娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學

Gretzky 發表於 2005-4-6 03:34 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-6 03:38 PM

Gretzky,8E })~Di`7S5{Y
Relax, GOD is in here, and He knows we do our best in here.-{E0?9AR%l8^,z [;MV
Don't be upset
.M
~N(B5oyj$dDz`Y GOD know what you did in front of HIM and... *{J!N)Fmj b9M\ ?
you should know that, even though we preach Good News, not everyone will be listening/believing... remember as Jesus stage, He did micrcales, but people still didn't believe He is the son of GOD.IU A
yO:z+zl
U did a great job ah!!!]l2s6LK
!bkG{f.W'XZO8rq
And I am sure He knows it
qa'B
aC"J
1lf+LW9\)?x{1@(sA{ In Him,2NDndP
Bright

ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-4-6 04:21 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]Gretzky[/i] at 2005-4-6 03:32 PM: ~1?(MHJ
%^g"y [L:Df}
Regarding the resu ... [/quote]
+e(l\Y%Ln`@
gm*n5x*E G .......................:lol:7wa:B*}4H _
$E`"|3zyI@8v,a
你up咩>>>???我睇唔明>>>???o7LPP+xB Zd&P;a

$h,@$i;g(Eg4Y 2千年前聖經寫d咩神積...我真係唔係好信囉!7aAy/~Qr~8t-H }
{DpP~8w(\3~8x
係甘!

DXneo 發表於 2005-4-6 06:30 PM

都是離不開強列排他及非教友即罪(歒)人的說法{3i$y'm4Q4N
都說把“神和基督之名及不要問只要信的思想放在一邊”
)ML1X5B-jt,G'` 還一味的神知道...神...神...
WLQTpYL*a2Of T
G 是沒看清楚還是沒深度呢....唉By7E m)rTZr
多說無益

ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-4-6 06:35 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]DXneo[/i] at 2005-4-6 06:30 PM:yT9^ePU
都是離不開強列排他及非教友即罪(歒)人 ... [/quote]
ts"e rR9Iv M iKJC c/~BF!h ehO
對!
_%Z0w;pm:Uj 6yCB _!h`8w
你睇17世紀西班牙宗教逼害就知啦!

DXneo 發表於 2005-4-6 07:15 PM

還有魔女獵殺,
vt+D;b;@
`ul
pa 酷刑對代之後殺害好幾萬無罪婦女和貓,
8u5pm1hb 後來引致鼠役,使歐洲再死數以十萬人,歐洲步入黒暗時期@J"g6Tth,Mb6Z~
這些以自己有限知慧去追"俆"他們那位全知全能的神,5Kg1ALS ?$J9I
多麼不智,無知,下流,可恥
,J~q4uC0G.Y6} 使人類歷史不斷加上污點
pZO)?EX -Ysj2ZB"UO
[[i] Last edited by DXneo on 2005-4-6 at 07:16 PM [/i]]

tung kin wah 發表於 2005-4-7 02:10 AM

How to prove the existence of something ?

It is very easy to disprove the existence of something , for example finding an exceptional case will be enough . But how to prove the existence of something ? Obviously the prove will not be perfect and never be perfect, so you always say you believe on something . Even with science, we are justing using induction to support our believal on something. So your believal of the existence of god is at the same level of my belival on the sun will rise from the east ---orrow morning. So those Chiristian article are always fooling people with fallices.
?$m&|/K2l!pb 9pNM7Ckkr{
Second point is about the free will , don't you think we have the free will ? The god have the free will ? The problem about the god of the Christans is on he is the ONE. Remember, we have no universal set in Maths , the same idea as the support of free will , also the same idea as the support of democracy, belive of market driving value and evolution ,..... all these come to the only conclusion that WE MAN KIND ARE NO SPECIAL ! ok ! ;W+PnGX C$E`


O"|G!|cw Don't be too self center as self-centerness is 萬惡的根源, 我選擇接受道或佛家的思想是因為它們的兼收並束，沒有強烈的排它性，長遠帶來宇宙的和諧。

Gretzky 發表於 2005-4-7 11:47 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

rest365days 發表於 2005-4-7 12:01 PM

有咩好拗?
v(tIG:Y1p7c{ 我認為信仰是活出來, 而不是分析出來的. 從來無聽過有人因為跟對方辨論,被人說服了而信耶穌.
` RjEt:{
^o 無論邊一個宗教,都應該是自己去經歷和感受.最緊要係清楚自己做緊mud. 有人博覽群書, 仔細研究, 認真委身一個信仰, 我好欣賞佢. 有人選擇人云亦云, 一知半解, 或者搵個信仰嚟please自己. 請隨便,  無野講.

nightmare 發表於 2005-4-7 12:04 PM

好鬼正呀....哈哈哈"""*T5t'?\LX3\:H
支持!!!

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-7 12:11 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]nightmare[/i] at 2005-4-7 14:04:k)J"WKBt A
j
好鬼正呀....哈哈哈""")c2~Y"AV
支持!!! [/quote]
Zfj2lv:mB/y 3AP%OY V}
so do I!!!
Tf`&rY!e0[ I agree what you write...
WFN[h?`
\I time, experience, will tell ....

sk 發表於 2005-4-7 12:37 PM

衪對事物的定義和我們的截然不同... not necessary

「如果衪對事物的定義和我們的截然不同，衪也可能對其他的事物有著和我們不同的看法。衪可能對永賞、永生等都有自己的一套看法。你在天堂的永生可能只有一年，也可能是一千年的折磨。上帝可以說，衪有自己一套包括痛苦折磨的定義。」 ...j1t2w2t!R
zO%E IIL
If people are created in God's image (his DNA ??) , our view of good ,evil and suffering can't be that far apart from God's view. He is not THAT unpredictible.
:NlFl/a[ML L2G"t IQ$Q"|qX)Q/skw
[[i] Last edited by sk on 2005-4-7 at 12:39 PM [/i]]

cheery 發表於 2005-4-7 01:08 PM

掂wo~~~~~~~~~~~!!!

jsqaure99 發表於 2005-4-7 01:47 PM

TO sk﹕
]D0|FX NO OFFENCE }y dRS{8?o
但請問如果我整容整到同你一樣a;@z?L9{ o!hE
係咪DNA都會同你一樣呢Tc\}UD4Mf c7rB
IMAGE又係咪解DNA呢~9?:@1q5{
IMAGE又係咪淨係解樣呢
:b1b1m9K/c*u:fQ;Z 我唔知2c$Vw\(@pK
但係人用現今不完整既科學﹐好似DNA既理論黎攻激神既”創世‘﹐}M,F6V|[
會唔會覺得未夠班呢'z?V6xV p({
人不能夠解釋神﹐就話神係假﹐係心靈上既托附
!j0?s Z ^ 但係而家連挪亞方舟都慍到喇
bQ`%?j ~(G"i2]D 又點解釋`zOC9l0e

-s!UA5Q$Is7Qg 仲有果個網址我已經去過﹐寫網人只係一個唔識解經既人(什至忽略左好多好多既DETAIL)﹐佢既網址簡直不值一看。

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-7 02:11 PM

thanks for ur info an questions.....
s8h__ a1o )_a-sl9Wwc4]2I9vN
em..I didn't goto that website either......

jsqaure99 發表於 2005-4-7 02:24 PM

我就敗興而回
G;B/R\zQ 以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
h,?5eS ~(N#~s 家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-7 02:29 PM

hahhahahhaahahhaha =p

rest365days 發表於 2005-4-7 02:34 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]jsqaure99[/i] at 2005-4-7 02:24 PM:]0zL\3L9l
我就敗興而回
q Y%F^9ZjOf 以為係大茶飯﹐點知連點CONTACT個網主都慍唔到
"@]6w(K:]7pK 家常便飯有興趣去睇下佢既無知喇 .\ [/quote]H
n4h5\&{"OT

.E~py9{s 個網站係一個唔錯嘅反面教材.  莫講話唔信嘅人, 就算基督徒都有時會犯錯, 將自己嘅意思”讀入”經文裏面.  在聖經裏面左搵右搵, 見到片言隻語能夠乎合自己心目中嘅意思就抽佢出嚟, 斷章取義, 迫聖經食死貓.3i*Wr_fDv
順帶一題, 現今科技發達, 出現電子聖經.  但係用嘅時侯要小心.  特別係search key word, 好容易將search results胡亂貫串, 小心小心.

jsqaure99 發表於 2005-4-7 02:36 PM

反面教材{-v2I`[6g'kw-e mt
講得好
,Q]
x'IL$Q B%q&z 仲有D潑婦罵街FEEL添

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-7 02:36 PM

yes you are right!!!!!,b R [b.d/t9G_

i q j _0y!F so if you want to read bible.. need to study in right way.. look at clearly for all the related bible versus... .. E tK+l;oBtg zn _
Christians (or non-Christians) could make these mistakes due to misunderstanding for bible versus.. look widely.. it could help.....

查看完整版本: 精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學