|
 
- 帖子
- 118
- 精華
- 0
- 威望
- 69
- 魅力
- 0
- 讚好
- 0
- 性別
- 男
|
5#
發表於 2005-4-4 11:12 PM
| 只看該作者
yes, it's correct.$ t$ W9 q) V& p; T
4 S! B) b$ ^1 M' gaccording to the law, if anyone get anykind of hurt in the bank, the bank is liable of this.% x( D3 l* C2 o+ f3 ]! }. D$ ]) _
, b* Y+ i4 F2 P2 z
In the same case, if someone get pk or hurt in ur home and u hvn't warned that guy before,
; i1 |& V8 a/ ^6 yand that guy sue u, u hv to pay a huge sum of money to him.
- |7 ?; ?5 w; z- O' s) `" {! i4 B; Z
so, at this case, a kind of insurance arouse. That's liable insurance, 責任保險1 H3 f$ g9 z. ~+ C7 e6 q
l, q: {" i9 x. u @5 i+ K+ p
in 90s, a man got pk in a government department, since that was no sign of 小心地滑,
) M, B0 Q+ z) z+ \at least, the government had to pay 10M to that guy |
|