娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]d:pS#}.a
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人0fI%J$ld(Hj,K

/O'mE,c:@*e 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
9M[ k+UR$z_2^T | q^!q&H4k L/] I
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
&]{#v2T-p.S.S
oPd'x,o ^!F.qw 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
JR a%^vr1c 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
2[2U'z MB
1i&{&@FuTfF(C 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
)G_T,S gRW0_/k
4U/e&`4vC \Z 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! #ZD z!`0OS5V
^-Qi(b&c)x&B\k
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
1?Q+B l!o9J Kf v 2v8}?&|}
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, !x]7~V we/w\_
2v4J?\ ^Tl,P
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
)k|^3P;q1n M,t)[+P9H%vb
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,C*q|!A4H)t*L(P
9r%f4K]+Nt]y
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? +[2|R$RC6dIz

t(C'JL%dS;^ 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]$[SJZ I'tff*j
,N.AkM,N#}?
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦c'i m[!Rd+[
0|'RxC F8w'vu`
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
1r'W6LnO#` :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable? AKztE?p;b*f
japan has been very influential nowadays.q Ce,o"H/F1Ri_
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,l)G?$o(_K+k
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]UT&R V&s+A

%@6[.ax {4M$Z R 是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得? Aev@MQ+I

x\#o-dqa 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
#Ha2xkU2Z r4R shall we be more reasonable?sb7YS ~$G
japan has been very influential nowadays.FX(yT T$p
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
r(K5u0M*Za&e japan should occupy a place. [/quote]z7e8l:z!w b

#\}:M'U$Oet
_Bot2tdG'HT4WN 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單..."VBNWO1oQ(gI
日本係好強我絕對認同
g^ Rg gN s 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家... O9f+]L$yr8r
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
%B:u `tt4wN :UQ!p+sv u
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
'k:sM7C:SI
E|PEjc5?/n"n 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),-wb+mdW p?0Y7g
!c2U\6sUA.l
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:S7qHi:Ii6F

|7V"u9a pAv3P/^6Y o[sTN,b

.KJ7GW*H\&di 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單... z@4_Ba%y!E
日本係好強我絕對認同
N1HB.Z1x2S 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
TF"P:GLI;\3T 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]&}Hrwu
lV.XiOU{^
'zB@]%g6r%B Cu
%gB7w2m U-HQ

B K,`lF i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
FZ;T-q%w^ K in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
^BVa4h&} a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries [3@-Uc$}&{
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:!Y W'Xk6XR#s
#R:k%X6P5nN4Y
8Qv$goPQ#f:X
`oJ&o*_,{

(Sl;tI#o o (X8G5?c{
Bo rg%]
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.9\.X l~7Fh
[/quote]
;a)Gs ly G^ \y4d4J%O(]
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@#Y+ab#jU
3D5UQR!F(C'F
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
2OF*Owv [size=6]講到強,i'_} R9c&T3]
h%j&vT X?VE
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),vF&h-|ow&T+_y

s.u8bBp#F,v] 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身), NRq-P%I

U3g6_/ut r!{&C 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
}?0KmsghQ z is8ES Kl9P

,A8I*K(lH:d | the bro knows quite much of history.
?6c7`XVW-G
&? P&U-b(e,f v X%o UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.!qjf f []3Aq

4?U o!rbj Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
8ZI`(s.@%s ?6E5Ce
/A%?Y?,JJP China has a right of veto否決權.$f:@)vZTaU
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
t T-]G`}$Q)slI the issue will au---atically be banned
,h"UV p"hX Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
?+e n a$`k)tJ
Li)n]4V%PTA
x"CZd)W+y 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
,W x z2zL"JLnL6] Vl K2\*w{~lx
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]w)M-vH)V&n _[:y

x:SP o6d `z0_F
s9e q(f-D,g 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
c ^/J(U9Y"}
l P#{/\ r'J3Xt/i_,|#j One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
;b4FP_E#W0SMI K.LDGK
why it is called "Brick"
TI n0L/Uu+w^Q ]2g"QP#{DM#?
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and ChinaHug*m3|,h[F X

[:btnmw2|
*pT-i,o\e%a$v
_iQ m0M4l+^ PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.