 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
6 I0 H2 y1 @$ G3 P4 C, W* o" k, x9 I- f! U. G' g
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.6 B, N& p5 o' T2 A- q7 \8 Y
0 @7 x% A1 U/ ^# z# BIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,1 G/ x! F, W+ L$ A& i( U: o9 i
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.: E! c0 G$ t* A+ Q( t
% j m: p8 P7 H$ i
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
' I5 B" ^9 X3 N( Z1 N3 k0 |6 }! J& v$ C
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
6 M' T) m2 h$ D7 j/ D8 j( hat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|