
______________________________P {RJ6Gw

.pD5gn` well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩2]m%h1q;I3Q+?} G
因為男人生下來比較強壯?{"i*Sr[`"T
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:_eRS:kDU9GI
打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?MOv:a st2F;X
打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:
0c hSH~LI6n,| 唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,ya3zeS_-V3b"T
有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,8g a Z0d%`7lJ9\n+NB
當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖+Ez5]LU
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
7A [1JqKT;{[L9z.L 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:
Q.TNP tZ"[ 就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:
IX|#PF l p ;jWP%V,X!c&Z

(g+gVPI2JV 我想講嘅,
_YI"x^5X7]W&~ 只係我地根本唔知咩事,
C4F _&v$J])Y*pM 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,w6My:~"z
咁對個男仔公平咩 ??u]7T^XFf
0h(k(P7[5~#yCP a!E$E
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]
0k|(U"|6M'_,C9T5M^ %I"Ij)@1qe J
that means you still don't understand what other people are saying5]wpve&E zMA

X a1gwr$M.M no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....*N{#Y6A$Tu

I @#eW*j1_-n the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
4F3l rm8K JW 都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]
Q8A#W]_+I|wO9L
rpW){&zM
N2_9]sg2tMk%} then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?/T-JZ(tN
-d0R&S!]{0j:|2G
do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????M#t/HHd V/U

q8c"L%F,F~ if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
%~H-p,YZqq mVv$s1~P0n4b

L%|M}+AA oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!
-c%v-mV0Q2n4|
l]xME;X,A| 但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,
7pYTJ;vK E 可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.?7Zh gjl8?i
0].Xm7iz Hz&h
首先: BELIBALA_D"{6M0k}'?;z%}
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
6v(c4qmv4Xz[ #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
(es-]Cp J #18, OK:)
,u lrs!b Ez9eTd #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:
"H.n:{x,fd&z'} ps. 有進步 good!:good:"d$Si|/pF

,m sn h q4x,L?%D5c infjlamj6S u7Db
#30 good point, :good:
\Z |b*eg,s5` #34 GOOD POINT:good:
-RXu(Fg"qQ}"U #63, 講得好! l#]5_9bn
:]f$?$O6i%l(I
Jen01,
M3B/?D1JZt e
f-w.St8ub(fP #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.d6L-V*F!Y2[
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!5\?P&r W6j&G*K&UX
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"1K8Y.U_(|;h`
我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?
mH6]%g kb2^
%J"g0Cr\j;s SLWONG3,Gt/q)o.r^"vH
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
l%vr)K:WC o5? 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
OIWY7B8~
V)}3F6}:hA jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......
'wXfV1y-e}+Y 在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
;?$l J.Y4y]s)T)SQ 而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
&F ~7|4j)C#X A 3L(AS!l9Zq~0t:M7h
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,2[1~]6~9r4Y v3qk5N
個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
4y Lh5K]7v.v7g 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,Rp*n \m;} z8B;SCfR
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color] JJXd9\g6]Od p ]
我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀
;j;n7Jy` c R0E (vwH6^(m
[color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意, qUSq ?'qL5T5l%H
       但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
Lf0m%s*c JeF u0y X 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:
A:NPQ%@]W#~t KrL6g g'd'JF}
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****5ZS|7B.CseY(H

2r hl(A0\^"c [[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^
he)m"b1c2ve aT#}e] A5qX#\*V
我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時UW6k4^x$h_zA$~

4]%yP4D K[KY? 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??
G(Q F d%g.U
#k]7@c%RN!R 你意思話我知, %c _4I2qffoGH

|(mu0OW)C 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯,}1K&HGS7m$|g G5l

2JzCmw+A 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例
mJz-Ae
:L9V0U%Qk"ZfJ%V 包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   $O7y.|z8[3k0_
s` |C'N
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護)Jg/j\OG/vjT{

i1`5L3XHc(V 照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
;}WaAQ3H4c!z'v ]Ktuz(X

$f S?-gXgn 既然唔知頭唔知露,9Q#A,m8S.K7Y+I-e/j
一開口就話個... [/quote]-L F*A5q)H^g
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰5i^$SX5\4_ x.z

LI!O3X)z*f!mN 我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,
5C _^ J9f[p@K
Z+J/L!d3\h!u 你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯*G.K{7b#@!x8J yp
x_)A R'UV Ar W
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??}!k)U X y|
#pTC w*F5k t
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
;k$V&H%Rl ;W y(Uvm Ak
以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能
d+b k&D7xJJ*h
o$`'X F3S$gw U| y/_U 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力Of{1piir
H}] q9v*i2p]
我問你,  
6j_c&f5G aw9x YL}w[${3?
世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??.V?UE.f9r5~

m7eTW|Q*`T%v 除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以| Y#O3i2g R

,LbAL @s 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
(ji:[Du:n~ #H Z-aVKn
不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢f(iql b
eJ]jH l9lOc
係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能) H g4B#PlR4b%|

AB)O9qrQ ~ ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰
+_ f&NP(p fMW*c}:Sc
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
!z4X I u_ V5w t%z6CZ7M7K,Jo
[[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可
Fd7ha:l1aAJ!b
%H\fz$Z0bS 我比多個例子你啦0\`!`$V.ar
cT2R/{q'd#B
係香港  
r fQrUb.`8ui6K#}
3E"L~.J4s 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上7]!Lk4Ut4az]

]i1J U _#G k} n2A 結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
x|A-q }:FC9A
6S p F;D0Q&_"W:N 雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪
@%\u;Q"z:@l.i
m1gi yEV 你點理解??
y3G+u \j I7C
2lX4C%io!\_ 呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....
_B1{vh7mj
#l,Oa}.B+KC    四川官員就毆打義工道歉%oL%U}j0A
[28/05 星期三 00:30] 9tV6a^7am#K2q

R^;L/J(F?"@nf 2r,B0] g?/~
四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。
!h*E%A$CoJ}esw[
/m+O,` F6GQ 事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。ivH p@y~8AE5L,F+CT

A!\:u-~W [url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.