娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:47 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]BOYDWAN[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:13 PM:d+LN#Y%~7Q,\%g
!Yw6_WM+l/_

#T$Ca[,L5M1c D
@8R,BGk_ y 講得合理亦有道理~:agree:g:?]TF8p'D8j;H
只要多一個人識咁諗, 就會少一個暴力事件發生嘅機會:good: [/quote]`,{ C'V|9Y4d#F%R
Lo+C2|Q(w YQ&A(e
BOYDWAN版主,Jen01,我只係路過吹下水o者:kiss: aLLL7D;u(v
I'm nobody.
rG+\7kp
OO+Y$z-^i0D
th*U7t,y'Rg@ 不過段片又真係好誇張,
l*R-o8e qx 尤其最尾一腳,
|i6S&zum*b 踢到個女o既坐低(內傷都似:noway:),
{)X2A/S2Ylj g 若我唔回應幾句,6Y8uk!e{
個心真係有D唔安樂...u7SsN5SS.Q{r
J2o;aoC| ?-K6Eo
[[i] Last edited by infjlam on 2008-5-26 at 01:20 AM [/i]]

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 10:49 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

infjlam 發表於 2008-5-25 10:59 PM

jen01,呢個唔止係道理,仲係香港法例:"G%sA!v"dV~ }-o
Q9p}"o Sg
香港法例第212章  侵害人身罪條例
q?f P/k#a +ZLE m%c r
第17條:意圖造成身體嚴重傷害而射擊、企圖射擊、傷人或打人(可處終身監禁)xL`%h\p
第19條:傷人或對他人身體加以嚴重傷害(可處判監禁3年)Yv?OT xY
第39條:襲擊致造成身體傷害(可處判監禁3年)
W6T+F$v;g9Rh%Q 第40條:普通襲擊(可處判監禁1年)
"X5IF-s OQ"]Y }X9rZ!Q+i

V o(t L"y3EFU 身為文明人,是非對錯,自己諗o拉...

belibala 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:
~7cj!o5p +nG"p#V&U[
p.s.  infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,
@ ta,\!| HvzO        但[color=Red]我個人係鐘意對號入座[/color].......[/quote]ws |#}%bg6\$K

np$k kG 唔怪得你成日覺得其他人針對你啦:haha::haha:}5R[e m Ti@LE!k4`
咁樣你做人都唔開心啦, 放鬆d, 唔好成日諗埋一邊

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-25 11:04 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:D2x)] _x1x/Z
P,qo pn"R%b

nI7bz B 既然唔知頭唔知露,"Z l;wClir'l
一開口就話個... [/quote]
ms"I"_3f*WJ
u"M5yKUxm5u2k/z
I"N'il5M!K9b Mr Jen01...after reading all your replies in this thread....
xU.@+yF%sg(d+S D`|(m v
you still don't understand the whole point of what other people say....uZ,hQY Xm
&@&m)E5W2_y H&P
(yes, we don't know the reason why that man would beat up the girl)
:^'J C4b!U` z H;u\]rxk
however, the whole point of what other people are trying to tell you is that violence can not solve anything.....PH2mT p"k8H I-I4t

5Y k ~%CB1Nf"C "個男仔出咁重手可能係錯,}ETnK2n8}&gD z
但你知點解佢會咁咩 ??Z:\@s,A1y\ h,N
當中發生左咩事你知條毛呀 ??^9d0n2T#cP Q&B*q^7c*X
至於你問有咩正當理由,
M2so4Z*q9ui9~(h M"\ 你一係就搵個男仔問佢,一係就搵個女仔 !!!!"
"yx9~;jM2J
!|oY@2uF0J2\t2y what you're basically saying at here is, the man could be right by beating up the girl if the girl had done something bad to the man....
:Zp-\"^Z%Y&O !U Ap:k"ZcZ
______________________________uPS'P'@R
)h#{ m T5^3Sd3U~.U8X
well, as a man, I wouldn't beat up a girl.  If the girl had done something terribly wrong and against the law, the man should just call the police and bring her to the court.....

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:19 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:22 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

qqwqqwqqw1 發表於 2008-5-25 11:23 PM

都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都唔o岩@?%{,[_Z
因為男人生下來比較強壯?r;nF i$r;]{
如果個女係空手道黑帶又點計先:haha:x4pR;c2r0GO ]
打比自己強既生物就無咁錯?
.?l I;P(ef 打唔贏仲同你打咩:P走都走唔切啦:dev:
PV)r.Z Z\6XL0I je 唔話打人一定唔o岩,要睇情況,
4cCs1Mhr&l'T{$K 有人走過來要打死你,邊趕得切求救,前面又無路,不能不打,
U f.M*Z4gs 當只有暴力能解決問題的時候,暴力就是神聖^^e9CJ(Z,de
我們為什麼不能犯法,因為有法律,我們屈服於暴力,6u F.] BO n;h Y
在背後支撐法律的就是最大的暴力---政府,社會:agree:iTnf(D-QD*Gg
就算如何掩飾,暴力也是社會的基本:gun:

jen01 發表於 2008-5-25 11:27 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:50 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:22 PM:
+H2f3E+[ s 3Bb-TA{

+a`8w#Xbs ` 我想講嘅,2V(D/@E j`f
只係我地根本唔知咩事,ix-D_q3T4a8Z
就唔好咩都入晒個男仔數,
N*d'su;w&J.Z^2@+D 咁對個男仔公平咩 ??
tl8[&{*s +~3{6Y ]u
p.s.唔代表我支持個男仔咁做....唔好斷章取義呀 ~!! [/quote]
R*X4f(] W
0\&s%bw W#nQ that means you still don't understand what other people are saying
*s#A_)M mT}/p
5agj1E^@ v no one cares what happened between the man and the girl....]l+W#Gt8n

O#joWy$B q the point is [color=Red]violence can't solve any problems[/color]

slwong3 發表於 2008-5-26 12:53 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]qqwqqwqqw1[/i] at 2008-5-25 11:23 PM:$n^9dP2o1L_
都唔知邊個定,男打女係賤格,女打男都... [/quote]&N ]M(Zg,r&f.i

E*aG M,u,h x9|8u3yuL Q9Dh+P[+ia k
then in the video, do you think it was the girl who hit the man first? p&Y ['uh]6L$Y["}

^J A.tv U do you think the man hit the girl because of protecting himself????
uQ1`9f&u
$l8t}"n4mOK~x)_ if the girl is that strong, do you think she would let the man hit her like that????
b"vd%n i8j]
4lbNsoD ,aHO0]2XL K$Ws#Dc
oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-5-26 03:03 AM

嘩! 訓醒一覺, 見自己開個POST有 A LOT OF REPLY, FEEL GREAT! s u[.{U0a

3W1@ S t A^ tQS!c)u(r y_l 但有點ARGUE, 我試下做"中間人"去說話,A,iG @O7d"@
可能比較直接, 請多多包涵.
*YA1YP&i3X$g%E *m9VF9_y(y
首先: BELIBALA`pZh9nRl#q P?
#9, 係針對人唔係對事, NO GOOD.1e3? jJ U2t/A tI
#17, 有點死CHICKEN撐飯蓋.
?:]'qxISK"G L #18, OK:)
M Y&qVE,l@8W-nK #64, 有進步, 說出重點.:good:%a f*Hhy
ps. 有進步 good!:good:
Y\$B+H6wd H0|wwnPB
infjlamJE&r'h'b GA
#30 good point, :good:Mr4wmE I
#34 GOOD POINT:good:
"lKE6Ea3pM3OF&U&H.n #63, 講得好!
-^*t b kYd-}|~@ M+X .UU['Q!NJ
Jen01,6v n8P}A8f#mP
5} l/G'rJ:I/}
#33, 你太敏感, 又話別人針對你........... 我就唔係好覺. y6|R!^NB"`
如果你覺得, infjlam的技巧就高籮! jen, 你咁樣都起火發圍.... 你咪低籮!
*z%ES Q^*T5? 你果句"[color=Red]我地根本唔知咩事,無資格去評論呢件事[/color] !!!"
g$Qx?%F'hK8P 我開個post出來討論, 唔評論, d 網友進來干嘛?
A-Y|L(C{'vky7` -RC@Cqg
SLWONG3,v`Fi#^ T
#71, [color=Red]oh god!!!  what are people thinking with their brain[/color]
;^;]%MF#R3t 有點港式, I like it very much:clap::clap::clap:
2wZ(t8M ?2NY*Q PN.H8gTV4~ v[pb
jen01, 你太敏感喇! infjlam在政版, 他的立場的確和你有異,......%QJm"q,s:p%`'@ o
在this topic, 你見infjlam回話, 你就話別人針對你.~x%z2Z1~4T4~8TU
而且你說話的方式, 有點市井小民 . 果句"當中發生左咩事[color=Red]你知條毛呀[/color] ??"
,O9y$S8A?z5`~Z
X"C ~o6Y'm_s [color=Red]我淨係段片見到,.WB~ ZY;z#K
個女仔班 FD 見到個女仔比人打都唔幫佢,s4IkK^QN
仲要行埋一邊冷眼旁觀,&b#O8O9^4\7v
咁即係暗示左d咩呀 ??[/color]
}-x*[rPXM\]0K 我覺得其他人係驚! not冷眼旁觀6{0q|"T"}dH0L6FC,A

/Uf2~:T8x ian [color=Red]infjlam我唔知你有心定無意,j}Oj)bs1UuC"yw
       但我個人係鐘意對號入座.......[/color]
3~+V.TJ k3V9u 呢d 紛爭, 是jen你個人製造出來的:nogood::nogood:
4G?2vP]$|$q
l&^@4}NY9M jen, 可否告訴我, 你的星座:)

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 03:18 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jen01 發表於 2008-5-26 04:11 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

Edgar_Davids 發表於 2008-5-26 08:09 AM

**** Hidden Message *****R,{y8K%\

GT,jOK8Q9fw [[i] Last edited by Edgar_Davids on 2008-5-26 at 08:30 AM [/i]]

QuiGonJinn 發表於 2008-5-26 09:08 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:17 PM

好好笑^^
"u&uqa1d:h6F:Y +sVT Jf)c"_
我問番你,  沒有男女平等的時候,  即以前封建時!u?k1{(L$n.R3v7Y'p

u$^y B3n$u 常出現女打男的男女不平等既情況咩??p$@` N/j"rPD

/S-Oa(iWu'`2x9M 你意思話我知, 1^TLRk{Gn

th6g:t'@~] 而家有男女平等, 所以條仔打條女係冇錯:]0m-w$d3DxG

2ZT"H6_jF N 第2, 單單係香港,  就有保護女性或婦孺既法例o!A4o:IF._E
+nw:y9TCNb;n%k.J_
包括強姦, 非禮, 虐打等罪,   
$Q4B0}Wjl/{7u 3U"QW*rb(B)][
係法律下,  女性同婦孺係率先得到保護yCF$y.d-My5F N)`h
#q1S+tQ,KXc
照呢個意思去諗, 加埋條片做證   相信好難說服到係條變態佬岩

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:23 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jen01[/i] at 2008-5-25 10:49 PM:i~/Be g1y
7E9Byi5gm5ZP nu
&Rp*M;^-Fc*_?
既然唔知頭唔知露,
MC%GQ [QE1J 一開口就話個... [/quote]acdR;uP$T
見你挑釁某會員同你係政版筆戰
#b8bf$zxo"s Q/lDn :EkM` vH)]c#f
我覺得好好笑,  你咁既思維...,,,g%W8N[7w-z
F3GjI| W
你重點係我地唔知頭唔知路  所以冇權話個男人是對是錯([ `@4F G }7u

d"a-{A jZz)H F 但如果真係個女仔錯,  係咪個男人就可以用呢種武力去對待佢??
1gS6`3ppjy/|P 8}"t-E8ud CP
如果個女仔錯,  個男人可以打死佢?? c] Gy9w!H7oqf

)@5bwE\s2}g 以片所示,  佢使用武力既程度非常高,  絕對有危及性命可能6M7U&D+\R3S${ s
C4SE}J9x R
個男人根本冇控制自己既能力%cYO+U2_*Rg:A
s"c9x'n;@F@t$z!~
我問你,  
/yrgA4a| 3O9D/V0Ql*m#N
世界上有人可以剝奪別人生存既權利嗎??
zl7rl&n \ V I9` nK7T Vg4M1nv T2P
除左殺人犯既生存權可以被剝奪外, 我諗唔到仲有咩人可以
] A?'Gv;Q},D
S4U'Sm-C%kzL 法律係要保護婦孺     相信情況交由警方處理的話
}7bS5|8od3G+Z
Dy/t)Oe_"\ 不管女仔有什麼錯,   男人一定會被起訢#F`A ~HC

H!qL ^\+^&x { b7@ 係一定,   而唔係你果d (可能)
2h~:g?#t1z"f'h)e!v @ L.V:F`4F i2Q2i
ps. 你既論點不堪一擊     如果你想同人筆戰n B)~$P Y8xY
`D ?8DC+xpx
我介紹你去aio搵會員chumy    佢同你思維不相伯仲
v0id ^0o1zN 'B(S@A:i#f"O8N
[[i] Last edited by 小小種子 on 2008-5-26 at 10:25 PM [/i]]

小小種子 發表於 2008-5-26 10:28 PM

jen01  呀可i^\-_5~[ f

(c+{/AT4z7x 我比多個例子你啦
J!Z-d"x z1`!G'R
ps8fkm I)U5H;q 係香港  y dv0o N4j\j

!X(l.m9?'drv 曾經有不足16歲女性  色誘 男性,  而果位男性大專以上
;w0b!Ks2\s_
e+nrr(So*k+`*n 結果係   男性被判   犯  與不成年少女發生性行為
)a2[A5|| ] E`A)DtF
雖然事源係女仔錯, 但女仔就冇罪(_/lq-Fgl9O?
{8ecT2d4}#~4q
你點理解??-RT n5ne6fsPo

4u k Hr[5P 呢d就係法律   就係保護婦孺既最佳例子

ktwu2007 發表於 2008-5-28 01:04 AM

終於知道咩事....wND.u8QegX
8p/I&^0Y`PM!Pz
   四川官員就毆打義工道歉
;I)D S/UT5~ [28/05 星期三 00:30] /P-d xS'J,vS]*j3T

CG/nk+LZ w z9xJ sFL,yd)l0q9x2?
四川衛生廳工作人員張建新,就襲擊一名地震後擔任義工的男子向對方道歉,並停職接受調查。
a$W{ps6~+E jn.K
boIP?-d G`m 事發在上星期三,張建新坐車到江油市一間醫院工作時,被為汽車消毒的義工用消毒水澆到頭部和面部,於是出手毆打對方。事件在網上傳出後,引起網民強烈批評。
O%?.{Iud %} I7OlpZ/\
[url]http://pshweb02.881903.com/framework/pccs.gateway?url=jsp/news/main.jsp&menuID=5&category=NEWS&newsid=2008052800300198500[/url]

頁: 1 2 3 [4] 5

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.