[quote]
某板主FANS連免費都唔嚟...............否則蒼井空就唔會無得揀最後要抱mc
[size=2][color=#999999]Tu-160 發表於 2009-10-10 12:03 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294716&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
你又知
唔係佢既職業就係做mc甘相中人:naughty:
[quote]
走寶:)
[size=2][color=#999999]Triangel 發表於 2009-10-10 12:07 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294726&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
完全估唔到是連假fans都 ........無:yy04:
之前中環俾$250結果她只出現3min
但今日任何人都可距他1米範圍內狂影30min以上.....free:yy04:
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]
你又知
唔係佢既職業就係做mc甘相中人:naughty:
[size=2][color=#999999]mnbvc 發表於 2009-10-10 12:11 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294744&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
我聽講佢係TST返工,過分又lunch time,無理由唔試試上嚟:yy03:
[quote] 90369# clkgtr
visa price=cash price=$0.013M:P
[size=2][color=#999999]小小康 發表於 2009-10-10 12:16 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294755&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
so expensive la :yy29:
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]
支24-105影人，始終分辨唔到details嘅頭髮&背景，所以才考慮入呢枝。
[size=2][color=#999999]小小康 發表於 2009-10-10 12:24 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294783&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
呢支鏡對於我嚟講好尷尬
對於1.6x 機個range 都ok
但係如果一年半載之後換full frame 又太wide
而35mm 又未有mark2, 但係就算有, 用落1.6x 機又唔夠wide
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
[quote]
呢支鏡對於我嚟講好尷尬
對於1.6x 機個range 都ok
但係如果一年半載之後換full frame 又太wide
而35mm 又未有mark2, 但係就算有, 用落1.6x 機又唔夠wide
[size=2][color=#999999]clkgtr 發表於 2009-10-10 12:29 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294793&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
所以我情願用17-55 f/2.8 IS 落1.6X body會比24-105 好,
FF body用24-70 f/2.8 @f/4 會比 24-105 @ f/4 好好多
APS-H body配鏡真是煩死人..........
[quote] 90378# clkgtr
full frame+24mm , 1m左右距離已可影全身:good:
[size=2][color=#999999]小小康 發表於 2009-10-10 12:41 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294812&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
我擔心24mm會否出現邊位變形(假如是24-70或24-105的lens)
[quote] 90378# clkgtr
full frame+24mm , 1m左右距離已可影全身:good:
[size=2][color=#999999]小小康 發表於 2009-10-10 12:41 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294812&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
FF + 24mm 要影得好, 好難用嫁 :yy29:
[quote]
完全估唔到是連假fans都 ........無:yy04:
之前中環俾$250結果她只出現3min
但今日任何人都可距他1米範圍內狂影30min以上.....free:yy04:
[size=2][color=#999999]Tu-160 發表於 2009-10-10 12:14 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294753&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
我好想去, 不過未醒:yy29:
[quote]
所以我情願用17-55 f/2.8 IS 落1.6X body會比24-105 好,
FF body用24-70 f/2.8 @f/4 會比 24-105 @ f/4 好好多
APS-H body配鏡真是煩死人..........
[size=2][color=#999999]darrens 發表於 2009-10-10 12:43 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294813&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
1.6x 機, 影生活相, 我都係用17-40, 少用24-105
[quote]90356# d228216 [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/border=0]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/border=0[/url]
:P :P
**** 本內容被作者隱藏 ****
[size=2][color=#999999]小小康 發表於 2009-10-10 12:08 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294732&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]咁心急:yy19:
[quote]
好明顯佢燒到 104度， short L 左:naughty:
[size=2][color=#999999]Triangel 發表於 2009-10-10 12:09 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294734&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quot e][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/attachment.php?aid=1402033&k=0061c45c25dfce6eff3ab93e7ce68a3b&t=1255107117&fid=66&sid=16e7tRZasEv2j8igM9RPi4frnLoONr4BgzEtDybXK8YmxzQ[/img]
[youtube]ZHwfcYItJQM[/youtube]:yy05:
[quote]
1.6x 機, 影生活相, 我都係用17-40, 少用24-105
[size=2][color=#999999]clkgtr 發表於 2009-10-10 12:49 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294827&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
17-40 我都有, 自從17-55 f/2.8入門後; 17-40 已長居後備(因我不願買16-35 II)
FF body我用28-70 f/2.8L (冇計,冇$$買24-70, 月尾單job 要靠佢食糊)
[quote]ZHwfcYItJQM:yy05:
[size=2][color=#999999]gn00987333 發表於 2009-10-10 12:52 AM[/color] [url=http://www.26fun.com/bbs/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=3294837&ptid=186065][img]http://www.26fun.com/bbs/images/common/back.gif[/img][/url][/size][/quote]
正到毒發:yy03: :yy03:
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****