 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.4 U7 _) c/ F% m
5 R: `3 u) u& T5 J) C* s3 xaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
9 K- G' x S7 @! e5 R7 m5 Q4 C* R9 A2 t( F) Y# y" D# a
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
6 D3 X) |5 F9 R0 X4 Xand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
+ c( m7 N2 }; M+ t& }: o5 c& g3 V/ R: a
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
: s7 _- Z+ n/ {% c/ z( L4 V' x0 A6 G% O
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
C, q3 y _$ {% C7 {# `at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|