Rika

由最好排到最壞) g. y2 L% c( `+ G# t5 O5 i
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
5 P0 S/ `" ~9 |/ O/ K: q( J( PB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
0 I* h* i8 L5 [- S9 b, ?S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her- x/ x, e- S" s* X% r
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure  l5 q9 `9 w% a& ~
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:8 g, {, O. u# L9 b
3 ~" Z. u  x' p! R: U5 c
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
$ ?1 A/ P& T! I) a/ d$ S/ V% ^; r6 v; e3 O% ^" E! y
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)0 S% a+ w6 s# |& D1 z# l2 J( N3 `
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!1 X7 E' G  i" P6 |4 E0 e" q* a
9 |+ z  P; [+ ^: @0 g9 g4 Q
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做6 S: V- \; W. ?6 E
" g! @0 g* J9 z- O; q. X
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
7 B9 h. _5 K6 W- T6 Q: D( u4 v0 k: \$ d
" s: \+ p3 i" d  GF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,* R0 R/ r. A5 c% I* w; E2 h
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
4 @( E' _: T$ z8 `' `! E' c+ t  K/ X" |8 i7 \0 b" a
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
' L; S8 N0 H" q" s* w7 J$ o而家答多次
7 G2 m" U5 q5 ~' z7 v% m4 nf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
" t: S* ]9 `0 d; p# l: al: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
; `5 o+ N$ i1 S/ e/ i  G4 @& Fb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢( C) j$ R  x0 C/ w+ s
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.: d' p. Q$ g7 E. o
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S
/ R- G. S" Y6 w6 m' L
1 `- m( i6 ~3 E" k& i: W/ SL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
8 j& _  t/ G' [# l' bF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度" U# ~$ O. u) R+ r# p, \
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒  A8 p, a. c. A. Y' O) V
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢8 h2 h, A: z/ Q% p# X
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞' o( z( S9 [( @0 e. r6 v, l
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"( O" X1 {1 _$ _6 e- _: l
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
9 `" A# Q4 E' U; M7 E* K8 Z' cM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法+ J' O; t$ j+ ]1 }- m- \
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
3 M( O7 H9 Q- ]$ m' q9 X* V1 D( LB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
+ {$ D' L5 @( z; J$ G9 b: u" y3 n2 [% C, C& p
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:* M* Y: p1 Z! A% t7 T
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己. j% w9 \/ I  O8 h
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
# i2 J# N- A" A8 @/ ]S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件6 d, o3 E4 M( S! R4 G' Y
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
' f  h1 v1 O8 |' \6 Z8 \M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

! h  m' Q7 F# C2 ?/ [3 n( ~* i& N# S. i/ |8 [1 s+ _7 Q- w' |
same choices with u , but want to add some comments % ]# J: }0 o$ l  W
5 m3 c0 l) _6 ^$ O
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
# x1 P% X4 }9 s) [4 [# R6 o# l, V$ O1 @) d( @
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
, d' r& R' Y6 g5 f
* r5 B4 l7 r" X' T# n' eF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ; [$ h; Y* F- ^& M
3 c4 v; u$ I, \$ k+ O" `/ v/ L
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......8 M' `' l% i: v: O* k/ y! S- v+ S* L

/ L8 o% g' O" V' K: |  ?5 P9 O[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
6 r5 [. g5 d% I$ |; aM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
- u# L  ~  u, mL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點: D6 E/ B5 g6 ~$ H) V% p+ i5 a
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
; A+ _4 c" u5 R0 `5 o: s9 l3 h8 a9 |1 P3 W7 j# ?
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....
- m; R! w6 J2 Y4 H$ U7 j) B5 h有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
, n3 o' ~) Q' Q% ?) R- G由最好開始排起既話，" N& @0 `, s- T/ l: j( Q$ o
L B M F S 啦，
* M8 c. M0 f+ m# @' w! A" @
! [  a( W" g/ G5 ?其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
& q5 q& N- j9 k4 t9 `3 U1 Z但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？, B# d/ P/ K+ }% m) m; J* [# x
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？: v6 r, e# @, Q* Y% j$ l. g6 t- y
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。; M2 }3 [/ l0 |' j# b  g# q
( @0 j/ y" t4 I# l
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，) j3 J7 d8 ^) q9 _8 H$ i# v7 m
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
8 h/ c9 ?# K" X0 @明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。8 q4 O1 N/ ]" C" N
9 j; E* _' s5 z0 A
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
9 S( C( Q) p! c! l/ K: T M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
8 M% `' v2 d, D2 W& o0 t6 s1 g亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，! ~* E* t3 o! K6 C0 s
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
1 h+ y  I; J9 c. H M 都可算壞了。
  Y2 P1 [4 z" D
) `% A/ X: j2 V- G+ X, M* ?9 f F 呢個人仲掂，" ^; ?6 p* p2 T; f0 B
知道既唔等於要講，; D0 M7 \3 F: Q+ Y
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，0 r: v& P! W9 x8 c
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。4 N' J( f8 U8 @' D4 Y6 P

$ v" l8 W8 a- {0 n最衰個個緊係 S 啦，/ c# j( g$ ]- Z9 o" ^
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。& U" c0 B5 h$ F* u9 e  V/ L: E

5 i7 L! @% }. ]! v5 m+ H' Q8 t
, o% Y9 O0 C. p7 _& L9 s
; g6 R8 s7 X/ I! ~# S: |題外話：- ~& T9 U8 {" r4 d8 u
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，/ j9 l+ `: J8 x$ h! K! C1 n2 U; n
睇到 S 呢條友，  {% T+ }( j( Z1 P% B7 T
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
* V* h2 ?& W2 h; ^1 y( ~- t7 y9 F
0 O7 H* N. A. _+ s2 @S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
: a6 E- p2 O1 h" U& XF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
: K* A# Y1 m0 T0 |/ a2 vM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她, e% X$ O9 ?9 G0 J# i( [
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
' \. X+ Y4 @4 x. a" x9 NL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...