Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
0 l. c/ Q) q* P3 o- t0 {8 u. H8 M& O/ o8 B% T0 c. o) ^. e

  r& U5 r+ `6 D我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

' e7 j% W& }; v: h# O& n

! O6 b: @( P# g+ c, B& q! g' C" ^In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
9 N. d0 u' r* |( L% d1 H
6 ]6 K8 s. h8 [7 v  ?+ I- v* T: ~( C0 j: X7 V3 ~, Z
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

1 k2 a. ?: i2 |( X% z
5 ]7 c+ k) v- |8 _' n' Goh really...
" E7 Q+ \" |- {: Q2 t  ghahhaa, thx a lot^^"
5 |6 t) C; T0 j" R6 `5 R/ D6 c/ Pi didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題1 Q8 s; v- w$ k% \! S3 J

; K, T* N) N2 ?& }' ]- y% i  ^. H$ J當然這是個假設性問題
% ?9 Z. X+ N5 k! d9 l但將人數倍大
" x9 P; N; @5 q! u2 W例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
+ f0 p1 w2 e! S' e# w7 D(情況可以換作其他)" r! z% O, z) E8 G5 `
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...6 v% e! Z1 Q* z! W
如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...0 X! |0 G: P5 j. [8 C$ W+ o# {
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:% y; ?  [( q' L+ q9 m8 W" [6 M
絕情谷既問題...
( G$ J  e8 A3 t5 [" S如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
' |& K" _! S' |) `如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

8 r5 ?5 s. ~5 E; e) H% g
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好. S" h& q, V6 p' i) B( t2 Q/ S
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生. J1 n3 {- G. C( J: H
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
6 A' r1 @# z/ n$ E$ R好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢
( X5 y7 H- k+ u3 |& |其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
) A6 P% @$ T2 a2 E# ]! J, E( }5 C$ F" q
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命% p! r6 B& G3 p) I) l
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
  {3 I: ?  h: s8 Q其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

- O3 ~+ c* y6 ]8 @0 w2 h

! w& D7 H3 b; W  A( J0 U/ bhaha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
& X4 Q+ z/ m$ z- |你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....2 a, N' b; R3 T1 `2 K2 P

; U8 j* t2 o4 u0 H! W* O: b, B$ r9 hp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
4 a9 m/ ~5 g9 ?. U  O; qyes, my reason is helping more4 \" q& I' @4 G) ?+ b. H
for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
1 G2 h, U* Q) |" U; \& eif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child, U* `, e0 k# m# n/ [6 U
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
; e. M5 L- k" _$ Q3 Galso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!) P0 h+ i$ k/ A
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
' J7 x! ]2 U! A. S# U& Aunder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~9 F" k9 H1 |5 y5 B
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~
5 B% X& r: M) |2 \我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~" E3 d$ G- I+ E7 _
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~( s% _0 k2 N3 S+ p$ ?
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~3 b; j( h9 e% A) H
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
/ s! M# N+ ~" M. F3 ~但如果o係當時o既情況中~~6 M- x3 c: w( Q" E
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）