[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 12:58 AM:
轉變不大, 出 alston 搭佢地反而平均得多 ~
同意, 所以我唔敢選marbury, 一定會浪費好多時間 ~ [/quote]
你竟然覺得 alston 好過 m. james?
m. james 可補你得分
對我黎講, m. james = 暫時o既 marbury
alston 就仲升緊值, 我都唔知佢最top時可以點 :confused:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:01 AM:
你竟然覺得 alston 好過 m. james?
m. james 可補你得分
對我黎講, m. james = 暫時o既 marbury
alston 就仲升緊值, 我都唔知佢最top時可以點 :confused: [/quote]
m.james 比較好 ~ 但係出左佢我地之間既range仲係幾大 ~
所以先出alston, 再搭佢2個..........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:03 AM:
m.james 比較好 ~ 但係出左佢我地之間既range仲係幾大 ~
所以先出alston, 再搭佢2個.......... [/quote]
2 james + dbt v nash + t-mac + Z
依個係最 balance 架喇~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:09 AM:
2 james + dbt v nash + t-mac + Z
依個係最 balance 架喇~ [/quote]
nash 真係唔敢放住.............paul 真係咁唔得咩 ???
佢都出返啦........到你手時相信已可回勇 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:11 AM:
nash 真係唔敢放住.............paul 真係咁唔得咩 ???
佢都出返啦........到你手時相信已可回勇 ~ [/quote]
因為 nash 可以換 iverson 嘛~
而且上面個trade真係岩岩好, 你仲可以留番個 sg 添~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:13 AM:
因為 nash 可以換 iverson 嘛~
而且上面個trade真係岩岩好, 你仲可以留番個 sg 添~ [/quote]
我唔得...............sorry ~
出paul已經諗左好耐........
nash..........真係唔得 ~ sor
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:15 AM:
我唔得...............sorry ~
出paul已經諗左好耐........
nash..........真係唔得 ~ sor [/quote]
咁我訓先喇 :sleep:
希望聽日 alston 打得好d, 爭下氣啦 :good:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:21 AM:
咁我訓先喇 :sleep:
希望聽日 alston 打得好d, 爭下氣啦 :good: [/quote]
即係唔得 ???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:22 AM:
即係唔得 ??? [/quote]
3 v 3 差少少 :)
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:23 AM:
3 v 3 差少少 :) [/quote]
真係咩............仲有咩要求 ???
你考慮清楚吧.........真係幫到你呢 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 01:26 AM:
真係咩............仲有咩要求 ???
你考慮清楚吧.........真係幫到你呢 ~ [/quote]
t-mac 轉 howard 會唔會易傾d :dev: (howard v sbk)
paul 尋日又傷左喇 :haha:
Feb 16 After starting for the first time in four games, Paul was knocked out of New Orleans' 102-86 win over Portland on Wednesday night with a shoulder injury after he slammed into the Blazers' 7-foot-3, 305-pound center Ha Seung-Jin in the third quarter. Paul, who was suffering from bruised left ribs, grabbed for his shoulder and rolled on the floor in pain before heading to the bench for the rest of the game.
P.S. 今晚11pm後先返黎傾~
不過我都會上黎睇下o既~
[[i] Last edited by 艾力克 on 2006-2-17 at 09:43 AM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]艾力克[/i] at 2006-2-17 09:35 AM:
t-mac 轉 howard 會唔會易傾d :dev:... [/quote]
paul 只係小事 ~ 仲有機會出明星賽 tim ~
sbk 不可傾.........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 19:33:
paul 只係小事 ~ 仲有機會出明星賽 tim ~
sbk 不可傾......... [/quote]
諗諗我個條件low:naughty:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-2-17 07:34 PM:
諗諗我個條件low:naughty: [/quote]
咩條件 ???
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 19:39:
咩條件 ??? [/quote]
Paul+ nash trade A.h+ AI:dev:
唔差架:drool:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-2-17 07:41 PM:
Paul+ nash trade A.h+ AI:dev:
唔差架:drool: [/quote]
唔啦..........AH信唔過 ~
係你叫我唔好信data呢..........
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 19:43:
唔啦..........AH信唔過 ~
係你叫我唔好信data呢.......... [/quote]
AH信得過west:dev:
仲有我冇可能出Fair比你
因為我出AI,況且你也比我強:dev:
[[i] Last edited by 清揚 on 2006-2-17 at 07:46 PM [/i]]
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-2-17 07:44 PM:
AH信得過west:dev: [/quote]
本身我都信, 但係佢呢排既表現................
更何況, paul 和 nash 唔會同時出現 ~
[quote]Originally posted by [i]fantesticming05[/i] at 2006-2-17 19:45:
本身我都信, 但係佢[color=Red]呢排既表現[/color]................
更何況, [color=Blue]paul 和 nash 唔會同時出現[/color] ~ [/quote]
[color=Red]=一切???[/color]:nogood:
[color=Blue]呢D係你既愚眛的執著[/color]:dev:
[quote]Originally posted by [i]清揚[/i] at 2006-2-17 07:47 PM:
[color=Red]=一切???[/color]:nogood:
[color=Blue]呢D係你既愚眛的執著[/color]:dev: [/quote]
愚眛...........可能你係岩既 ~
唔可以話係一切, 但睇返出場時間和表現data, 佢作用比之前低..........