Rika

由最好排到最壞% L$ Q' A- }/ ]
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
" ^2 p9 z' [7 Q4 QB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
' W- E' `1 ~* |+ QS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her; F- i! D) ~0 P& s4 B4 d
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure4 ^: n0 _  r$ E  A8 |- `
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
+ V: o. i* ?* I- E: X% L0 H" z6 S7 a2 }4 t
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人4 W/ s* s& U: ]' F7 h: Z; _
- j, V& |: Q( o* E+ e: V
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
# O! n0 S+ \, a" s, ]- j; B. o: B     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!: Q. s+ \" Y2 K; y4 e1 F6 u* @  p

1 F; ]3 s' A, [+ [0 `+ i* OB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
0 r" A0 M" C& @* \  v! c' K9 w7 V$ E4 P! T' r
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
+ d) M- w- i  c  ~5 A7 _# ^7 n& m
! U0 n6 O7 o; M  mF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
  }+ ~# P- E- b' O& `     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
) ^& D/ P3 h' m$ v- e" d# S, J9 |3 v% x
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
; j$ p2 L8 m# n  p: g1 V而家答多次  N# ], T4 a$ w/ E( a
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
6 W7 y; B. k$ N. k$ F, w% I: k# ]) cl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架% g3 u% h) I9 ^, Z1 W, M3 v
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
- B+ ?1 o! Q2 H1 x4 L3 gs: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
9 y) P9 k  c" |* U! |" sm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
: [. F" t- @5 B: `- ~" M
, f5 [, C6 q+ J& i0 pL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
0 w  J! t& P6 U- r/ VF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
- s( g3 r7 V; \( t) W! L  L: DM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
; D. N# ~; r- x) b0 B$ D8 i- rS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢( z4 L  C' P6 Z% e3 U& H
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
+ K! Y+ }0 c9 XF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
) a/ p- i+ o6 w- zS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取7 w# B/ t7 @% K. |0 k6 X. o- l
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
* K9 Z5 Y0 M' g2 UL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果) l' T5 ^! ^/ p
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
; l& j/ g* l3 |2 f
/ N3 P+ d# N% U7 g世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
1 n8 a' P9 n9 L8 Q+ f& l' @L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
2 B; r7 s0 B' d% T9 F5 k3 lB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘+ m; F4 O7 G5 Q1 y1 f' a
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
2 W$ K" r+ d" d- ~F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方4 B6 I* n! b9 H$ k
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

" j. G; B$ j6 m4 {; {3 h, L& z, T; X8 s

- Z' ]! j! N$ o  h( | same choices with u , but want to add some comments 9 X: L7 O& N2 W
5 ]) m- g! A  T/ V/ [+ L
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  7 K0 d/ x4 C3 x

& m( I1 ]8 Q% I3 h6 V; YS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )7 h0 m$ o% D, l9 `5 `8 ]3 N
2 }# N9 K) F6 \0 H7 e5 e
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome - S- s( n6 Y  [" v' z
+ H6 j2 c# A6 N9 o  ~
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......8 G9 N! v/ o* `5 S( s3 m

/ A3 d7 x' y( }$ g/ Q[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge9 n& U* j& h+ V3 x
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
7 v/ Y1 T5 H$ _7 ?8 Y* UL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
$ ?1 Q: [5 x: I* q/ o- S! b0 u' ^F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
0 N+ s( |5 p$ G( l; J: Q; R% l* z3 H: A6 G: P' F; l
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....* l" }7 x: ~+ X. R- i: z
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，  h3 @, B2 I3 i  N5 g/ y4 x
由最好開始排起既話，9 s% ?/ s  u0 o4 O
L B M F S 啦，
* X, A% o5 c' j8 _$ k& ^4 v  K: J# \, d( A1 w0 f
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" S* O/ G. ~: d6 o) w
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？% _% x, k2 x! p* e
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
) x2 B9 l0 _5 ^- ^8 q又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。8 p* o& i# q+ _: p0 w

; t5 h* L+ H9 j6 p4 A4 y而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
6 L4 Y4 x5 B7 B) |所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，  w, {# }, n' l, [
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
# N6 ]. Q: Z& V$ Y5 S" J; o* n  x# J+ d( L0 m  L
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
" T4 A: A* r% d/ h4 R: ]. s M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
: P& J) b0 T/ Q2 m1 p- I& P0 z) s亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
% H/ H" s# k, D8 T知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
; A) \8 z7 M: i) u M 都可算壞了。
3 g3 O# ?, ^- `4 N+ M# T- n
+ K, r( M' u" ^& I. T7 E F 呢個人仲掂，0 @- G! D0 w0 k; [. `% K
知道既唔等於要講，
) q8 C+ {$ n, }如果呢件事發生係自己身上，' R8 M2 W" k. T+ T5 t7 ]
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。7 f8 K5 F' k& n7 ~! }/ u: ?* f
3 F, c! g7 N/ W, v- t
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
) W' x& {- C) L9 w6 b( R4 ^- \始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。, `# g+ U% m+ P7 h8 ^- R" Y
! T- ]. `1 X! ?9 A# J
6 T3 W% @* U: D7 @7 T7 ]

7 `! y8 r! \. b' S! X0 d題外話：
8 }, B2 J5 u3 A  |2 r1 J唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，/ `; q% z* `9 C" d9 Q( ]
睇到 S 呢條友，
& @3 ~+ F1 F$ s我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
% Z* ?# E6 R$ e3 V, h' J, l; E, u# I+ ^5 Z& s' F
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
; {% g% r% L/ A, X$ m9 k$ U1 e5 M1 JF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係. R* t+ F& L& d1 t
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
$ U: i/ s, k, p3 D, j. L0 MB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
! h' W- a; ]/ S6 ?& c7 e6 p. |L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...