|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
( `/ a; H4 k6 V, T
3 D. F: Z7 c( _- M- U# r$ t, b# Baccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.
$ ?2 O1 t3 x* g! q3 ^6 Y
* e' G1 r/ X1 ~4 a b0 nIn the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
) @! z8 G4 C+ R) g) [2 \4 T* _: Nand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.: U2 Q/ | \1 f- |: k
; [ Z6 Z' d' x7 V) @0 m' L
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險* k1 O. c+ a$ K# b9 P
: I3 u, m* i; t1 D! Y
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
# H l. e) E" k( U: l4 V2 }$ Tat least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|