娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]y.g M q*f9D/k5mt
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人
2W2~%ob!gq$CM
%Q]#^ ^t!~qdh 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國 p5by)L2w

g&@O3M#~-~+m 大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子6?*c^/~k9F,K!j,r
}||@)\ A^3A
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
^e C"]{h:w 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
%d$uK]H%Y?6O$T
{'R t C5m k0] 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
b!z&{7~!bf T rI8n j#f ii
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
7_5v)K9oB6ab
c2[u!u c-`,g 早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 7P6tW9DVYAPz
[~;C i2e
美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方, A b-z P_,ts
^.m cG#Z%F {d
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
O3i f:@^$E cR Eq,N.{T
最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
J:LX Z.Vn*],ok )C6o(qwjR1sA1g
美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
Lr1?S0wBiq pI(IM'Iz
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]!?f P9q8x t^F1t
SZx"O^G+pgF
[[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦x!{A5_.t Xz
w&U;r0})e3k4N
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!Oi9Ob3\6N:n i(vT Mu
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?*[9F%i*T3x u8@
japan has been very influential nowadays.
MmtJm${O although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
U,d)g5z{@a japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
"S$h4U[Q T (s2Ehu$JdS
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?9Z%xK)r!gf

e,XNRk'`+q!z 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
#L(N6Sj3NRL uk@d shall we be more reasonable?DOtFgZZ2O2S
japan has been very influential nowadays.
%ha!X2V6H't9wu*_/L although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
S U2xej8? japan should occupy a place. [/quote]8f9F l!A3\ q u

A5K0jyl UE` k"Rl
yu ] ^[ oE 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...GPM%X&`0}{
日本係好強我絕對認同NvfQ{)p
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
.P3?Y @/H 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,QNb ^E!q n#?

? byQ#JQb O$y\#H 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),$M4B O$t@qJI
6S&h {,_Y v
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
B;]+qi`)az E
9X,QR-On.d-F 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:3~y2Z_Q;O| \

'N;RUe:u }(Z;]A;e
u `T,v*np ]KT'D#pq;l [-J
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
(i,wT ?;FI 日本係好強我絕對認同5Tw$o l(g|;N$@QK!b3D
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
x [4y d[.g$Q5~ LNr 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]a {2N`*x:J1z+@
A*H \Z+G:Ie;jj{
wT!Nn kl
},A.Fh*@'w-Zn

t,m-yGV i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.
Gc!o@t in the next 50 years, japan will decline.6m)@2i b OyP
a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries m*pYJ;` q(k
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
BSvTd6g8S c7A`JM&L[I

q@ WqU4tm Yf5v.@B%e'l `@ Q
$o:x$y"?5lt`
u7YB;i7n
&iQ p$h1`&p E| jI
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.3y+n#x*mUO"v
[/quote]H#L!} T4V;k6}7J
w%J(^e4o/A
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@9r*BRr'r

YoU2~"Y~ 下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM:
sf3O-q)] [size=6]講到強,
w5yC1[/BHyL
z$xl@3{ 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
.wC3_\i,A 8} WKHEa
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
k9ANIwf8D Mo6Io*U
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
#P$Ak]9VUJ i(g1?znm
1B/xv y,~.YE
the bro knows quite much of history.
:al+i YD w *f#UW| TQ!E#o)a
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.
;n5E\)DF#Y E;PN0W}"O0a 4n/F;E gole
Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.3m X9I&E:b8yo.tK7n9u
@0q{&N5W1l
China has a right of veto否決權.
+jm*BH:f X If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,,h}d m~{
the issue will au---atically be banned^!O!u)X Z:R
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
+}M6}~%C$]D?Ds
[.W kK;J0O io/V7}
i`4{;K:nOf 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@/W5zpf |;a

:{b)rz(QA 下面果句唔太明:P [/quote][h6G"J*``

(B4W srM%[;at$A\
.m!g!wuL 金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.kE%gR#u
#UnT6x+z ^A f#w`
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首saa-c M2C Znm2~

-~"JFg5z8ecy.A why it is called "Brick"%x+z]+c0e*X1x

\(t@!B&\mH&X it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
h xrr;},z
&}6N!Uk.~W(C;g 0dqs/^-v"Q G%R _'h

f7x4f2aU ~[OY P PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.