史艷文2 發表於 2005-4-30 01:00 AM
雖然我唔用BT,因我中意租碟用電視睇(畫面大)
#i2a `{4p7T1R&wV%k
但我都希望佢無事,因太多垃圾戲,D濕9電影人係到瀨地硬!
F.king 發表於 2005-4-30 07:08 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]短毛[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:48 PM:
e!M9zX[ n5cZO
大家可以睇o下有關法律條文. 裏面*好 ... [/quote]
j#O:z.l?9g
I agree you points that it could be illegal
*G:CgW8^
but that is still a "gray area"
W`"kP$L-QF%WF7i
whoever win, it still makes us to feel that the result is unfair
M$T;d4Sy3~y"_
;bz+ZjYL9H
anyway, I want to say that is
D4bp&Rukc;\K
who is supposed to be protected by laws
g%qe5I In+|W
creators?
TF+pb l5Ne%y
but I think now they just only protect big companies but not the movies market
|"p-gn0yGTg
let's them copy others ideas and produce lots of boring movies (not all) to earn our money.
.u/u(A]#x.W2RQi
when we are cheated by some shops, we can sue those
MX-[YJRtr
Why nothing protects consumers to choose a movies???
junob04 發表於 2005-4-30 08:41 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]dogson009[/i] at 2005-4-29 10:03 PM:
^Ce}`
其實我都唔肯定係咪真有其人=.= [/quote]
?5X'p@c
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!!
HansChan 發表於 2005-4-30 09:58 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]junob04[/i] at 2005-4-30 08:41 AM:
/gc
\@;^5K
]a_}iS
我都咁話,可能其實係班差佬為左想"空"我地,作個人出黎,做戲!! [/quote]
A:D
]m,tNX
唔係喎!
O:Qd"g&xh0?
古惑天皇響--- 嗰度好出名係大佬黎喎!
1z[-EXsf
我以前都成日去download佢放出黎啲戲!
pb-FS
C@$|+F%bP
佢真係好有熱誠嗰隻, 由舊到你諗唔起既戲到新到岩岩上畫既戲佢都有!
f:r&Pz.~0kB(Lr
就係因為佢出名所以班pk先捕佢!
大家樂1234 發表於 2005-4-30 12:27 PM
希望佢無事
ey.aBD C8A4Dx:o
一有先例以後就死嚕
jason williams 發表於 2005-4-30 12:36 PM
honestly, i also use bt, but i know my action is totally incorrect!!!
FHfZl
Z
dun say nowadays movie is bad or not, downloan it is giving its face.......
7_l$t#I'pR
if so bad, dun download la, right?
M V;F|a,]}
i am dun shouting on all using bt guys, because i am also this guy^^
d7c"V&V9H[/^l0z
but for the fact and 對事 to say, dl by bt really harm the company a lot, there is no excuse for using bt is a legal way and correct
P(q
X3X
Z8x/A)Q
v
no need $$$ and need $, how to consider also no need $ is much more benfit la
9d w0q$ix!Ao0z
so what i always think is that, in this modern and high tech society
2Ha,D7l._8u
using bt or winmx this kind of high tech should be graduately to take over buying CD or going to cinema.........
.C RPV/E/_$j
why not develop this to takeover now condition? even need $$$ to dl, i think ppl would also accept (but sure the price should be lower as much more ppl would dl to overcome the production cost) BT really a very great invention !!!
|U7AL
W.gA8A
so, even they catch him or us, i only can say he or us are unlucky, but not incorrect way for them to do and custom also doing what they should do, so dun fxxking them la^^
coolyiceman 發表於 2005-4-30 12:45 PM
罰款,冇留案底!
uwm$k5NM+`u
佢又唔係殺人放火~~~
6QN5[#\'fjr~H
政府想比下馬威0的人~~
` tsXz
錢就一定罰
$m*i!L!~LZ
未必要坐牢~~
HansChan 發表於 2005-4-30 01:31 PM
如果真係判佢有罪,
h z?/t.}h}9{.n
唔知佢會唔會上訴呢?
k%NV{VL
佢又失業既, 會唔會冇錢上訴呢?
;V2h
m!B?a4mEG/B
到時有冇人幫佢呢?!
EV4886 發表於 2005-4-30 04:17 PM
最後同佢針掂,叫佢認左網上盜竊及行為不檢算數,網上盜竊就口頭警告(因知前有案例參考,條友網上盜竊人十幾萬地武器都係比口頭警告),而行為不檢就因初犯罰款HK$1000不留案底,咁大家都孝好落台d...
@bcc@ 發表於 2005-4-30 05:39 PM
冇事!!!!!:cool:
小虫 發表於 2005-4-30 06:05 PM
法官班報法令要幾個保鑣護送佢返屋企^_^
老鬼X 發表於 2005-5-1 01:54 PM
無奈!一定搞死佢
markmk 發表於 2005-5-3 04:29 AM
一定坐牢......殺雞警猴...仲要大字標題咁話俾bt友聽..
人人人人人 發表於 2005-5-3 06:09 PM
唉...試問有幾多人未用過BT??政府係都要搞呢D咁o既野, 多少都感到無奈
ilovefuckingyou 發表於 2005-5-4 01:47 AM
告得入我切!!!
bonzi1983 發表於 2005-5-4 05:40 AM
I think 古惑天皇 is immoral, but not illegal....so he is not guilty according to the law
karenmoe 發表於 2005-5-5 01:14 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ilove---you[/i] at 2005-5-4 01:47 AM:
r{(lW}/S/y
告得入我切!!! [/quote]
u^ x4mD vFe"hIw
我當初都估告唔入,
!M]Dt,xjF+pH
不過我老豆提醒我,政府咁多大狀,
OiRC~p9?_y
真係告唔入就唔會告啦.....
timho1027 發表於 2005-5-5 03:34 AM
海關做戲給美國電影業睇
)n
u2V}%|'F]
我希望佢冇事;)
wolfevil 發表於 2005-5-5 10:08 PM
會有罪, 不過冇圖利and第一次, 最大可能會守行為
阿細 發表於 2005-5-5 10:54 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]EV4886[/i] at 2005-4-29 11:18 PM:
~8V }/B#?
美國咁講版權法都吾敢告BT,香港海關想扮勁想做世界法治一哥,輸.....輸硬.(除非又請人大釋法) [/quote]
cG"y i6|XXqT0s!~1_
因為美國人權大過天...所以唔敢告用bt d人ja...香港海關想扮勁...就唔見得係la..大家都用緊份內事...