Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
6 ?- t& E& H' G# Z& |
# W* V7 A' [/ ^( l* s8 X9 ^6 t# [% N8 V/ i: c3 f7 Y
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

: K) x7 ?- M9 W" P1 L/ T2 g: l# O% I# P: y$ o- {+ K
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:7 W. [$ q$ O* p6 b0 G$ m6 }' [
2 L7 k- D" D' I6 ?# G+ Q

; p) Y3 s) x# ~; `2 N1 s' zIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

. J  L& ]5 ], _
& V* `/ [* B! w/ d/ noh really...
& t: \0 z; M; j) Rhahhaa, thx a lot^^"
5 n! v8 Q9 r8 Di didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
# t1 G! f* Q' X; Q3 k' _+ L5 \* K1 l
當然這是個假設性問題
7 c" j/ V8 G% l" [) _( ?; s" M6 p但將人數倍大! B5 }! s  B8 ?( v! e# R
例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
3 W/ l4 R7 R, @; C4 p(情況可以換作其他)( ]# M0 y2 @4 _: f: S
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
; C2 |8 v! |7 `1 a# W, s如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
; ]4 \/ t- S% A: }+ z  Z如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
1 L, H& R! V1 O& \6 c3 Q絕情谷既問題...
0 K/ o& ?0 N, [# L, d" r9 i如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...; c6 P3 {* v5 L7 q  M* X
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

3 a$ ]2 O5 w- e  k9 x0 a殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
" [4 o9 k$ K, k6 f) n於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
( @+ y$ |+ r- c' V, r% {但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
) T+ L/ g8 s2 k0 Z# R8 k+ u好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢; Y( [* [. }1 G$ C) I, g5 m
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
3 X7 G4 F7 M$ |  p8 ]% p# x" P: d: `& }
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命. i$ Y2 c( T! _: O8 b& M1 S" \
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:% ~& z. A9 c' B& ]! p* B8 [
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

, @% N5 z5 L4 r1 c/ S( g0 X
, @* d$ p, v9 G) T2 l- n4 d
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
# w- \9 Z  m+ c4 l- m你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
1 g( n7 x" x: ?$ B& R! _7 [7 N  e( h9 w' J
p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child4 T7 s9 X3 F3 L: B% P1 J2 L
yes, my reason is helping more) z+ |& E( X- q, s
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
9 f! v' |8 R6 T, x; |' Y$ Cif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child8 D. H5 j9 m  M# t# c- L2 D
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
: O% l. X& `4 W( S4 ~; [also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
& V  E4 K; B: K6 |" imay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
+ Y/ `: |5 n+ ~& B- Ounder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
# Y' H* G3 X5 X5 q4 |, \當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
8 O  x! m5 o7 K9 m. A3 b我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~+ c4 }+ [2 D" |) }2 I5 b- I
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~
( i( c( ^7 S/ c9 ~即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~
5 T4 |6 v5 \+ e) v2 }$ y我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~/ C$ c4 U) c  H+ V
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
: e$ _& E$ J" k我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）