今日睇一睇 別罵..
有個問題,,, 好想搵人解答好耐!n2cE"z rm其實 係有雞先定有旦先呢 A U;K u#f$sb
我咁問既原因有兩個*Bf1Jd|6|
1.我唔知道答案想去求證
2.我相信世界上無解答唔到既問題,遲中都係有個事實&Z)xbsj] L b@!{$Z
↑睇到以上 可以唔回 但係咪罵 罵者正龜公;););) Evolution la E!X5T\m T
5\p6DAsrI:Uv
罵你做乜 ? i know the answer ar!!!.Q(W K.[a%p!D
Its egg first0Wl(QD4a-i5c0q&w
the reason is coz chicken actually mutated in the egg!#p bN&Kf(f-J
but the creatures that hv that egg is not really the same chicken as today...so when DNA mutated in the egg..it come out chicken...(~7Am A+N
so u understand ma??:P **** 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽 **** 你信 evolution既話.. 應該係蛋掛..
按evolution, 新物種係靠基因異變而產生 (雖然實際上基因異變通常都會係有病eg, 唐氏統合症 or 生cancer..)
你信創造論既話.. 應該係雞囉... 好似係蛋~係溝出來的 [quote]Originally posted by [i]☆威少★[/i] at 2005-11-11 05:17 AM:/FZw6A%c ?Vq
有個問題,,, 好想搵人解答好耐
其實 ... [/quote]
叉開d講... 你講得都正確, 世上冇解答唔到ge問題, 但係, 解答到 =/= 人類ge智慧係解答到, 亦即係話條問題係可以被解答到, 但唔係被人類解答到, 人類ge智慧係有限, 就算以為自己解答到, 可能其實係解錯晒.
正如有人話, 有雞先定有蛋先, buy進化論ge就會話有蛋先, buy造物論ge就會話有雞先, 但邊個先至係正確? 進化論定係造物論? 人類ge智慧, 可能真係不足以解答到呢個問題, 只能夠係話你篇向相信邊個多d. 而我比較相信造物論. [quote]Originally posted by [i]My heart will g[/i] at 2005-11-11 11:31 AM:E,O W x C4\*T}z
i know the answer ar!!!
Its egg fi... [/quote]
totally agree!!
頁:
[1]