娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:i\"} p4MXs.}@3r1|
$~9B sx}#p

YEb3]1h)Q PS
Sc$w+?9@!\vzP&adb 講得合理亦有道理~:agree:J(B$|!E1H ]j9O,N
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]
@-M(H&]0kr
(f-t)ZY0W]k.~] BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss:
#i'r0R/Ga5x$ru I'm nobody.I[gx?Bx&K
]z:p Q,I V$Z9Y i({
%QsO8A7c y8b
不過段片又真係好誇張,/Qnlt"T ?*^
尤其最尾一腳,Fz#d9m"K"f
踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),i Z9Jcj y3o_6M#v
若我唔回應幾句,z%e*`1@ z `$Yx
個心真係有D唔安樂...P*`!WZ(h/I F ];@ ~}?

(l^Z$Ebqgw [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:
'iA6J&jU#sb!F
k*fF;KZ"n 香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
"Ks)S&e{~O'V
RU_HIKT 第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)&F"I X!m:y
第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)|&E j \3W4R
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年))Dm B/fLF
第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)
)t2s'j/k*] WBbQ6c
z.}1R!AQ+hq "e)b:a@ }z*p@L
身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:%pvQ8bt%G5S*cO5A

j*r/D/t,DP^ Wz p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,!N7^C:gBU|
       但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]
BS6W]%C&`#}&XV3R
3~\(^T@3| x&n(|4?X 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:*G3^]c u1VGn1n
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
b3y!j? ~4wY#R`"A
|+[F-M }%x :Y Q$Yv5d0Uj-W9b
既然唔知頭唔知露,
#g,U/i NSP(u5^ 一開口就話個... [/quote]
5X%N{"B6]8K
4J,mI"fU8{gA|(w(H g3_JDc
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....Z+QJ}(`7Vc;e

8\2T[? K Y you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....%D7_LaaWZ
8Z&sfl'R
(yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
(nA2|'U+z?
3F7| x}q*c$G3^a however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....8sMVdI8O_{~

_5w"F_{ "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,
(Cqy,X#Hn 但你知點解佢會咁咩 ?? x{G8N9{o {
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??h+q+_:c1k9{%xh
至於你問有咩正當理由,
6l"q+J$n5@H'O3c 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
]5}$\ \0vr
`h)vQ V6|ROgH what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....
/Z^,NY0K:Vm9y3m /kd^7fo5R
______________________________
'K} x/p.go!Lk
I"R1yy.JJrFE well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
Y lS_4o9? 因為男人生下來比較強壯?
GrW8k Wk6Hp-V 如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:
,_L$O"?H*O 打比自己強既生物就無咁錯? IO|'qc}Y
打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:w9b4A yS@dGm
唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,2BN_D0Jj
有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,
J#W9e _1k^:J;X(uB7x%PB 當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖U1N5Rn+S?Sn$f9n
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
.qG2Ij|)R;yY 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree: N/olk)D3hgr)M
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:
;w:P1y0J*of
)j {`#p,g,t i
NH&e!O)H}+zI 我想講嘅,
]6j.|t R9Zo 只係我地根本唔知咩事,
^'}4naI7| 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
p!ghHS8I 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
]e5@eqh7gl
SK'Z Kx p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]0M` P LOQf/ALQ.F

D)aT(AL&v that means you still don't understand what other people are saying5vntX(ZU-j$U!t9p:C

+X2I6qiq(g no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....
3xZPN r N l"m&t )l"ft$hz1p@`#Gh
the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
aLIt(tvB J 都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]{$K8Q]nx&q:A0k8y

&X;OB*xP.a:I9}'q
Y_4PxTrv {.c then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?v;i W"O)w"|7q

s$c GQE8vl9q'rY+f do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????3lI{ Cc/n:mY3MA
OKg6D4NqB6LI9V,N
if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????Cl;N^U+@1P
vw;\0}1rLa\

S|[%k-{[9\ G oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!
[kJVo&I} "h ET kv9a
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,3x)i!rX1W H}?
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.
:r'F[k)zC +|7sQ'C`8x0a.I#w*A1Z
首先: BELIBALA
-g r u Od8u8Y #9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD."Z|gn?8yy
#17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋. v3Tg[;u,F_0_
#18, OK:)
ANL!^Zk-\:iM #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:
rQgTVpkq!| ps. 有進步 good!:good: y'F"O!\O

lD4c)oG:I?j8n(^J infjlam T4[)o-^ Y'm^n
#30 good point, :good:
-W0pd` \P H #34 GOOD POINT:good:
mgg A,B&tU #63, 講得好!
c9P+xe(SkU'a
(Xd3@4k4J8r Jen01,:j]l o_u1w

4n"ti E4c? #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.M_ a#dzHk
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!0[c\9I^Jl5\u
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"
&V(RQE}K `n 我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?
$D;Sfc.ru2jjP 8t5Z&x"v,Q T#v
SLWONG3,
H6N.IK7~ #71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
M k%w:k,k 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:;msXN!f#uT4[4z | mq
Y2JAG+J$h*R+g1p oZ e
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......
p4y&P.s-W!{Hr 在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
U.J:V Su,Z,` 而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
Ak6FU$KV+Z7g3] DVc-`]
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
(A#K+x@%D[ 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,V ?*V;SD(Rx
仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,
3rl4_ \Q{0i!^ 咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
-mFmxG!}5fya 我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀4n n3M@ GWS6D x

4t9u)Re3?5l.l [color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
W^P,~_s        但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
2Z#AR9l}tS 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:MW3o u!V`[?0A|F
&E(f ]jVV._)vX;k
jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****
#d3vg3? R%|
OK\3n0G5Y$[0r/F7D:X [[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^x2Y#\z9L

8AR0}-w(M*I*\8s 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時
T^ WnT _!ttb+Q,i Q t'OFE
常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??,pvgM,O}~+r

L Dgj*b#Vh U$u 你意思話我知,
[Am9N0~+^Z
!s,MRJ0n\H2C\3_ 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯r&a%hj1c$Z`Cr

;Tv ]+kAt 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例
^9S~X t n of6os rT-~7v$pd
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   
,x?;AT T
2ZbaC5D*I 係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護
&hd*F u#@&Q[ o1BN6M7oEa
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:8KC)v(Cb k0t+s
[m0G| y,??1N t3pm

P }+H P3wR*_:O 既然唔知頭唔知露,]N y`8eO-?#`
一開口就話個... [/quote]6{ B-bO"a)RE
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
/o3c!@k?"qTD 'sO0A2\&Cws
我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,
q"Q;dS&|!` rn.@up
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯
5ju/`s|5B9n+~ c8x _8kknn
但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??9q7`hVv"^/Yc4x1ihG\

$K^u-d \2y [ 如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??%fzt5n+{(ok{8b!Z
Z"CM[Kq3T_%Zhn
以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能^9Q,cbf5}vR7l

7G5t3Y&p-G;A 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力)K jMm*uNgGP&P)?
8\1a1F9{:Pqk
我問你,  
Cg+V Oq$a,{lq
@&nVYP"I@/]q7]d 世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
1u_f}5kBK:A
7{VxB3IGdi-ar#I 除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
(gdy\-E&_m:G 4y mg*B a8F L2{t
法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話6a(o-u!f3p

p.}H'f~ C }? 不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢 HqR9[XSWA`~E

qeQ*Jjy 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
3Z T5l8~5u L:x!J ]B*Lic4R%Q
ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰
K2?4M(R6O8d,ZdOa B $r}:N0j"r*{d!`K
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
0P]&Qt XGp;l[
L?JHE6r e x [[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可
7j7M {Xc:t [T
;V O{ H&Kn$]] 我比多個例子你啦
d]"]j\L.@
2h Z]%Pq 係香港  
/z~L`(\ 7bfs%k2L g-M Y1i
曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上!Ld%Y$F}b

J#F-D6UF3W.l9c 結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為9v"D3E` b3F#l/|

_ Y.at,Vi 雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪pe)\7Gd'M/o9h
R8]-C;w ?7{b
你點理解??
h{%K }!}5t;L)`X h,r*G.N B i2UX
呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....
e `6~O'xOV ? F:} {_(V@BD
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
3IT:I m LVF\J [28/05 星期三 00:30]
-~+If gTK ?5E%d,r:u
a*PW Fk7S*x1F
四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。
%GeX/?*C 5JJ~#],v']3q
事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。b#d/[!m&g []7hY
k Cqs;WUua
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.