娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???-o^)N p*_(w%H&G$IXN
金錢可以買到公義$A"{ f2PGF]|
我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~
J5A2B'J$^ }ui F#Fm 打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過
"TtmF X~+` 係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,w'cD"UJ Ql
你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判)wR oY%m9h kDs
that"s all
)X#TD*R.sZ/f;W
&p.oV7\C [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
RHbz.x WI!h[ l.}2Q|`T5Fn9{
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
+LZp'Ti Z6GYP&z'wH
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:
a7u1sc TH2h 有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]"wyNO.u,G6Q$A
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,
v~2Qva8} 但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定
c&e9n^Y9H*K3k9II 仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁
0e/[1o!UHj-T|
.H;R"Xs-o-R 事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:oca|8^9I*C8F+\
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote]
s(J} M-f6c1p1Ud#i vfe6sbH7QkUI*j5^
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.
#{ I)n+XI9A#H 用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
R^0U^T6uK9q 0up3LR nOe$fT
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
d?Oh0c p
?(oI](k-V8IdqO [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:$qa_@d
W-]5E!~.o YK9Y)l
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]W\|@x!^
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。4zz7p G\/{

!qE*u;mxv2YA*~0h Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:
|c,~IH i5r.M ~P$N'xXT%C{)Pr

([8R&V-[8B.iL3g 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]V)IVz"W.Q"vGZ
0h c!^IMh
This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.?@jDB
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:(a+a7s/|/YzhONb,v

%CsT'Qb!r_ 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
C*Du8K9^1kh$u
R%h%W!Rr-hwx&y y 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
e K a/t i 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈b,c._4y-q?/g@

!e'L3T(MHg]x 我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~Z T6X*Gy)KV.b

lSo7K*o.^ [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:
K'u Ori!ob hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]6f+l9m$~ G
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:izu~e1W^C
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)[0Y"E#Z8qd6v

KK{ Iort B.ab ` 民事訴訟:f^'b-k~3E.z3B
告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:#sJvn*T-ZA2d(P

B1_8Rw%B!Z
V"M6d8n6Z/H(as 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
{O7E"p!R$`6yf 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
^IL\c 大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。)SUtX6F.A!YLt

Isu2i(_ b7bsn+? 答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
;WCHO3B k 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
ko@y)t{:[ ^!L`4R+T Ph6B
Not always... like this case..
W`o~+ze;}*[U or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點
:QL o*C%G6W} 如果你喜歡
0oBhE*Hv hc 您可以加入討論
T(aA~)g 但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
y \}3L/@{F#D&l 已經代表自己的觀點
x$R3MI%m?FI[ 您沒有需要繼續吠
%Lx$QK&s3_q THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.