|
- 帖子
- 199
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 102
- 魅力
- 3
- 讚好
- 0
|
10#
發表於 2007-5-18 09:12 PM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by shehboy at 2007-5-18 07:35 PM:+ W6 _+ H; h) }" u- Q* O
4 y# Y( S/ y4 P8 C( c+ R7 R: ~
. ?8 ~7 }7 q: j+ T' n! p( L
同意., d1 x) k( N# d# v5 b" ]
但呢度講緊既唔係外面好多...
I do respect CU students' good heart on this, but with their limited ability, the have created a lot of troubles.# j4 X! c5 t$ G9 o! D& }+ A- W) c
Your analysis is partly right, but i dont agree they did it for "為左搞噱頭" and you other subjective view against those students
1 b/ q* |. F2 i# E* t) |# JI dont know if you have even been into publishing business, but I can tell you, it is not simply copy and paste from you Microsoft Word, every article they have published they have put a lot of effort into it. If they simply 為左搞噱頭 there are many things for them to do besides publishing newspaper articles.: @( l/ o, ~, D0 Y) T1 g5 T+ m
As a commentator like us, we always simply looks at the result. If we want to become a good commentator, we need to look further down as we can reach the core of the matter.2 q( |8 I, j9 }$ L1 c, U o f
* R$ D& t' B# }& `
1) In my opinion, contrary to the gov. decision, i do not think think CU has breach any law' E) i! T- r4 x
2) In my opinion, I do think they are in good faith when they conduct the newspaper; }( ~& M' {$ L0 ^
3) Also, in my opinion, CU students did not put enough consideration to look into the possible consequences as their work has published7 S& M! o* m5 l' O9 H
. S: r# k- K- V6 @9 D0 p8 A/ s
Thanks for reading this long ass boring reply |
|
