娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 男人打女人 - 好賤的男人

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:x;n)m$](laY'p
0TsO3Is0r|PP&K_
:x7fvA9|_$p
o
ndRmOKr
講得合理亦有道理~:agree:a0HU Q!{qY
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote])U5s%@bjAd@9IJ
Jh zk*i3Y8M
BOYDWAN版主，Jen01，我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss: ua{/i:u"B'_dA
I'm nobody.
@:H#{}(_
@O _6B:[#C
D*][g
oZd^gPU.iao
不過段片又真係好誇張，(X0Jv*o/{B9L
尤其最尾一腳，
I(L5[wbAP 踢到個女o既坐低（內傷都似:noway:），k#P)R |;s3dR
若我唔回應幾句，
1V7Lws-|%e }2{ 個心真係有D唔安樂...rjQ`)E:W

&R)sWHiv!ah [[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01，呢個唔止係道理，仲係香港法例：9La!u2UfQ7~M
hLqV?l]R;F
香港法例第２１２章  侵害人身罪條例+\8R[tDf ~

&zBvu K-B 第１７條：意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人（可處終身監禁）+z1m9U
an
第１９條：傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害（可處判監禁３年）
\/f5Y8b z-M7M 第３９條：襲擊致造成身體傷害（可處判監禁３年）mNI B
_el,w
第４０條：普通襲擊（可處判監禁１年）
#z BHZN/i
o*BP"P'NE"sB t(db)^ H:]I iU
身為文明人，是非對錯，自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:.gGZs)G:U
j~;cC8r&jy
p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
LUibb        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]s,XsTDt2T
\x\1lY
唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:
rlEA%X#D 咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
VO6|J,CT~-Ey6Mna Y$R?#x6F+LwX9|

+~YmD~9H1U}%d 既然唔知頭唔知露,
!XHO s Cf7bp? 一開口就話個... [/quote]6F.T%uth5t-N p'w
+vT,w^a(g,Lm*w
~K-nH"tRUl$m'[
Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....F F)qp]'|]O

VZ_ I#~ d5E&N3z you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....,x\nEn^"v-n

q E4a;M;Bo1lyt (yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
%S{}3A_"i(]
&cL!Eez1^/r!q however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....
2zyZ{5p eY\Von JYA%M-s
"個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,
(b GIYT6R,Nd 但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??
7t/D(J{*{ [f2w 當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??J5b Z,YpF
至於你問有咩正當理由,
'P:@Tg'}v6\? 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"5e(h
EG%i!b

A%lC3R},{ what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....l'm7_Z"u2Tm+z

h2uk$Sh)VwRz ______________________________ jG+v
BIp-N
yq k;z9mu(Pd
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩
VJ b9pS!wK7S9hOx 因為男人生下來比較強壯?G T8C|5}:`Mj
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:z]Q%PEB4jg.\B*W:c
打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?*Yo \0U$tN2n
w2|
打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:
6uyc(^E-Ky+hf0d 唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,,Dr3lT}b
有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,

\ a?.c,m7DD 當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖 @&RU3l;SRH
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,
7u|/x"\.H&Mm 在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:s:e5Q7VEia%Wo
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:3V*Wh/\/q*Vs1~0PCC
2TQ7[ON#F&xwe

)S[mD$}u 我想講嘅,
H5}3P7vQ4_#@` 只係我地根本唔知咩事,
2m*zL HM c9K5| 就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
_6_RNMxd} 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
|uXa)x2]U (\J?{"P.L)te C
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote] s{.HIo

4F` \+o l0ly that means you still don't understand what other people are saying
ck0L8SZa.UC%b 0S#T M-l&J&S+F1Q+]
no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....

R l%g$su0r SSy7I'v8Nj2H
the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:
*e3I&SVRv)TQ+y 都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote],C'_le8} MU
gPDU6I7i
`sVPy6g^
then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first?
Gvv[e |{"a+LpH2T(b"q
do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself???? Ht9@ ?
A(?&PM

Y;M4rQ/\
|-Oh if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
)f]wa
Ebo
W(x\R!u;D3]%@ H$g Rx A zU,A2}4|-T `.?
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT!t)}7ALL,Wn*W
3La1B"Z_cG+R6f!I8@
但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,,nZ^0~q*y}M
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.yA
~W ^`3o
d6hU&w(L$a
首先: BELIBALA1hP's^Ci)s*LK
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.
X Z:s${/D*b.f(t(QQY V #17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
#zfKl,fucB^+o #18, OK:)a/^(Gcx~.j
#64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:`s${4x ["R }"G
ps. 有進步 good!:good: p|*D/D,k-a

Ab}}$d
ou infjlamQ&h'A&Y&R+BSaF$R
#30 good point, :good:iq8F:r:Out8X+Xy
#34 GOOD POINT:good:
DF;zq2l #63, 講得好!
&Q{GEl.qg
M"I~"lE:yx Jen01,
fU qMZ6\J"x
2LyVLLq(j #33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺.7Y2Vn8]W^
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!0S Y2E A1g&qha
你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"
[DLE*\ 我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?
fAe'CU0athU
,|iAfq)[b-ON SLWONG3,
d/?q7^Bi8RA #71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
B,i-qYh8\*A%XU 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
g`Dl PzP5^ L ?mT5_&@q-v sCY
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......
"d.m8hw;{ 在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.
3JS SI#dW,`*_ 而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??" EN)Av2|T0J(i
mqr3Y8sW;{b
[color=Red]我淨係段片見到,
;H wC^
t Lq6ef 個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,
:| |X7f s 仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,'k_N%C1u6n${f
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]*\;et(w0a
~"r
我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀g${!Kre#N
e(z"aG:B2D
w n`D [
[color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
1V3T,hx,q\N#abH        但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
.e.v6l;z5]bW(w/r$tzj 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:!O_N"ObH
YS

'LuT9p'YS jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****
xcJ[sl)A$F.BjUd )i.l)L!t8t#U"Gl,an&H
[[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^9NF$Xx Q!V;K{%v

PBbs x8ucH 我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時B#d-\j5Q\2[
(v,Ji,?i.c!V
常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??!AD"UdU3H$`E

2e6I2w*`:C.^g 你意思話我知, sD:tO$Q0_S }D

5b$gh]2~ NL&H,p6A 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯
]![Nyg'e:o ,v2CA4b"Vdv
第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例 |MEbYn^-J

jnE,|I 包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   :vNDr!h4n
|%y5gy aPS
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護sIHX#fG*vtE#j

m x8Jv9Z_pei 照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
6dhw2Z x
K0w3g
t'F']R*Tv
,j rz5n&RN},V;R] 既然唔知頭唔知露,
-i-Oa)V Vqi*cb3@9g 一開口就話個... [/quote]v"l
@X'_
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
Gjj'U-W8WF
P+K4fI8x
N 我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,
P/w6eS)m2O/f
'Ch x*[PR0qPK/FH 你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯
R-a:Mh%tq
,^wece/Q%b0D 但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
O b]d)w s.w4l6Q2C:r
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢??
1cb9fxm*Yw
(ME9X[U 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能AvK&{kzu G@S

CR&mErt@(o 個男人根本冇控制自己既能力7e3V c)u}$Te

.A%Ak ~_{Wss 我問你,  L0L,ml*Gu

UEr,CQ4V 世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
|h)G6n8r$OiK*\_ Zc*C8H#Kh7U
除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以}#F$`.F#G
p,[&o

)ocNx$z5c ~ Y F 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
'xJ0WI`u!L4uL
5k#GQ1M w.Rc 不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢
I0N:^1ik6J Y&h| 'c#n!B$b.rh \4b
係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)RwM4f%| q

SMBABp ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰
{ot K9Hk'O'[A,m n4^*Pr!C)r;L
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
^ ~R,nmyd ~ #L\/@A+F&o4Wx
[[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可
T-bl ?3~/y&~X
K+c/h Mb oy#w 我比多個例子你啦a2rvZN!K4PkE.w
)@5_*Oi `;nJ6Q+R
係香港  ,a0~+Cj S~:p

"C0aS,l ~8u 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上m.\%SfQBRZ-M
-Gp?5m g8Y,F c@-r7l
結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為I6u:h*v+`PUf3L
,[Y$e3ow+y
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪+nb8Zsc/C6],_6I

]3x'\ W:o'W*~0K%hI 你點理解??
B$n+v(X5Eqt1N2a-W}
i4W$C_q&q#|-{'jo 呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....2c1gUu(BO6G9x
6j6t"C`W
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
q?7N1U"Gq vQg1my [28/05 星期三 00:30]
G6~*_;u!w.s
p:xj
F+P4i)B"]3s 2m9R6RZ D4_ L-s/a
四川衛生廳工作人員張建新，就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉，並停職接受調查。 uw@ G;H&K#S/W

b0@XPB0m/] Q:U4K 事發在上星期三，張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時，被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部，於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後，引起網民強烈批評。p;oY-|4EP$Z
#YFwl&H0j'iWDZd
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

查看完整版本: 男人打女人 - 好賤的男人