|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.# C @- O8 f& k5 C2 D- ^. ~& u+ \5 S: n
9 P$ l4 x; c9 c" qaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
$ j% ^# O1 a: Q1 @8 N* P& j
A$ c$ G/ h8 D9 l% H# aIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,# j, V3 i5 I$ @9 V
and that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
7 e8 z* k1 s: h, W) ]5 p G7 a3 F0 {1 q( e# C2 q& i1 _
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
4 Q: C9 U( I) Q7 A1 H, H% \( O/ H
6 e4 Y6 S$ Y+ O( Q+ z8 u& f8 t; i) ein 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑, - Z3 d6 K7 M3 h- e+ c! Y4 ~
at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|