Rika

由最好排到最壞
- b1 q  j9 s$ \+ F( z. UF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong, I/ z; Q6 Q- C" G
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount: }" p8 ~, o- m" o8 Y0 X. p
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her8 ~) e5 i) \, Z" q' E; ~
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure: ^7 Y; m3 ~% h, E1 V1 J
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
+ `' }, W* [) i. ?
; K) y3 B. \4 sM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人1 K) `7 u, N9 E0 ]) t

. V  [- x0 p6 }2 j" `# gS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)7 r! ]% l1 E+ d- n
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!, Q, W: r0 @: A: ?, n* I8 Q3 K$ J
8 ^% A5 a$ W( ^* S/ V* X. S; \: `
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做' B, x$ x( E5 `& `$ d8 p
1 N) T) C8 D7 H0 M0 ]  N
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志+ X  g  Z# M( A

! _7 p0 Y1 {8 ~- L9 FF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,0 S1 _7 t) F- S+ n& l
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
. C' o; @% k$ g( ~, G% h6 E, z; P$ t9 Y" w# D( h$ D) b/ L
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案. ^+ b( }& i( F8 A; P* o
而家答多次$ _; G' \+ a+ `$ p2 d8 p  _" ]
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
2 ^9 M$ ~* m. R1 T1 r! Nl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
% ?6 m! v( _" C6 @# {+ b; `! Ub: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢8 L6 y5 P! P9 I0 y% o6 e2 L7 j
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
; Q6 b/ \( i" |3 i& }6 [m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S' Z7 o3 L3 e, t0 g- B

9 c; R) o6 T4 {- G; XL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
/ e* h8 E' ]9 Q. }7 ZF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
4 a: }( K  E/ F  @M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒2 H5 W- W  Y; g5 Y- y% N& t# @) [
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
# ?- P9 w9 ?, V4 ~* g2 cB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞( E5 z& w2 }1 m) Z4 m; p( J# Z
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"0 `' ^. A( Q. E% c: D  b
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
. b+ X9 H* ?8 b( k- S, y3 r& g2 lM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
0 k! h' [, R& |L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
- U( S  r- a  n3 G6 XB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
& J: q& U1 r' }9 q: e5 Q  ]) B& H8 n; v9 S9 b* b. ~# ]  J
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
& g) a- g. k6 g* x6 T$ bL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
' w$ u+ E6 b4 d+ N  k3 f0 W. g0 nB = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘5 W, s. H8 M$ \2 _' n& u/ m( H
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件$ R; `7 |5 D6 c" P% W% q# x2 k# R
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
/ k. o9 q! \; {* P. X" J  W/ i7 M- V, iM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

% n( |, p0 |% {7 K, I

, T2 x+ N7 u# E0 } same choices with u , but want to add some comments
% a/ b# t' W; k# C# q7 O8 t
; W. [8 H% `4 P  j( a$ D, A! ]B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  8 i* c5 d! L  L" D+ P
! A& ~! v2 O8 V' |
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )6 j1 ~# U$ J" A2 n, H

5 @* t2 b: H8 [, LF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ' N6 U, s, a/ c9 @& Q1 O9 O% a2 Y; }

0 ^9 Z8 y" z4 C" r: w. mM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; x+ J; N/ X/ C, s
+ f* }- ]3 U3 Y2 B) v2 T
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge$ z: t. g% R0 I6 c5 _; O
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
+ }4 b- e% h! s4 M; {* oL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點$ g+ \  M3 F8 s- D$ |; G- t) U
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
+ ^' ~! O" E, \9 \- s
3 Y8 g4 `, J- K" i3 M, h# o最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
( o3 ^$ S- D0 X0 A+ w) B+ t5 I有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，* W- f1 ?3 z; D
由最好開始排起既話，
* {1 u1 p. y: B9 A( t! _& bL B M F S 啦，7 S5 d% B" u. f- x3 V5 l7 v+ X

9 i* f" ~, h; M/ l# ~/ X0 f其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，9 _" B! s6 A) V3 c3 F
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
9 y, i/ v+ I! i/ T, N4 ^. P如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
  D; o$ |% r8 h6 a又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。4 y$ L8 ]/ K3 z; I
% z  i7 U& Q. |
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，& @. L  T" R( J% w# l3 u3 g
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
+ E* p& O/ `( @; U1 W8 z明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
! S  Q, l1 ~9 ]/ S5 v% u# i+ a- `# U# h, b
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，5 X6 {6 D" d5 Y0 n4 F
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，8 X( G, F( V$ M9 S& U. E
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，* w: J9 n$ \* |' {0 }1 D  r: X
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，3 A! q; w) W/ q3 X$ T2 s& l5 U
M 都可算壞了。
( E7 C8 e- q$ I3 A. r( x" a& I, `
9 l1 f# e, m" H F 呢個人仲掂，4 j( ?( R7 {# J2 r! f7 b
知道既唔等於要講，$ l2 b& T+ s, ^+ c, e1 A
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
, K6 I' u, f7 p我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。3 V5 P( b# w* `% Q

* F* P7 g8 Y4 J* E* `; Y2 _# E# d* S最衰個個緊係 S 啦，8 |* N" O! C* x+ G9 y
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
# D) ~0 W, ]$ m9 k( e
4 |' N0 u% Z6 L6 N3 L: @  M+ J9 {. c

! }7 ^3 C* u" T1 _; x" [題外話：
2 R8 z1 a6 k5 Q5 U. m9 |9 T唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，1 z; _- Y3 D6 M, D- W" ]
睇到 S 呢條友，; F/ Y6 K& {; h$ k5 @
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L! N3 ]5 X0 J, L

  f9 ?! e3 {0 }- W+ L- O2 MS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
* ^% [4 C% M3 g* A# D6 x' KF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係- y8 }5 x$ d& N) H! K! \$ w
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
/ F* G$ ~+ [: @' b" \B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
# z( Q# O# R/ |; ?! N  c9 CL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...