娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url];N\+s?G7A*_U B~
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人6L^-l}+[ ^Q
|&}SS O
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
i9i3@$CQm`G"L 6_X/je8NY|KS3L(Sh
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
&f0oSua+S f5og8Z2y2y0q@
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.:~]#`JCj^D
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
mj$n^R ol ;J#s KQi
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
{(o&{sc)ZdS
&~P4h0u i$E[ 德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! -X4^x~F8oH8C

O!^t&N~8e ] 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 K4dJ q]~\:{
"Z~zv[%sIu
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
4HXw(XOY^
-_5`OIm:l0\C%] 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
eAm&yy6j2gnx +i/gP$z0l
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,4mdG{k HKt

St&u:bS;Y,w1? 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛? $n,@E"G-qS~%|8Cp

O;D"x7v S.` tKo:K _ 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]
,T-v^;g+oI.m
o v F|.Dm)k1l7Z [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦oH1t|Y2uG8~

jh;Kk K"B 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!! [r K2t/@x?5G
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
0UTe6Q-w)R4| japan has been very influential nowadays.(]:KuI(?'C
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
a2N.T PN mt~5Y japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]I*[&Y0z})`2e
vk7`4_X$i%hK a]
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?Mtn4KPf I7{
#^6J }h1F
不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
#tyc.\)_l*Q shall we be more reasonable?
N:w,PMQ0lAz japan has been very influential nowadays.4\m)yxt7[ zH C
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,+[#Y1aUl:T{
japan should occupy a place. [/quote]
E1RRZX5X{O&wt1J ~d:z/m G7o8J

Y&M N,B _ 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...+Y@?3eU1p%Y
日本係好強我絕對認同7~ tJY&s-R#`
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
1VA!?a1y XZ6\(| 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
2l'N7b7L |%Xp'e+y 9Z.|!O,baI
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),L i)Fa.w Y})cD"J
RAe[9sy/C![
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
2}yY].~? .r4a,gR m
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:%_cH3VkGX;d

*{;Wb;O4snDd
.u#\UbPd zs {K ?d Q(QnD k
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...h o8@6bHM
日本係好強我絕對認同
,taSl'j1E#D 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...m)u`*`.rV's u8G
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
:k"` e0QG4yN9R ?3O,^!z7\ Pj]
,tL]v,_1E
7lYn'p&@C2JZu.kS2]}
I5L9@kW4aZ'H
i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.4h4ilwQd
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
Ga.V.pJW+{Ez4^#x a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries u|R R|i!@
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
q UX ^'nF q+NBy5Gy
LQVZ*mJ.xd9p.m9J
7tJ["Y:[Tk

DG ^(L,^
b7kg+vB?:F nJS hWZ \
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
,j*H%KKel-| [/quote]dq$oJ:f,V2O,C
0j$W.i-vd f xV
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@zM"~"b(kl
2A Q(f)juMr}
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
Ni:v/Vf'if [size=6]講到強,(Q3KCz |/GfjB]
/\\+rR1M7gk
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),-J2f0Y-o+D c6c
*o#ht N2s kl6gD
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身), d3X:r3?oi5I

ojA&I3e}A 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
0}9Z&U+vJ1Q `1bt&{isV.d
&Oi.lC,m9JY.zW(o
the bro knows quite much of history.(kxE1y j8A o
2oM!d!]Uc
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
xj?[-Q z
oj0C;?3qq Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.!da&oPh(A
uPzz%s
China has a right of veto否決權.^!RW7c4v$g;xI9J [c
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,bo6D6}`M-f
the issue will au---atically be banned|v]x s't(Y/k%UW
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:Z!V}:?o Kxo x
m*KJ]k.MX$a
-VBiA4Pb y5?0Du
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@8OCK'R4^;P UJ9Nv
;v(w?"|0D~Z@D|
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]5Efa|V*B
W^5}2D/_ s7mL
G?0Y*^ i+j_ rj
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
:n'fbK3FcZ#O!Y{ j;U*nhfla Q
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s:e0BvR1z
ZL%A/q2XZU9t J8@h
why it is called "Brick"
jQv'd Ig5S~ S|dlZ_
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China$ak'S |:v
9O i6vS#WLqk5|8p u O

V+DQ+Ut1G'U"b M%]n%f8B?$O7j"K
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.