|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.9 D4 D. Z0 h8 e4 D s+ _
3 c( r: R; W) m2 M
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
4 {+ X3 C! p3 x2 v, f
3 [& V6 q* u9 m. ]/ v0 w K% qIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,8 t; s- \" [7 \. r0 M- ^9 O$ W; }
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.& A& K9 H$ V& n- }3 W$ v
! F4 e! M# G6 p2 ?) V( M, z+ W
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
. x! t* w2 r: i6 W+ N- k- j, u4 {
) L3 a3 y7 I( U; Din 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
9 A+ r/ b$ [7 }5 _# _( b4 [" Dat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
