娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]h,@9fz9B g UA(S
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人.H2f gG uoP

5Znn&i5`*\ 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國z,c[M ~s(o

z;URb)x^ 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子/A"]#l NH%J
$req.TD
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
+BC$\kT^.QF 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
&` B,cR ND6m Q.P8uX)w'?2}!t
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
rZ!{'EI n
*\:NI/Sf!^k)E 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
+NzG&O5M4|"d sy
/\9Cfu+WN 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
fy@8x*d|)a,IS/k
%r/Cnu:Y4sy 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
'S!|6@(\s0n$DD,M l GN4gJZ i&_'b6G+Y
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; "]cN)k-Wn1p

n[Qz%J;b([(BW8]{ 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,u5M MQ{N(~
};K6]ny5Qg_3\PW
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? e3tC)C qc*F+VC

%^"q%y)i&hY,GK1l 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]Js0mDW
+R;l-Zz(v9U
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
E]8^:TM3u)_&A5m$z#v )Q#G } ch#i(^ f
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
Dv ^XwC :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?/DK+[1M3w*x_]Y
japan has been very influential nowadays.*q-Zm }O @`
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
-?MM4Lzf[G2} japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size] O`/O.ro q sN

T1P8MA/p 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?'U:_\b6o1YQi

-|Ku$d&ix)Aq 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
!|F$c7A%if shall we be more reasonable?
"[ j.LWvh japan has been very influential nowadays.
9K2~KG7r8Z;]L:X5j"R although i hate japaneses, but in UN,7U ZAU m;F)v!Ti
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
ZV-_ jvd*f U Y^)c AqQy
m8sA%MMX;q
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
0GhC z c 日本係好強我絕對認同
6\-@3nSN4o*D\ V 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...3o!zz^+xGI_2X {
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強, WH_Os9t4S8C|

YOh/nw[x9~ 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
qo$l Q'E:A
F H8d} c6?Fp#o 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
pr z"s`J!_
"?%c7V }!aBHO3Ao 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:
F6I:^(g o
A8m&L0k+Z1m3i F$zg 2@bc6g+M U8R

9g5e s#C'W W 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...N(ta U9u"QH6o
日本係好強我絕對認同
1gQQQSb C 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
YQz.b-W 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
|$m H4B1Ot}_l$dI
!pe?A sk "bG5{h$?D:`M#t"_

S Q\V$CV x 4PJ(}U1cZ AW
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.B8d#bIM,Y#R:u7C
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.j `(Y0kY"f%\+Jl&O
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries w$@7I)_z%ow
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:j`gt\&p?%ni0V
b P}oF2g]
;\!XP9No#X"J
W i$fu1iP \V
U@4?y f
_k |:g7r _u

s |:z6lcR in the next 50 years, japan will decline.:Pz2f{[
[/quote]Z~l"[;d5I
WK5}3v/A
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@@{:@;A kLE{

LjY4mO)P 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:l.rT$^M
[size=6]講到強,
Q Mhva 'J2y c ~.Zw6jh!F
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
exA{ dz`p1_
'j\)s(jg |~ 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
u^Ihd um 9v,i\f-~p6g
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote],\gR9s0e
/Y;vPTf;K!T9MX7F

DE"S}-_"aST W the bro knows quite much of history.{6c je3H"H+a"vb!~
s^%P[ap{:zT
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
q;nx1O8I*m
c'd1V/]2J3A Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
3m m0]I m#J
u6@8yx*s} China has a right of veto否決權.1PY xaJ z1k
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,jiI*Ph|
the issue will au---atically be bannedX9^-xV\2o?
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
.{,n9I(F(I6J #M\HH2LC \v(l
E Woqp z
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
6Ib5fj V2hxRu I e[b |"h.|
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
H| ybNpG2I
#Fb#D5NyOS
/Can:o5@JH'MK 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.S-s,lc9d5\ N
8CWR?4BF ZG7U
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s+DHL{b6D-p4m1bc/Y
k)X c:eU"k1GT#aF(f
why it is called "Brick"
GM0B5T XqNw.qE.@ /`~+r-\dr
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinaQ6c#F5Q l}T}A
,w4h.~y!`5T\ |Y

!L'oAn!n0m xU #P6C U` n
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.