娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]o YS|M&c'l
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人C,DPj i!AG%G G
!G Za;e@5wQ9[5Y
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
&K&h`1Osw:H0w
&q ~+MXyU 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
3I(PsUu[email protected] GzO I3^D)`*h
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.t~-nE9C"H o
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
V2@Tpl
+h7C l-]}p|F 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
:Z#N2P-s7X'| j:] Jr0w-U\8e c.s
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
w7F5A.f9B)W R*ykP }Xf^
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
#cF'Y:gqz._*VzH MZ!VE"D5VNv}`
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, #Zfrx8TC5{
2D&~ A|So
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; %u0Igf9R3o%GdlTc _
TKz3QT~%] k#kfs
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
o\;L4{l/k #J9D$z#M7AE
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? H}i4uFS j5@

5h^DvOi/I 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]7DFeBI(i]

oS3u6v&\O2s [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦1o1I6Z8`2\
i2P6n)l]7\+P
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
gY,e"@Q~Fg0]#m!N :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?V{8L}"N?/hSo
japan has been very influential nowadays.
:a`)N-kI#y} although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
p:S5Nn0^%~5V)D japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
y Xy-l'Kr;m$^
j%M M`F B'x-b U 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
(j3|5sL,} 1C V8]_G5Z*J
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:&dG1\w ]4|}7?Z
shall we be more reasonable?
"q0{L b e:Q/QyS japan has been very influential nowadays.1}9[T;As
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,\-vT|,J ~9q
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]4R\&o5uR
^VJ'~-m3^
0lM(S'r:r3K%@
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...)[!g{F&Qes
日本係好強我絕對認同 ?w'|2s+yY
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
F q ^X7X h CK 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
y F_2hb$|Y,eoB
*g~ t9w$P!\/`^ 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),1g q-~o;l Z x2M
"C ChJI@o o"P
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
'lPq RH,G9l9]c
^V0sAZ)t m F 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:C&n|2gV,LwYc!P]

iu#`3^)[5a e&n/zt/q9O
6|g0i U!}N'h| O KsM6S+Oc.t
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
[6r^N-b q9I 日本係好強我絕對認同(Jh&X}$Y
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
_}l4nUb_-\ 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
5V!{Go'@3p$SQe
5\%m v^ en7K ;Z|I;zv^ }}
,sU8A-m9c#@.Wz
0]8WLP*{@(q(h
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.1g,RQTM Pz
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.;_ X*P.mh~t
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries W:fM+Q5G;Tj W
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:.tb_Mj`.c[ pB
:\Y!|q8^m#X+B+q}[CUU

p9X'S|rZ"a 4o)d qz`5yWM&E];k

1ucN[9PF'f ;m I&x ER}4R

7_`-?.P[ RC:QL in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
'@8Q4D/[1RU [/quote]@3^*\1` }7fz}J6`
/j"z]/G$f
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
J0D8e4m8q(KWO'y ig%` 6w Gp'o1s\V.D8kR
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
|JR&@8f@ |aa [size=6]講到強,
%V"R0E\.S)Y+b
?#@4\+p?3UO 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
&i:v'w d(B4J
G0_ _c~4k J 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),"i9}?,}A/Ez#R J
(y/a'A2R#T1gf(V
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
"LL(Gx)d c#wmH
uW"Jp8T0k cU ;cYs!l `(M,`
the bro knows quite much of history.
4w_M7^1h%?(x
ZD qwq9nLm UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.p^UX2\#q\
J K IA5a]
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
c k~XCc,c3A
Yg4n7b%r6qTp China has a right of veto否決權.
j{q6g5D%U,V If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,"t!L FF+o]
the issue will au---atically be bannedROWA YeZ t9_
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
.Qz`.`}Ep D 2{'\ \J5G orK
)?"^sf'r/?
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@QW'^L/j6J
6i+J+Bp5iLa7T
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]+]*T5kH O6hH

lHS%[B:l(r jz.T s M
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.#`G[,oY:~Z:y
7u)VS.d#k6_._)H9]
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s;pX8ZG[V`
-I6o.V%r)v
why it is called "Brick"7u ][!sn1Pf

"H(NC)H9@:P it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
k5h&L,F_7J^)WG
l5Z'I ]FG!}VR{sG {;`t5UM:v6{:sp

-E7T~/Y}g PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.