- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.9 {' u! h' u4 J; t
5 F& U5 ?, P0 g9 @+ h8 A5 b, X3 jaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.6 h5 V+ q$ `' Y
# I1 w2 M: f2 ]" @. iIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
8 {! i3 D3 P9 A& x& W* V. ~+ cand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.7 s0 G/ h: X' M) J
9 s l' n* n1 F4 L9 D7 gso, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險 [; ]3 \) O0 v- u0 e% j" H/ ]; \
& _) Z2 y y3 y
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
2 [# D/ T! d: e! ^( @at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|