Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~
Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???金錢可以買到公義
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad: 疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。 人地講左啦~
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判5zF3vm H+f `
that"s allJ;t&vV-Eq'm&TH R
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]] 寧縱勿枉 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~*TXv3H0T
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]3V`T2B"[ y4I_
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:(wksVy/b-Q R-_
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。 我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,;p2Odm'd u y
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱，“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的，這次審判也證明了我的判斷。” [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:@"D9u:f:YD@
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
l\:Ng8} P
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣? x j5Vi\MEe
OMQ(Uk%A-KU x@B;W
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴 LX"g*UGt
:Id l+AA@
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
-A#Z"D.w2[D i
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]!b j:F:yD_;T k
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]9_U d`$z_6Ywf/S`
6ce[ H:gy}f
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.
Find out the fact before you speak lar.... hello vivi, you beat me to it [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote].pCw b$k!x
f1[y'd s&fM7Q
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈$RQe7P X P
C!hq-_'_SLrf
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]] [quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote] xyb:A(D%I$@
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D 刑事罪:?9L*bnpTwN
告人個條友= your goverment (not you)
n D0o{;S?'@
民事訴訟:~1Jf+~ t'J q
告人個條友 =you [quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:r x U%{ A.U%M
D/\)q6d#I2f
$qDw&dkX
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。){ i"fyN/v*MA;m
.{ yw@ vwm&A
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。 thank you for your teaching 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
(|%d?#N3A
Not always... like this case.. 6jnG+N r
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge 我想聽大家自己的觀點
如果你喜歡)H;p$d3c:lB
您可以加入討論J\M.gMon |
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"!v&hY q N!A\:vL\
已經代表自己的觀點
您沒有需要繼續吠:A%c6_2U a:E
THE END
頁:
[1]
2