sfxc0000 發表於 2005-4-25 02:41 PM
由好至壞:F>M>L>B>S
(u/H:X5@dX/K
2akIa GQj_q?
F:我最接受呢一個. 雖然可能好多人認為佢影響左L同M的關係, 但作為一個朋友,
w3CeZ9i$zj9}7B
我認為佢係應該講出真相. 做朋友是不可隱瞞朋友的:)
D8e}&p)g4r6D+Bjd x2j
L:雖然佢係為左愛情而做出呢d行為, 但係都唔應該出賣自己肉體.
)\Bq]O
當出賣自己肉體時, 就如同出賣自己私愛人, 但L好值得同情:(
[1Au @@o
M:當知道自己私女友做出呢d行為, 分手是一件無可厚非的事.
Tfc$pq(u
但佢就冇給予L解釋, 所以佢都好唔o岩:(
_5d oUa }&l8c
E#q
B:明知L極之需要過河, 竟然坐地起價, 其實同S一樣咁賤格,
#H.s#J!G1t H'e
不過因為冇肉體交易, 所以好S少少:mad:
/PQ/u`Bip"Y#z6H
S:一定係最壞o個個啦, 因為知道L需要錢而提出同L做不道德的交易:mad:
F.king 發表於 2005-4-25 03:41 PM
M, L, B, S are doing something for themselves
FU9zO*L,|R
e
M is for his pride
#C0P9n#k|UY1m
X$O
L is for visiting her lover
]hr`#xn8{X
B is for money
Ic3YD4UB&jN
S is for sex
5o{d+\~(^
except F, he can't get anything
Ae#f9geL'z
but he just did something wrong for friends
'u0Ww:a
V
[9c}
therefore, I wound like to support F
!w2l
|6x7G1V
Actually, in the world, there is so many this kind of friends surround us and I think we should not lose them. they always do something for us without gain anything
R;j3U/E FA7Cyk
"m]'^"d7neC|\
from good to bad
~}5c\NC%yI*M3S
F >L> B> S>M
dexter 發表於 2005-4-25 06:01 PM
玩過啦, hehe
sfxc0000 發表於 2005-4-25 06:03 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]dexter[/i] at 2005-4-25 06:01 PM:
;g&mV"N;[Wf
玩過啦, hehe [/quote]
,v7^6M,q}
其實我上堂都玩過~~
Q.S Z)T0LvX
h
不過內容有少少唔同:D:D
ssFCoRn 發表於 2005-4-25 09:15 PM
L = 為左自己love既人寧願犠牲..[我都會咁做]
}.r)[;M_C7L8{.E
M = 因佢係比F誤導所以就比第2佢啦
$kU
N!m-q,u,Rs
B = 一個為自己利益既船夫, 正常hk人係甘
%q9o@1}o(Zt4x7C
F = 唔知全情話比M知誤導左吖M
:sI&R\3H]%r}`*j
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件[呢條P...都算..K啦]
crap 發表於 2005-4-25 09:30 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]sfxc0000[/i] at 2005-4-25 08:03 PM:
#c-}!Yo5XF#Z
` ^qP }@X,GPv7i
其實我上堂都玩過~~
8E;U c&eI
不過內容有少少唔同:D:D [/quote]
G8`,\7hD"b/w%B2h2b
f7O4v8HN)W+U
答案唔係重點
)Fkd+IY-]6_Ka"J
點樣分釋先係重點:D
singdotcom 發表於 2005-4-25 10:59 PM
最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物: (我當$20只係好少錢)
{V
\&h6tz-{
ZH:@;Js4vr1Q
L - 要過河有大把方法, 只係為左咁小事就同人上床, 愛一個人又點會咁易同其他男人上床, 成件事都係由佢呢個決定引起
4|5VO!ud9XD O'Zz
H'z4T gv4_+q
S - 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格, 仲要以為用$20就昆到條女, 好cheap! 但係條女又真係比佢昆到喎!
6pK1U&C:A#Va)O
g&w{[C
w+Ffb
M - 愛一個人應該要包容佢, 就算佢做錯都唔可以飛佢, 何況佢唔係害你
U"Cm
}#IlW
$@7t[X#o?
B - 呢D冇良船主都係衰架啦, 但係呢d人到處都係, 呢個人對呢件事起唔到關鍵作用
0j5x#\9qS.F
p:CJ-ps(D
F - 佢講或唔講都會有佢個理由支持佢. 唔講, 咁m唔知就最幸福. 講, 就比m知情權, 等佢好好解決呢個問題
jason williams 發表於 2005-4-25 11:27 PM
have answer right now?
crap 發表於 2005-4-26 12:00 AM
準時12:00:lol:
w%r!}B+G n ~8[
m4U-Aiv
[color=LimeGreen][b][u][size=10]第二階段:[/size][/u][/b][/color]
0lX$VMA
KR@
p'D
u3I
[size=5][b][color=Red]M = 道德[/color][/b]
h,^b1ls$y1iI9W
[b][color=Green]B = 事業[/color][/b]
u~|(B\U
[b][color=Purple]L = 愛情[/color][/b]
F$T
Kbg6o"YF0~u:F
[b][color=Blue]S = 性[/color][/b]
4uy6EM2f_;X~
[b][color=Brown]F = 友情[/color][/b][/size]
CP(pGY(LqH-K
)H&SN du_
H_c.aH
根據原註, 大家排的次序是你們心底覺得呢5樣既重要性, 準嗎?
S+N#s l+Jl7H
r4]R e'k
"l3w*k*I;?
準不準不重要, 現在關心的是:):
u+m+o HT]1L:}8Fq,H
1) 把道德跟事業排在附近的朋友, 你們認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
3r`/[BLG*H{3t
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
xt3Jc;o,I0J A3E
3) 把愛情跟性排在兩極的朋友, 你們在現實中真可以以愛為大前題去找女友嗎?
w*j mq3c@ x;h
E7v7Cu(j
即使沒有如此排位, 但有興趣分釋的朋友也不妨跟大家分享一下, 第一階段沒回應的朋友也可以參與回應第二階段:D
2YqT
s;P"@"N
cuC2DN4ms(J'Vs
[[i] Last edited by crap on 2005-4-26 at 02:14 AM [/i]]
風火雷電 發表於 2005-4-26 12:12 AM
F-佢將佢知嘅野講比佢朋友知,當佢係朋友先會講,等佢自己諗清楚*o*
,J&Ai%]W$O|?Pz
Y
L-為左愛,完全冇條件地付出,不過......真係值得???
9w0m+fLsk
c*O8m!S
{
B-一般商人(奸商)做法,冇野好講-.-
^H|2I'h
J*y
S-依個賤人,見人地需要錢,就要人地同佢過夜嚟滿足自己\"/
/EVy v2x
M-原全冇諗過對方對佢嘅付出,話分就分,冇"L"嘅付出,又邊有曾經開心嘅日子丫>﹏<
風火雷電 發表於 2005-4-26 12:15 AM
打字太慢=.=
eAc]p]X
打完出到嚟已經有答案-.-
jason williams 發表於 2005-4-26 12:25 AM
quite accuate wow
dawrf 發表於 2005-4-26 12:35 AM
B F S M L
F.king 發表於 2005-4-26 06:21 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]crap[/i] at 2005-4-26 12:00 AM:
&g*L9U\,i
準時12:00:lol:
s6c1?`9m$?A?J
(hR$g:~%H:x#Cd
[colo ... [/quote]Well, the analysis is quite suit to me
8C-INhp
I had posted my answer before, and I am in this case
q/nbVz/^,P
(w4m5~~ _1cB
2) 把友情跟愛情排在附近的朋友, 你們又認為此兩者可以共存嗎?
0K[
m+MP6d
)R?z
yljfFyi
I believe this is very hard to be together
Ix2v|Ck0yv
but I still trust that both of them can be together
yuzhiliang111 發表於 2005-4-26 10:54 AM
1)道德跟事業:如果一個人連道德都沒有的話就連做人的起碼準則都沒有,這種人還會有或配有事業嗎?