娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]v kfn9Fqzo
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
1Y5t\lU([b)i
[@ bc)| @PJ)|6tw 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國 lU/j!n`SBjq8L0s
uMwI j
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
R;c$Q9` r8F*O0L6BVj
oy&?+P:lPN0|_m 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
?k?"B-V&u*G 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
/d%[o{/L)I E3_c)k DX)ag7u8m h
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, UK3y F A Qb Eg

,S w5F N!OzR 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! $V:hQ UY9c

z*@4s(`0??;g 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
Ro!W _!P+c :wB5`w*zl2Z4l
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
[wG#?h Fj*J,i#A@+N
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; (y[Ibj$n$y%Q1~RU#F

g-m4X|0h |p 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,y{)X N#zy(j:P7iq
{qr!f/U3Dx{
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
$zvI7Z-Db'u\;x
E5}P p6M9G+kjeG4g 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
| JV1Y#I&x;B%w
h-a `w$e5r [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦O3k(b2s8R d4huQv
GU _)x#X$yh`a7I
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
3oI+tM3v3N0E4jF :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
a'C(MyObU+S,kj japan has been very influential nowadays.
w8B%\$PYl:l although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
1v ?&Mf1h japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]!?V4dU?AS$X.J _
A:}9}IDl
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
`+Z'cW6p:hZZ \
/zn,YM6T 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
'zd R^B:sni shall we be more reasonable?:K [3b"}A#dQ4Y ]
japan has been very influential nowadays.L4|}/W-BG@ O V a8x
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,!yN$N;P/\ rz.z _(X0D
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
d [} MVk^{o )Mo pu(w-G b

,J ?nxg#KFN/qoF 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...'g_GK(U/l
日本係好強我絕對認同
`z^ zSw_6[ 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
6yK tV:_w!ZFR#K 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,:}wE+e.d!B

k$M-X8~Q 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),ws N t6qL3ho[A

I!Sx X2M U+n8JD 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
~(I:\ x-Go I"TO#Nb
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:e,c}l[RS M8Wn`
Zc pZ's"B*D
O%a$?J ~8xch

u)Z,a _D6W/DlH 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
$Y&F#a_'DB|F 日本係好強我絕對認同
#g|~ S({:u Y6E` 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...ng"b!Y#{
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]0c$X'z+tBypw
J x-Qv:fB
HAq_ly
Uv7s k-g_F

8q,}W~3R ? i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.{{%]8IA$`y
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
J9vf`slVBM!_ a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
"V%~"`@)m3X9rg-oH Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:Q p$F,e2zBj-{

5`.wS&o4| Z3{ @!pC8Q^LuZ

,t+o%J\^b:U&a![
I+`?y+}/P Y E-h)Z f

a&s4S6U\~p5Q*K in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
`"Q&y.sba AD'H [/quote](IAR#|R{(l;qJ#r
#L#n:Y~u sK:Q&F
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@FE-B"Mo\

+A0k h fe8g/f%wzG 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:8WO,lMI'h
[size=6]講到強,_ qfr b)n7`

Oi)F GaY Cv"M 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
So#dc7@Iq *U sa7w w3^r
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),(r[u~ L-@ OZ-b
/PL"[!Nv m
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]`pa(k TftX

] Z R/H0zvC(p p-uZ\:Zs ~
the bro knows quite much of history.])y%G8i3H?#V
1Ebuc#RU
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.R3L4\iK"T(c?p5z{x

m#e0QuS2E1g+l z:] Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.Oe.gVW8jh

` @;_![hi'WM-_Y l a China has a right of veto否決權."cD7W;UCY
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
l l c6O L the issue will au---atically be bannedeW\+q'b@@]oH
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
B!Z@,c(N?? N5l0w] 0x0M*C K V,? rQ

@'SAgWi+Q|"@ R 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@8Y-x d'B;X6T"d7u#z

W*|^&sB:EtF7G H 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]QK7]gqZGN

(b N3epng9F P6B {rE#C
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
0H z~%r_4GE 7g8CU1[/v&@x.DMG
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
fb9b^pP-D !u Jsg6Z/xY*N;Qx0V/W}
why it is called "Brick"M3ISP {`}
CB5Z,cdi9S
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinaB},u@E%mWg*O

;Mmco&j y"v(e I LSU;N [K1^W
.wln5VK-t
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.