娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
+fl._Jz0i U [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人S,p8V#|.rC7s7?/bh
I;o2fCS-dO;J$P},R+k
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國S5ps ` ?G[r X(u
u8r _7~| JU
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子"C S4I;Vcc"O%O1^^$Y R
s(ZY `%U J T u$r
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人. fa!vQ5oET.u~`
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
9q7S^ {#j G Q7s8lc
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
1kW(])H*SlM O8_&Lv `f aN
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
9t8^DgfO(t"jK
H8k%Per0t E 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 .} K ^3e8r d

K*C }3z ~~ 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
6X"a4]#N1y}zz
2I _!GS4r;@h|nb 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
r0w"A0Y~4Z I
cvWBk {$x6e 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,T&V,Zur7[0nP z

?cj3y#j4~F 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? M)c'|*zZ-N*n
(e8a0uv;mm_!n!W6^s
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]8\&[[0B2Ej!h:Y;t
] UE#][9a-HH
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
#On;_3|n7Df$\.U{
0u(Q7H7ALw ]2k 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
3e't+k"i;u%x :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?C^.z-yt f/E(x
japan has been very influential nowadays.
'G tI Lwp#b I although i hate japaneses, but in UN,7i0d4J`n/M teU
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]i:[}B C,a,J]
aU!v*S'A s
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
^{!eif)a {
L {Yu+~3q 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:1Xw6o` ?4P`5i e
shall we be more reasonable?
6h0{A*CcR japan has been very influential nowadays."A;Fk1J)G7x
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,WUQN HKb"~7N
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]a-}!]mhV
ByA(A#a!kQ
.f5Oc~%x
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...f,Xc9G5ok(TN
日本係好強我絕對認同T)V2afSI
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
-W3A,a| r3]k 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
!r AJf-WQ U
Gn([/M ~7_A 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),?g1]"U]:T6c&Cu~
E1? xB M\q ~
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),K1| lM&s$X
5Hp o ZJ\@-Q/g
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:G'Hbx,u#Y"j
w^(YuZ(~ @7Gx
Ib6}H%RG.VL-z
t T"t(~A+H;|
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
s4R{$R)g,DHO9Wlk 日本係好強我絕對認同
6A'T(b/N;k&v{ 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...Q r'|&h,|&i(f W
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]eZ,n#Ny.n_&Z k

-pm hs'pc d sC/y,HpOr poM

?%Me!uk;I a6cb8g!R3G0T [3d ~
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.:rO(qG3}W
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
V:@.h vn/b"Rx^ a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries
8KXp)J~ ~#St*FQ Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
(Vskg~/y!S
+A!s k+U0G*e(H [G
| S'KR/VNI$c5W @L5pZPe

(KA-fs]2|i o/UE|3tm

,r)_Z!]&E9fE6x in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
tR3FC;LJ2S [/quote]
$gn Q J?0U(F
`l&q ],t gxNo2m 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
M,j}2t"|1W ~ w]?t`n6^]uJs@
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:am$j4q-s
[size=6]講到強,
9zX&Z%t `L 0E F)B/Ql
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
%Tw6N*eK
2X/]-K3u-Rl 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
Bj,ZE|IT L^3R#S9r-e_ p0g
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
qy4QS m)i
-S4yx#Z+b/K0?bh 0b:D'@(S%j8N!_
the bro knows quite much of history.S.Z-n|'fN&q
i7ks&o._!X
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.O!A'VzsB tc.L
{'LW x'fVF cS
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
)A5i*f'f-["O9WT*G
&xx? a:X]Q China has a right of veto否決權.
wY/D;n wC.qOr If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
g~0JO1aST,N the issue will au---atically be banned
3|*kcp8\TFxS Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
dfU?y ^&v
rp"f \0Lu#U@
ZZ MT3z%?f 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@F sW;H*U:I9W
!EE~w oRz
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
O9xr D"Q,uIOL$} B'M7r-w~Ww*G;Wek
!w$Bw*^;v7UUZ6dbe5]
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
:yh*nC [k |
J#XNZ9J One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s%Fa"s:kk(R'}

7\g:V)vL3J7?V why it is called "Brick"
chN4_T UB"m3B_K5@
;bRH6d8g it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinayPQ`,W)B0Kc

G { hc,eB.K
+q%C Kxw7a *DK^*oH
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.