Rika

由最好排到最壞+ q1 k) E0 p* q8 p# g
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
# ?. X$ Q. D5 Y; g6 g  I$ |B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
3 o: e6 ~  ]- n: p5 \' KS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her+ k4 H% z0 \* H2 `4 \$ [
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure' E4 h3 ~. [/ ^" C7 C; f
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:5 j; H; y' }- ]. d6 o
2 |1 j! ]& b* b! u. w. k9 A
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
* v! ?0 [, T! u% ~( C
& w; ?+ F) a6 x5 F) L2 E- ES - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
  s% F; x1 x: w  @( D4 t' L     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!4 n+ D' l6 P  G; d7 c

$ k) y+ C) V( D! w# I) L1 Z! ?; vB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
! l+ k+ {7 E; ?+ a" ]  N' ], M1 @' Z/ R4 l8 m- T# M3 G. C
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
( c. l% e% D1 o5 S8 N! D
& c* C6 F" c  m8 g, bF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
7 q$ {( f* T+ A0 d- a5 q' g+ @     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好; e4 t5 ^/ m/ ?5 }3 X
  X: s8 M! i6 X* t3 G
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案% R% ~/ L9 h/ ]) L4 `- i
而家答多次
% e$ ~6 @) ~, N. W0 n$ {: Rf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
6 a, A. K1 h# o5 [5 |8 Xl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架- m4 r6 M: S$ A( x( P/ ?
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢, }& |! v& L+ X. E# N/ @5 f
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
" r: y5 `2 Z$ V. u0 x# i5 v. rm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
4 {/ C, b) V6 j4 k$ H: T1 Y% H3 m3 g- J( |& H
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
4 f# T2 P# z/ g: r, }7 yF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
1 S8 B; b$ _% ~2 sM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒; T9 K& U2 O2 R& P: ^. P
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
( E5 H# Q. i# J4 qB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
, l$ B: o5 w1 I8 o6 |4 GF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"! a2 M$ c6 ^! Y2 q' A
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取7 p) b) b; e7 L; g) c0 N  C! y5 l- G
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
, Y4 T6 a6 A! W# W" oL: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果( b+ N2 k) i. _' ~  k# r8 D% }
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情9 v. R; E4 ?8 _* M0 D2 W; I
* v8 @, B- c, d
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
9 g, P4 @% G  T9 S* oL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己2 z. u% A9 k' }$ h, p: z7 T
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
: B9 X- K; m2 d0 yS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
" a6 U- e& h2 R  RF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方& {' D" u- ]# J& P1 ^5 z& X
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, Z7 }8 o0 S" t9 H9 p: e

6 ?$ Z) K4 X  D same choices with u , but want to add some comments
( ~: E- ~0 z. k/ z( Q* q
7 f5 U" d- {8 v' ^9 K. Y  {9 \B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
9 r' {! K& s# c* ]6 k& ]% c  P' _, u  B! x, O$ C- y7 z+ @& T
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
# H5 g' u! y5 u! a: {: g' o4 {8 |1 l
' A8 q6 I+ f8 J( C  D4 a+ vF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
3 a3 g6 W8 B1 D* {# p" U$ C; X1 q9 i/ P9 d6 c! n5 [
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......6 f+ f, Q3 c' M. e
0 x9 ?9 N' H. N
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
( d7 z1 M) n2 u2 EM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
( {4 F0 R! l* _6 P& n- V- Q/ cL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點& K8 C% O& j3 z+ W, z
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma+ J: \4 a+ L6 Q6 A, q: @
3 D2 j* J) `! A* F
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....4 I% f2 _$ d( P0 Y
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，# \+ ^( b" H; Y8 k/ e
由最好開始排起既話，3 {. `3 O( e6 }+ Z, k( k7 Z
L B M F S 啦，
* @' D$ E( f: M) [/ G/ p/ P' u: ~7 J/ h; @: j
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
1 @6 X# W3 ~4 `6 a- T! b) O但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
9 |4 E, v; ?0 F; Z% f+ Y3 p如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
' d1 f' P/ N' H1 B$ x又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
/ H* F8 [3 f' r8 u) l. m% g" u# ~) ]. e8 A4 ?: ^' C. L5 z* k' U, l
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，. P  }$ X2 }1 y
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，1 {9 y# v3 w) q( T# D3 `1 l6 C
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
+ g2 t: \$ Q$ t: M# [8 E, }" t
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，$ {6 Y/ Y/ }/ a7 B: A
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，0 Q3 z+ U* z+ p  u+ J6 d
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
6 ]2 u$ f4 A, Z! ^知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
; ^2 k/ Q; E" c3 N  t. o9 p( H M 都可算壞了。5 H; v7 h$ ~8 A% t$ Y9 e8 S
8 B6 m1 c' E. W) u5 V/ h1 D
F 呢個人仲掂，
5 ]! j; [2 L- v1 O4 @知道既唔等於要講，/ n: @* C$ T# a' m% R0 ~; `/ S
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，- _! C' _5 T2 {0 C% i, x
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
. m/ z; R% b: `/ q& A2 p9 A$ E7 V7 O9 Q- j# Q) ?
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，6 x1 w/ G! D0 r8 g
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。" v4 a" c3 r# v- j9 p* d
$ a: f8 W& O, q

* G" z5 z5 f7 o8 p5 t) _* X8 ^: T+ N: v, j+ ?
題外話：0 n; M4 }- C9 g, C) s
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
- x% V( b9 D7 U4 H* S- K( F7 k% K0 z睇到 S 呢條友，$ O7 T: i# ?  c2 `& V4 T
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
  E5 g9 ~# P$ H# G8 l5 Q' N
- [( ^% n) O5 i/ }: `& |6 `) b1 fS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
" C, i6 ?- n* X+ N' XF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係/ A; l; u. Z! |1 o1 D2 t' b
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
9 y5 C) T, x$ h& N# {' o: eB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害/ W, O% e* l6 f. X8 M8 g' _
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...