娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 06:42 PM

反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國

[url]http://hongkong-property.netfirms.com/UN/anti_japanese_to_be_un.htm[/url]
Ez`K`aLB [size=6]請大家簽名支持,亦要告知你的朋友[/size]

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-3 06:53 PM

全力支持新經濟學巨人N m"G5T;i2g F
AWODu6o
反對日本成為聯合國常任理事國
)L1\N%Lk.A5ccR 5@N6U*Z?}wRA P
大家要珍惜今日可以咁自由happy享用26FUN.COM的日子[rw$k,PV
u7BbC0i m+u
千萬記著, 倭寇狼子野心, 必須提防慘痛歷史的重複

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-3 10:19 PM

小日本狗一定信唔過,心胸險惡,又扮好人.
,|P}G&m,ge Y 鬼唔望一夜之間海嘯加地震,等日本 齊齊玩 冚家產

clchoicl 發表於 2005-4-3 10:30 PM

[img]http://hk.geocities.com/ronald_be_free/pkjapan.JPG[/img]

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-3 11:45 PM

[size=6]請大家將訊息傳播開去![/size]

sklai 發表於 2005-4-4 01:10 AM

[font=宋體][color=Red][size=6]反日本軍國主義復興[/size][/color][/font]

chinese 發表於 2005-4-4 01:22 AM

totally support u

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 01:25 AM

[size=5]同是犯錯,雖然改變唔到歷史,德國卻願意道歉及賠償!
,] DwNS Zm*j
`W5{o1M$| 主動建碑立館,讓後人警惕, &Vi$TdQ.{]4b
I;z8c$ps6`'?;r(`
德國政府對處理第二次世界大戰的態度及立場,值得一讚!
7Y+}5Z*{A @i _O%Ob/^0\
早排有一個登陸諾曼第的紀錄片,片中詳述當年的慘況,並由各一名
vH/c4{}~7o%p
_4N!P6BXGX 美國及德國老兵,各自站在自己當年(60年前)的地方,
7PA,{!m:e
gR@V/p!g/F#RRX 美國老兵講自己如果搶灘,並且親身示範,德國老兵講自己如果死守;
d.wY1?K8Fr
GG'iR n] 最後在片尾,兩名老兵相遇, 並互相握手,4A)z0t9y!_Z*[ P'N

DA)Zk8h Q!ZX 美國老兵問:當年你見到我們登陸搶灘嘛?
#c)z7~@`S DCA$mO$d,rd
德國老兵回應:有....我見到......[/size]hB~bW+g&?%|

O | P0F#b7e [[i] Last edited by 新經濟學巨人 on 2005-4-4 at 01:26 AM [/i]]

小豪豪 發表於 2005-4-4 01:41 AM

反日本,死不悔改

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-4 04:29 AM

好心d日本仔啦,有時間拍多幾套av咪仲好...我罷買日貨都一定支持你D AV碟啦
2tJe6X/mC O-Wg S
~9x b C6M4RX 男個d精盡人亡,女果d俾人姦死哂,咁就正

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-4 06:59 PM

請支持!

pk boy 發表於 2005-4-4 09:20 PM

我會用行動支持,溝哂d"o架"妹,直至佢地放棄呢個念頭為止!!!+m5G!R3h?g:v
:):):)

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-4 11:46 PM

shall we be more reasonable?Kiy!e]W1?]}!a
japan has been very influential nowadays.kp5E:\:Z
although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
Ma&SC1J japan should occupy a place.

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:00 AM

[size=6]簽名反對,好合理囉![/size]3a"@}.E%sKk6T
8j'm/Lo*P N
是否代表有錢人可以做乜都得?
u*C&B2r1w+y-a
)a6jp+y\`pD7J$C 不分有沒有錢,都要有作為人的NORM.

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-4 11:46 PM:1`7q8E4o7L0WK5IPa&^
shall we be more reasonable?
y*|?}6fC6vo` japan has been very influential nowadays.
$WX Z:` Fj2{OV%M L although i hate japaneses, but in UN,
*\_Qopo| U japan should occupy a place. [/quote] h"zh+h}7m~

,{!x&n ROV/B3F4W+R ;`3xX5cR
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...@H E,ue#z']-~
日本係好強我絕對認同Q'A!`'N |AL
但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...
^2H;U0A*E ~ u(n9M 助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@

新經濟學巨人 發表於 2005-4-5 12:07 AM

[size=6]講到強,
0E`W3H7}-}X1B n.L.k m&P]q.w-}@W
第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),[0l*xM*v lfF
^(Tma'o6l PY4Q
及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),
yb/NY!s
NX#IJ]+J)\ 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size]

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:09 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:02 AM:3i%UZ1gB n I t ~P

kr]5Wp&AU-l ^ xPiV IQY[
*l,L,Z Kn5Z)O
兄弟...國際事務唔係咁簡單...
um#Gya M#c 日本係好強我絕對認同
,w!K5P\+i"Qj,Ig 但同時佢亦都係個好有野心ge國家...bSBl n[l+T
助長軍國主義講到底都唔係一件好事 @@ [/quote]
.r @s$lJN;j Emsk c

U3_5U%]&J2@2?2G/I_ ph {4?!yYB$\3b

{C6ox|"n?#| i agree with u.So i say japan can be a member of UN only. {8BOe[jm$hTk
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
5x` {EJ(Xp a new "Brick" will form and become the strongest countries k"]2X N(b.n.L
Does anyone know?

MaxFigo 發表於 2005-4-5 12:12 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]stupid X[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:09 AM:
a e0Io~Z
!K(xk-ui+Al
4wU7X6C0AO9G8Nd
T3B&t t0W$D
Q9E cI]
}dgY%BF:M q]+q4s dpH:Q9`F*Rk u
in the next 50 years, japan will decline.
PhF*R6cE D [/quote]/mV^f%d3]
S d]uZ-Jy"v gK
係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@
/y4\nfu N V&m}){u
下面果句唔太明:P

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:16 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]新經濟學巨人[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:07 AM: KkC/Hb5J~:Q5J
[size=6]講到強,
-Uk _X%Z
T)P G|0t Ln8a] 第一次世界大戰後,日本強佔山東(德國影響範圍),@P!_9T%e

'X4X0q#l\@ rq ` 及後日本更退出國際聯盟(即聯合國前身),/Z ^:cKj eje

9i2rnjx3F)q 肆無忌憚入侵中國![/size] [/quote]
i)Cg c)AAzDjy"w
8PzN k4c]#vD )KNd5m%K+P(NQ
the bro knows quite much of history. W'E1Q}@G"H+j

)SDm T1` UN is now becoming國際聯盟. Its importance is now decreasing since America attacked Iraq without permission from UN. UN will eventually 架空 by strong countries.%`g2beNV,R$Z'@c CI

P @U m2oJ Apart from that, I think Japan is only playing tricks with America because he can never enter UN if China object to it.
M}2|%P)|q]
2F$E5[h:n9p China has a right of veto否決權.
B`*Y pt(J If anyone among the five 常任理事國 uses veto to object,&C%fZ(Sj4@*bI ~2j+F
the issue will au---atically be banned
u'h{`Y5T Veto is a special right offered to victorious countries in WW2

stupid X 發表於 2005-4-5 12:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]MaxFigo[/i] at 2005-4-5 12:12 AM:
r3@~+oI @
#n9{MG+YEC&E}$J
:`cj ^+Q0A;|+O 係ar...日本本身其實都隱藏左唔少經濟問題 @@m R`g%X`$`!f|
3r3g:?*Jj{1Q_4b
下面果句唔太明:P [/quote] cJm X&KaX/jTv5t

1q$`vRr(^ \-vq1C+\g.KB
金鏄四國 is a new idea which shocked the whole world in 2003.:}u7w"qN RoN
7u j/f]u2EME'a
One of the 高盛 investigator proposed a report which make the whole world ecmomic scholars and also 元首s[A7z _e`(s }_YD
v}}`5iY
why it is called "Brick"
%x.Z3j3qcGvB HK{X&?0nN M
it is because the four new countries which will lead the world economy in 21 centries is Brazil,Russia.India and China
fl'j3~yQ,P a"U P Q &TyT W,M;oPx8j
U\ oY1G7CWv;qg
cF1W:y9M7gk
PS: if u want anymore info., search it in yahoo, it's a very new idea but very well known among all 投資行

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.