娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
!M;On}(r&| [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人CmG"iM"u%Q
ie_v:j1K,T`B4uQ
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
[&qk5d XQ I*WA+Z3b0pUL
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子5[ r$NDY

3G r;fNAv 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.#Gq'P3[ba F
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! ~q![0juN Y"N
ebe6?@+Y-H Jax
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, :N~w"y9b*h9@

N`r}E^ x@ 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! &X'x3~.N5LoK;g$X

7h;bNLFK 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 2B*j2K+V9ga
S4H%|(nb)] ixJ
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, r;l'g$z&C d&Z+MN#H9T
~'j6fQ*Id
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
1H5i/xx$O{2w'_!B_ ]W C5iefx#i T
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
1X Y-abw qfP N
,r2|*e:pn;H c-k(M2W 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
"MO D2h1O&d!i U{MI6y }&JIv?5h(NnC
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]Q?rX}pe#s~
^mK!n C5ez1e|W
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦$R2H"Eg.Io{
N7}"p])nF
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
3\~S9K9jXMgP :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?'s3Gsn^]f6E
japan has been very influential nowadays.4Z j5Y|t4j
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
H&GZ#H9Cm+c%vY7G japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]%H*zT$bh'}c
c#E n8T5Qn}o]
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
OZ L6JN/W S ']K X,V$z
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
xO9Hro N9H shall we be more reasonable?
z c4UdbG[v japan has been very influential nowadays.zW.`p`/B
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,,G@ Hetl
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]pzF)S_e'~v3L d

&}$v B)D\ +b4Vg%k9B A
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
f.|{7rc$]u!B 日本係好強我絕對認同
g8p:ued| 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
1]$|I'c/N@X 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
"a5D5KaEy &aE8c{$[,Mc!M \-n
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
6Y'{ ~$X)|:nC;A
FM tzi x7QD4l 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
"h]?2B-l5\a)f$G @]-D[(m3Ah
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:S qLQf-jte4u.U
v*pKzSs])YB
$Q$Luw8q
t'LGZ Cg
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
d/O LSq6{@9F,O7N 日本係好強我絕對認同m&C7nO*R
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
mi l9b)sZ\ 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
D$qCG:iR-oX
*} iNp8NgZ[ h
EM,v I$B S\ 'eF/_0nV4B9\

"b"WpAJ [GpF'l-oEQ i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only. _+]'ibN&|!l p
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.!a#c5|DS#H"f.^m7}
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries (L}te*?0f
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:f Q7R3Q0@[F
5{vL6M2L'v

9F}l8Fzj1^V R $v^c7}:iu{*z

5P#EE~?%s;J1I
4sG.SwO?%wJ$~7n
W!z _/g(hqNoq in the next 50 years, japan will decline.$@mC h"U
[/quote];]8v0x'Gl+?/X&xY
:N,AJ7V~*QE,w
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@In M-eJ#r

)O]\D#B5jCD;|Q 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:!P_Sm \c7iC
[size=6]講到強, U-J-fl"^8n!B
@ Knc)X2iN KX
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
r+K$MVA
Qkr$Yi,Bh2y&m(d 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
v&|rP$z:BJC
+G-S2l(D0P 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
(Uh'WY u5M LN,`#@m,]
i_hga j[
the bro knows quite much of history.
}&o9TAf&??&s
,Pc9Ir[4\ UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.il7}8F'[ {
+p|9NCD.s;KE
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
Y+yad0rJ[SU\ -F!K1f Qh"j
China has a right of veto否決權.tLs m#I G5N
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
UVq5w S/_:I5m*P the issue will au---atically be banned
rw.tqY Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:i4\ D,A3YQ0FI!H
`6IV@{;{-uqXs

"T)c^]F Pc*w P 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
5z8E]_YAN)a |Wb
})Z,l }0s*v 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]` h)_,oQ)nHF

xK8j'\uS"Q!e
i q2b4Haf|_.G 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.K7A:b(l9sp9@5a
x^v!M6?"L [
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首shZ$NB.G.^P0G/NUB

W'uE*Pp*k} why it is called "Brick"
(c"L)^$l _0x7v5_ ca$ZkJ]L ]1o&W
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
:Hz|9e9OUP4FHD
^'C}(F W'o:K ]?+x \4cl#PH8]'EC0y&{

4c6s)fZT"ve6t8f PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.