Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
; ^; _9 n% {- v' w+ u  q3 g+ b# E. v8 P# O" m6 ^
1 f' K% `1 u+ O; @! }  M1 V  c
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

( d2 F# [8 e+ M8 i
1 y5 V) ?' f3 ^% v8 G9 K# T
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:2 i4 W5 y# v2 v6 j4 _: B  x
! h4 A" F9 p# w' \( v& I% k% A

9 U2 {- X! G/ C7 z' NIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

% D, M0 V  ]0 C2 M* f4 b0 x
1 F2 K9 N: G& l: foh really...
, S9 t6 v0 H: K; U/ uhahhaa, thx a lot^^") _" }+ `5 j$ d* E; ]
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
0 j0 o& [: j1 j7 h3 U7 N* z8 C+ E4 f2 i9 i" {2 W) M1 V, V
當然這是個假設性問題
2 `. e4 e, K  r" s: V) u$ U9 Z但將人數倍大
/ V+ w6 \: i) Q4 g+ m( |' \% |例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
  H3 u1 k' Q' J4 V+ Z, E$ v(情況可以換作其他)8 R0 f! y% i) D! ^. x' f" E2 P
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
( Y& h8 x5 k$ ]; I8 h1 \如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
5 B  k7 B% G. ?* V6 b0 m如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:& C7 x; a7 Q3 r
絕情谷既問題...
- y) e) O) h! k  X如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...
% ^% V+ [9 q0 I4 T8 n如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

5 D( a: d/ f! o: A
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
! `: a  O# [8 M  G於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
$ J  B4 {' Z2 M  h% A4 n( Y但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩6 Q' a* `9 P( y  C/ C8 A
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢6 f2 K4 r/ G) {# a: Q- q2 J' R' y  ~
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢2 s: }" G: a  L# G
% Z- s7 H& |7 V& N! K
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
3 l$ Z4 W6 u/ ~( h不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:* w" P: j9 s5 [# V8 x/ G
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

# D3 M' `: X" i& M: `
2 M. e% m8 j& F
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣3 U3 A- {/ m0 ?, ^' z" r
你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....2 O) B) Y  T: j" y6 k( K8 X7 A

: g% e( w( }# V/ \3 p0 ~p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child
+ W6 y) u6 t! U$ i6 z. jyes, my reason is helping more
" g( T  |: }7 ^7 J( `for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!( t; i- A  g0 H7 a8 E
if saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child5 o# `7 {) g- I( Z* C' Y- i
because no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
8 h/ z9 L* t( Halso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!
* E1 Y; _$ O! ]& [6 Kmay be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!6 i( e$ m+ r* ]+ O) `. @
under so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
  C# N0 X) b) h" J# n+ ^) X當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~  l6 l  N/ U% s% H
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
2 \4 J3 i( X* p+ z* L0 w# Y2 [! t正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~; E& ]7 p, r! r" y6 f8 }
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~' H0 B  _9 O% k8 S" V
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~! I/ g2 _3 ^/ [  j, i0 V; C
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~) \8 F; Q' l. F" c. J- Z9 }
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）