娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]-\%N:m&}$B
[size=6]請大家簽名支持，亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
y!N/Q"l(LzBt
6g4M2{8Sl TXt&aP 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
O$g&M Lw N(c .x@(EO7N4k5@
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子-n1tX(pPQ6x4B
i#Dn|)m%O3k
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
,K%s_
e}*H{ j;S 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去！[/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯，雖然改變唔到歷史，德國卻願意道歉及賠償！
]F4`8C.S9?w J6rbCg/y UM.M3{
主動建碑立館，讓後人警惕， s?Tm8}$Z
sph V]\Y&p~({
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場，值得一讚！ }Y!U!uA
t6|

w;o%vqL"\ ZU 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片，片中詳述當年的慘況，並由各一名
;@"M)F0^\/P
W:@ hz%U(ih 美國及德國老兵，各自站在自己當年（６０年前）的地方，
9XuShVb_n
)o(~@*A^twf*{(Ov 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘，並且親身示範，德國老兵講自己如果死守； {"YvP2^k]
9HH2A&qB\(rdF
最後在片尾，兩名老兵相遇， 並互相握手，
-I:L)cfa.`2}!]
z,V8u1Q0S3L'Wz 美國老兵問：當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛？ I|_4gIl4Jg
"v;?/l-fn0d}
德國老兵回應：有....我見到......[/size]
e%p'pR'bMh3O
!v3msS c.i%k ^'xG [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦a,\S4x|)vT

o9^
s1@2Q 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持！

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!.VX2K!}ULo l8t4|
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
FZV'Ha(`F japan has been very influential nowadays.
,C5i,fo;u:C~ although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
&TJS-yl v:? vj japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對，好合理囉！[/size]'^7N+m(\},c4\pyM/U

M(wUFW 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得？!yi'b(z}0\'A9V
J4W4Do!e2R
不分有沒有錢，都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
4pr#K-Krg2H shall we be more reasonable?
_8E-e:|Z]sV japan has been very influential nowadays.
e!I m,m!S"? although i hate japaneses, but in UN,r.t(Kq1ku
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
8x3AthUamV 2A"Tw`8?o8U
W s^
o!{6O0PuKB_
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...l%@#ZG#M;\8p0bq
日本係好強我絕對認同
!E6tIRW 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
3^0[PDRHf 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強，
(_T"pXY
RFu0h)F]B#GY0l*y] 第一次世界大戰後，日本強佔山東（德國影響範圍），
9XPb~F[R+d
W
!bR7iSCo%z 及後日本更退出國際聯盟（即聯合國前身），Ce2n3?H,DL
A)C-KypSb
肆無忌憚入侵中國！[/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:eX }6|5j"Z/qE{w(g~
G'mW7ze0{l2ze*z

-@B%EU/?-d@:ZX)oQ
'b+o!P%oLT C`A 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單....y#w/f a|
日本係好強我絕對認同
2ozTPg+Fe|V3F%R 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...7E4G7AO3~!k(K7D,R
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]5O0u#o!EY"nY

s}o4O)c+z/_ (q.H~f/k^a^O
#}S5eitrKG]
a$T/R#w&D
b5L1p@5W
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
4aMga,LM in the next 50 years, japan will decline.#C)V0jU9l2z
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries 9S'N)Wq)?p'}
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:3fD
cg#i+e
1F)Y1OE$yua|

o!N+}7HuJ
4Qn%bG D
o tC)OqD+th

pFA$iG
#p(a \4^7Z\ in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
T8ThEYwS$^ [/quote]
JTlgLL g'w\F+hv9Scd
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@ ~q,\^#g k/Xot1F

$VI]es%DDx 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:c-V{P4r0A3e\.? f#h
[size=6]講到強，
dZ*^$FT8\d O6\J1n'z;j
第一次世界大戰後，日本強佔山東（德國影響範圍），7o(G;q&T+o@'e1mV
H+\;ZE;Z0~
及後日本更退出國際聯盟（即聯合國前身），
2{c[.w*\1v4Jn^
8e6B4C}p#^6b 肆無忌憚入侵中國！[/size] [/quote];H4|R6y m9c"}4W

5pY'Ac;ma2}Q eKUj#V
the bro knows quite much of history.
J$fr'U+X4LB'aG/qwq{
'?ZvU3n:N S${G
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
j*hg2h+_ N
%Z0{7H p'E-IQ^H Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.M(IO bY
t;Ak#JjoO
China has a right of veto否決權.
6K
o^|?"Pr*S If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object, kTE1pb(vjL4H
the issue will au---atically be banned3g h&x.sIK
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
S_/M2MT!e
Z$Ej#lYl)w:I'~1p ,}@;j@8Yq:v.Wy&ACm
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
o/d(zs'Q~DB
"k[9R(Wl 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
y%M Tx5L!I$b$f 5H0R$PB/OK?1S
I6SDgX(Xz
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
7o$r!QX5mn)O Ot9@2LQ^i9}ixJ
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
U|V2s.X`$_ *~,` pDE$qxL [
why it is called "Brick"
L0o*W-HM5m.C@ GT*X%PJ
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinaI6Y(aMR7}P|f?
6n
w.}
|8y
mN+Xzp6]/|
B.Ie8J+t{ZL
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

查看完整版本: 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國