|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct." W! f, k2 R( X" j
3 n5 T: D4 @8 V9 F
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.; l! X5 m* r; `# f* `
# ]/ V! o( G$ I7 C. hIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
+ o- q+ h- F1 e" k' uand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
9 x' w" f; @$ T: d4 B) L( Q* a; `. p$ q* {$ T
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
. k' [* ~9 r, I5 z) M
' @& g& |, m5 @3 k. F* {) g1 p$ }in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
" L( r/ [6 {! lat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|