娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
1v9AAk.X] [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人6egv:F V U

z%lK-q|,G(rc,J 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國6f-jWx5h]4L l
:FA9r Q%|GwN
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
4F+c&r N)}4^ V6n,^ {d8uPi(H${{0d
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
2G2j+X$rJ"jj 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
9O8~xi5M~N.L'Aq -n6U8C-`x ]8A^6o(V
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, f6a0C7n#yC6]+yb1P

qZ,U6jw%PR RN 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! (qI%],I.NQ JC
d!a~ H{4j.|y3@-C0?^
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
.SM6I`"u j7zr+sT
!QB$]\i 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
Qm$C%@g w_4e$m:`
.y#I"r3u*O%}G{X"d;i L 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
#{+CGa)GD#a@Q
NX-Q4CEx8B&ci&\ 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
wW O/hnk9] @+g:J'`$@E
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? l5C-H`-v~%I

H I!q+w&w 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]7ZI Oq2hu4t

/SOu8hA [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
:oW e0dUV3T
~9A [q~ F8C}+x`ja 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!i2]gbm[0a`
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?iP8S'V9y
japan has been very influential nowadays.
.p2}s2p[2o although i hate japaneses, but in UN,;J(Q2^K0z\7Oy5F$e(J
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
+Z m5Ht-V *|I B$oSl
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?ZJ9IG:{
aw#h8pO"k_+d"N
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
)K iK"S1c7r4Gc6T shall we be more reasonable? v!o q)W}-k3a
japan has been very influential nowadays.tg:gj/V'\"f:i
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,b,u dE4L|It[*JK
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
&[5O0wq x,s,m z-?0? o}:R+rq9EP

'jVX#{}HeJP/jX 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
)U6WJjn(J 日本係好強我絕對認同tHv Ch5Y R
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
$r9Cl}O_1umL-t 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,/to x2k$LY0`J

)p0HWU ? ^ 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),8G%_MhK(p6A;IY

c B"g{-uG L:l 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),z8`#Gb l[6z t{o

"y6F-e~y S q1s"? 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:S)ztejZ|3S,f
c0xA[w Q[uZ1_
$p3lYlsR-Y$c
+pC [W A:Z+[ B
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...s T p)_&`N
日本係好強我絕對認同H@)xCr x6g;Pa
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
C-|5aEZ 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]!|,@S^s
7kE UX7n

/hzO-A7Eb
q-_qJ:a\ *p~uWau
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
0c(Yl8S T? b in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
k3E-} J)] P W&~M a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
r4| r{7L[9j Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:s7Zi"_{m

my1@4n5xi 5u"i0N5N+v\X

b8N4k4P&BSh:n5u ;NG+L^+mgb
DL s/Xm~

qfro/o[%c6y"L_!I in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
k~`Nv0` [/quote]
:P+Pr\s;{x4N:z
F/qh[.W6td 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
/@H7L,P)l#EL;w!l p2Fwz-} D1S
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:%f6KX#Ph }q
[size=6]講到強,sk&rtd)gWC
k*ugKf!o9p
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
H&a D:tVbpt?-g
\g j6S1LY)dX8Z 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),E `*^3V X*AD-tix
_!j)ZWf
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]_Fi/S5J7I?

@#_ t:p ]S6h? -DT;bi V
the bro knows quite much of history.`j;pr+gCY
a g,V i-F,J:q9^
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
VY4Q/X e(B U 2kXF%z5q
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.`3Tb3y&[

\2{[8Q o1kH!u`!r China has a right of veto否決權.
KgF MpG2u7~%x If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,Tdh#y8DW*J2@
the issue will au---atically be banned'v/Xv3jpk2Y9K
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
6O5LI? ju}G_ )y,l4b!WV?/tMqw|\
5bm+c1yQS.]F
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
Syx Z4m n ?Dz5Ptg-K
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
d4K$iRYG6b
'R.Hf2bP]B0b7P
'jF xY8CM fW` 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
7i9SM Lm$e"o9@c3c ?6mhRv\e }3|
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
(Enf(Fo mLX?1T{&I:D
why it is called "Brick"
a He2Zsq2fY~
\$_d$}E7F!vQ it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
^(i!i s$NXV m3a.V0A
/m+n_7C g*P:y^N
B-To R a2~4s&{
6^!~4~*Q3X PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.