[傑出港女系列](轉貼)又有新野啦
香港法例有等如無.-p4@;fz'k h9Xs nw/bi%MI~
毆打係刑事,警方竟然不採取檢控行動.
對打人者只作出警告了事.:V:M7`[}'r E'? l _'A
.b2A @)Qt
差人涉嫌包庇打人者.u `.I j.\|.W
[url]http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjZIvpq3dQ[/url]
而阿伯打人係事實,毆打係刑事,警方唔可以唔檢控阿伯.ga j'hr&@3Ld
'g/? jx.v`%V_
請問d「死差佬」,幾時修改左法例,毆打可以警告了事.-z*S q\ BT}%W p
n2o/T{gV v\&d b
[color=red]個人認為.....*@?*?dk2mh]3e
.K B ^/sJ @:y&BdZ
岩岩唔記得左加評語...(依家補番)
4[ IS%f JSl#H3v
好簡單,個阿伯唔岩在先,但個女仔都唔方係咩好野.....[/color]p5P {xy#J"YE*V,W:j E
WU"`fr u+atd_
[[i] Last edited by jen01二世 on 2008-6-30 at 12:17 AM [/i]] have u studied law or anything related to legal studies?
do you know what is called an "assault" or "battery"?
are you the witness of the incident?oZ xF/qp
if not i prefer you stop commenting on this issue..
and better not using words like "阿伯打人係事實" and "毆打".
otherwise, you could be charged as "defamation" [quote]Originally posted by [i]Kev[/i] at 2008-6-30 12:12 AM: Y?)g3U;I$M2s3G8H
have u studied law or anything rela... [/quote]+^2f7m(e Qq[:Zk7~Z
$| sAC7b+v(a&m
黑字 : 係轉貼J_4q)r,K]
紅字 : 個人感想
{lS(kN8S9{
ok ?? dont have to ask for my approval :)%Iv_%l.DS
it's your choice to get yourself into trouble or not.Lx*{&l8Wu |r#L+C
btw, im not sure if "publishing" or "spreading" "false statement" is against law or not.. e#Ea P __[&U
just becareful even if the words arent your own words..
good luck and hope you could last long in this world. 我係甘認為
該警員明顯地想息事寧人...
唔係既話唔通拉個啊伯返去告佢傷人......但係都要驗到有傷先得
如果驗唔到有傷,甘去到警米都係警告...浪費曬3方面既時間
以上係由阿伯係錯曬...既方向所說
我反而認為此事係一件雙方道一句歉就可以解決既事
該警員的處理手法絕對洽當[ YW/D:e5v!t4fm
請恕我直言...該女子有點......那個...........無x取x[ B Y*f'C K m yeqcG,Z
由佢將依段好明顯係佢自拍既片段放上youtube,仲要改個甘既標題就知道
頁:
[1]