Rika

由最好排到最壞" h3 R% H& q2 h/ `9 v
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong3 _8 W" g" l6 @3 S" c9 a1 @! ]
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount
$ u; m: v+ N+ f! ~S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her9 [) n+ S# {/ ~, T5 n5 E. f- t
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure( Q1 X7 ?  e$ ~. x& q: ~7 i
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
: P. Q% ]; |' Q# N( i5 V/ l, H
, W' h- D2 n/ O0 f" NM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人: C7 p7 ^# @8 v, d

3 _* m) V% W0 z2 l( N: {S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
8 N3 k2 r6 d' l& ~/ f9 |     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!7 I( s! y- [5 P! k; }5 F
# p( @4 u5 d! b
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做- l8 ~1 ]  a6 w

# j& q! Y1 h4 M0 AL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志; ]  V( l! _, R9 q  p: t+ G

+ A' }! o! z. q& ^0 QF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
1 ^7 H# D2 P# B  ^4 H9 X     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
6 t, q' \8 l+ P+ J7 N+ s  ~4 w1 a6 y) l# O5 l+ c
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
: i% r' X2 M* x6 s0 _/ W而家答多次; A9 P, a0 p( @  r/ r4 Q$ \+ H
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
% H5 J3 ^) [+ q: f3 a6 v( o) Z( zl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
! ]' d3 N$ v% l4 w, _4 Yb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢1 G" d) O% r& V
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 w* T  S! T! J& zm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S( D% M; p& u8 Z; x+ g
' R& m' h" g8 I: Q( Q, ?
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大& Z' t3 E5 {  z
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度  s: X& Y- Z  j& P
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒& z4 R& }, L) b
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
1 S, a1 I5 T& eB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞6 c7 G8 r( G0 d$ U/ H- |" R
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
+ _/ L: z/ p  W3 VS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
- \% w8 C$ X( S* _5 q& j% aM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法- ]0 \$ ~+ ~% `. e: c. Z
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
/ w7 A9 ]0 L1 M" oB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情, f' K- |5 k4 C% y- Y+ h

  b* j+ k& W# j' k世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:# t0 N. y# E7 S
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己+ y3 l2 h3 J: d
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘- F6 S0 W" X% x3 q
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
( [% ^& \' ]7 W# J' x) n. |5 W# |F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方& O! Y9 i# C! Q; ?5 F
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* I. G: I# I0 {; \3 _6 e1 k0 W/ Q+ y- A
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
& l; J0 I6 d9 X5 ~0 `: L9 [4 c0 R  m3 Q3 W* ?& F! |1 Z& n
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  * T+ ?' e# c: G6 c$ k0 B
# s) b/ F' w8 H% G
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
) l( o* T2 t7 t7 k' v' g' ~  j; y! Z) D
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ! R1 r3 p$ _# F5 ]. R9 a( x

% \- B6 p# o! X' _" F. @$ vM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
  ~7 M, K8 ^0 `# B' [7 ]5 t  y4 O% z6 @2 ~4 Z
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge5 ^4 ^4 W5 ^  Y+ K0 |; i
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
/ d- o4 H, B* ?0 J' w4 mL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點  @/ F; r# T$ I$ Z% N% `1 ~- ~& I
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma) N; e6 D" F1 b- v
% S* K+ v. Y7 s0 j# |
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....7 \' _2 e2 f5 l
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，' U# x; ~$ x, k' |: y( X# |( V$ m
由最好開始排起既話，
* Z; {1 j: q/ H) [+ ]" l6 ~L B M F S 啦，8 J) m8 c; G7 {* i, B& ~! Z2 d

* I6 f8 y. W+ g! L其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，
: o6 u9 t# D1 f# |; d但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
! k3 }7 L2 ]- _' J# J( Q如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？" p" |: ]# M3 n. Y9 a
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。$ H) B. K- h: n+ S  d8 }& I
* N9 x! `* b1 G/ R7 M4 p# i
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，! A% [5 ]# X  }  f& R
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，" A" G8 V$ T1 w" b/ w* U. t' ^
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
1 z. I0 s( W5 F- K) K
% G# K$ y; s0 m' S/ L4 j& o而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，7 I  D# i% \. L7 Q/ _% l4 B+ d8 o
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，' \( @# t$ Y) W! f' h, z
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，+ k" M) j: K4 u3 b" g" v7 O
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
  E. ^' Z. F6 E' s M 都可算壞了。- K" ^! t2 G/ L/ L; m
; b- y- H" J: ~( l  y" e
F 呢個人仲掂，0 W" R9 N9 c) L0 p$ z
知道既唔等於要講，, Y& x' `# ^- x  d3 E- P4 j4 i
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
9 c1 O4 F! v0 y我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。7 J* m; v9 {3 T* K
9 F* m1 A  P* m$ P0 `
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，7 v$ x8 c, E& S& E
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
& _6 p* X* J; q9 b5 `, v6 K/ W# v' Z/ H% M+ a. e% \4 G6 r$ f

0 a7 Z% e* `$ @4 ]4 A2 E5 R5 O' Z/ d
題外話：: V9 U7 Q$ {/ y% R& N7 ]) s3 P
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
! f5 W% o( L" b睇到 S 呢條友，
1 G3 W& p' {8 Y0 |( u7 [3 F我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L: j* P4 [* d5 x6 [' V' o: m7 \% w3 {' Z, }
& S4 \2 |; B7 {% X
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!2 {3 Q) p/ v; H6 e2 g, |4 q- \/ ]% H
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係! _% K" r2 P+ q4 f
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她2 q. K6 k/ M8 g0 ]' I- i
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
  _2 e2 M3 l: F# d9 ^2 t6 [L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...