Rika

由最好排到最壞0 e$ W9 ?) A" W( @+ n" Z3 a) |1 [2 }
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
8 o; t8 B' ~! U3 X4 uB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
$ {0 o  f; E# A& u$ FS, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
4 w, g, T; O" w- OM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure; _7 M0 e$ p/ G3 i) i% x
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:7 n6 @. h7 Y# G% b3 g2 N
. S$ P. o; m6 }; H$ d
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人9 S1 V6 }* K: E, i( D3 e; b

  @  I& w+ j/ \S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
1 b1 Y3 N6 k- R: v6 E' ]9 N; e5 @4 N     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
$ A. z' U3 e: J% t8 K8 M4 O" E4 Y# Y# @- \! n) N! ?5 @
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做6 m' E2 H' j' |$ K6 u  c! S

) A, R" {# V, x3 w$ j& x, {9 cL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志4 n( f9 W9 C: t5 K" g

$ O1 m4 n; Q( y! _/ @. aF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
8 U$ T5 f& h5 s7 t& r" [# W) H7 r6 o     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好6 ^. d. T( @  {- X/ z
. k, R8 V5 ~0 V; O3 G
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案4 N% q# T% `3 q# I# V
而家答多次
' _* y. D0 i* Wf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
6 g# s/ D5 h" ]$ N" V- ^+ ol: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架3 f! y- @7 b3 {( u2 L; F4 ^
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢( o2 U3 ^2 K# s/ x, |4 {! Y+ D
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
; j9 c! x, f! e9 Y- B6 m! Q; {m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S: F9 i$ O2 t' c' L9 U$ L
1 d! s* s4 |- k
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大3 u1 n# b  i! Y0 ~( k* H5 G8 O% n
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
3 U" Q5 B8 J% ^9 _M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒' F: X0 k8 ~) k! [& {
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
0 K2 p+ Z7 Q* ~5 UB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞3 s( V7 Z* S6 i2 }6 l% ]3 B
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
1 I+ x" {+ k* q* }8 xS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
. @* W# C; I5 O) }M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法6 l  ?0 M$ m5 I0 h- c7 [
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
/ Y: x* h( K3 Q; hB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情
# \+ p1 _4 q3 E- R6 E5 ^0 s  Q
# W5 R5 r6 ~' a; a' [- Q世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:) z) }! G- e+ n9 k
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己% M% P0 I2 h4 i# F. U# b5 C
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘/ {: b6 x" P/ P  y
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件  [4 }( _" U7 m- ~8 v6 D. f
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
9 F' W4 P4 H% R8 Y* N. \" }M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

; ~& |4 k" H3 ]
/ Z& g; w2 y' R. j
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
9 S* t; n  d; s2 H9 v$ A" n+ F- }! ?* B, q
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
, e$ j4 g, W' _2 e+ ?- K5 f
# A4 c. B. H$ g  a* P' VS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
+ N9 x/ `0 N9 n# ^% ?6 Y7 i" r- k  }+ d6 h
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 4 \2 y4 x! U& v: G( J/ f
' b% V* A: k( I/ z
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......* K% T, _; p5 ^, h& b1 y
9 w9 D( Y9 J8 z. N2 G9 V/ u" e5 W
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge5 p3 Z+ ^4 \7 S! m* G
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢0 i/ g& K. {/ K9 S  P; K$ C0 A
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
7 M; V' |8 Y; PF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
% z) K, _$ {8 z5 h- D- F8 U9 C3 a% z) Y" _
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....- J, u5 T. C' S) c6 G0 [4 f
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，7 [- M5 {6 {( s+ [6 @  P
由最好開始排起既話，$ e( H. [8 z  \
L B M F S 啦，
5 E- ^0 X! q" [1 a+ |9 N7 B/ m4 J) x7 a1 M4 g8 z5 A
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，/ K/ S  k& d/ f
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
% i8 t) A6 k3 C, U  B如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？( G; G3 p9 n+ m5 v
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
) m4 {& i0 S4 o
8 a+ h' _* D, n5 q7 r: e; l而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，# J8 g3 z: k5 R+ X( v8 K9 p1 j
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，$ t8 y4 D+ P* k
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
, h/ n: G& B) [( k
1 ^2 D+ |2 ^, Y5 n/ W而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
5 u- r7 x5 {! } M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
  a8 v& {- ^. c: P亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
1 B/ ?$ P/ N* I2 k/ t知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
9 _6 ~; h% {% {7 K M 都可算壞了。
( @0 C+ A3 O. X- _( a3 E( n% u, [+ @8 V9 v1 w7 I2 v" w
F 呢個人仲掂，, f6 N' `, L/ L" `
知道既唔等於要講，
; M0 T% }+ S  x1 h4 B6 s7 J* _如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
3 K; `' w2 B# Y8 f我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。# n+ {* r& `# D) ]; K

1 K9 x2 I* o1 g. z* n; W最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
0 z; ?2 o0 _7 }: J6 W/ r始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。; P. q9 Z5 m/ ]( m6 U5 }
9 D: h" Z/ z& z: Z) d7 z
" W& ]  o, E6 n& J7 Z
" B5 Q$ D. N! ~( p) R& A
題外話：
9 k% n+ T- a( F; z6 U唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，6 N- v" ~6 m4 Z% S3 U( o7 M
睇到 S 呢條友，
$ h2 G5 y  R, I1 c/ r我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L( }0 j( X8 o. x% @0 I
( k2 c; G* V( _% i$ ]
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!# `3 \  l0 i% x; ]( W
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
: C: D# ^1 j2 e+ ^3 V! {M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她7 }6 T2 k, c9 ^8 R7 O. ]0 X/ y6 G
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
% R! x: l: }2 Y0 jL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...