大家認為古惑天皇既下場?[積極回應者+5](頁 2) - 吹水版 - 娛樂滿紛 26FUN

史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-30 01:00 AM

雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!

F.king 發表於 2005-4-30 07:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]短毛[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM: DX|&j@ Yo
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ... [/quote]
I agree you points that it could be illegal(W{{a@/D7FM!{
but that is still a "gray area"
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair

anyway, I want to say that is
who is supposed to be protected by laws
creators?5x9qFN,j ^0^ s `2A.M
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market|eD Q7d
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.;T3YiH$P9?qY3[
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???

junob04 發表於 2005-4-30 08:41 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]dogson009[/i] at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:fN-E${B7ywb%t V%A*D
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.= [/quote]DcP| {1j
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!

HansChan 發表於 2005-4-30 09:58 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]junob04[/i] at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:*gZ}+vi]l
&Vh*r USQBSK
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!! [/quote]
唔係喎!
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!]y m S Apbp#q
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!!o9D&f%~|1w
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!3mns9R2tIo
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!

大家樂1234 發表於 2005-4-30 12:27 PM

希望佢無事
一有先例以後就死嚕

jason williams 發表於 2005-4-30 12:36 PM

honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......*f(Opx$~~F3K1?0]
if so bad, dun download la, right?
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^S(f0fGcg:P
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society'k8V8m#]US YZ'F4[
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........&Sq#t$n7lX.z
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!;W5~lC%Y Tc/s
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^

coolyiceman 發表於 2005-4-30 12:45 PM

罰款,冇留案底!
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
錢就一定罰I]B1@"@ ^@%S.`$j
未必要坐牢~~

HansChan 發表於 2005-4-30 01:31 PM

如果真係判佢有罪,.y*|c ]kah L
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?`/m'UI8[4P-EmLQ
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!

EV4886 發表於 2005-4-30 04:17 PM

最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...

@bcc@ 發表於 2005-4-30 05:39 PM

冇事!!!!!:cool:

小虫發表於 2005-4-30 06:05 PM

法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^

老鬼X 發表於 2005-5-1 01:54 PM

無奈！一定搞死佢　

markmk 發表於 2005-5-3 04:29 AM

一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..

人人人人人 發表於 2005-5-3 06:09 PM

唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈

ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-5-4 01:47 AM

告得入我切!!!

bonzi1983 發表於 2005-5-4 05:40 AM

I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law

karenmoe 發表於 2005-5-5 01:14 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]ilove---you[/i] at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:0ck adMkL \k{(r
告得入我切!!! [/quote]5I[2v9mc#L+`
我當初都估告唔入,^"s(|:b oH*_K^
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....

timho1027 發表於 2005-5-5 03:34 AM

海關做戲給美國電影業睇.}Yl`}|"uz
我希望佢冇事;)

wolfevil 發表於 2005-5-5 10:08 PM

會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為

阿細發表於 2005-5-5 10:54 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]EV4886[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法) [/quote]
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...

頁: 1 [2] 3

娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver