|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.3 V9 L7 C8 K6 j, h/ l
( V u+ ~; t7 J3 N: z8 _according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.6 O9 {/ B2 i4 N) F2 \6 w, u! ]
7 G0 f; Q3 N4 V/ P1 J; \
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
% D2 u) S+ p7 c k2 \" I; I3 y w; Xand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
k+ a- L: @" V# k4 e& z+ e$ D& g
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險/ S/ d3 f7 `$ H( c
6 F7 J, h. e1 P( `
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
b6 B0 }7 L* b+ T7 L( zat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|