Chingy

Originally posted by crap at 2005-4-27 01:20 AM:
  M/ q* o, f; r; O$ l; ^( [& Y, {' o) H, @- J
" z/ ~+ \" S( Y! W& G6 k9 z0 O4 F
我都覺得錯不在他們, 是他們的父母 ...

0 E2 F' q8 S  u8 k5 e9 T
+ T9 p7 R- ]7 @! ]1 N2 ^* K, L) ~
In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

crap

Originally posted by Chingy at 2005-4-27 07:12 AM:
  Z8 i1 s: g1 u1 m
6 ^6 h+ V- P3 y" {" k0 t
9 o/ f8 {( V6 {! k9 g# A# ~In Spider-Man 2.Spider man did stop a train

6 n8 `3 ~# [" b! [! Y4 _$ ~) I; q+ ~

2 s- X0 g3 }0 c+ noh really...
0 L% I2 q. [1 \; l8 @+ E1 |- @hahhaa, thx a lot^^"
. p8 Y! W7 |: _; {/ ~i didn't watch ch.2

springspring

挺出名，在偶理學的問題
# [, \% U9 ~5 W( d, S1 O0 s# D/ \7 M0 v" ?) m3 T; f
當然這是個假設性問題* Z5 V$ k9 h+ M2 Z' ?" v
但將人數倍大
# Q9 o7 S' Y, b例如是十個一個，到一百個一個，到一千個一個3 H8 g( S" O% D4 E7 c5 D% J% X. X- ~8 ^
(情況可以換作其他)! W0 o7 h+ N& ]# v
始終有條界線

easonwing

絕情谷既問題...
9 K# T  N- j6 w, M如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢...* T' l( W3 q" i3 p
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

easonwing

Originally posted by easonwing at 2005-4-27 12:12 PM:
% c) i; ?6 H, Q& N; n/ y" D絕情谷既問題...
) j1 K6 a# p& g如果一個人個邊係我親人,我會好自私咁求佢..." k  r3 _) v4 S9 Q/ k* S2 N( {- H3 ~
如果唔係親人,我會殺人警百...

- h; M7 \5 C8 @殺一警百...

srfqt1

其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多愈好! V6 O4 Q) q1 a- Z6 c2 L; u7 C9 f
於是好像好順理成章要讓火車轉往停用的鐵軌,等多d小朋友逃生
  e6 y0 N' c5 |. Q5 B- t但是諗深一層,咁樣真係好像唔係好o岩  |8 h1 M: [( c& J4 ?' n+ U# `
好像crap兄講一樣,停用軌玩的小孩, 因他始終才是守規則的人, 他可沒有預料過會有危險,點解要犧牲一個守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命呢" u# J$ k: t. u* ]( }
其實到底人數的多與少值唔值得去考慮呢
; y. _, i5 U$ t. D! n" W/ A8 o. o6 ~  B; @! r
我估如果我有時間去想清楚的話,我都係會救係停用路軌玩的小孩,我都認為冇理由要犧牲守規矩的小朋友,去換取其他唔守規矩的小朋友的性命
' G: V8 F: M+ L* r3 V; e不過,係千鈞一髮的時間要我去做抉擇的話,可能我應該會被表面上的人數的多與少去蒙蔽咗,而且眼前真係有一班小朋友,不過的確又好像maxfigo講話明係停用...咁條鐵軌一定有d問題ga la...如果轉左去好易累死果班乘客 !!,可能我係會其實為咗少數唔守規矩的小朋友,犧牲咗更多無辜的火車乘客

crap

Originally posted by srfqt1 at 2005-4-27 05:44 PM:
1 @5 s+ N3 R% R) b6 i6 ~( J其實我最初係即刻諗要救多d人,救得愈多 ...

5 x: }3 i; ^: a9 B4 X9 B

! y; v+ Y3 n( {haha, srfqt1兄, 我們終能於球場外達成一致的睇法, 哈, 相當有趣
7 \7 V5 T5 Q. g0 x你所說的也對, 下意識的確會選擇救人多的一方, 當時根本沒辦法分清誰對誰錯, 只好靠本能做決定..其他的要看天意了....
, M0 w* A( |7 t2 K
  A7 @7 ~  d& o* R! K  k$ j. S$ `p.s. 小弟昨天在你於好文區發表的文章下留了言, srfqt1兄你有看到嗎

jason williams

i think i will help those children instead of that child. d4 a  \& x' o+ t2 R
yes, my reason is helping more
6 D- o7 Z  ]  q4 U: _for this sudden and short period, i dun think i can have so much time to think the background!
# O4 l' A: i! `0 ^- M5 ~5 Y# L! E" Aif saying that child obey the rule but others are not, i think this is not a very good reason to help that child
4 @/ S; y7 i5 P) t3 M: sbecause no matter the rail is using or not, i think also no gd to play in that place, right?) C) u0 X+ {. p" t
also i think the question hasn't tell us the background, none  know that child is obeyin the rule so that he play at the rail which is not using!!!/ t' c6 c/ x- k# R  k" x
may be other reasons so that he play himself at there, such as, he is a bad guy that none like to play with him, or all children also dunno which is using and which is not using!
" o( Q0 d  m; munder so much confusing on the background, i would choose help more than less, just a normal think during this short urgetn period!!!

sfxc0000

作為一個人類~~
/ S+ l# J9 n, Y. ]當我見到呢D咁危急o既事情~~. v) S, M3 E+ m$ m4 g( p
我冇可能可以好理性去諗個後果~~
$ z- D, x. F+ r+ O7 N6 \6 T  P' ^正常黎講一定係以人數為先~~& y! |* N; ?" D& m, v
即係我會救個一班唔守規矩o既細路而犧牲o個位守規矩o既細路~~5 [! s% g0 V& n, ?$ N
我只有o係事件過後先可以好似Crap同srfqt1好理性咁去分析輕重, 對錯~~
. }/ N6 W) e+ K但如果o係當時o既情況中~~8 i7 t- @( h; y8 A8 f: I, [  W4 |
我只有犧牲一位細路的性命稷換取一班細路的性命

中華卡樂ｂ

我諗我不會搞到火車轉往停用的鐵軌，因為咁樣會搞到火車乘客犧牲，而且果個守規矩既細路冇理由要佢犧牲的！而且我睇到火車黎中，我會用我既本能去救果一班唔守規矩既壞細路，雖然我明白到一定會有人死，可能我自己都會死，但我咁做一定唔會後悔，減少犧牲的人數，而且可以令一班唔守規矩而且死唔去既壞細路知道錯誤！（個人意見）