娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
:c7B)kVdJ)n2~ [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
8Jax }\&l%I s
'fLqu R%Ej 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
7S5Xga)u jg%IE 7ZMsj:e$@ } ^
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子:\&{JY[P$`?a8I
K i2sW)f!FK
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
#e)[gx5G 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! 8R*i^p)~ G
r O7vW$i;J Fr&d
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, n.}1b+Y0H dA,H

4H#np-f%el1YF$E(z 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
N7f9^,vb&pd
&_8_*JV/`#C+U 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 -WU"E/Ye"ip

2p5S{ `3d3E4ba!e 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, s)F{,X|
"{A#nhD~ WN
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
8c4F9u;]~?;n#fy 8~!_ r/C#w2\ ~?2t!L(f
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
`6]X~\ %L a;Od p}8?]UA
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? vd8xQ#hA4]2n

.{%h E)W R(rSC 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]Ii` L+t5x'lF
H/x W-C5^0X-U;v
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
}6{B4DOW%z/moS9P r^'fA'm:I:j+r
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!W%Y*U G0d8z
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?7W$D'T/G{Nuu1O
japan has been very influential nowadays.rqF8KO$G;O!~E
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
\&G.d ^ W0av japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]PJ!M Y6Ju.y5]
O)Q*\(i l A[
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
Ygb-L)r!K)o}9]
1e;O~9scCwC 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
w'E"z ^5[)E*{C` [&P shall we be more reasonable?
7rVcB5s xx0K&b japan has been very influential nowadays.e_*d9E#N&PO
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,Y GU&n5i_lX%L
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
rL Y0g8E OpgJ~6NG
6NR.f`:F;P C ~%U(_Pw"q
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
e]lr EJV6v8`%a%XH o 日本係好強我絕對認同
o Cg ^G^sP|*i 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
F2l9S[8x 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
,jAt%ycST 9p Pj!XnM-}
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
(jAZ#M j{I S)?}3p%{.@;_;Y
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),t3e$]f:|
#`PI9r#H9OO!G*m
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:i#Z6e!oi%YQZ

(T9P rup|2_"?*[Y 0H Gq~f^!e'vko

$M[S_C8@ W 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
BT*S5gQ 日本係好強我絕對認同
)GPX E+{ 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...1xT3}`/z
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]clv1iE#WT3B y(~
N\M&SJf]&_d

N/o)h&P Ycc-E uM?*fT,Ur Em(q
o;svS1w7K(`.pk1f
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
4z-D/G#J^Z8suv)}n'j in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
*kp c}$W']2I]5B.n~ a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries !jM%c3\P(c
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM: Z%s8[(?F6G

[a B,[+J h~^ r&DM)a*f-xeP
jN l|3P8["k

IS:S g.LM
"gdEl g.DE;M ?+sj$h0MJ
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.A$N N*n{d0l*L
[/quote]/w6L7KaL

:u#Pe*[7c2P 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@fEiU NB

g^S9r q:V5[@!})D$a 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
#O%e+Yt3P&~ [size=6]講到強,A Q R`2f)uuY1[F
]k"ga } z#bW
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
y7OP5m"fL
X3E{p} 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
GKt(oM Z1\{
5s n"h\6U'XQ3W0B 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]+b1?%R6s4br
P:W9FTi zh;O

A*T6P.w&B,W(` the bro knows quite much of history.
A!@$?'|vV"b3c
8NM)s(@^.awWhi:^B0F UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.:Mw c!E0La+sU;\
/u-V;A7p{Dl
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.5]5X]4U"ww]^
D { AM:a"J"LJ7? _M
China has a right of veto否決權.
AW*uN-VX6f If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
)wb'A F\:U the issue will au---atically be banned y0r @\rL4bNB
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
1|kh9QwZ2I&H
5\hC gD
+u9CA#n4D 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@tLsz}BY6p

V.Sv{QP5d 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
-a#A{"O3C1en
v_ FA{F&]u"lnt
+C[3V7K+gf 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
:\c)N.z}cA6MY
M_4r.E1vn C One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
0L7P:V|$Q5V%U
(EV&V]3U)i why it is called "Brick"
j ]uDe] 0Q |5_pL5D#R
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
w(pS1u/i&V/XJ
mvq aJ&],F
_-Nb)O'dF
f'[qBP B PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.