娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 04:16 AM

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩!!! 回應啦~

Michael Jackson 咁都打得甩???`z9_}KP!U"dk K$h
金錢可以買到公義
EOu%xv#s PtH 我唔相信Michael Jackson 無狎童:mad:

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:18 AM

疑點利益歸於被告﹐法律需要保障雙方面。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:22 AM

人地講左啦~*Y5zu)lg
打得甩唔代表佢無做過,(打得甩係因為冇十足的證據),並唔代表佢無做過
uT;j$_k-q:e 係鬼都知佢有做啦,唔係邊有咁多人搵佢話佢狎童,
xMm!r!Ck 你去下<<空間靈幻異次元>>應該可以問到Michael Jackson死了後會有什麼審判!rMZ*[~%[2o;I-y~
that"s all
j}\H9I*bmqo[f
_(w['RG8h!^3o3o/L [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:44 AM [/i]]

nine5er7 發表於 2005-6-15 04:28 AM

寧縱勿枉

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:42 AM

有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。

spector.R 發表於 2005-6-15 04:46 AM

有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~
)E9["locgf.~vV/t I0Q3h D,h7D.y
[url]http://www.killsometime.com/games/game.asp?Game=Michael-Jackson-Baby-Drop[/url]
;jC:G3y'Q osr(Bs
[[i] Last edited by spector.R on 2005-6-15 at 04:56 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]spector.R[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:46 AM:5pn!J.H ml![7P+Zc
有人影到佢ja 住個BB 係露台 fing 下fing 下~ [/quote]&HBg)bMP
尼個的而且確係真﹐距真係癲癲地架。

karate_pau 發表於 2005-6-15 04:47 AM

我100%支持米高,但係有冇做過只有佢自己先知喇,
z?fz!IbOK 但係證原告男童母親都唔係好可信,屈錢都未定*[6GeD1c
仲有個tom sneddon 好似同佢有仇咁,好似一定要釘死米高咁0oMX x:U:b3OEZ
k:n1T9o`5hVp4}.L
事後mj前妻德比·羅維事後發表聲明稱,“我肯定不會與一個戀童癖結婚的,這次審判也證明了我的判斷。”

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 04:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:42 AM:3}Y#Q|9K1b s7I-H O$D
有無做過真係無人知﹐你唔會知道D人係咪勒索不成後所以出黎屈距。 [/quote] Pv!und z
F @J/M*I$e9FG$l
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打官司,咁得閑出黎屈佢,d律師費都唔少.O,b1k$O`*S$Z8qd _
用d假証據博勝訴?同自己的錢(律師費)鬥氣?
i IvJvVi,L 4I}z2o&r'gp l
你地會唔會俾大筆律師費老屈一條友 博一件冇發生過的事的勝訴
.Gi y-D!k-i
~/vF;t _:Cg$EH [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 04:52 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:00 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:gx3{L.cTq A

6Ay+Ksi 除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote]E(x9]3r+[GJg
先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如果你被人打﹐如果你有足夠證據既話﹐你靜係需要報警﹐然後律政處會起訴果位人兄。法例係保障市民﹐如果要市民出錢告人既話﹐甘D法例咪等如無法例。而果位人兄就要位辯護律師幫距打官司喇﹐尼個就要比錢。
1`BNZ dNK
]7cM]W$zW~&Qj Civil Law 既民事訴訟就係如果你想告人﹐甘你就要自己出錢喇。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 04:49 AM:rK fQw(G

k~| r`+M.F !~5f-u`l } }
除非個條友好有$,先咁得閑同佢打... [/quote] hJ ] b0IKu

N P%E(R{.T\,| This is a crimial case, the goverment/tax payer pay for everything.`,q-mUVf+g7Z1|
Find out the fact before you speak lar....

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:02 AM

hello vivi, you beat me to it

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:06 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:00 AM:
4wuQt&XU3l FI
K.sk(NsmO} 先生﹐刑事罪係由政府出錢告架﹐如... [/quote]
0\'h#`@8hJ2d
ky7hts$|(V(Cb)s 照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)
0}OqQ'P 如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈
1g Ici(z ^ ]$OYnVLps
我讀得書少,唔好蝦我~
z1hP1S3~0zgi#b
Mg,M/Z-U6E2}d [[i] Last edited by happylion99 on 2005-6-15 at 05:07 AM [/i]]

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:07 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]johnwu[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:02 AM:$no4@$lTpQ(U
hello vivi, you beat me to it [/quote]TE9a,c%v]H
haha Mr Wu, beating you is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ar ma, i will grab hold of it for sure.:D:D:D

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:09 AM

刑事罪:'w1~/~l'Z0~6E3udi
告人個條友= your goverment  (not you)
%gj duo2t *p*^n'?+f*L.J"t
民事訴訟:
5E([tcT2`%D;crx 告人個條友 =you

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:11 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]happylion99[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:06 AM:CZ:gZ2Q1X

t0dR#Be#CG ^8Q-{]^ M1Y(l*v-yp*@ V_
照你咁講,咁樣告人個條友有咩錢要支付呢? ;)_D5hv6GJ-|l4?M
如果無錢要支付的話,咁個個都會走去博一博,告一告,屈一屈 [/quote]
!hi-L5gDq;u 大錯特錯﹐你如果告人唔成功既話﹐將會被人反告毀謗(defamatory)﹐到時你就真係要出錢喇﹐或可以用法律緩助處既。hp2r{)h @2G

k+uy @H.})w 答番你個問題﹐[color=LimeGreen]告人個條友[/color]唔係一個人﹐而係成個律政處告﹐受害者靜係需要做證人。

happylion99 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

thank you for your teaching

vivienna 發表於 2005-6-15 05:14 AM

仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。

johnwu 發表於 2005-6-15 05:17 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]vivienna[/i] at 2005-6-15 05:14 AM:
o:d5_:u K 仲有再補充既就係律政處靜係會o係有足夠證據既情況下先會落CHARGE﹐唔係話告就告。 [/quote]
u*u+Y*FK`'lV m&d"\ VzVN7lj
Not always... like this case.. "c)N,EM1{k
or SingTao newspaper case is 有足夠證據既情況下 but no charge

timho1027 發表於 2005-6-15 05:19 AM

我想聽大家自己的觀點MZ*WS3iG2FE
如果你喜歡
_q;f-B-X {[+] 您可以加入討論jI n Z%efXq
但如果某人認為那"人地講左啦~"
J QCc3rc^ R 已經代表自己的觀點
]!L2k+e!@'f{W6`!f 您沒有需要繼續吠
j0QV"C$R1K THE END

頁: [1] 2

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.