[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-5 03:07:
我覺得連換都唔洗換,奧雲同迪科爾打法差唔多,除非奧雲冇狀態,否則換黎都冇用~:o [/quote]
咁奧雲停賽唔出得嘛,如果奧雲同迪科爾打法差唔多,咁出佢基本上英格蘭連陣都唔駛轉,打法照舊
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-5 04:09 AM:
咁奧雲停賽唔出得嘛,如果奧雲同迪科爾打法差唔多,咁出佢基本上英格蘭連陣都唔駛轉,打法照舊 [/quote]
哦,你講緊果場,咁又係呀,既然奧雲停賽咪再試下迪科爾囉,無謂搞埋d咩轉陣啦~贏到就話好彩啫,贏唔到咪死???:(
嗰晚直落睇埋蘇格蘭vs.意大利, 我覺得蘇格蘭踢得好過英格蘭好多.
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-5 02:08 AM:
就算出迪科爾,我諗連迪科爾佢自己都知奧雲先係正選,奧雲擺明唔出得都唔出迪科爾,咁選佢做乜? [/quote]
做後備
[quote]Originally posted by [i]rest365days[/i] at 2005-9-5 11:02 AM:
嗰晚直落睇埋蘇格蘭vs.意大利, 我覺得蘇格蘭踢得好過英格蘭好多. [/quote]
Yes the scotland k.miller played very well, even nesta cannot mark him successfully. Also their 10 hartley has very good dribbling and crossing skill too. Scotland played quite well.
胡禮菲臘斯係曼城時打正選國家隊輪到戴亞都未輪到佢,一過車仔打後備就變陣都要出佢,唔怪得咁多人想過車仔啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-5 03:37 PM:
胡禮菲臘斯係曼城時打正選國家隊輪到戴亞都未輪到佢,一過車仔打後備就變陣都要出佢,唔怪得咁多人想過車仔啦 [/quote]
咁佢的確好過戴亞既= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-5 23:19:
咁佢的確好過戴亞既= =" [/quote]
但佢踢曼城時就冇得出,除非車仔時的胡禮菲臘斯好過戴亞,而曼城時的胡禮菲臘斯就差過戴亞啦
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-6 12:15 AM:
但佢踢曼城時就冇得出,除非車仔時的胡禮菲臘斯好過戴亞,而曼城時的胡禮菲臘斯就差過戴亞啦 [/quote]
你講得啱,依家車仔既SWP的確好過依家既戴亞= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-6 00:18:
你講得啱,依家車仔既SWP的確好過依家既戴亞= =" [/quote]
咁上季曼城時嘅胡禮菲臘斯就差過戴亞??
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-6 12:36 AM:
咁上季曼城時嘅胡禮菲臘斯就差過戴亞?? [/quote]
我相信唔會囉~戴亞不嬲都唔突出既
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-6 01:06:
我相信唔會囉~戴亞不嬲都唔突出既 [/quote]
但過往一兩年,戴亞在國家隊出場機會絕對比胡禮菲臘斯多,但佢一過車仔就好受艾歷臣重視,英格蘭領隊在用人方面實在有太多顧慮
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-6 02:21 AM:
但過往一兩年,戴亞在國家隊出場機會絕對比胡禮菲臘斯多,但佢一過車仔就好受艾歷臣重視,英格蘭領隊在用人方面實在有太多顧慮 [/quote]
SWP近幾年先有人留意到佢,戴亞係紐卡素打成點係人都知,
雖然佢係國家隊既出場機會係比SWP多,但係SWP既係各方面都比佢優勝.......我諗佢唔係受艾歷臣重用既,係想試下比佢打正選啫,唔通英格蘭真係用4-5-1咩= ="
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-6 02:23:
SWP近幾年先有人留意到佢,戴亞係紐... [/quote]
04年歐洲國家杯戴亞出場機會差不多可以話每場都必然後備上陣,胡禮菲臘斯就好似冇乜上陣機會,要試陣就對丹麥試啦,人地巴西明知細哨停賽,就熱身賽都唔出佢,咁先係備戰嘛,出一個下場一定排唔到嘅陣黎熱身,正式比賽攞黎試陣?唔怪得66年之後都未羸過大賽啦
dyer 得個名乍嗎 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-6 02:31 AM:
04年歐洲國家杯戴亞出場機會差不多可以話每場都必然後備上陣,胡禮菲臘斯就好似冇乜上陣機會,要試陣就對丹麥試啦,人地巴西明知細哨停賽,就熱身賽都唔出佢,咁先係備戰嘛,出一個下場一定排唔到嘅陣黎熱身,正式比賽攞黎試陣?唔怪得66年之後都未羸過大賽啦
[/quote]
每場都後備出場又如何....夏格維斯,菲臘仔都基本上是英格蘭04歐國盃後備必上陣既球員,
那你認為佢地比SWP勁???我就唔認為佢地比SWP勁,再加上當年SWP都好似未入選國家隊,
佢對威爾斯黎比SWP試下打d世界賽外圍賽既賽事,我覺得都冇咩特別既問題,反而佢打得幾好,再加上佢唔係只係試SWP,係試埋碧咸可唔可以勝任防中同埋變陣後會有咩問題,唔通佢用楊格又係錯誤咩???
我覺得英格蘭係對威爾斯果場試新陣冇咩問題,因為友誼賽同正式比賽唔同,正式比賽關係到外圍賽既成績,球員們自然會比較落力踢,
但友誼賽就唔會關係到咩成績,某些球員自然會比較放鬆,例如:里奧,占士.....所以搵呢場試下陣都無可口非,
雖然呢場贏左,但個陣得出黎既成效明顯係唔好,我諗艾歷臣試4-5-1係係慘敗丹麥之後先諗出黎既一個所謂的對策,
但丹麥果場明顯唔關個陣事,係占士痴左線同下半場冇左泰利既問題而已.......艾歷臣都傻傻地既:o
[quote]Originally posted by [i]jordi[/i] at 2005-9-6 03:06 AM:
dyer 得個名乍嗎 ~ [/quote]
碧咸退出國家隊之後,右翼呢個位以佢既實力黎講根本爭唔贏SWP:(
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-6 05:01:
每場都後備出場又如何....夏格維斯,... [/quote]
我唔覺得戴亞好過胡禮菲臘斯,只係覺得打細球會嘅球員唔受人重視,胡禮菲臘斯在曼城時國家隊都未必入到,但一過車仔打後備都踢冇幾場波就正選喇
友誼賽唔試陣咁為乜打友誼賽?如果外圍賽試陣失敗輸波代價可能好大,因為波蘭現在只不過比英格蘭多失1分,嚴格黎講英格蘭係唔可以失分,巴西阿根廷外圍賽試陣就無所謂,因為已經出左線,對手友誼賽冇咁落力唔緊要,最緊要係自己球員適唔適應,教練一眼就睇得出
如果你認為友誼賽唔試陣應該留番正式比賽去試唔緊要,但球隊輸波就唔好怨
[quote]Originally posted by [i]ciger[/i] at 2005-9-6 03:04 PM:
我唔覺得戴亞好過胡禮菲臘斯,只係覺得打細球會嘅球員唔受人重視,胡禮菲臘斯在曼城時國家隊都未必入到,但一過車仔打後備都踢冇幾場波就正選喇
友誼賽唔試陣咁為乜打友誼賽?如果外圍賽試陣失敗輸波代價可能好大,因為波蘭現在只不過比英格蘭多失1分,嚴格黎講英格蘭係唔可以失分,巴西阿根廷外圍賽試陣就無所謂,因為已經出左線,對手友誼賽冇咁落力唔緊要,最緊要係自己球員適唔適應,教練一眼就睇得出
如果你認為友誼賽唔試陣應該留番正式比賽去試唔緊要,但球隊輸波就唔好怨
[/quote]
SWP根本就係有料之人,就算過左去車仔有冇正選都入硬國家隊嫁啦,可以話碧咸係國家隊個位既接班人,就算佢對威爾斯係正選我諗重要既賽事都唔會比佢打正選啦,
我唔係話唔應該係友誼賽試陣,只係話唔應該話佢地係外圍賽試陣唔啱同唔好啫,
當然啦,外圍賽試陣如果輸波既話代價可能好大,但依家英格蘭贏左波,口碑一樣係差,再加上我諗艾歷臣都睇到個陣有咩唔好既地方,
我諗星期三對北愛爾蘭都唔會用4-5-1喇啩,如果佢照用4--5-1既話依家都炒得喇,唔洗等06世界盃過左先炒,
就算球隊係外圍賽試陣輸波我亦唔會怨,因為佢有好陣唔用仲試陣既話抵輸:o:mad:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]abc123aa[/i] at 2005-9-6 15:13:
SWP根本就係有料之人,就算過左去車... [/quote]
艾歷臣明知奧雲停賽,對威爾斯唔出得,如果佢想排4-5-1係咪應該襯對丹麥時試下呢?起碼知道得唔得或有乜要改善,外圍賽試陣係唔係唔啱同唔好就要睇下佢原本有冇機會試,如果奧雲對威爾斯出得但踢踢吓傷左,對北愛爾蘭唔出得要變陣試下就無可厚非,但明知有得試而唔試,走去外圍賽試就唔係好明智,而且威爾斯唔係魚腩,好明顯艾歷臣唔能深謀遠慮