Rika

由最好排到最壞6 u) Z9 ~" t( z+ y+ s
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
0 |7 ~9 h3 C( g9 a; [+ HB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
) W6 d) T9 K( A) C- P% E  L( X3 BS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
& v6 y) @4 @# ?2 r& N8 lM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure3 T% g: l1 c0 o* N! n8 {1 o
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:8 l, ^& C2 u4 O" i% q

/ M0 i/ j7 K# \M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
- Q( g. M! A' _' H2 e5 l" O' P' m2 }: H& k" m' G
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
7 J7 H: E, c( C- Y( X7 [2 R. f     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
9 g; C, L8 i- C' |# g: k' x
! o. o7 Q7 ]. T5 ]! p# lB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
0 p# c7 A' n- d9 X" I% ~9 A7 f/ u; u. l6 `/ l% m
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志0 ?$ j5 _; u! t" N
1 _3 u; n/ G  @3 M1 `: m
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,; C! b9 C# }  O" E" n& q
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好' a: W- c! V1 l1 G

! Y* c3 T5 e. O1 l  R, T" c, M; h[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案4 l, u& K6 n0 }7 H+ ]: K
而家答多次6 B4 l' \% G3 v/ i
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
# W/ r6 R8 L5 Jl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
" q! n9 H. G8 c3 ?8 t( z) w# Xb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢6 D% b& i4 R4 l: E; `/ ~
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
5 K! |5 P; i  C: S: Jm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S! D+ Q2 D. m! W

$ v! L; Z- T% }3 E; u$ e% pL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大4 P5 x5 s0 `# g$ e7 t
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度8 x) u5 m0 A# `& C
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
7 }" b8 f& U7 I/ @S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
1 F2 w, T; F) PB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
: \- |4 z9 s, j2 m/ u0 e5 E. }% AF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
5 a* b7 u+ C3 R; A; ~1 aS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取0 u, n+ k- c$ O; ]0 N6 V& @' G6 }
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
7 A3 R& U! h# t) F5 AL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果0 {  S+ S" e8 ^  ]
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情: i; w7 n2 R" v. l/ a0 }3 u

; z' _$ p* H% F8 t世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
" x$ g, z' Y- L1 K3 p5 BL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
+ U0 K" l' m" j3 gB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘8 Y/ \4 |- C% g0 N* Z
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件( @/ k* V2 l/ B3 A; A
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
7 j& ~0 }- X/ A- E& lM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

1 Y  H/ N. X. W% r. a/ l- M
/ W: |$ e* j5 E9 i" v
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
% u3 ^# U2 y6 j
* _- `9 c/ x8 @4 U! pB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  / |! U( a) B9 |+ K

0 ^4 U* }& B, k- F: Q6 MS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )6 ^  I. E  }' h! x8 |2 A* f7 R! ]! ^0 q
! y! `$ X) i( j. c
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
& r  S' F% q7 G& ]( m- v) q" ^# t5 [
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......7 W; v' U6 ?  K8 m7 y9 u! f; ~

, P) A& Z% k9 ^/ {! M[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
( u5 e% J$ s! Q: z- DM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
8 ?+ h1 d% U2 JL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
# x) H- [  |8 r+ D# z, r: }$ @F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma( ?8 B* u! g5 J" Q4 s7 f7 i' Y
$ }) C! v* D: A* T$ D3 _0 r4 L
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....4 d9 m( i1 s/ o5 a* b
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，3 R! r, e& e" s; ^) f  U
由最好開始排起既話，
9 z6 e* B$ C9 N6 Q2 M7 fL B M F S 啦，
. Z5 b! O! e7 m
' k+ o! _' b) P8 A) O! A, j其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，' P0 ?3 \) s# y+ C- ?4 w
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
4 U1 u2 k9 x  o; V' Q如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？! ]# G# ]7 C- n$ Y9 ^: ?- F5 E
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
; Z! M, A2 z  o8 q6 k0 H
' s& ~! W- g. m' ?( ?0 a而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，8 t/ m; U( j* R
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
2 Y; H3 y! K3 J( Y; \明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。( s: j! A+ o8 Z7 H3 e/ F

( i: f4 }! z$ B9 }" V而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
) z7 e6 ?- h! B1 @$ ?# A! }, ? M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，3 l$ L; B9 D7 T# d% g# s* U9 H
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，$ y, F) V( j* H- O5 A
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
, K# [' W5 z+ p; {0 H9 b$ v* z$ r M 都可算壞了。
! H7 Z# P8 E+ J. v: B: R4 w
" f  ?% G! T4 f" o F 呢個人仲掂，
. D8 O9 D% d0 c# g4 z0 P$ U: f知道既唔等於要講，; C- V; a: ?% r' ?
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
" @- L* s5 L$ i# V6 J我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
; I0 l- X: V: b8 P6 U. w5 v+ s3 {1 d+ W
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，' q8 o0 r- F5 ~- e  L9 Y/ I0 a
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。6 w# H2 C$ [; M9 y1 `
5 s- G8 ^+ r! F; `6 Y; w! O% k/ J

! G2 e) B1 L/ A1 D3 W. h
0 `/ C) q/ Q- S! d& s/ X: W& N題外話：
- ?4 P! j# S1 M% a唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，1 H# c. f# l2 J4 x( s# o$ S
睇到 S 呢條友，
9 u' X& h4 f. K! \3 K我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L$ d  r8 R+ `( x$ N5 ^3 J$ l, `; p

9 ?, g# [+ [& K7 uS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!( A0 Y) G9 W+ `+ R& [, T) H
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係7 K: \& K# R0 D" E& i) ^, `" s
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她; s( t8 q2 r# S+ o
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
1 P, q6 f1 R% `5 t2 l9 F/ XL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...