|
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:6 _+ [) U, }2 e$ e( ^* N2 Q
5 }0 @* k' z: ]4 J/ p, ~' _6 }% ?4 E2 d+ T. c
同意.
7 [8 P8 w) \+ y7 q但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多...
/ O4 v3 \9 F% t+ TI do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.# ]7 O6 X( W% U- x) |9 g3 P
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students5 @7 \7 a0 _1 p
I dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.; X- }8 T$ Z3 ? p8 H( U
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.( X1 |* f4 B/ q# N
# _" ?( [7 b% F) L/ G; Z1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law
; |) D2 \- G- O& |. F2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper5 U6 V5 T, L$ ~8 ^' |# `& b2 j
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published
2 ^" z# x7 n% Z0 U2 G. }" l f! W' p; K5 Q
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|
