精彩辯論-----信耶穌不合科學(頁 6) - 吹水版 - 娛樂滿紛 26FUN

DXneo 發表於 2005-4-7 07:19 PM

#98 Ko*~5N0M{ B
說了等於沒說Vl Tp-v+\2z*}g
#99
不必再想“視綫轉移”開題目S0G&[y_4Ox K#]R(G(F

請勿再用"視綫轉移,你和我應等潑婦罵街招數"

轉話題便是我以前的說話比你的正確,r{1OBray
)A0b&t@%u@Z
[[i] Last edited by DXneo on 2005-4-7 at 07:23 PM [/i]]

fishball 發表於 2005-4-7 07:23 PM

你說你的話正確那就正確吧...V*jMd-p`\I)D)y
我也明白透過辨論不能改變人的意念......3Z.smkcB9^
介紹你一本書《科學與聖經》h*Q$|a-Q7|!xjGu:c*`
看了對知識增長有幫助

DXneo 發表於 2005-4-7 07:34 PM

"你說你的話正確那就正確吧..."-------潑婦罵街招數Y }G2jbiTBYdxKk2u
不是我話正確...是事實|N7Kx+gUX6G
"我以前的說話比你的正確"9E v#_ XXAEv
f/vi8F`b-j3Ul2y
"我也明白透過辨論不能改變人的意念......"'TMu bD,s/j K
不要改變話題,這不是傳教,是你指出我文中有誤我才回覆,/F!Xk o)gS#?'}6jH-m_
事實是你說的話有誤

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-7 07:35 PM

Cool down pls, everyone, ok?!

tung kin wah 發表於 2005-4-8 12:37 AM

真理，科學，人類的態度

When I was a small boy, I look at the sky, watching there so many stars, just want to ask, what's over there ? $N(c,|DKi/RrlGY

I start studying books about the moon, the sun, those planets and read the story about Galieo & Keppler, besides appreciating the beauty of the Universe, (自從十二歲開始青春期之後，開始鐘意睇女多D,以上浪漫既情懷，已經比神收返佐.....) I just discovered the limitation of human beings. They are always looking themselves as the center of the Universe. Until recently, there are still so many people thinks that they are the center of the universe. Have you think about why the god looks so humanistic ? HE IS JUST A SELF REFLECTED IMAGE OF YOU. Just projecting his thoughts to explain the whole universe, that is why the whole Europe suffered from a long long dark age. Please go study what the hell happened in the past. ;`N7Oe:HGwfM+d3r _{

I believe in god, that is the destiny, but certainy not the one mentioned in Bible. Darwin believe on his god too finally , but not the one in bible. Please read more about what he did especailly after he discover the evidence for evolution. Please don't fool others by saying that great XYZ believe in god after he die. May be his god is not your god.
} cFi}'vQn
What is truth ? Can you say that a pencil will fall on the floor is a truth ? You drop 100 pencil and think the 101 will drop but it has not yet happened, so how come you are so sure about it ? It is the way, the scientific way, tell you ! You can predict what is going to happen from your induction. That is the meaning of truth, the CERTAINTY. CERTAINTY is a concept connected with time. So please tell me what can be predicted by you with your god and don't talk about the past. Past happening in the bible is a story but your scinece text book teach you something you can check ! Don't be fooled by a human self reflected image. I'm glad to have this opportunity expaining my thoughts with so many Christians.

自以為全能其實最無能:)
8srXnE[dOt
尋找真善美是做人的態度，也是活得精彩死得燦爛的方法。(E*Hatq s H

人類這麼恐懼死亡，自我中心的態度又怎可加深對這個宇宙的了解?

樂壇渣Fit人 發表於 2005-4-8 12:40 AM

[size=4][color=Maroon][b]加入精華I[/b][/color][/size]

nightmare 發表於 2005-4-8 01:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 2005-4-7 07:35 PM:r\8b Av"C9K i
Cool down pls, everyone, ok?! [/quote]

哈哈,佢地都好多道理....3\;YQ%Kj1b.KMZ\
我只係對文章既趣味所吸引....a5K}1r]$H
比起佢地對神,或無神,既信仰力量,感到自卑

jsqaure99 發表於 2005-4-8 02:57 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ilove---you[/i] at 2005-4-7 07:01 PM:
,Y+?%{D\oY[
+U7hF:d0_J
証據...係要証實左既先叫証據

用眼去睇下個隆就話係...又唔做下"碳14"確定下年分??? 見到d對自己有利既所謂証據就認屎認屁認唔切...悲哀! [/quote]ew7T&BFK&V
&{{)C^L0~8m

唔係想話你﹐不個你經常用錯既EXAMPLE同經證實既謠言黎BACKUP自己會唔會唔好意思﹖當然大家希望多些人發言﹐但請你先做RESEARCH﹗

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-8 10:03 AM

*headache*

Gretzky 發表於 2005-4-8 03:39 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽 ****

DXneo 發表於 2005-4-8 04:36 PM

多謝指教,hR[R;^lZ

但歴史事實也不可隨意更改

fishball 發表於 2005-4-9 12:56 AM

我覺得這題目很有意思

fishball 發表於 2005-4-9 01:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]DXneo[/i] at 2005-4-7 07:11 PM:原子彈本來是用來殺人的8F'U3C1p5MW1kZZ
[/quote]1C\-}.f"c h4z4Q{,v'?M

原子彈是以相對論研發
而相對論不是[b]本來是用來殺人的[/b]

DXneo 發表於 2005-4-9 05:40 PM

原子彈是以相對論 E=mcc 作為研發基礎3Ugn_Qn
其間花費幾多金錢研發?美國是以國家財力研發 Re*[#w[/z3P
核原料也花費幾多金錢?
不是相對論,是美國以國家財力殺人.

"--羊頭--狗肉"(借用你自己的話)的信仰力量,殺人都比原子彈多W(c vob@ [
科學都應該感到自卑!_3h.r^K^s

[[i] Last edited by DXneo on 2005-4-9 at 05:49 PM [/i]]

neptune1122 發表於 2005-4-10 03:22 PM

nice.......wow

raj72616a 發表於 2005-10-10 03:00 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fishball[/i] at 2005-4-7 07:13 PM:#q8@(^ N*Fa#B_h
「猿人化石,北京周口店都有啦!!! 你唔... [/quote];i q@j9S9[Z5b
'@O(eDPi-u7wr;eMn
北京人?F!z&_ _AQ$l&Ew,U
有文獻記錄同埋複製品囉@2j:C%cd@l6SR

原來既實物? 冇呀, 冇人知去左邊呀:i#W3t:OnP)s6U0QVj0v
不過本本中學教科書都稱聲真係發掘左出黎囉
c]^b(sN T8b+bI*i
.)|.?MSYg2C2Ty
.1a'X-K4m\'A
.f.q:rq;`W|
.
.g Xa6j*D*NM
,`wDx8}FN N2~B
我覺得, 無論信教既同唔信教既, 雙方都係樹大有枯枝, 推埋d垃圾偽證出黎企圖支持自己既信念... 都唔知係好心做壞事定係點...

waterfire 發表於 2005-10-17 03:19 AM

原子彈造出黎唔係殺人ge 咩 G}6xp%v;W}Z/n`g
咁同造一把豬肉刀唔係切豬肉有咩分別
唔係理佢ge 成分同來源...= =A g1r4Zt*s? c6Y

大家講有咩証據ge 時候, 可唔可以做下d research
ref 一條link or 書出黎(最好有埋出版社同author)4e.N UY|,PWX
唔係一個講完真ga wor, 之後又講假ge....
玩咩, 俾d 有力d ge 野出黎睇下, 有咩名人o個deMGd6o
有名人有公佈, 唔會冇web site 同書掛gNC3f\?'}_Ql
得個吹字係唔夠的

頁: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]

娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

真理，科學，人類的態度