娛樂滿紛 26FUN's Archiver

SEEK 發表於 2005-10-14 01:16 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

herothree 發表於 2005-10-14 01:55 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-10-13 12:16 PM:
K:L:J:ls]m a n*H6OX [b][size=5][color=Blue]Sports討論版算唔算係最旺?[/color][/size][/b] [/quote]
iP N,@nY ;^XX,hB}0F,`
haha
ukeu1ME+Z+K'Dm:T] i guess so, sport is pretty active
+Xl1X9i{dZ[ pg-z.N3Z"@h'Z
i remember when bright and i first join sportkkQ%})YUS.pb
no one speaks at sports as well
F8L[or-I then later we got honoured into 名人堂 (later, bro bright became 版主)]~N)Z}!y~k
all the sudden everyone's in for sports6Q`{(]a%rY

yd,F&` NT}0t/S but later on those pts betting game and my injury drove mei away from EF5r,[s?Pj p

vr g4j(q7[ v now we're back tho!D:h/WCd#]j
it is pretty bored sometimes %{vs L,g%b6a$`z
i can only speak for sports, coz that's where i mainly spend time at
4xW[k/?H6\0d sport is mainly soccer,P:Z-D KgM5F~3_$Z
there's no room for other sportsS z nC4r ^5zF
i post sth...but b4 anyone could see it...it's pushed down all the way to the 2nd page
@-N4zdrTtt it's tough
y/J Cqx _ but i'll still try to bring more than just basketball and soccer here

jublio 發表於 2005-10-14 02:12 AM

05 年前注冊你就知 e 度以前好輪多野睇
"QCq1t#X1l%gh
:@(VII.a?n%`
%lop:wE O{ 而家言論受打壓, 又要分,真係幾 sh it

jameshohk 發表於 2005-10-14 03:02 AM

咁應該點改革?

ALWIN_WONG 發表於 2005-10-14 06:08 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]gundamman678[/i] at 2005-10-14 12:33 AM:
^/tB7{ Xk]T 原來都有人有同感覺......!\_3VwxA
我都少參與左啦...... t2d'\5Ef:sQ _*@ W'X
一來很忙,二來上來頗悶.......
y8?j#J8qGK"|1fc!}7v 我最鍾意留連既"戀愛區",版主都放手由得它荒廢啦~~ [/quote]~'a vU6lN3R
1w4J x{ n
cM+\D@t _
好 似 不 止 單 單 "戀愛區" 以 經 荒 廢,)[3Ug`;u8U1}f
如 果 你 地 有 留 意 既 話 會 發 現 好 多 區
y tJ'L5{ 既 版 主 都 開 始 進 入 “ 冬 眠 ” 既 狀 態 ...

甘國武 發表於 2005-10-14 06:27 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

kakeidevil 發表於 2005-10-14 08:49 AM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]甘國武[/i] at 2005-10-14 06:27 AM:
4A(^}w'H;P Y*z `NFi H7m6Td*j
睇我由極度敢言,變成e+成隻狗咁,就知啦! [/quote]d,nxv|Agi
rbBO"w2TiS
!Sk-U@V];U
:D:D

亨九利 發表於 2005-10-14 10:56 AM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:01 PM

點解冇版主入黎回應吓!!

d228216 發表於 2005-10-14 01:06 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]garycheung[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:01 PM:
U$z2vFL0[ 點解冇版主入黎回應吓!! [/quote]0xT-mn nFY/}"s Y
有邊段有需要回應呢?

garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:14 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:06 PM:
6zo myX6~,?p)q @
(S v+a_Y$L"H 有邊段有需要回應呢? [/quote]
@i#?%E } 對現時EF的睇法.

d228216 發表於 2005-10-14 01:21 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]garycheung[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:14 PM:}/n.YM&mdR
:Ed/yB9Oih6x
對現時EF的睇法. [/quote]_[+[1v"X8{
版主想知會員有咩睇法.

garycheung 發表於 2005-10-14 01:57 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]d228216[/i] at 2005-10-14 01:21 PM:
0Q LO[ BJ.K^!v
g+e K|e5X(aWk"v 版主想知會員有咩睇法. [/quote]
o#ag Xx _ u7? 我覺得EF而家好商業化,搞個《頻寬-用者自付計劃》但都知綱主經營ga難處... O3yebz
可能係咁ga原因,有d會員不停出post為左攞分睇相,但忽略左post的質量.:o:o

lettwan 發表於 2005-10-14 02:26 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]SEEK[/i] at 2005-10-13 09:48 PM:
fb7fsK)v \Yq2I [b][size=5][color=Blue]板規太多![/color][/size][/b] [/quote]&T{K,VqJdZ
唔準打粗口係死因之一:mad:

austin666 發表於 2005-10-14 03:14 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

shaqkobe 發表於 2005-10-14 03:17 PM

其實我覺得有關方面真係要林林計解決問題。的確26FUN人流少左,分享又少左。

austin666 發表於 2005-10-14 03:30 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

jublio 發表於 2005-10-14 04:32 PM

以前26fun 根本就係一個好麻甩既咸網,R&R!} P2_g,pm D8?
現在要轉型,
;? Ea6DEr W1b2v.F.S~3T)OH
所以就係要強制一班麻甩佬著西裝,唔去雞竇去大會堂,咁你話悶唔悶

甘國武 發表於 2005-10-14 06:15 PM

**** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 ****

nkt1000 發表於 2005-10-14 06:51 PM

[quote]Originally posted by [i]austin666[/i] at 2005-10-14 03:30 PM:4o/jKVU:?QN
U1m$h1vmk

)s4oL [jy)V&tE9v{7O z {zP7YSV v
我都同意ipp;Ky3krv
衣家俾人的感覺係貼... [/quote]
~c7j_ Z]k'`r 同意!!!

頁: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.