|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct." m) N6 D3 L/ d7 y# K
% i) b' R) C$ k
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
% e' t: o! h) P
# Q' F. S* H9 G$ {+ {In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
! v7 h( ^0 W2 K) i0 g4 O( C& Oand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
* R; i, {" l# X) h5 y7 L' P' B! s4 G: ]7 _
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險" s% |' k: v* C# L
( ?5 f0 j$ [3 W7 {7 Y! Yin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
! ^2 K( x! Y, d8 t' E0 @: o' Zat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|