|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
4 R: Y( K& L6 ~
3 W; g* U% J0 m1 v$ caccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
$ h: C3 r( T# ^9 C8 r
( d- L6 h7 e# V9 E! v6 O6 I3 tIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,3 k; ^2 _9 C# K0 G! e- C
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him. v9 H' d4 k+ m C
" A2 F" b) _* lso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
2 T' d+ k5 J7 ]. G% c/ V# a8 l x n0 Z' P
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, / A; D: g' @1 N1 j: ~- X
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
