Rika

由最好排到最壞) d3 v- l8 u, s+ ?' D( i0 g
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
, I! }: `- y5 Q  j1 o6 ]. g/ }B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount2 I/ `; C( W* B* P
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
3 G/ G1 ^- J4 y) a3 X. H9 @3 xM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
0 a# [0 d0 w  gL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:2 j. |- L1 {9 V/ L8 o7 K
0 S, p9 o. V8 a8 S: K7 g
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人( [" v/ x' E3 T+ X' x7 C$ d0 m

# N' F$ q' T# i- C; u3 Y3 N. {5 W3 G' ^S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)# |7 l0 l3 n5 Y5 |+ g& H" y& i) A
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!* w* ?9 i+ L' ]. i4 ?# @
' T* `/ Y7 `9 t& s* Z! d8 b
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
) r# ~* a7 p4 G% |( F0 ~
0 s6 K4 e' z2 X# V5 kL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志! y8 x/ K/ [# x- m& b
  {9 D  c) o1 u" C
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
, \- @* c; f+ n0 d' @; Y. S- r5 P; l3 t     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
4 v% [- J& M1 o. ^! r" `2 g2 C$ h6 D* S
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
3 ^# `; ?5 |' r- @而家答多次' i% n/ O& @3 v: j1 g/ F% `: o& f
f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽' p% P% `: c: l, c' ]6 l& i% J
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架4 W, Y' O, k, }' C
b: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
' V' x) d3 P- i- u. G. Ns: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
7 H' }; n4 y6 ?7 p2 t$ w: W) Om: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S  O+ h+ ?' t" l$ ^: J

8 |8 Y. V+ v& e8 PL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大3 N/ d" g# \5 L! n) m
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
+ f5 F6 e& ?7 c) w# a1 ^: ^  B% zM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
5 D$ K4 S7 E: JS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
+ m& o! m; W5 n9 d! S( FB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞0 v, S& T9 E2 M: h* [8 Y$ d% V
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"& \' m3 M# L& ^
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取% B0 K* k0 u$ H0 M+ H$ D
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法7 w* V# \* J8 Z, N& v
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
5 F# q6 ~: M" v- c( A4 iB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情' ?( c+ _9 ~& i

% q# G* O7 k& }2 L* s6 Y世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
: `' q3 H- g, X( k$ y3 [* ]L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己! @: |: y0 a; _4 q# E7 {4 b
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘$ K$ M) z( A( s+ P! H! K( n- H% ^
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件9 ?2 J) S* V: u2 b, [
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方, c  C2 V: S; U3 j! |; P
M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

* L0 u4 P2 O! ]2 q2 ?- f. P- ~  g) ]
same choices with u , but want to add some comments
) Y& Z4 |4 [6 S3 \2 s4 t6 I# B$ Y
3 `' \$ S0 l# y9 ^  k; ]$ WB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  
  P0 x2 {/ u8 G- T, h6 C  d" ]! h% _+ g! T) E( v0 A! O* e9 h
S : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )
1 F! D2 S! L8 A+ m" w# a3 S, ?6 k
* m: [- q' @, i  z. R* ?F : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome ) V, H9 k. `, [+ {8 D
8 c6 T& d6 J  H0 ~4 A( z
M : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......; S, B3 C. L* N* L. X0 i

0 U* D, |$ g) ~' a+ o/ N[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge' i+ o9 ^/ _/ G3 C8 R2 |
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢2 Z( E2 C7 C6 o; g$ V! R/ c
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點) t5 G" _( g4 o7 P3 ~) ?
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma5 r/ V, C8 ~6 W) D
  L- S7 K# }( {: c
最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....+ R6 |4 n. y5 B. P7 w
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
, a9 ~$ f/ Q  ?由最好開始排起既話，
& G& \( |% m6 I$ x; u- h* r( YL B M F S 啦，2 l8 z; j8 m5 f* g
. O4 n6 I" _* G* a6 Y& R: t
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，$ r* E4 S: V+ J# w+ G+ J3 |& v
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？" }6 e- s; n7 Q$ M3 i5 T
如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
1 P. Y* H* A  a1 O9 D7 A又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。
, j( i! u6 s+ G9 o
( q% G& g$ W. c5 e  I1 e: P而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，# A. G4 C5 y( H+ P
所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
' c4 m. ?5 K4 b) L' @6 J明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
# \* D% H! p) v/ ]6 {
0 K6 e/ @% d  P2 ~/ `2 D' z而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，1 m6 l6 Q5 H. f1 a2 `6 F, j3 q
M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，! U2 x) D/ j9 U6 h' m& {$ o" t* T0 L5 X
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
! _+ @1 D* B/ _# U& l: l2 \% |知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
, _9 M' F, ^# R- o M 都可算壞了。% ?, C6 Y. j1 Z8 r0 K

! |' i8 c0 f9 {. K& G' s F 呢個人仲掂，
7 z8 U  V/ K+ d+ u知道既唔等於要講，# H! `7 A) @  O7 \2 I
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，3 a, j3 p8 n( `3 S8 e. m& ?
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
$ H' ^# H, W& S$ t* Z% w1 D  `) Z2 G5 J
最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
8 Z1 x" V' D' n. c# p9 ^' ~始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
: b3 h/ |1 y1 U/ y" @8 g" l  u2 L

1 ]& q. \) R1 S) Y- @% r
8 y  Y' r1 P3 [% {8 t- P+ t題外話：$ e! b. u. H/ w" w) [0 |- t8 A) z
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
: h, x; [. o: e% |睇到 S 呢條友，
  @  I9 R) j+ ]- v" d' {我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
" B: ]7 D' T- C: W- T# ^* ]
! m1 A5 [  E0 e7 G$ V6 v& tS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
: M* V3 J- k6 d0 vF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係8 U! h$ |2 l8 c8 d
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她( h3 ^4 l( T6 _9 U- N+ o8 ?
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害& k; u. P3 r1 N
L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...