SEEK 發表於 2005-10-14 01:16 AM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
herothree 發表於 2005-10-14 01:55 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-10-13 12:16 PM:
$^1uyq2u:Fo*`'b,Qm
[b][size=5][color=Blue]Sports討論版算唔算係最旺?[/color][/size][/b] [/quote]
2o'tYs.o:Hq+n2L9s$w
7L qv%d u
haha
!ku\&p I'vM6wWR
i guess so, sport is pretty active
:h s0P0TW4OQ!P X
kI'B8Z6s
i remember when bright and i first join sport
rY\,Q)qs-I
no one speaks at sports as well
f*z j&@&r^:Gl%M*yI
then later we got honoured into 名人堂 (later, bro bright became 版主)
?PFi2}
all the sudden everyone's in for sports
(P^K
FU
L uNM,Q}{
but later on those pts betting game and my injury drove mei away from EF
_0A:kk1S2Z&` KWJ
%|xgajx ~-~3^
now we're back tho
ztg!d:p!UM5x
it is pretty bored sometimes
zSKz5a&F
i can only speak for sports, coz that's where i mainly spend time at
#zxk3|4~
sport is mainly soccer
)I|}1zf\d2w-F%c
there's no room for other sports
[;T8n7U9Ca
i post sth...but b4 anyone could see it...it's pushed down all the way to the 2nd page
j6i3K1VRmKvX.C
it's tough
1h
v`"y6Y/y.|{
but i'll still try to bring more than just basketball and soccer here
jublio 發表於 2005-10-14 02:12 AM
05 年前注冊你就知 e 度以前好輪多野睇
O4C4lQjg
C
voWQSj
8JoX._3?A$P
而家言論受打壓, 又要分,真係幾 sh it
jameshohk 發表於 2005-10-14 03:02 AM
咁應該點改革?
ALWIN_WONG 發表於 2005-10-14 06:08 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2005-10-14 12:33 AM:
qaK w1I|
We
原來都有人有同感覺......
+v_Y6r"J}W
我都少參與左啦......
1vq[5K6}7A~
一來很忙,二來上來頗悶.......
-Ujo@o~ \o T*TY
我最鍾意留連既"戀愛區",版主都放手由得它荒廢啦~~ [/quote]
1[6dgnHf!FE
#l*h:\D#r0}'@
:p"y5Q*BMQ3VZ
好 似 不 止 單 單 "戀愛區" 以 經 荒 廢,
N;}+x] }x?wx9C"~
如 果 你 地 有 留 意 既 話 會 發 現 好 多 區
{tapi(X%y
既 版 主 都 開 始 進 入 “ 冬 眠 ” 既 狀 態 ...
甘國武 發表於 2005-10-14 06:27 AM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-14 08:49 AM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2005-10-14 06:27 AM:
Y d/W i2ABL
)v#Z@#hp e qy2]
睇我由極度敢言,變成e+成隻狗咁,就知啦! [/quote]
KY@6q$S?,kz]
-{!my.ujYS
&kB#GY O[?
:D:D
亨九利 發表於 2005-10-14 10:56 AM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:01 PM
點解冇版主入黎回應吓!!
d228216 發表於 2005-10-14 01:06 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]garycheung[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:01 PM:
PI+|4Ge,T%v
點解冇版主入黎回應吓!! [/quote]
^2{b^r$|
有邊段有需要回應呢?
garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:14 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:06 PM:
q$g8{&aN@g5jB$[
ZQ5CgA*A
有邊段有需要回應呢? [/quote]
D_*~"Wu2b&j}X
對現時EF的睇法.
d228216 發表於 2005-10-14 01:21 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]garycheung[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:14 PM:
0Z5i.Gj4H7K W-yj&g
i_ZK5Z
對現時EF的睇法. [/quote]
Q.]f ?/`!Fb#T!Y
版主想知會員有咩睇法.
garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:57 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:21 PM:
(t8j&_uit
zXAGEY
版主想知會員有咩睇法. [/quote]
9M4^ y
`C0PHZ ~
我覺得EF而家好商業化,搞個《頻寬-用者自付計劃》但都知綱主經營ga難處...
m~2]x]K}
可能係咁ga原因,有d會員不停出post為左攞分睇相,但忽略左post的質量.:o:o
lettwan 發表於 2005-10-14 02:26 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-10-13 09:48 PM:
/dp,Fv6P ^Q"bPj5V-]
[b][size=5][color=Blue]板規太多![/color][/size][/b] [/quote]
1L
q0`N:v8d1zz$yA
唔準打粗口係死因之一:mad:
austin666 發表於 2005-10-14 03:14 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-14 03:17 PM
其實我覺得有關方面真係要林林計解決問題。的確26FUN人流少左,分享又少左。
austin666 發表於 2005-10-14 03:30 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
jublio 發表於 2005-10-14 04:32 PM
以前26fun 根本就係一個好麻甩既咸網,
Ik!J.|._
KD"S
現在要轉型,
$LSHaa!d
+_DP3NZ gQK
所以就係要強制一班麻甩佬著西裝,唔去雞竇去大會堂,咁你話悶唔悶
甘國武 發表於 2005-10-14 06:15 PM
**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****
nkt1000 發表於 2005-10-14 06:51 PM
[quote]Originally posted by [i]austin666[/i] at 2005-10-14 03:30 PM:
CI3oc
Y:v
%x
S.YE4Gv
'|3j^
u2h*FNy
VHYBs4L;j
r
我都同意
&ME?:eQ{.|
衣家俾人的感覺係貼... [/quote]
\9MovZE%JQa
同意!!!