Rika

由最好排到最壞
& v4 u* v4 S' C5 gF, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
7 J( X6 ?4 @+ ]# v/ d/ F+ w9 AB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount7 I: `5 ^; u, h1 i  l
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
2 ~. S' b  b& u& `: B, g5 xM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure, y' {. l3 r, ^" M
L, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:
# N& h& e" p* |( h
" P: [  ]8 P* w) |, ?, BM - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人0 ~! `8 T) I& d+ s; r: x
+ A. y' [& w# J
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)3 }9 m7 t5 ^! P0 z4 B$ `+ ^9 r
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
1 {; x9 Q3 J4 Q6 j/ Y+ I
# O- b- t. U; B2 lB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做6 [# [6 L  F1 W7 V$ t( m3 s

0 ?, ~8 i4 ^7 R9 ?5 nL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志0 p7 S; A' l/ R
$ Y4 I5 ^; u; H( J; R' f
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,% S& C! j, d0 s9 D! Z: s
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
. O: s, p$ A( F/ l  \% W( i. n# [" ?0 t
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
" o/ Z& x0 q$ m" A/ J6 J而家答多次: K! H* \/ x( b% [0 F
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
! I% G/ j0 Z( e% pl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
1 {# r# `5 d9 l0 U! ?$ Yb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢/ i* Q7 f- S6 ]4 c
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.$ n* v" y) e! r, H! I+ ]
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S3 j  f, u: p$ C9 h1 ]( a

: j( k7 }3 @0 o# r5 yL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大7 Y1 q" r) r$ A+ M( |1 Y, J; D
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
* D* a; \: n! [8 nM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
- M- a2 X/ b1 uS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
, r- C# L6 r& B9 i. `B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞+ L8 b9 t7 r" ]) B$ ~  M
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"+ |1 L7 Q; m. B2 w% Z
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取4 ?" \5 p5 M: O4 a! R
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法- [! m; m' @8 y4 n& N; Q
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果) _% A. `$ N# S* ~
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情- f2 W4 s& o' e$ I7 @; `. p

) v, K. c2 F5 e7 A4 i0 R世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
" a  B6 p7 C9 z2 Z" jL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己7 }. B7 [/ O  T/ `" d5 @' ^
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘' G$ r! ?# C+ O4 a4 L6 V* ~5 k
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件# s4 Y! l6 M7 t/ S/ }' |
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方% ~3 p8 G/ X  R, V, P4 Z( f
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

0 ^9 w7 d8 f! H) S/ U# c/ P) B5 E, M
& K; H0 K4 e8 o$ _' G- ~( h9 y6 I' t same choices with u , but want to add some comments
. v1 d4 G8 @( U) y. O
) [. A( h) ]* B2 gB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
- t) h8 ~/ {& R; ?8 E' c2 q) ?/ ]+ Q  x' O  z
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
$ A6 P# K' K" l. Z: o* I2 s# u7 q
F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 4 P8 \, k; r: }# b. U- b
) p' A+ y' L5 j- ?
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
# C5 h7 t0 F1 L  W8 u: i5 U8 _8 H' f- J! ^
! S; X9 D- q7 `* T8 l! V[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge3 P. a8 y2 d% y- Z# p' a
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢4 O$ s5 p" h. T3 J' s* H) X7 _
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點0 V) N: ~2 i; i, L
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
4 m* L( g* Y2 o7 }' ^4 W6 g7 `6 Q5 ?- h) w
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....3 z8 L. N9 q' s1 [- f
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，" j9 m4 {! k% G7 `# l  g; Y( P
由最好開始排起既話，
1 v  O# R" |  d" t9 y0 ?; _3 |9 B; LL B M F S 啦，; L; Y, U4 F" }
3 _' d0 a8 B% u. Q
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，- R$ U4 }4 ]) G" U9 o! L9 o7 M
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？2 B! W( N7 e1 e1 ]) v
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？5 k1 R' C; t  q! T
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。" X* O! y: ^' n2 y

! [4 U( @( P. m5 [) y& ~. F而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
" X% [6 ~3 u- B  [& k" ]所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，9 D! Y) _8 B( n' H
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。4 \( f* g% U( k; B8 j

4 E$ r" @& Q9 `  C) s* u而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，5 g/ _) i4 v  h$ S" p# I
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
+ n( P: n+ b, o* q0 |+ B亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
3 r. [- M6 M/ w) ]. T! U知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
: c* E, Y% f, y' Z6 |* d0 [ M 都可算壞了。9 R  r/ U- d* R% e$ O/ w
7 ]' o0 V: U" Q+ ^: T! \1 Q4 b7 N
F 呢個人仲掂，: `' S- c8 v+ i2 g
知道既唔等於要講，$ [* @& }' H4 M9 ~  j4 P. H
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，
$ z# ?; c% c$ Y我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。1 h6 b  [* V1 z" Z" N2 z

7 w' I5 \, p/ W) U, i+ o7 h最衰個個緊係 S 啦，4 q0 {( I9 i( ?4 g9 o
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。) [3 Y8 |& ?  A
2 o, d- c: c" X# ]/ x: e( q4 R6 X% E
  R1 j5 h* f* @& g- r0 y' f

8 `4 [, S& t7 C8 v. S. ]) A# n# i題外話：
4 m5 q$ Q3 ?) f$ L" T8 L$ M$ i9 j唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
: v1 j7 ^+ a' }/ @% Q0 @5 Q$ g睇到 S 呢條友，
$ t& B/ h6 T" m5 R我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
' g5 H2 @  A( W% K, t' P; Z% Q6 i6 q8 G3 q! a4 l
S: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!% r  A5 I( ^$ V* j( R6 z
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係9 h4 S1 M8 w3 d; j% g; ~
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她; e( b% h- d1 i3 t0 W$ u% [
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害( ?& w; H# h+ a8 Q
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...