娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???kz$`%C(fvW#R
金錢可以買到公義Y)eoE e;?4LY+^
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~
E v)LZ1f@g 打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過g7c:L E{'k+b
係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,
$HMR3A:M2Q;M7BM 你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判F6L5d&H0j_
that"s all
'e ~A_l.{
9zrZX1Tq [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~"a$[3{Tm;H%U

+A,rA2o9TZ N [url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
nGHLu?Iu\ l:IcNt6A0aK
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:ou3Kg ] \:d:YI
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]L,dI:d gY
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,wMOat
但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定bkJtjz0mEZ
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
;^ nLb C+r
mK2n+G-F+o;I*Z}1t 事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:
*GA-H_ b(mY 有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]4SYo9r1UU p f\
{;i(H2t0@c\!G%a${?
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.
Wf#enLsx[ 用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
;AJ3CS%e%x
/D;B"nhyK 你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
.n as(fy
X)o1r grC [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
ws'aL-|"zrz
N3q P X%AI:u&E'R 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]G"F*u]9\yE E
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。r{A,SxlB%n*[

+N+?v6YPw&T^#M Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
U-\,G4}vc0ov,b*S 8RH9R5FU

U:i-qHP2jlgu 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]3~n X KP ?aAAi

.za7g/ibjo This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.et,U)RYm7G8Zj#s
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
-F]K(Bh!BN
b4k/o)OJ;[ Fge 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]/I!n&g/hS&?Avz
l L:ht7co
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)vZ+B)n8eu.LV1e1I
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈
"a/[-V/r1\?*oEH
*y2a{5W'u^%I7D 我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~Fb sg ~+yI;I
ym8[F@-q%]
[[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
Z5c3y6I$b$bq:Z5ck-E hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]
:k^yFa4Y#J I haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:$qU[a(B"}$g
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
h)Gt,RE3z
!h `f&eSg:Dm 民事訴訟:8c KG6T!AX{-_9F
告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:S {;WBb#} UT

&Op-YK'T(lUz{2y
D(Z.P'E{ P4c 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
V m M5H$K`^ 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]dk.a$b`k;S
大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。2[t4_A4X M:\"oMCx
? B5Y0xj B!ik
答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:+L1M9JyAR8X W
仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
*Y6~1j;N9}qJ d
dc5S"^!G1y'JB Not always... like this case.. LC*s1hh W
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點
Q'_ D?o/M'TZ0G 如果你喜歡
m;[sgm*Obt 您可以加入討論/y![-~-osD@K9J
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
"{!u ^\/@O(yLZ 已經代表自己的觀點
q]_6h:@X |(F 您沒有需要繼續吠$X?:m w^.bVIW
THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.