data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07e1e/07e1e63996ad98132e371ace14df4d98a3af28b8" alt="Rank: 5"
- 帖子
- 2960
- 精華
- 4
- 威望
- 1369
- 魅力
- 844
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
8#
發表於 2007-11-8 12:44 AM
| 只看該作者
Originally posted by foto188 at 2007-11-8 12:08 AM:/ P& \' I( x& O' D6 ^
2 a, ~3 x; D& R
$ b! R% b2 {$ j% K
"如果"
0 B2 W! ~+ Z, w- I) @1 e- u, G1 N) b5 m
they way you comment is no different from those irresponsible weekly magazines. you cannot make your assumption becomes the fact. that is not a fair statement. 8 J, E8 g* m) i
想不到一個吹水區變了時事評論區,還要一定100%正確的言論才能發言
( ~5 Y. x4 ~, p* f8 E. D本人英文欠佳,只能用中文回覆,請閣下見諒。
7 \" P+ o9 f: B X' P7 j; y! Q; g! M n1 ^/ v3 S
豈不聞[空穴來風,未必無因],之前[頭條新聞]事件徐四民已點名說此節目不當了,曾特首也評論過[十大中文金曲]是否繼續,而且政府在查核港台時也發現財政賬目有問題,加上近日港台員工貪污醜聞不斷,令人們會想政府會否要再次評審港台牌照問題呢?4 c% M' k+ f$ J7 p6 N, M# x3 ^
& E8 _: _0 \' x7 J; d( \* D5 P" J
當然,以上只是個人的想法意見,並不代表任何人立場。+ M" k$ u3 W: v) a! d5 P
/ i+ O; e4 J K
[ Last edited by oz2 on 2007-11-8 at 12:46 AM ] |
|