Rika

由最好排到最壞
  ^; `; c/ c- f: M. v, ^F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong2 a: G% s! {7 d! r7 t
B, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount8 {  i% ~8 m: J! K0 Y2 i4 M9 x& D% g. l, G
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her: p' b+ _+ X9 K- X0 V% L
M, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
; l' U( e6 T" C( u0 tL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:3 |9 h5 }, p4 S6 R8 ?
$ P6 y' K9 a7 |3 b/ B. |
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
3 C1 h& H* J% p+ F, q& \4 P
% g+ [; n+ \1 L6 j! H! JS - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)9 O& T# u+ h: L8 n0 B' \4 J
     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!
, t' }+ E; Q3 p) w  @
9 R+ K2 W- e$ K3 y! W, lB - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
) T2 b6 }* ^/ e$ L  L; @
2 D1 \& \5 r" i5 \5 i* @& X6 m% aL - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志! T" J; w# x: I! [6 [2 v6 c" N

& m' [7 b1 l5 H2 fF - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
  R& {! o" s( b# x. u. ~     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
( q8 ]0 w- p7 V- P- J- g+ G7 N: V2 d& }% [. w5 @9 g$ V1 J: h
[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案
$ c# E3 p) a* E8 P- f而家答多次
" |* j5 y9 p, X3 ]f: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽
! K. j% _! r  g* j% t, W# fl: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
& \1 L% A; `# Q' nb: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢8 P+ W8 I) k0 B+ }$ _
s: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
" ]2 W8 K! j: t' z2 tm: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S, G- C0 ^' a2 t

7 t& E2 J. S" ?1 O5 FL為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大
3 V; `5 s3 z, y2 UF排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度, |& Z2 P9 N* x; c+ ?0 G' P
M冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒
, K1 v9 M7 d$ BS乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢
( Q6 D9 o) V  UB都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞
& j0 H, F9 k' _" ]$ m. YF: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"5 t; O( E) p9 ^5 z8 c
S: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取$ S/ x4 F0 y; F5 B/ y
M: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法3 l/ c0 T1 B: n8 r& x
L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
" H( u' Y. \( L5 E) F2 P- t1 yB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情" k) V; q* w+ P0 x' y; G  {
" X' }/ D- {  P" Y( t
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:8 L' w1 i. b8 g8 D) d2 S& H
L = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己
, S+ Q! M# L. f5 R% _B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘
8 v- o( k7 p. q! T5 L" ^S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件# f0 S! z- N) U$ O
F = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
3 M; F5 ^& Y2 Y4 q2 [M = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

, O+ a; z8 I! T- u* f# s  L1 G- {2 e- ?( V2 ~/ \, }
same choices with u , but want to add some comments 5 z/ {$ M  D# _/ f! c
1 h' |: f) `$ u7 P# _
B : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  2 A$ N& N( ^# C3 X& ~$ `

3 g  e* ]& x1 E7 l4 _' hS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )0 k; A# }2 n- E

+ W) _* u/ C' }1 N& rF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome 5 _$ D/ L# P$ U6 Y  K+ c" R" t

: m, L: g3 \1 \# K0 h  `: IM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
! I/ h& {$ ^3 L' _. z1 k9 S3 }  Z  [
8 f  F5 j) h8 f) ?, }# r[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge: a* B1 z$ g$ f7 @: s9 c5 D
M, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢7 V8 X# I& K9 F
L, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點9 B: B* N$ f0 ]1 W+ m& `) e$ K- e
F, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma
6 f# m* N3 c! W$ |1 W; m
- e/ W. f5 _3 T8 t最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....! s$ `$ X/ T. u
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
! a5 E4 y2 c/ S1 n3 b% m由最好開始排起既話，# ?7 P! `* V9 F7 _9 T5 e
L B M F S 啦，
0 o. j* g: v# ^: G* Y) S& R  c+ u+ Z% G  q
其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，" z1 b$ H5 d$ H2 I( a5 q
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
6 I  i* l# H) A/ a如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？
/ I: q5 v) T, q又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。4 D0 V4 n/ l* u; l" \
, Y$ O( Y; t& X( B: j0 V- D# }
而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
6 X0 t  |6 [9 w! q+ E所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，  l/ b6 g4 T- j0 x( f2 C! R. a
明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。
7 {; }: D8 m% |: H1 A; F' p$ q
% h: |( M5 i8 N2 m/ m5 m$ G而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
5 S* `  @: ~* _7 n+ L M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，
5 O8 h$ h! D8 e: `$ g亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，
; V& b: f. b/ m; u% }* l; ]知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，2 m, y# n- [3 Z% u4 N1 B# c6 u
M 都可算壞了。
9 I' R9 a% f0 ~, o" g3 r
! P0 c: I* c: I1 `, T0 K/ ` F 呢個人仲掂，# b6 y6 w& M6 l/ x! R- k  j
知道既唔等於要講，, Z% V5 M  W: [8 k, u, \
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，8 K) t" M9 k9 Q2 ?2 t+ L+ b
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。! b( F  {: l& D' t& v

# G# ^  _) H# @9 S; _最衰個個緊係 S 啦，
4 y  C) P5 O6 K. ]) I始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
' B4 |) a+ t' R" s+ G% O& p( z7 h9 {( u& |

5 D0 g) C0 N6 @  [' \4 r# R7 g" A+ u, N+ o$ K& n
題外話：3 Q- F. z$ E( Z$ s
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
( f. U/ i$ a3 z! t睇到 S 呢條友，$ _  w+ W( U4 }' @+ }% h( ^5 H
我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L
" |  ]& H+ B/ v5 y/ n
- G: L3 Y& h0 C  I3 B' q4 GS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!
1 T, N" M) B! G  p* ^6 m1 PF: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係
* f$ _3 ~; \3 }+ X! Y6 m1 qM: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她4 p% o8 v$ L; X" e  k
B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
# d" K  K$ Y! g! e! Q1 q; VL: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...