娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???
\v4gK(ZD2k*Y 金錢可以買到公義
m3Ot9k,K 我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~2N:EyVl+@v N
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過$rk{r^h^JK&s
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,
7p { VH m/{:` 你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判kw;T oC
that"s all
.jz6tA(kD z.J(D3s 9HDIye#w rw
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~/V0~C#rzw

-Aqx;`Af6v#|/B9W [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
,Atmp?%W
%]6pl'l-E J [[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:6B{|trGp"i
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]uY;m/Bz#^ ~
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,
7FL"dZ5F;H)J*q[ 但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定
v1v \5Eh3F;r$W 仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
R.RRqK.M
k[]0e(g#g 事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:
6B v:[ U&k){ 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote])O(Rf }} ~

nGLS+` 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.
?Eh*cF0~es5IX8cM 用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
9htr)k \aF .BA R:SPC4RA
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴;C0@3RLE8t7f%u/v

!A!JGj2TFU\$g-F [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:oZv2[ ^2wt7w L

R$@#?}_&p 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
/z,]0t)Q8_N$i;wq B 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。
yUcK @1NL ~.Og&? |;C6bB6HN
Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
EaN:JN3@4K y.f (Q%{ c/tpJ k

A,pAT,D m 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]
4eT:? ye9\Ha N/O !_#pm:a$OK/LkC"A
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.8eAG9NI^ J u
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:o%gm Y0e ya"e+d
3Rp s b4Hp6A
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
2O m/Ps!fs:Q)M#?)K i$u4^
LV[]zR F 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)n.{:pi*|~4Bsb
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈{9|!Xr5FJV

|/z!m9YFV7tG 我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~PW?UG6MF:Chz

O5HG(X{;z;i [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:$EA5u9g(|Hu!m'wI m
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
8S w*v,t0b St5s haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:
.t V6J$Ja(lc 告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)8cw+c3K@.I'[+`
i`q0_ u]3w*By
民事訴訟:
&c V |'V.lq 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:
UI rxg
({+qh/}0m ,R'I(H*T8g)D7|5J#W
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
j J|*j+um/L 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
7y g4m*}:s2D 大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。(w%vf!t ?(o?+~5H
(M^-_6q&g\ M&iP
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
p+\i2I l#a 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]sr r)Zo@.Y
'u \ T6P6L6o J#r7m
Not always... like this case.. Gs$I4^\
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點,P,DYmi3VU
如果你喜歡/Qu+I6q R2|*MS
您可以加入討論OO`3S.Emi
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"hY` fC\
已經代表自己的觀點NbwQDN)I x+Xz*q
您沒有需要繼續吠
)~W\!N%pL THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.