|
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
. ]. j. w: _. \/ w
! p9 G7 ?, ~4 caccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
0 |7 J' x4 h, {$ P4 j" l3 c2 E: |6 |% g+ R8 k
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before, ?$ {: |; \, K, [$ V
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
$ [3 l- O$ C3 C8 k8 g+ `! X
3 Q. t1 I4 x' }- y. E B# o7 Hso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
( D$ `- f* k# A. _
5 ^/ k% Q% u3 E& c M Qin 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, $ Q5 H |$ n# c: s3 f1 X
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|
