娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » jen01抵唔抵死?

mk政 發表於 2008-6-16 03:51 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Zeus_001[/i] at 2008-6-16 14:27:
v9Dq O#`.d5e$V [b][size=6][color=Red]我覺得BAN 佢係幫佢啫2q~RW;?'G!?%Q/@

&cGt'fj6G 佢又話某某係mk 政:nogood::nogood::nogood::nogood:，呢啲嘢分分鐘俾人告誹謗[/color][/size][/b] [/quote]
mGP&S a t
-@,F!df%fqg~r -口-你搵我呀

mk政 發表於 2008-6-16 03:59 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]belibala[/i] at 2008-6-16 14:46:@S2M9r-? W
[url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=183812&page=1#pid2725431[/url]QfcY.A!F_'Z
M
真係有guts [/quote] d%}]!jK0oNF
y*_I{+|/b^0[4L
nonono 其實點解夠膽咁講野
(]*hMf:|oG 係因為佢當左成個26FUN都係頑童俱樂部Onm
Cx2~[

O|2V-YY0HO 佢以為個個版主都玩得1Z"M4e$Rl*rO?
:secret::secret::secret:+}f?EP-] {

sV|X*x3E
沙灘仔 唔玩得:dev:!}
_5c8Ps
(JOKE)

0000001 發表於 2008-6-16 06:59 PM

當買個教訓
1_ i-G+|E 好過喺出面被人xx&TWjx'a!r;A.k
hopefully he will be back

slwong3 發表於 2008-6-16 08:26 PM

I didn't know he got banned...
3Fg:S7{Pb!bx that's why we didn't see him for a while....
e^UGO;E(S
"t piN$lF
but anyway, even we chat on the forum or anywhere on the internet...we should still repect other people and be responsible to what we have said....
H4PNz,NAG9t:|
!}\~L.V from all the posts and speech from Jen01, other people still respect him but he didn't seem to respect the other people

tonykwl 發表於 2008-6-16 10:48 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]12d3[/i] at 2008-6-16 01:06 PM:
udY!a}} 搵左10分鐘, 終於比我睇到佢點死啦:
0v4EK.E9eEv1O [url]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewth[/url] ... p;page=1#pid2727449
*x
~
f3hQ
P e,u&}`F)zB
版主用手指尾秒殺左, 仲以為會死得好轟烈, 唔抵.Ax+w7}nW
... [/quote]u/R GJ"_l
果然口臭~!:dev:

ch.chak 發表於 2008-6-16 11:18 PM

睇完佢死因
q(@Xk$x1m8Iip:X 絕對抵死
5x's.~'HU"~ 每個版都有自己版規eGV\"h9FWH c
自己唔睇,重周圍攪事
Df'AZ,^VZ&I"g 死得好

fderek 發表於 2008-6-17 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]打狗棒[/i] at 2008-6-16 11:55 AM:
*f'l9s"r1Rc 就以這次被ban的事件, 本人覺得他罪不... [/quote]
kg q?!R1[ 9G3@S6iRv
人有言論自由, 但大家上得來都唔可以一味用言論自由就亂咁POSTd@@$T4k,[H:_@t
咁樣好影響其他人, 更可能會搞臭個論壇, 所以我認為版主做法恰當bo$?m!m,v/k
犯事不能走極端, 這沒雙重標準吧~

〥～灝～〥 發表於 2008-6-17 12:25 AM

放心...佢好快會借屍還魂

也媽嗲 發表於 2008-6-17 12:31 AM

[b]罪不致死 [/b]~
~[AZ"g$fM
F x7Mf.mn1oO-i$V 佢有時係儍頭儍腦左d,人放縱左,米亂up野,引人注意者:o n3b'y4U'g8T~T
oq"b/x;sKWnV
但未算好惡意果隻,不如小小懲罰算啦:D

rio90hk 發表於 2008-6-17 12:34 AM

在穩定壓倒一切的情況下,佢le位中共支持者被ban亦心甘情願la

littlepig 發表於 2008-6-17 12:59 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fderek[/i] at 2008-6-17 12:16 AM:
I nU$F)ZJ"I
+U7l)aU!SUa$a'Y@
x?9v,qYo 人有言論自由, 但大家上得來都唔... [/quote]+c}sB
b|)C

1v`Oi] 閣下所言正是本人所想。如果各人打著言論自由之旗號就可以無的放矢,ef 版成為罵戰網站指日可待。濫用自由猶如放縱行為, 因此絕不能姑息養奸。
5x~J5P%c/V
,XIZ5wJ~$^5F5Z 樓主雖云此憤青在過去數月帶給各版友無限"歡樂",亦帶起各人討論氣氛,包括少言既我亦曾樂在其中,每晚以插佢為樂,但近期此小子之言論已缺乏新意,回覆每每只懂quote前人言論,略為修改"你/我"等字眼,又或是反問人地有冇睇清楚,實質是自己看不懂或詞窮便胡亂放屁。偶然轉貼一堆屁話,加上理橫折曲的廢論後,看後只令人發火。Bw3L[ ~I A

tKlq&p.m3^lC 觀乎此契弟任意妄為,氣燄日盛,視版規如無物,感化已不是有效的方法,對付冥頑不靈之輩,用上極刑未嘗不是一個好方法。不評論版主今次手法是否過嚴,只是當人目空一切,終日撩事鬥非,所有既孽被清算是早晚的事。

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-6-17 03:35 AM

其實好多兄弟都曾經提醒JEN01小心言詞,
+w+x`j uRl1A 但佢依然故我,.......... 大家都覺得佢遲早一劑,N"B:pzsVU%n]
-KZL C.t
最估不到係BEACHBOY兄出手, cgZ0N$xnxCV
佢最大鑊係死於出言侮辱該位女士,7d/y3HM6} ^;VW
CASE BY CASE 來說, 抵BAN!

hamsubboy 發表於 2008-6-17 03:37 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]infjlam[/i] at 2008-6-16 01:21 PM:]9v!k(C5^}
我唔評論死因值唔值:kiss:
ztj5Kk"F LDh}M 3v Ah@*f O4J^W y]
我只想...
[,MX"e3RimQ$cj| [color=Red]佢一日唔得到一個似樣D o既教訓，
FOXq7XV-`J 一日都唔會學識什麼是「規矩」，
0Uq|yC
U,vw-`7sV&c aL 今日的死，若可令他頑石點頭，
'r:u'h [t
]o 對佢來講，可能係一種好事[/color]Gg"r+N K9vj0g-}

@GA.K)E)MXc [/quote]&af5VPe1j

'e,}D h~B"B AGREE! 所講正合朕意!(n-abd;g1dv%Iix
:clap::clap:w;p*U`map;s
y4a3K)U/AJRy7\!z
[[i] Last edited by hamsubboy on 2008-6-17 at 03:44 AM [/i]]

打狗棒 發表於 2008-6-25 06:41 AM

突然令我想起兩段戲: 「捉放曹」、「貍貓換太子」!!!

查看完整版本: jen01抵唔抵死?