- 帖子
- 24445
- 精華
- 3
- 威望
- 10006
- 魅力
- 459
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 女
|
3416#
發表於 2006-6-15 01:11 AM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by d228216 at 2006-6-15 12:59 AM:
It is common welfare, not related to stuipd or crazy.
However, it is a result of general stuipd thinking. The rule is protect the consumer only, than provider need extra money to recover the cost, so real consumer spend extra money for such unwanted service.
Is it really smart???? can smart place on decision making not on the returing.... I thought the consumers are end it up paying for the recover cost, but it is not true. This is the cost that the companies are paying for to get the relationship like us in the furture. |
|