Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
# o9 I( x; Q; Y% {
) T+ @  i- Z4 L1 }2 W% t$ j" i
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

* G: S2 |0 @- ~7 U% h

* S$ o9 v% }1 V2 G2 N0 Y* S+ YIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:8 ?) Y- ^$ X" ?' D. P( s' t; O( F; {
" `" ]( ~6 O; b1 b$ U8 r
0 R2 q" L! b& @
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

! c6 @- B' C8 u7 p" r( `+ m
1 d# M: D, Q  y8 d' F& H
oh really...5 X3 _" c  ^, d$ }" h( ^+ D
hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
5 H8 [6 a- V+ N. `3 ~0 ni didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
; X, J- B- A# p5 b* @% u3 v9 J1 p& C
當然這是個假設性問題
1 z. r# V  u' D) }3 u但將人數倍大$ v5 M- w, A. U
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
! m/ y8 \( e( w4 n% H* `: @# \" K(情況可以換作其他)3 x/ j/ T- n9 f# j7 v: v: l
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
3 [: J  O* z) r如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
6 e( R* A! `( C# k- a# A如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
3 G! M! W: E$ u: a4 F絕情谷既問題...- I& Z7 \- K+ ]  a/ |. @3 q
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
3 A" T( \6 E7 [5 d2 z如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

6 K: u  n. }" x7 c
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
! I! H. h3 L9 i2 v3 x# M) @於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生) |/ J9 Z9 c7 P% a6 _! h
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩3 c4 L. U0 H  p
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
/ H, c. [8 o" B3 I0 {其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢9 b& ^1 i1 g8 R4 {, W
1 o6 i' \" X" C$ u% U2 o
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
# Q7 a% H/ \1 w! Q4 u5 g1 \不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:% e5 I+ b1 G. C' R# `
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

* [' w& K; j9 Z
& v6 F, n* Z$ q) q( U8 T
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
( o" l# `' @) M: H3 q6 L你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....+ f9 U# f8 l( u9 v* ?; z+ Y

6 m6 p( q$ k* o! W4 X2 }! S. Wp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
. D& r$ @% G/ N: d3 S6 Ayes, my reason is helping more+ F) d- b9 q7 V8 k# @
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!) M( F- E: B3 u- ^/ O& R
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child/ @  a& a0 c; J3 I
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
, Q- B' `( @3 H- o9 salso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
( \  e) h# Q% s. p0 x% D) W: A7 F6 amay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!( J; k2 `3 I: }; y3 K. U$ [
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
+ b# P# m: |' a  s' R! w當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~8 a# ]- L- B/ P) h
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
3 t* k. H, {" k, Q3 f# _, ]$ V正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~, ~0 u3 [5 `4 O  M# V! u: }
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~# ?8 D" H0 {  ?1 h, m- T
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~) a4 E7 G3 K! a2 [, X( p
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~. t! }( _% A7 I5 Y* O, Q4 w5 L% B
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）