娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
Ta Z"P9}%s/Z [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人&s(`T8zv&i

9E'FTi IRI 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
6U"Z]2BT/L ~0w$G
B1fw%cyN 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
1rJm BAe;Nb e A~j ZzfX
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.Qa.r0^#MZ4yP*fD
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
k/qC:I A H;b/S^$G XgVd
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, 4l@#|Kr.W
Jbv&s&J|:hJ
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! O1V9Wg,pE8}
Z,HtrJV1sU7^ e m
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
!M5V@](F@ R I&O|?e[A7t
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, N1Hx&\;F2Q0Kh

H0PQ f4~k 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; }$lz+bu)a
J!ei*pJ FQ
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,IW$\s@q

!J4x.B valrt(J 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? :[L+A:jE"j-D

4K$f2{}G0U 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]!R"B{-`p7t
5M3w+FGa
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦.d,L-~mL ?dG5`V k

:Q1Q obo`t(yU0Sg 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
]+^yZv8f@A6`nn!m)_ :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?[dF6n?_
japan has been very influential nowadays.6wj1mu6\:p]
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,])ta:e]!c
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
*fm9[g2{ Z
+dD fc:z8Wf't 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
U+{!O UnX8D
X[sdcz6} 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:}!b,L"e(Xz N
shall we be more reasonable?;H\gw?$Q7P
japan has been very influential nowadays.
;E3a@(l-RZ9B%R although i hate japaneses, but in UN,Q IJ$S*E0i
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
z%sl xI:Y#IR
fxx}]/GM"x /z N\?6N T{1X
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
o-Q}$o7jAh!s8r#E 日本係好強我絕對認同
M+[ p ?YV 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
*a!u By!D^BJ 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,Mq:A h\unws o
IV,O/f/~"Y?:}Xa8a
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),m F ^D:`K
:Iv5~tnI0s l`
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),V wH.o.ol

#U z)T9O|Y8l3L 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM: a LLa&m
8L/Z@3`y
b'ji C/^Z

!pF Z$aR6g.^*EO 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
(|m3p'pw Qh 日本係好強我絕對認同v-ldo$V.|%g P
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
4?5HRul(NS 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
"zG5^%Bk0[A*s
~hu!OH
)K"A8j(R+K~cb6k mo8^L9w*^ L f#cA
E ]y"_)F+f|!t9ri
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.$v.T^jp'UC,z
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.l&@yJm
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
bs2eb/Lv Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
-f2O"l8a}PdV:d nmU9z1B1b(D

OgBBr"OU n 3|N PZ M mf
5V7zBPZq

7y'q D5H'u!K1V5Y ?'xo&l~D|%M
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.7ji k-z _,|
[/quote]
[FfJ%Z.}Ao8P
UA} CM%f1R 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
!t-^u"B!M U
%f)vd+U S? OX,U 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
(k_$e&p8_8BhK [size=6]講到強,9TbwNg
'H7l4dP5CMk
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
eh{a z_*T *CYH"FM!l+b)e
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),} f)?di Y+}+?

c_s|9p 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
x/]3P-}o-c7g.N |7]%b+O`?0T!r

$bE/dGh[i the bro knows quite much of history.:uI7EBo2\2Y

'XeF|'K$P[ rA M} UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.AcR9_J#nF4g @
O T,SKP-QM
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.BZ9M;M4y&Hnb
\u.h&EZ-D;l|6D
China has a right of veto否決權.
pw2K}H!w2Hh If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,/y^{k8O{o m
the issue will au---atically be bannedq3}I i{W ^ J
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:'UX.W0i\(B&M

(CNLq9XJT G8Ni#Z*p
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
v9]+T dQ H#J+tHN "a'Ls j\0?
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]A;FO)k5gI0CR
6KRjD-nM:?2H[

T2W(v"?)| 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.8t%t.^_x RL mR*lb

k D:D&e gR One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
-m/Fd:X6{x7N
9]q:k3H%M;~#L why it is called "Brick"
E] B:CK!M]a
"AT-q9O{#M it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and Chinak*B+K ^&P+c

E oYT4\$rl@@ &}?qVE:g \q9p-k s

pO2n,}(T"[ Q!E~X PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.