|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.
) T9 @2 Q# g7 @+ ^" b. k2 ^! P0 y6 s) t) I7 j$ i$ }
according to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.' [, {0 f0 k6 S) [
' X2 H# _9 L" j- d) J! }
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
$ K5 D0 t2 ~7 J" z+ x+ rand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
9 s; S$ A* A3 O. c+ ~+ j2 }7 x) M0 y1 ~* X6 E6 m
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險
3 l4 O* A) g, g, B1 V/ U( N7 b) ^) b; D. w1 ~3 F
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
7 R2 B2 B x; [% I/ i' ~at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|