Rika

由最好排到最壞
" {8 o9 i6 Y! g1 }F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong8 @( ~. k" J2 T  x+ g8 I' y7 m
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount7 L& V$ c1 m+ J' [7 W
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her6 P. S% X5 P" g+ {5 K$ B6 }3 @
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
  ^2 c1 b$ `; IL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:! T" i5 d; K2 M% L$ O3 m

+ A+ u2 r+ I3 X& o2 `M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人" |% O4 K. @( U+ C& w  w

( Q( ]8 c* m9 M, B4 ^$ {' ~/ CS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)8 k& M1 v; P1 u+ l
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!1 u: b) S2 o' q( w* O
( T) S: a  S0 U' S
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
- N+ r; O6 }  |, O$ F! c
, W# F$ D, `0 i" l) UL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志8 x0 _0 w, X! {) [$ c( b& a
1 s& `& }* ?$ o0 [- `7 N0 M
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,4 V. |8 E7 h% t" K+ |
     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
0 ?; w& L! Y9 E, J8 y# L( _$ T+ u* D+ t
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案; }! k9 u, ?' Y7 t: H2 `5 Z3 {, I$ s
而家答多次4 [) R0 ?3 d' Y0 [
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
% |% ~$ l3 R5 E2 C, F  rl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
! X3 T( L+ U* s, Q3 r; `b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
4 R# ]3 w: ^- @& Ss: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願./ T0 x  M! l0 N0 e3 b2 Q
m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S, Q: _! U7 L8 i( M: P. }
( R0 j2 Q9 X! b; t
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
+ Y$ J/ [4 b, ^# K; m. WF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度4 c3 h8 B& t' T$ J/ m* B3 a6 h
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
5 k. E+ e) i' b: c. Z# \) V9 hS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
6 t6 C2 |, d/ f+ w) x1 pB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞2 k2 T  U* v3 @# i+ f
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
! @+ o0 F, E+ F6 e: t7 c9 K( T/ ], U: DS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取! n3 [1 _+ X, A1 o( ]$ B4 E5 y( j
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
# p: E+ t; v0 X' R2 p! o) r0 H2 A0 |L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果: d' f  {. _; p. m9 n% N1 j
B: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情( R0 ~) Q' S) _/ ]  X* y
( ?! e1 D  v1 v4 |$ ~
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:$ g  x: |3 b5 a2 h# J9 ]+ \1 ]/ [* {
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己% U  m8 v! z$ s  E! B
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
% O4 h. V& h2 x" {6 zS = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件  N2 x  N7 a& j2 f
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方) P  v. @3 E& i5 Q: u
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

$ H; Z" R: D: Y" ]: A1 o- [: s% W6 c( J8 Z3 G2 V5 K
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
  ~0 ^& e/ b' l% G( h+ q$ }( i+ t( j) N3 P( ?
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  2 @8 j7 E3 t3 U& s+ \7 }

4 I0 ~9 a, {$ e, }+ TS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )+ p6 t4 f7 X) v' Y+ C/ l$ D0 x) Y$ ^6 V

7 Q1 Y5 m; m$ `' N, Y* Q# c( a# T8 OF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ! {' o: d# a2 Y3 O+ i7 A& h

: T7 W( b5 h7 _5 g7 R4 x. @7 {8 zM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......! F' R7 W& k/ ~3 v

0 o& C7 f# U% C9 |[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
1 }; }7 l2 r5 M5 A5 M* GM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
! R. M; _" c0 I* z- Z" K% `L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點5 }8 S6 G. b1 f! n) a  |% G
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma; {/ S3 b/ A) y; H

- W& k3 C+ V6 o% ]最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....; h/ Z7 s- A2 p
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，5 l, m4 y/ |# I: [  k
由最好開始排起既話，5 ^7 M5 C8 T# E- X! u$ p/ \7 `
L B M F S 啦，, }' ]4 z0 `8 V5 a* g$ k
& m" y+ D3 ~9 J$ ~. @3 b( U
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，6 i. X  D6 }) S3 u7 |
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？: B! ]/ Y) P( q$ r8 E8 O7 Z' ~: P8 M
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
- q( T& n$ P5 q. O又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
3 S* G6 _# L- s' ~  L3 l5 t
; m3 L  h  v, I! w5 i! N# M而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
5 I; d5 \( |* z& m所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
6 v6 h8 N! e9 }9 `' j! ]$ R/ o明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
0 ^  r/ h, {7 L* \+ g8 q- T- K' B$ w0 o" H* i& I
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，) F6 b: E( q" r
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，! ~6 E: ?( b2 z3 p
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，# {3 f) h8 P8 u/ j3 O
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
# y' v' v6 D5 W7 ^" K/ ?+ j M 都可算壞了。
+ m, s4 N9 q' [  }
* X8 e! J1 _3 j- T, n F 呢個人仲掂，
+ D2 Z! `- _  F! P, {" a. l知道既唔等於要講，) f8 D5 e- O% B' @6 f& t3 c0 |, Q/ B
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，% d4 W8 ?  x2 F+ y  o1 O
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
% R1 \5 W/ @: f. c  Q; Q( m3 \
+ z8 ~# a) I0 O& C9 t最衰個個緊係 S 啦，5 e, @/ B" z3 V
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。0 T# s( v5 C, a$ v( J5 g1 W

; \5 c, L, W! m% T0 ]4 K. @& |$ C0 Q$ y. ?% U0 ?+ O0 t

$ u* A2 Z4 `: @4 M# q! Q1 q0 i# B% s題外話：
5 j- c: E0 M8 L唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，$ `8 A. i) q0 Q8 p$ X
睇到 S 呢條友，! \" N- ^, V$ ^+ |
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L8 V4 [- v+ _9 @( ]7 Z! @0 U! D

) p5 m7 ~  f9 D' ~8 GS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!! B$ H, z& F% }  ~) x
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
+ e0 y( H# I8 T- K( CM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
1 |% M8 }4 b+ @! j9 ]* aB: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害7 u% T* p6 c$ C$ Y+ E3 w
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...