 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.; M$ A$ b' |4 Y% J! @- {
8 l3 {; |/ o* f% t7 A2 _; r
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.: H* Q! }. h# e/ r/ z2 q/ G
: s+ G& B4 k: d
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
. L* @$ h9 n1 K, j# yand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.4 r# v* I' [2 l5 q% @
/ z( s; E. ?" M! Q! Y5 M6 Rso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險) T6 ] B& G9 k0 H" y7 e6 c
3 M3 Q0 T9 G$ R
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
/ F! N$ R& }$ ]. Hat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|