娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]m%c;B-u$v:Ec
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人v)jUE lIM
1Ds%s#Q*\.xK
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國KS[d;].ikZ
1Q'DHZ LSc d1d
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
*C.n2FAx (e,v ab1m,I-J
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.*_;xj%g4`a/R
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
^'W0pK&]d A
E.GS#e;uVl:F 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
'u9D#C$cY,}6L7{
c~#Z*uYHO 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! J6pq&i8{5rft

D5c2oDT%`d&}.K q 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
JU|7EG(w7p
%ps&H&f7G4Td3fc"\ 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, AK&O8aF1c$} Y'^2P

*d| }&Py2M,R 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; 8ITe5Sx

eH3\(\s;u 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手, a [-q} F4n#UW

~/Y*x'_cs 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
DW2m[Xn
a [L:R"`.H7T:re 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
'zyhh^5i4c&q
.d1o ZOL[['mM| } [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦(f\J%vV}\t'Zp
&OS7I7NS
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
yj `aH :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
p["cIc(y2n japan has been very influential nowadays.mEBF1V7}
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,dEN{&mQ-x9J
japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size] w ow4UOXr
_zCg)j"g
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?)q+?$v'@W

i%FL1Z?X;v4N:L|^ 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
^|:A+?v shall we be more reasonable?
B.Gg+X:z(Ui japan has been very influential nowadays.
3dD ws0P:P;v,j although i hate japaneses, but in UN, o7Z&O#E3C9tVQA&|
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
.K^f,xpde'K
&gA6y~M2~(g;y ^ 2X p8uM5z @l
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單..._e4\k1GE'X
日本係好強我絕對認同
K4p$\s r Ts 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家....[v#HnL.n zs%Y@
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,(d7`{4G6R w
;F~XZ y1]KY%dE
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),&Z.wK0Y VVN9U)s*j
$@1dmu/SJD#ou
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),g:xY6W,?Xq

|R:_9Cal3k 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:lD,g*t$pg

:Vz)K3EZ3E1V(mD} Y.^v'P wQb1s

K#uL!p-~n B 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
VJ_;x&X!CV;\ 日本係好強我絕對認同+n$jcI!Ok^)J
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
d\7|l+lDy 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]~5^+D?p-aG.G
sSp2iN@5V%Myk"y
&~o,v oAN+m I
$uVR2R ~~%u/Ig6O}W

x Lx5XCY:B y9i8f i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.%\#P&L|9t~Iz~`"p
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
c!wr0` Q!k%D a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries i x_{0^ [
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
CM$}D:]1W A6t cr 8W |"K7D S.I_R3N F

5J$ZM.fM'Y
P0?2c!~A/H3lM,v#b B
'hvz$io&iZ3o
.uj[0tZ"[ z
O!\#_4` | Z!sU"Y in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
3UN8R7Pm [/quote]
y(]Jw r]Q ^%J+a2G:tK;P
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@0~'vc _.qX3sy
h,{N!F%^;{
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:O@`4_u7y6_,^!aJ
[size=6]講到強,
p)Hm8Oc _:w8fDr6i2SN!?&j Z d
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
.@9T+]EgM!T ShY(F1mI$|;vdK
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),0nU"i!b rB O

(wO c}8R0] e"f(s'n#o 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
Cr%V(w8]5T3FQ m9s m&[Es
Ohe2Y2N+ElP w
the bro knows quite much of history.
dA mfV
[!~v S1n8Zu{S UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.Y^jFBV:cs!Y
V zO1sR
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.NG'Igrx,u-Q z
^Y9I;^X%A6l8Q$u)sn*a
China has a right of veto否決權.:A%WQg1eN-q?
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,A%eq+X6n
the issue will au---atically be banned;If[%Vj
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:fn4` Y0~o}3z^xj

dPQV{.P:{ Qz T.~ O,@ H6D.@^j9Nw
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@eW/s OnJf&[
5|N6Q t-J ?+NdJ
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]E-aSG0?C$U-i9E7h;D

t&t7lJH3W ?l yK Y5{ Zm!QM
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.O8FG'Y$zpj

5v~6n4D"N!k"n+jV One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
~4g%_Ba
-bZS!Z3U,p why it is called "Brick"
`C1@Q!k+P4NC ]
up/X8q8IAZ+nU it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
Pw-x9R*ha
O6B exA9k ;fX+Md\4v-hwc
/[-x'u7LY
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.