Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
9 _; Z  H4 p4 ]% i4 @6 P* |% j0 H# J, ^! E% p

, O" `9 _  A2 A3 {我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

1 p: b9 i; T4 r8 b

9 q$ y" D, a/ W' H( J" K- p0 ~In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:7 W" K: L$ f# Y* m- q  q

9 E& N' Y( y3 r
" p/ W8 f- D+ D3 }* z8 E0 oIn Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

' |0 w  P3 l/ {9 q- ^

& x& [8 p' x- T9 Roh really...
* l9 w  Z: I- E" E5 `hahhaa, thx a lot^^"* |7 W" c( Z. D9 u9 V: t
i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
$ f6 c" @" u( F- h0 \" J# d9 O3 W1 ]' l# o+ N& A0 c5 f7 I
當然這是個假設性問題  T3 C  U2 R9 x) I* `; }  x9 c0 ]
但將人數倍大
5 N8 i1 ~& b1 y$ C' Z4 p$ @, r" ]例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個
9 [1 H& s2 H/ o) \6 C(情況可以換作其他)( d) y- |: d' H5 N
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
: [' l- m# t% _8 [" T$ U! {如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...2 g, p1 I5 B9 ~4 H
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:: m: Y  r% R. ~. }2 m
絕情谷既問題...
& H1 r4 `2 g; y6 I0 C0 x如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...; P/ [% B4 c$ b  A) w8 y* P" `
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

) {8 d3 @* F( }# q( F5 r% K
殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好
5 K" R2 A& r8 f. N9 c於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生0 p# W% f% e) K( V
但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩
/ l+ L/ @+ ^( a8 P好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢( K% i9 c# m+ d+ \, E7 g
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢, w" F! [& Q2 f8 W% M4 \

1 ^3 P; I/ Z3 Q# j- t! Q" b) ^我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命: F% R7 o) e  K
不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:8 Z+ Q/ ^8 H, ~' `0 ^6 z. j1 p
其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

6 Q8 I: d4 _9 O! |6 p8 i5 G# \3 S; o  \3 R/ u2 Z: i; z9 O: \0 q8 v5 R! n
haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
2 S: l; L- b/ R3 V2 o你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....( F, N. P1 ]- {) V  Q! _

" w6 Y4 R0 r4 g" |7 F5 Gp.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child. w3 _: a1 B, E; |6 r2 s5 ~, V
yes, my reason is helping more
) O+ P; ~9 X) u. P" ?for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
5 ?- b( B9 I2 u7 I  r# ?+ K5 \4 K" xif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
+ T, B2 B/ |! O% wbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?
' y7 r' c! y6 Balso i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!! L+ m% H: A) @' {+ [! t/ _
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
5 z* B2 ~' z  ^# Munder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~" P* x3 `7 M1 `$ u
當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~4 W6 u6 o9 {& Q  C
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~0 W! Y8 b7 I- Z3 G) u
正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~% M; |* P0 ~" Y: T9 R
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~+ ~9 A! }, q9 a/ ~7 }8 _" Q
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~0 {6 O2 a8 V- a& t8 F9 y6 X
但如果o係當時o既情況中~~
4 F. Z' S" o+ S0 A  Y我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）