[quote]原帖由 [i]Triangel[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:04 AM 發表:
[ 動用儲備防銀行告急 , 港府5000億抗金融海嘯 ] [/quote]
...waste of money, if 700billion USD didn't even fill in a tiny hole, how will 500 billion HKD save them?
I predict the Dow will be in the 7000s.
[quote]原帖由 [i]ktwu2005[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:08 AM 發表:
點解唔救左我尼條淫虫先:hitwall: [/quote]
鍊死條淫虫黎浸藥酒:yy22: :yy16:
[quote]原帖由 [i]Lee3[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:10 AM 發表:
...waste of money, if 700billion USD didn't even fill in a tiny hole, how will 500 billion HKD save them?
I predict the Dow will be in the 7000s. [/quote]
咪咁悲觀啦, :yy01:
[quote]原帖由 [i]Triangel[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:12 AM 發表:
鍊死條淫虫黎浸藥酒:yy22: :yy16: [/quote]
無野出, 好慘架:cry:
[quote]原帖由 [i]ktwu2005[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:14 AM 發表:
無野出, 好慘架:cry: [/quote]
無野出, :yy31:
醒多條 link 比你
[url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=192163]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=192163[/url]
[quote]原帖由 [i]Triangel[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:14 AM 發表:
咪咁悲觀啦, :yy01: [/quote]
其實, 係咪應該叫番D 銀行家自己出錢, 救番個市:confused:
依家D 散户都掉得七七八八.......
[quote]原帖由 [i]Triangel[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:14 AM 發表:
咪咁悲觀啦, :yy01: [/quote]
not enough people in the government know how the economy works, neither does Paulson and Bernanke, evidently by their actions. So we've just burned 700billion, well filter-038, how many 700 billions do we have?
[quote]原帖由 [i]Triangel[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:17 AM 發表:
無野出, :yy31:
醒多條 link 比你
[url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=192163]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=192163[/url] [/quote]
不如使幾百蚊去叫雞:haha:
[quote]原帖由 [i]ktwu2005[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:17 AM 發表:
其實, 係咪應該叫番D 銀行家自己出錢, 救番個市:confused:
依家D 散户都掉得七七八八....... [/quote]
屌, 銀行班友有$ 就吾駛政府出手啦:giveup:
[quote]原帖由 [i]ktwu2005[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:17 AM 發表:
其實, 係咪應該叫番D 銀行家自己出錢, 救番個市:confused:
依家D 散户都掉得七七八八....... [/quote]
first of all, those we caused this mess are pretty much bankrupt. Second of all, Congress is their friend. Congress is the people who are helping them. I would've done with the UK is doing, use the money to buy stocks are banks still standing. Let them not fail. Instead of throwing free money out in the open and forcing normal people to compete with that, buy the stock, put it into cash flow into the market so the people will JOIN IN instead of pulling out.
Secondly, the American Dollar is backed up by credit, if the last couple of banks fail, as Paulson has warned, then filter-038, the USD will be worthless. That is why we must protect the last few banks, they are the final line of defense. Instead, the US gov't just throws the money feeding the parasites that not only caused the problem, but is also making the problem worse. The 700 billion didn't help anyone, why? Because the market is connected worldwide, 700 billion any gov't currency is not enough to run the world. What we HAVE TO DO is PROTECT THIS COUNTRY. We have to make sure that the money is still worth something, make sure that our economy does not take a final plunge. And neither Congress nor the Federal Reserve has shone any ability or plan in order to do that. All they've done is just got all the money out of the treasury and split it amongst themselves.
[quote]原帖由 [i]Lee3[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:19 AM 發表:
not enough people in the government know how the economy works, neither does Paulson and Bernanke, evidently by their actions. So we've just burned 700billion, well filter-038, how many 700 billio ... [/quote]
[size=6][color=blue][b]不要問,只要信~[/b][/color][/size]
Sound Stupid....
但每個 investor 都懷著呢六個字去做, 不出半年,問題便可解決!
i cant believe 聯合銀行 is still holding up. My accounts are there, dont know if you've heard of it.
[quote]原帖由 [i]ktwu2005[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:21 AM 發表:
不如使幾百蚊去叫雞:haha: [/quote]
幾百蚊d雞就吾好叫啦, 哂精子:nogood:
[quote]原帖由 [i]Lee3[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:27 AM 發表:
i cant believe 聯合銀行 is still holding up. My accounts are there, dont know if you've heard of it. [/quote]
Boydwan 可能知!
[quote]原帖由 [i]Lee3[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:25 AM 發表:
first of all, those we caused this mess are pretty much bankrupt. Second of all, Congress is their friend. Congress is the people who are helping them. I would've done with the UK is doing, use the ... [/quote]
[size=2][/size]
[size=2][/size]
[size=4]Quoted....[/size]
[size=4]"The $700 billion package will help the Treasury Department to use a variety of measures to help bank (sic) rebuild capital - including buying or insuring troubled assets and purchasing equity of financial institutions. The Department will implement measures that have maximum impact as quickly as possible. Seven hundred billion dollars is a significant amount of money. And as we act, we will do it in a way that is effective.
The plan we are executing is aggressive. It is the right plan. It will take time to have its full impact. It is flexible enough to adapt as the situation changes. And it is big enough to work."
[/size]
[quote]原帖由 [i]Triangel[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:25 AM 發表:
不要問,只要信~
Sound Stupid....
但每個 investor 都懷著呢六個字去做, 不出半年,問題便可解決! [/quote]
To KNOW and to believe, you can be forgiven.
To NOT KNOW and to believe, you are blind.
[quote]原帖由 [i]Triangel[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:38 AM 發表:
Quoted....
"The $700 billion package will help the Treasury Department to use a variety of measures to help bank (sic) rebuild capital - including buying or insuring troubled assets and purchasin ... [/quote]
How do they justify it. There is no justification to it. All they say is "this is a whole hell lot of money, just believe us" This is why there is market panic. They are not coming out saying "this is what we are going to do, this is how it's done" They're just saying "We believe it is right, and therefore it MUST be right and it will be right" They are using very very vague terms to cover up their incompetency.
[quote]原帖由 [i]Triangel[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:31 AM 發表:
Boydwan 可能知! [/quote]
yea but he's not here
[quote]原帖由 [i]Lee3[/i] 於 2008-10-12 11:42 AM 發表:
To KNOW and to believe, you can be forgiven.
To NOT KNOW and to believe, you are blind. [/quote]
To KNOW or To NOT KNOW are the lower level of 不要問,只要信~
[quote]原帖由 [i]Triangel[/i] 於 2008-10-12 12:04 PM 發表:
To KNOW or To NOT KNOW are the lower level of 不要問,只要信~ [/quote]
Well that's one way of thinking, unless you know about philosophical skepticism. In order to know things, we must first observe them. Observations can be done personally or by proxy, through books or tv or hearsay. The problem with that is, it relies on physical senses, and it is too easily tricked. How do we know that our brains are not in a little tiny vat that's constantly stimulating us?
Of course, KNOWING also means that we have a belief in something and it is justified. It does not mean we are RIGHT. There is a difference between right and knowing. In order to know something, we must believe in it, that's it. In order to be right, it must be proven right, and the tricky part is, can something be always right? That's a hard question, something may be right let's say 100 years ago, and then heck, technology advances, and whatever "it" is, it is no longer right.
Somethings are more readily acceptable to be right, such as 1+1=2, that's right. However, if you go around telling people about the string theory, people might go "wtf?"