娛樂滿紛 26FUN » 吹水版 » 究竟有冇神

ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-4-9 04:01 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]austin666[/i] at 2005-4-9 03:33 PM:*Lu-koO}
#Xi*x9Ug\

*K_RI8T 如果神在心中~;Uq/D)aSM

S lEF@U3ZEg 咁吳信都系係心中啦
D:gsvC8zOH
g DAD)ZZ [ 咁又何來 "唔信咪無囉!"
%Y P!~CJs9_8O,}!}o$m
]F0Fv
CQ d 前後矛盾=.=" [/quote]%Z}SN+h#O0?2j%p

3goN [$\-P 即係,神,只係存在係心中(自己創造出黎!)俾自己祟拜!
G Q3P,t4s

$n(BPVU(C 你唔信,咪無囉!

tung kin wah 發表於 2005-4-9 04:06 PM

An indea of 'Silicon Life'

To fishball and other brothers beliving in god,
-OqUd6|3S,y_7XM lWB*|9n
First of all I agree with Gretzky's statement that "A Supereme Being (whatever God/gods) DOES NOT NEED US to believe in order to prove his/her/their existence." therefore I can't disprove its existence.Iz!R(z m@

dD,i:H%xom%bg However, if he doesn't help with our further understanding of ourselves, (or even inhibiting ourselves from finding the truth) you have to choose your way : understand more but also further understanding our inaduacy, or STOP EVERYTHING  and feeling satisified with believal on the god ? I choose the way of science so I've just borrowed 3 statistics books from library learning how to have induction from the collected data.
Yzb;bV+X3g
N${VG:W:s#E About your statement : "要造到這個條件的機率是10x10^-450" , I study Physics as my first degree, I've confident on understanding every scientific statement, they all have some ASSUMPTIONS. I never heard of that before, would you please let me know where did you get this statement ? I would like to look at the underlying assuptions before I belive on it :)m\tW
xx)r/e
BB(iz)w-]x
I recently read some books on 'silicon life'. Some researchers using the computers to simulate the possibility of evolution. Do you know the result ? They give some basic circuit elements  ( just like amino acid ) , some selection criteria like having all high freq. signal pass and weaken all low freq.signals ( like those defined by our environment ) , and let the computer invent anything by random and competiton.... The result is that, ONLY 1xx STEPS ( i.e. 1xx offsprings), the computer INVENTED the perfect high pass filter we designed. Without our help, the nature can always find its path ! ;n,x:MB/Y O2w4BU

&@*j QDCR]d3fo!zn If one day we put the solar panel (葉綠素) , logic gate (安基酸)...etc together and let them evolve by themselves, then the silicon life may be created. Believing in nature, we got to compete with them and we may not win in that case. We are the creation, but do you think we are the god ?
;{rhF K3t!qm%| C,Y(U0WE`%G
冥冥中自有主載, 人是很渺小的....

austin666 發表於 2005-4-9 04:07 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-4-9 04:16 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]fishball[/i] at 2005-4-9 01:34 AM:8m!W&d*jX be
感性:3}z3E}:M\;ch
這世上有一位神

Gp!d]8NE 是主宰
sA6Hf NI 如一切出於偶然OK$j5k
Bd(wP{
那是說人類只是一堆垃圾?!
]/OF1oA]F2y)T 不只是人類，是所有生物都是一堆碳垃圾?!po+H6}4yz
那人的靈魂何在??
j'x"YZ S [J1c1X /}D,j/oS&`%hx
理性:
-qVG6Tu:N~%z~ 我以世上第一個細胞為例P#W^kqI
要在現今進化論堅持第一個細胞的出現方法

@%s'B]'v~+c u 要造到這個條件的機率是10x10^-4501w)^%S)G:lj#\
以地球的體積，發生這個事件是不可能!! G?:YV3E
那第進化出一個人的機率更是極極極低
7m/osAS;\$Dpb 而一個不信神的科學家"賀耶爵士"在一九八一年八月十四日的倫敦"每日快信報"
,_w7X+u
HwRn 有一篇"必有一位神"的文章，在當中作了一個比喻：
QPx(D} l 相信生命是偶然誕生就好像相信龍捲風橫掃垃圾場後自動裝出一架747客機
.Cpqg*T&F2M [/quote]&R] qhs
2{{6p-dx"H7lE
點解不可能?1萬億分1既機會唔等於唔可能!
Q|0RR;tFn:LZ
7ii!~;UHW 當然要人去估生命點樣係幾百億地球出現,係好困難,亦無從証明.
]/^0K0aDaBu nx%o+c^/sTd
不過如果話所以野都係神製造出黎...我相信機會真係等於0!

ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-4-9 04:19 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]austin666[/i] at 2005-4-9 04:07 PM:^V-u]a&dD
;`"b2OZg

cCF,O@4}}7hK
+A:Z{G(pl4WJS (自己創造出黎!)俾自己祟拜!
7C4y&BS4O6W-_@1t
c!w'{B:M"j$U
果D好似叫 "神經病"............
Rru9AG,f` d0Nc^"uC3uS
神點可能由人創造出黎 [/quote]+NsL"\wV1K:f$?
m'O"i1F;i jR7Wy B
因為根本就無神!
[c%_JO2m G/|T(z
7{ eb)sWDw1R:q 如果話有,都只係存在係你既腦入面,實際根本唔存在係世上!

ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-4-9 04:22 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]austin666[/i] at 2005-4-9 04:07 PM:uwCz M8_/j0B
*h4FW2a|W"u8W5c@

cY6Q&b&d%|5Z m | G'e,w&Tf*Z9i+}4G
(自己創造出黎!)俾自己祟拜!
R9`HM.`VK&O
$}EYva{/@ 果D好似叫 "神經病"............*mc}b6w4I
a/|A"G:C
P
神點可能由人創造出黎 [/quote]@H~(zzK;JD
J3T;J(|d4Jz
其實你講得o岩! 每1個宗教都係甘樣由人創造出黎!

大家樂1234 發表於 2005-4-9 06:19 PM

我信佛多d

RyuII 發表於 2005-4-9 07:43 PM

但點解冇人信神係高智慧生物(外星人)?

inpennhouse 發表於 2005-4-9 07:54 PM

唔信 你睇下教宗都死左la 死之前重要咁辛苦 又唔見jesus去打救佢

cyhk 發表於 2005-4-9 08:33 PM

好似係度傾有冇神唔係幾好, 個人信仰問題, 好難有結論,(Ul
?)Df
所以呢個話題, 我從來唔強人接收我的睇法, 但又唔鍾意別人強我接受佢的睇法,5hr[Pmw2J
~0wCG km u x?,['?-g
對宗教信仰爭辯結果, 可能是宗教衝突, 甚至宗教戰爭,
#o2c$eV @&N7t;e.].m 總之都係個句, 河水不犯井水, 各自修行, 互相尊重, 咁就天下太平lD{-\H)JD\\.z
m,HG(w$C0}
[[i] Last edited by cyhk on 2005-4-9 at 08:38 PM [/i]]

robertchai 發表於 2005-4-10 05:47 AM

我只係知道林志玲係我既神

crap 發表於 2005-4-10 06:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]inpennhouse[/i] at 2005-4-9 09:54 PM:P W_*q#yoi
唔信 你睇下教宗都死左la 死之前重要咁辛苦 又唔見jesus去打救佢 [/quote]
CD){M^
L'h@a-h:Z:eo-n;` ?N.` T;C ZF(u
生老病死係人必經, 中西方既宗教都係主長永生, 人生只係一小部份
\R x{(kJ @i5B 佢地都只係想導人向善, 活得有意義KM7tZ`'|+X
大道理我唔識, 但任何宗教都唔應該用黎信口開河/開玩笑4@b v@6}i+|
希望大家明白, 成熟d同專重別人既信仰:)H]AqR
K S

M
jt
L4t6PO [[i] Last edited by crap on 2005-4-10 at 08:04 AM [/i]]

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-10 08:21 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]inpennhouse[/i] at 2005-4-9 21:54:T G{4\3aLoV
唔信 你睇下教宗都死左la 死之前重要咁辛苦 又唔見jesus去打救佢 [/quote]
Z/[UCH*[%r PL |^*I.bD7A
I don't want to say in rude way... NGN/S7`!z2tS,x
/Y9C
i`Oxg|
but in reality, how could u know?!

anttiniemi2000 發表於 2005-4-10 11:22 AM

god is only for some people who don't believe themselves to believe.

neptune1122 發表於 2005-4-10 01:35 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ilove---you[/i] at 09:39 AM 09:39 AM:&T VtM^Y4?@
%f l/PA(A
]1RN$vs(w
你信就有,唔信咪無囉! [/quote]
7k3o1I"p"||B,~1HP;F9V i also wan say this but give you say first....so think wat u think.....if u think have so have,if no so no la......;);););)

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-10 01:44 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]neptune1122[/i] at 2005-4-10 15:35: Kf^/N3xp9@6c

/Z'X3N"~*Ds"k,L.oK i also wan say this but give you say first....so think wat u think.....if u think have so have,if no so no la......;);););) [/quote]
4V!^Y5v_4~w 2DA&I)_S+y1j
yes, your setences is much better and in polite right!!
5d8MUhN9B4r
Vj!u&UA/t.p(qd ^^
3nun]4|Y$W:j$Z.] last one is really immature and in rude

neptune1122 發表於 2005-4-10 02:06 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]brightlee[/i] at 05:44 AM 05:44 AM:
D+[#UFB@+SN J,M
F+UE-g.zi*X W

B fbD.eZ:V yes, your setences is much better and in polite right!!
e4m7xz6E)[
E \&B7p'Sr~ ^^
!T9fv%[m#[c
m\/f last one is really immature and in rude [/quote].h/Mii%S,A!hc2AG6v
thanks bright.......

crap 發表於 2005-4-10 02:41 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]anttiniemi2000[/i] at 2005-4-10 01:22 PM:
`Gr`3J god is only for some people who don't believe themselves to believe. [/quote]
1@8e5J;n%|D+|q?
2k'[fV3`4y,j #@;g~'zC!AMd
People pray to God for world peace, people who don't believe in God is part of the world:)

brightlee 發表於 2005-4-10 04:19 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]crap[/i] at 2005-4-10 16:41:
V(Z*v4~'i d!pF
+`J0E7zdCk0] kgn-\5g&\?.{

]}/W!vu!M$}1T
People pray to God for world peace, people who don't believe in God is part of the world:) [/quote] dvrS1_!m%|9['U
G D5u
F Uye
good quote.

tung kin wah 發表於 2005-4-10 11:56 PM

Yes, it is the basically the number one rule of my believal in nature.3iY Y4Xe
+\&{#x-@ }*}v
Nature will always find its path, even without humans' involvement.t5J+d%|0_9Vk0b#C9r
The ways nature evoving is by 'free will'. So basically I agree that someone may believe in god, someone may believe in Budda, someone may believe in A La, ....even a electron has its freedom to appear in any location from our confined knowledge on quantum mechanics.  Everyone must got the freedom to choose his way lah ! b r,k,iPX ?r
o%_#`#W/R%uR8Z#Z2~
It is my consolidation from my knowledge in science and history: freedom => changes => competition => efficient selection =>  progress => strength to survive. Applicable nearly to all aspect. #Yt c:gyV k,{
.vR XG{0d
Ha Ha, but I've more believe as the utimate development goal of the Universe is unknown, but the ultimate development goal of human being should be 真 善 美。
f)T(YP&ac_#b 2Xbuqn Gk RHh+]H
唔係 FA LUN GUNG 講既 真 善 忍 喎。{+}
_2E ^z Jw)S
R ]v3n&Gc
請對宇宙給我們在思想上的自由常存感恩。
V"U\O:rx,|}D 不同的人類常嘗試以不同名義剝奪宇宙給我們的自由。

查看完整版本: 究竟有冇神