Rika

由最好排到最壞0 J/ N  _; x1 H- f7 a
F, He/She told a friend the turth. Nothing wrong
$ t$ j; b; R7 O; zB, He is just a business man, he works for money. He doesn't have the responsibility to help L or give her discount+ n, B2 @/ d$ w4 u+ h# ?* Y
S, He just pay for what he wants, he just gives offer. He doesn't force her
7 |0 C* t' ]2 |  s; S& kM, He cannot accept L had sex with other men. This is alright. he hurts too. But he should think about why L had sex. The purpose was pure
4 D. C2 p6 L" d" q) AL, I think there must other way she can find to earn $20 for the transportation fee. She is pure but a bit stupid

左輪仔

最高就代表我最唔LIKE既人物:/ X& x' r0 y3 A0 I- ?4 g7 R
2 Q; P5 Q# h" r. k/ t& e
M - 點解佢唔搵條女先,要條女陪人一夜再過河搵佢,自己唔要錢過去,枉係男人
* r1 _& c2 H. D6 U3 S/ D2 I$ G0 G* K+ s; Z4 n
S - 我最唔鍾意呢D男人,呃女人一夜,仲要0趙完唱喎,(唔係F點會知呢件事)
# L8 q% H' w9 z. U  l3 a7 Y9 S     比我一定唔會做,正禽獸!!!/ z9 z: q5 u& c# L7 f
+ i' |4 ^4 R8 N; F3 C* Q" }8 |
B - 呢D冇良船主,知道左件事就坐地起價,為左錢咩都咁做
/ I# a. ?# G, @+ u( G% j3 s+ v/ C" k% ?% Z
L - 雖然佢咁做係為左同個男既一齊,但係為左咁而出賣色相,唔理志
6 w' r5 `" W2 P3 M0 a  |. z  @7 i7 C' T
F - 佢忠於朋友係一件好事,但有時D野,都要睇下環境可唔可以講嫁,
6 e7 v/ @7 X( Q4 H9 u) d     正所謂"寧教人打仔,莫教人比妻"嘛,績下口得好
2 _/ }6 T# ]& l: x" J
4 p* H6 r4 H5 z- L5 b[ Last edited by 左輪仔 on 2005-4-25 at 01:17 AM ]

代仔

我以前都好似睇過.但唔記得個答案4 h' E/ l  [3 u$ W3 l6 _' y
而家答多次
6 W; f) F# Z" m% M2 D& p7 [: m. `) Jf: 因為佢只係張佢所知既事講比朋友聽# {$ f1 y& _1 A. }9 x
l: 為左見佢既既愛人, 肯跟一個唔識既人一齊過夜, 不過我唔讚成咁做架
6 F7 Q& @# ^# j$ k6 ub: 坐地起價.明知人地無錢
/ g+ Y4 ]# w. ]1 Ws: 衰人一個, 明知人地等錢洗. 雖然係你情我願.
( o0 v6 |( O* Z" m( F/ `/ f1 o; \$ ~m: 最衰既人, 條女以經唔好過架啦, 知道之後.重走人同人分手添

hk853

L>F>M>B>S' c+ d2 k4 [4 F8 y6 g$ W: r8 o* i* C
: S( J8 x, y) o" {" L( T
L為左同心愛既人一齊,甘願犧出賣自己肉體,好偉大" R7 K; i) o- Z& @& E' D3 n
F排第二因為佢同M講都係純粹為朋友,唔係有心拆散M同L,因為決定權係M度
+ H7 P& E, O, N2 D  \5 W  H* nM冇原諒L為左佢而犧牲色相,但都尚可以原諒0 e* b0 H( X$ O2 m, }
S乘人之危,最壞,明知L有心上人,都要用佢肉體換金錢2 S5 l* E# k) G5 P+ k
B都係乘人之危,但商業社會係咁,所以算比S好

JCer

最壞  F>S>M>L>B 唔壞. q" {4 v5 O" J6 v) n% N: t5 t+ m: C
F: 如果佢唔講,物事都無, 佢應該學下"善良的沉默"
: G- w2 ^" F8 }7 S! c' tS: 如果係鍾意一個人, 唔應該承人之危, 學下明正言順地去爭取
' Y: a4 [) K6 }: h4 g5 N5 p# m  BM: 不明白L的負出, 自私的想法
# U7 X: K# [- I0 u/ T% b: ^L: 太愛一個人, 愛得太傻, 無理後果
% w4 P; A# A( X9 M% w' hB: 有危險的工作, 收多D $ ,人之常情9 x" i; C; |3 U
! h# z! W1 p9 {* e
世上無絕對的正確, 也沒有絕對的錯誤

angellyz

最唔可以接受 S, then B, then M, L and last F.

tai1980

Originally posted by Asurada129 at 2005-4-24 11:24 PM:
/ d1 @4 r: h/ {( M- {) K" D5 cL = 為左自己鍾意既人寧願犠牲自己! S; H1 p5 J/ w4 D7 m
B = 一個為金錢暴利既船夫, 正常生意人都係甘# H1 R7 d( |; B! ^6 P2 |
S = 知道有人需要錢度河, 開出不道德條件
" M1 h5 c8 F* i' pF = 不理後果告知當事人, (估算係情敵)....拆散對方
% M5 K, L" \; d( H" F6 U  TM = 不知愛人為佢犠牲, 反而知道真相不理女方委屈...仲拋棄佢

# Z: s) Z  e! N7 Y5 O6 e5 _1 Z& p
! }, X7 L+ x: K9 D0 T, b6 B
same choices with u , but want to add some comments % B2 s" H( b' \9 q9 p, K1 f

1 L" w* c- L* FB : not agree with u on this comment , cos he is at the shore of the woman (有一天, 在女人的這一岸, 有個船夫), so he has no way to know that the woman is in-love with the man across the river  * G( Q+ f6 \& ?& D8 }* @

9 [" p+ [* @- }% p6 E9 eS : there is ""no-free-lunch"" in this world , if u want something then u have to give-up something so this is a legal transaction ( the woman has the right to refuse ) ,and he is not that bad cos he fulfill their agreement in the end (  女人答應了, 她拿到錢後就由船夫載她過河 )2 [* H4 b, G, S0 w

5 f, T: u9 u' f- mF : if this guy has a brain , then he should know the outcome
4 ?2 M: m7 R' U) J5 t
1 F8 ^4 o1 H1 ^- oM : in the present-day this guy is call an asshole ( no need to explain further more ), but this story took place in the past time ( 從前有個男人和女人 ) so they should not be that open minded but it also said that they love each othe ( 非常相愛 ) , so......
8 T2 X/ e- @7 f* o6 ^& B" }0 ^; [% `( t# @1 }) q! @1 x+ x' N% s
[ Last edited by tai1980 on 2005-4-25 at 01:58 AM ]

waterfire

大概可以講....錯ge
3 B& A: j5 g: G$ Y! f- S  N( eM, L 都係為左想見佢, 而犧牲左自己ge 肉體, M點解唔可以體諒下佢
3 K4 P0 d0 |1 Y1 s( R7 N( ~, hL, 為左想見M, 而唔考慮下件事如果穿左會點
( b2 s0 V3 r* E4 pF, 有時唔係樣樣野都講到咁明ga ma: w5 [& j; N$ D- [

% ^. |2 l8 |) a& v, A2 G4 X+ [; s最錯就係, 點解F 唔叫L 同佢過一晚, 就唔會講俾M 聽....: Z# q( ?+ H6 D
有女唔食, 最大惡極!!

hiroraymond

好似好有趣咁，
7 k9 J' I/ c5 F# f$ L# h: ~由最好開始排起既話，6 N& T4 H; |# `! f9 R( Q( G. W
L B M F S 啦，
2 M- t5 h4 X4 e& b: }
9 n8 v7 J6 E' ~1 A, B& K( W9 C其實不少人都會話肯為自己鐘意既人就算要埋自己條命都得，2 ^5 Z' E2 }4 d* a. L
但當真係需要既時候，又有幾多個會呢？
3 q$ d% Y$ L% F如果覺得自己真係做得到既，又點會唔明 L 有幾鐘意 M 呢？1 \, l. L2 D5 d  k
又點會唔諒解 L 會咁樣做呢。/ Z& b7 V2 `6 o  q  I

6 P  p% I+ v4 O) z$ W( v而 B 都只不過係做生意，同 L 做個交易，
' y3 s6 r; _$ n( P8 o0 O所謂現實世界中既商人 ( 傷人 )，
' H* y1 W; |$ Q1 O. l明知你咁想過去緊係開高價啦。+ o% F/ `7 Z& o
: C; i: R9 e+ f1 k
而由第三個開始我就覺得係壞，
$ r3 ?; P+ y7 E1 {( z7 j. f, C8 F M 唔能夠體諒到 L 背叛佢既原因，. ]( p3 p  ^7 y8 u
亦從未為令雙方可以重逢呢件事上作出任何貢獻，2 r, [4 ?; j2 }2 L
知道一切後更即刻放棄一個甘為自己犠牲一切既人，
; K! u) Q$ P8 n0 T, X M 都可算壞了。
$ m2 g( C9 K8 j
/ X1 I; z: i0 L7 C F 呢個人仲掂，* S2 P1 v# i2 R+ N2 E
知道既唔等於要講，2 K3 k5 x1 t; `" P
如果呢件事發生係自己身上，9 C% k1 x* x2 ~6 x4 k! S. b
我諗會即刻毒啞 F 呢條友。
" z# u) B8 ~; y' i1 j1 }$ X, I/ z9 d  |
+ _8 Y1 H3 j: f/ V  Z( E1 C" p" ?+ ?+ L最衰個個緊係 S 啦，$ E. B# S' B7 S- a  l# v: \
始終都係討厭提出不道德交易的人。
' S4 {4 y2 y/ `; P! o. |! G/ n! P% k- c9 h; M
8 j: {7 P& c6 P& I0 R5 P

, N; h0 s& D4 |) s; m) o0 C* H題外話：( F3 u1 Y6 a: F9 V  K6 o! v
唔知點解睇呢個故事個陣，
8 {# H/ |5 u4 H* Y睇到 S 呢條友，
/ t. ]" D# _# m- D/ w我就即刻諗起英皇老細。

newman2005

由壞至好: S<F<M<B<L6 Y& M( g- A6 @! D

( }7 _3 p+ ?0 RS: 看中別人的弱點而作出不道德的交易去滿足自己私慾, 最賤格!, n, |) F* d8 }- c' _
F: 不顧後果爆響口, 影響L和M的關係" i. S) n! O; a! n3 G) ?3 w) s0 Z
M: 沒有理解L所作的事背後真正原因而拋棄她
& C% t8 L( ~; X) H& @B: 坐地起價想得到金錢上的利益 .... 但不是對別人造成傷害
0 Y6 K, I8 R% c( g* C0 k5 ^L: 寧願犧牲卻換來分手收場...