娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url];o'h C _X'I#AS;bd/|
[size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人 }hC3H~G:}

~B}$s:@m1ZL v 反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
Fezdf5c:xJO ~ T O'C"WW A#r
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子
u)]6mx)` p7@
+J$Y ?N&J8x%_ 千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.7P h O5L2f @G
鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償! ;p;cvtqL^-T@ v
;{CwJ|7}A2U
主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕,
-cm!U,z,KP1e N&{6`xe;[
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚! /_0F0h:P*P0l
S$y2e`Ti;C+o C
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名 \t B)hy1}

@ m*aPK 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
;ozuqe_ Rkq;?0_![
美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守; 5NuJU;Xtn4k

V P [4q GZ 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,
,h\H$Q*I W b
w4x)w*q fvz5Vc.Q 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
PAP v0SdBm3x
9`.R-fDw6E t!J 德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]2`CL-X)n |2WHf9d

4L&D `D'KeCj [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦^[D9_ j4p,Rc
VCf7PcOkt't2u
男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!
(L#NM hd&v;mm4hK :):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?
/J;^'[(Q3U6z Q japan has been very influential nowadays.,k|5v~ x%?$I&]c
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
2q3x-Ih:Wv japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]
(z1x0z-TCH*B xs Q{K1S I$g
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
{"ce&S[ ^Afo
$kojI;[W 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:
.[#i9p-sz{ shall we be more reasonable?
j!Wd bN$}v japan has been very influential nowadays.G.WF7JC$e,iQn?
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
(u)Pc5}[n japan should occupy a place. [/quote] Z+n#h/i"m|o_T
$aL LWBG3~8g

\QLi-@mU4B5d/ce 兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
V-o b`0Q _ 日本係好強我絕對認同3~)` G;P'E:I@
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
7b'i M!vj8imUv$V 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強, L+`MrE

+_DWFO0@5ZN 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
jII%g,e ]4P@5a
-rWlk^Mdo 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身), AAuo]| w2H

4Z8u4g5Q)S YXY6k 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:J{z3i"|j&pN*C

|6M'B!x'D"n"S A]NZ e7rBr|
"gp$H"u7M'?0`
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
)i&lhakP7v.pZe!g%k 日本係好強我絕對認同
!mRZ(r;?I 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...e:Nv]z _-L
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]#gBZF0J9o

0~'i;bA rO Ob9fffa#U

fV6cy0st5~E/w
9r*E`.~.})f\ N i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only.N3Yg8YS7Z
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
.F.C/aF(~)v3A;VB@U$K a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries f-k0DzY,k[o Q6ge
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:7nX j|3P$?@l
'Ht-o/[i4n

5xg6B ?;IY Gj@i/JeE

:k9X.NN:W
RR*A,P&S:cT |
WEjg8U in the next 50 years, japan will decline.9}'Rw;Re:d]*] \
[/quote]
D_u0{u6C w P
)v4h!a w|JN 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@!C(^D1tNl
&a)l3Rp~I#P&Pnne!M
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM::`s8t h|*N:g i
[size=6]講到強,J@3`j{'a'LAGi
Dg J7F)? ]-pC g"Y
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),
+K)q4z lbN#H3p C (PgQ'o$P%out
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
w_S;]I{"X2V Nw|` z Ox
肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote] xf-EiG+r.nH'q

X!pzd2Z)q l,}l MgJ7]
the bro knows quite much of history.
f^1o$ou ~CO +L!Q{)l-UYY
UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries."?V@ XMJ S}!m(i

-U9rOvN"eo.p Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.9T,G@3AS#TuO

!o U7AC8W9R China has a right of veto否決權.Q Oi(H x#~C0A4k~
If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,
*eE U? Nf the issue will au---atically be bannedTx2bib8i1i
Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM: S$d1@r!{ s

S?.r*H'UDz W k;| wa!@'s;\+m p1G
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
2A"ps!b"n1y $L Z0b$q`W
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote]
!dTR1p\]a/e .O@7c O2r3~!z+I
k:}1Tf*JfU&~
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.
;UCKOhV7Q6{ $kgfS"_Jz
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s
r"l~,i~?~ ;j*a2pw;pF0c2Q
why it is called "Brick"
EUhB y!yP m:\(E Q h0dml7m
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China&x6l#u)b1P,hLD

O~myT'`w1Gm
A`EB~j,[ uF
en$iIcI6D PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.